GiESCO 2019 banner
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 GiESCO 9 Effect of irrigation regime on carbon isotope ratio (δ13c) in different grapevines

Effect of irrigation regime on carbon isotope ratio (δ13c) in different grapevines

Abstract

Context and purpose of the study – In Castilla-La Mancha as other winegrowing regions, vineyards suffer the effects of the global climate warming. Severe spring and summer droughts are increasingly frequent, which concur with the phenological stages most susceptible to water and temperature stress. Under these conditions, irrigation use is required in order to ensure the vineyard growing sustainability. However water resources are increasingly limited, for this reason is required to choose cultivars displaying high water use efficiency. Carbon isotope ratio (δ13C) of grape must sugar has been investigated as an integrating marker related to water use efficiency and water status in grapevines. The present study was aimed to explore water use efficiency in several cultivars subjected to different irrigation regimes, in order to know those that were more efficient and subsequently develop specific watering protocols for each of them, according to sustainable production and quality goals.

Material and methods – This study was carried out in 2017 and 2018. Variety response of δ13C to different irrigation regime was assessed in a multivarietal vineyard. Grown on trellises, at a distance of 2.8m x 1.2m (row by vine spacing), the plants are trained to a single guyot system, with 110 Richter as rootstock. Orientation is 30oNE/210oSW and the vineyard is irrigated by a drip system with two drippers per vine-stock. Four treatments were considered: survival, 0.20 ET0, 0.25 ET0 and 0.30 ET0. Determination of the carbon isotope ratios of grape must was carried out by on-line analysis using a ThermoQuest Flash 1112 elemental analyser equipped with an autosampler and coupled to a Delta-Plus IRMS (ThermoQuest) through a ConFlo III interface (ThermoQuest). In addition to δ13C in must sugar, yield components and must quality parameters were determined for each treatment and variety.

Results – Irrigation promoted a decrease of carbon isotope ratio in must sugar. The relationship between δ13C and water volumes used in irrigation treatments was negative and moderately significant. Considering the data of two vintages together and treatment as a variable, the effect of irrigation regime in carbon isotope ratio was observed in all cases with significant differences ranging from -22.58 for T0 to -24.48 for T3, whereas in WUE only T0 (30.15 g/L) stood out from the rest (12.86 g/L, 10.84 g/L and 10.32 g/L for T1, T2 and T3 respectively). On the contrary, when grapevine variety was a variable, there were only significant differences in δ13C when considering vintages independently. It was in 2017, with values ranging from -23.52 for Airén to -24.69 for Moscatel de Grano Menudo. Regarding WUE, in neither of two vintages separately there were significant differences. Between δ13C and agronomic parameters there were some correlations with different significance levels. This study contributes to improving knowledge about what of the cultivars grown in the areaare more efficient from the water use point of view, and the irrigation regimes that would have to be established to achieve sustainable production, both quantitatively and qualitatively, with the minimum water volume.

DOI:

Publication date: September 18, 2023

Issue: GiESCO 2019

Type: Poster

Authors

Juan Luis CHACÓN*, Jesús MARTÍNEZ, Adela MENA

Instituto de la Vid y el Vino de Castilla-La Mancha (IVICAM), Tomelloso, Spain

Contact the author

Keywords

carbon isotope ratio, grapevine, irrigation, Vitis vinifera L., water use efficiency

Tags

GiESCO | GiESCO 2019 | IVES Conference Series

Citation

Related articles…

Different soil types and relief influence the quality of Merlot grapes in a relatively small area in the Vipava Valley (Slovenia) in relation to the vine water status

Besides location and microclimatic conditions, soil plays an important role in the quality of grapes and wine. Soil properties influence…

Extreme canopy management for vineyard adaptation to climate change: is it a good idea?

Climate change constitutes an enormous challenge for humankind and for all human activities, viticulture not being an exception. Long-term strategic changes are probably needed the most, but growers also need to deal with short-term changes: summers that are getting progressively warmer, earlier harvest dates and higher pH in musts and wines. In the last 10-15 years, a relevant corpus of research is being developed worldwide in order to evaluate to which extent extreme canopy management operations, aimed at reducing leaf area and, thus, limiting the source to sink ratio, could be useful to delay ripening. Although extreme canopy management can result in relevant delays in harvest dates, longer term studies, as well as detailed analysis of their implications on carbohydrate reserves, bud fertility and future yield are desirable before these practices can be recommended.

