OENO IVAS 2019 banner
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 Optimizing the use of bentonite for better control of haze formation In white and rosé wines

Optimizing the use of bentonite for better control of haze formation In white and rosé wines

Abstract

In winemaking, the appearance of turbidity in white and wine is a serious visual defect, which lowers significantly its commercial value. A major cause of the formation of turbidity in wine is attributed to the presence of temperature-sensitive proteins. The proteins undergo slow conformational changes, leading to aggregation and flocculation phenomena. The process can be accelerated by exposure of wine to high temperatures during transportation or storage. In recent years heat-unstable proteins in white wine were identified as grape class IV chitinases, β-glucanases and a fraction of thaumatin-like proteins. Although proteins play a central role in the formation of turbidity, other components present in wine such as polyphenols, sulfate anion, polysaccharides as well as ionic strength and pH value play an important role in these phenomenon.

 The lack of reliable tests assessing the risk of protein clouding during bottle storage is a recurring problem of winemakers. Currently used test assessing haze potential involves heating which often causes overdosing of fining agent. Despite the large progress in the white wine research and substantial development of the analytical methods applied the phenomenon of white wine haze formation remains unrevealed. The traditional treatment used to stabilize wine includes the addition of bentonite, which is certainly effective but due to its non-specific binding results in a considerable decrease in aroma compounds and therefore the quality of the wine. Thus, a strong need to establish a more selective and economically justified method of wine stabilization, which will preserve the aroma compounds in white and rosé wine, is undeniable.

 

This study aimed at the development of more reliable haze potential tests and more specific treatments for wine. To achieve this objective the knowledge the protein binding properties of different types of commercial bentonite have been analyzed, including the following: elemental analysis, surface charge density, swell index, external and internal specific surface area. The effect of quality of water used for hydration and wine pH on the swelling properties of bentonite have been also investigated. The proteins and polyphenols bound by different types of bentonite as well as the quality of the obtained wine (aroma compounds) have been identified using the above-mentioned methods and compared during three harvest periods. Finally, we have established the possibility of using bentonite alternatively on must with the development of a specific test to establish the dose of treatment.

DOI:

Publication date: June 10, 2020

Issue: OENO IVAS 2019

Type: Article

Authors

Benoit Bach, Anne-Claire Silvestri, Jean-Christophe Perret, Marilyn Cléroux, Marie Blackford, Agnieszka Kosinska Cagnazzo, Marc Mathieu, Wilfried Andlauer

Changins, viticulture and enology, University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland, Route de Duillier 50, 1260 Nyon, Switzerland
Institute of Life Technologies, University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland Valais, Route du Rawyl 64, 1950 Sion, Switzerland

Contact the author

Keywords

wine, protein, haze, bentonite

Tags

IVES Conference Series | OENO IVAS 2019

Citation

Related articles…

The Baco Blanc, the Armagnac hybrid variety adapted to the viticultural challenges of tomorrow

Today in the wine industry, a lot of alternatives are available for reducing phytosanitary inputs. Among these, prophylaxis, the use of biocontrol products and the deployment of pathogen-resistant vines are the most promising. eugenol (2-methoxy-4-(2-propenyl)-phenol), a molecule with recognised antifungal properties, can contribute to the last two alternatives. This molecule has been identified as an endogenous compound in the baco blanc hybrid variety used in armagnac pdo, which is at least tolerant to botrytis cinerea.

Three new Apulian seedless varieties available for the table grape supply chain

The table grape industry in Europe is undergoing significant changes. For instance, in Italy, the national register of vine varieties was established in 1969, and since then, many varieties of table grapes have been registered. In the first thirty years, from 1969 to 1999, 62 seeded and 24 seedless varieties were registered. In the subsequent period, from 2000 to the present day, 23 seeded varieties and 99 seedless varieties were registered.

Foliar application of urea improved the nitrogen composition of Chenin grapes

The nitrogen composition of the grapes directly affects the developments of alcoholic fermentation and influences the final aromatic composition of the wines. The aim of this study was to determine the effect and efficiency of foliar applications of urea on the nitrogen composition of grapes. This study was carried out during 2023 vintage and in the Chenin vineyard located in Estacion Experimental Mendoza (Argentina). Three urea concentrations 3, 6 and 9 Kg N/ha (C1, C2, and C3, respectively) and control (T) were applied in this vineyard at veraison. In all solutions were added 1ml/l of Tween 80 ® surfactant.

Ceramic imprint in wine: influence of hydraulic ratio on ceramic dissolution and wine pH in amphorae systems

This interaction is primarily due to an acidic attack on the ceramic by the wine. It results in (1) the dissolution of the ceramic into the wine and the release of a wide variety of elements; and (2) an increase of the wine pH. The extent of these effects depends on the mineralogical and chemical composition of the ceramic, as well as the hydraulic ratio of the ceramic-wine system (the term hydraulic ratio (ρ) defines here the volume of wine over the surface area of the ceramic in contact with the wine).

Produce wines with no quantifiable phytosanitary residues – Impact of washing grapes?

Consumer expectations are increasingly shifting towards “residue-free wines.” However, from an analytical standpoint, “zero” does not exist. Laboratories often use the quantification limits of analysis methods to signify ‘zero.’ Improved techniques now allow for the quantification of levels that were previously undetectable. This is why we prefer to use the term “unquantifiable residue” rather than “absence of residues.”