GiESCO 2019 banner
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 GiESCO 9 Nutrients and heavy metals in a vineyard soil under organic, biodynamic and conventional management

Nutrients and heavy metals in a vineyard soil under organic, biodynamic and conventional management

Abstract

Context and purpose of the study – Promoting sustainable agricultural practices is one of the challenges of the last decades. Organic and biodynamic viticulture can be an alternative to intensive viticulture, furthermore contributing to reduction of impact on environment and human health and guaranteeing soil preservation and quality products.
The aim of this experimentation was to evaluate the medium and long-term effects of different agronomic practices in viticulture on nutrient availability and heavy metal accumulation in soil.

Material and methods – In 2011 an intensive vineyard in north-eastern Italy (Trentino) was subjected to three different managements: integrated pest management (IPM), organic management (OM) and biodynamic management (BM). The experimental vineyard (1.5 ha) was divided in twelve plots, four per management with a randomized scheme. BM plots were subjected to green manure between alternate rows (BM+GM). Every autumn, from 2012 to 2018, soil was sampled in four repetitions per management. Air dried soils were analyzed. Exchangeable K and Mg (extraction in 1 M ammonium acetate pH 7 for 1 hour – 1:20 p/v) and bioavailable heavy metals (extraction in DTPA/CaCl2/TEA pH 7.3 for 2 hours – 1:2 w/v) were determined with ICP-OES. TOC and total N were analyzed with elemental analyzer and assimilable P with Olsen method2. Statistical analysis were performed using the RStudio software.

Results – Exchangeable K is the nutrient that exhibited mainly significant differences (P<0.001) among the managements. In detail, OM and IPM showed on average the highest values, proving that manure is a good supplier of K, which is a promoter of photosynthesis3, is involved in sugar translocation from leaf to fruit3,4 and plays an important role in determining the size of the berries, influencing the final yield of crop4. The lower values in biodynamic managements (BM and BM+GM) were due to lack of K supply. Total N did not show significant differences among the three managements. This result highlights how organic manure and leguminosus plants of green manure provide enough nitrogen for the crop needs, as well as conventional practices. Bioavailable heavy metal content was similar among the managements. Although Cu was used (<5 kg/ha) during the whole experimentation on all the plots, it was not found an increase of the bioavailable concentrations in the years, as expected for the accumulation of this metal in soil. The high Cu content in the soil, due to the abuse of this fungicide in the past decades, means that its use at the doses allowed by current regulations does not cause a significant increase in soil concentrations. These results valorize organic and biodynamic practices, being more compatible alternatives to protection of environment and human health than conventional viticulture.

DOI:

Publication date: September 21, 2023

Issue: GiESCO 2019

Type: Poster

Authors

Raffaella MORELLI*, Roberto ZANZOTTI, Daniela BERTOLDI, Enzo MESCALCHIN

Fondazione E. Mach-Technology Transfer Center, via E. Mach 1 , San Michele all’Adige (TN)-38010 Italy

Contact the author

Keywords

vineyard, organic and biodynamic viticulture, soil, nutrients, heavy metals.

Tags

GiESCO | GiESCO 2019 | IVES Conference Series

Citation

Related articles…

New satellite-based sampling protocols for grapevine nutrient monitoring

Extension specialists often recommend nutrient monitoring through leaf blade or petiole sampling twice a season for each vineyard block. However, due to the time and labor required to collect a large, random sample, many growers complete the task infrequently or incorrectly. Readily available remote sensing images capture the vineyard variability at both spatial and temporal scales, which can capture canopy and soil variability and be used to guide growers to representative sampling locations.

Composition and biological potential of grape and wine phenolic compounds

Polyphenols are common in human diets, primarily in plant-derived food and beverages. They influence multiple sensory properties such as aroma, flavour, colour, and taste, such as astringency and bitterness [1]. The major phenolic compounds in grapes and wines are anthocyanins and tannins (proanthocyanidins or condensed tannins).

Yeast derivatives: a promising alternative in wine oxidation prevention?

Oxidation processes constitute a main problem in winemaking. Oxidation result in color browning and varietal aroma loss, which are key attributes of wine organoleptic quality

Application of remote and proximal sensors for precision vineyard management in Valpolicella

The integration of sensor systems in viticulture is significantly improving vineyard management by enabling faster, comprehensive crop data collection across the entire vineyard, supporting more informed viticultural decision-making, and as a result promoting sustainability.

Influence of agronomic practices in soil water content in mid-mountain vineyards

In the context of LIFE project MIDMACC (LIFE18 CCA/ES/001099), several pilots have been installed in vineyards in mid mountain areas of Catalonia (NE Spain) to test well stablished agronomic practices to increase the adaptation of Mediterranean mid mountain to climate change. Soil water content (SWC) at three different depths (15, 30 and 45cm) was measured in continuum from August 2020. One pilot (WC) included a well-established green cover (GC), a new GC (NC) and a conventional soil management (CM, tilling+herbicides). NC presented an intermediate state between WC and CM, responding similarly to CM in autumn but quickly reaching similar SWC to WC, then following the same evolution till next spring, with CM presenting lower values along autumn and winter. Then vegetation activation decreased SWC in all plots, (much slower in CM, lacking GC). Sensibility to spring rains is again intermediate for NC, which joins SWC evolution of CM by the end of spring till next autumn. It is expected that NC will resemble WC more and more as its GC develops. In the pilot combining vine training (VSP vs Gobelet) and hillside management (slope vs terrace), no clear pattern could be related with these conditions. However, both terraces seem to be more sensitive to spring rains. A third pilot included new vineyards (7 and 1 year old). In the new vineyard (N), higher canopy development, a spontaneous green cover and row straw resulted in a slower SWC dynamic, not so sensitive to rains but conserving more soil water in spring and most of summer, even with presumably a higher water extraction by vines. In the newest vineyard (VN) the deepest sensor is still sensitive to rain events all over the year and SWC is always highest at this depth, revealing small water capture by vines.