Phenological characterization of a wide range of Vitis Vinifera varieties

In order to study the impact of climate change on Bordeaux grape varieties and to assess the adaptation capacities of candidates to the grape varieties of this wine region to the new climatic conditions, an experimental block design composed of 52 grape varieties was set up in 2009 at the INRAE Bordeaux Aquitaine center. Among the many parameters studied, the three main phenological stages of the vine (budburst, flowering and veraison) have been closely monitored since 2012. Observations for each year, stage and variety were carried out on four independent replicates. Precocity indices have been calculated from the data obtained over the 2012-2021 period (Barbeau et al. 1998). This work allowed to group the phenological behaviour of the grapevine varieties, not only based on the timing of the subsequent developmental stages, but also on the overall precocity of the cycle and the total length of the cycle between budburst and veraison. Results regarding the variability observed among the different grape varieties for these phenological stages are presented as heat maps.

Better understand the soil wet bulb formation with subsurface or aerial drip irrigation in viticulture

The gradual change in rainfall patterns experienced in the south of France vineyards, especially around the Mediterranean sea, means that the vines are increasingly subject to summer drought. The winegrowers developped the use of irrigation techniques to ensure the maintenance of competitive yields in the production of wines under Protected Geographical Indication label. In practice, drip irrigation pipes can be installed above the ground or buried into the soil as well as at different distances from the vine row. The objective of this study was to examine the profiles of the wet bulbs of the soil obtained from two drip irrigation systems : aerial drip located under the vine row and subsurface drip placed in the middle of the inter-row. This experiment took place over two consecutive seasons (2020-2021) on a 3.4 ha Viognier plot in the Mediterranean region (PGI Oc, France) on sandy clay soil. The annual rainfalls were less than 400 mm. Soil water content probes were installed at different depths (20 – 40 – 60 – 80 cm) and at different lateralities from the vine row (30 – 60 – 90 – 120 cm) to control the formation of the soil wet bulb during irrigation. The mapping and the analysis of the data allowed a better understanding and differentiation of the water percolation when irrigating with subsurface or aerial drip. For the same amount of water and without differences of vine water status, it is shown that in a subsurface drip irrigation situation, the size of the wet bulb formed is larger than in aerial drip irrigation system.

What are the optimal ranges and thresholds for berry solar radiation for flavonoid biosynthesis?

In wine grape production, canopy management practices are applied to control the source-sink balance and improve the cluster microclimate to enhance berry composition. The aim of this study was to identify the optimal ranges of berry solar radiation exposure (exposure) for upregulation of flavonoid biosynthesis and thresholds for their degradation, to evaluate how canopy management practices such as leaf removal, shoot thinning, and a combination of both affect the grapevine (Vitis vinifera L. cv. Cabernet Sauvignon) yield components, berry composition, and flavonoid profile under context of climate change. First experiment assessed changes in the grape flavonoid content driven by four degrees of exposure. In the second experiment, individual grape berries subjected to different exposures were collected from two cultivars (Cabernet Sauvignon and Petit Verdot). The third experiment consisted of an experiment with three canopy management treatments (i) LR (removal of 5 to 6 basal leaves), (ii) ST (thinned to 24 shoots per vine), and (iii) LRST (a combination of LR and ST) and an untreated control (UNT). Berry composition, flavonoid content and profiles, and 3-isobutyl 2-methoxypyrazine were monitored during berry ripening. Although increasing canopy porosity through canopy management practices can be helpful for other purposes, this may not be the case of flavonoid compounds when a certain proportion of kaempferol was achieved. Our results revealed different sensitivities to degradation within the flavonoid groups, flavonols being the only monitored group that was upregulated by solar radiation. Within different canopy management practices, the main effects were due to the ST. Under environmental conditions given in this trial, ST and LRST hastened fruit maturity; however, a clear improvement of the flavonoid compounds (i.e., greater anthocyanin) was not observed at harvest. Methoxypyrazine berry content decreased with canopy management practices studied. Although some berry traits were improved (i.e. 2.5° Brix increase in berry total soluble solids) due to canopy management practices (ST), this resulted in a four-fold increase in labor operations cost, two-fold decrease in yield with a 10-fold increase in anthocyanin production cost per hectare that should be assessed together as the climate continues to get hot.