GiESCO 2019 banner
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 GiESCO 9 The effects of reducing herbicides in New Zealand vineyards

The effects of reducing herbicides in New Zealand vineyards

Abstract

Context and purpose of the study – Herbicides are commonly sprayed in the vine row to prevent competition with vines for water and minerals and to keep weeds from growing into the bunch zone. Sprays are applied before budbreak and reapplied multiple times during the season to keep the undervine bare. There is growing concern about the negative effects of herbicides on humans and the environment, and weeds in New Zealand have developed resistance to herbicides. Therefore, it is imperative that we reduce our reliance on herbicides in viticulture and incorporate methods that do not engender resistance.

Material and methods – This trial was conducted in the 2016-17, 2017-18 and 2018-19 seasons in three Merlot and three Sauvignon blanc vineyards in New Zealand. The trial was a split plot, with half the vineyard receiving multiple sprays (the industry standard). The other half received a single spray around budburst, and any subsequent undervine weeding was done using nonchemical methods (mowing or cultivation). In each vineyard half, five sampling locations were established for vine, fruit, and undervine measurements. Vines were assessed for canopy gaps by image analysis, yield, and rot severity. Fruit was sampled during ripening and at harvest to assess differences in chemical composition. The undervine area was surveyed at budburst, flowering, veraison, and harvest to assess differences in bare area and presence/abundance of various plant species.

Results – Reducing herbicide had a dramatic effect on the percent bare area under vines, as well as the species of undervine vegetation from flowering onwards. In most vineyards, canopy growth was similar for both the control (C) and reduced herbicide (RH) treatments, though a few differences were found, generally with the RH treatment having more gaps. A few differences were found in midday water potential, with the RH treatment generally having more negative SWP. Despite differences in canopy gaps and SWP, there were few effects on berry size or soluble solids. There were few other fruit compositional differences, though the RH fruit tended to have lower yeast assimilable nitrogen (YAN) than the C fruit. Yield was generally not affected by reducing herbicide, and rot severity tended to be similar between treatments, indicating no negative effects on fruit quantity or health from allowing more vegetation to become established under vines. These data show that herbicide use can be reduced by 50-75% with little negative effect on grapevines or their fruit. It is anticipated that adopting this technique will reduce herbicide residues in/on fruit and slow or stop the spread of herbicide resistant weeds.

DOI:

Publication date: September 26, 2023

Issue: GiESCO 2019

Type: Poster

Authors

Tingting ZHANG1, Allison HAYWOOD2, Mark KRASNOW2*

1 Thoughtful Viticulture, Napier, Hawke’s Bay, New Zealand
2 Thoughtful Viticulture, PO Box 312, Blenheim, 7240, New Zealand

Contact the author

Keywords

herbicide, resistance, grapevine, weeds, sustainability

Tags

GiESCO | GiESCO 2019 | IVES Conference Series

Citation

Related articles…

Recognition of terroir in american viticultural areas

Un’ Area di Viticultura Americana, detta AVA, è una regione vinicola delimitata ed è dis­tinguibile da caratteristiche geografiche i cui confini sono stati definiti da regolamenti. Il sistema AVA rappresenta un ‘accettazione del concetto di terroir (terreno), come dimostra­no gli studi che confermano il carattere regionale dei vini AVA e dalla sviluppo di sub­denominazioni più relazionate al terreno.

Protein stabilization of white wines by stabilizing filtration: pilot studies

Protein stabilization is an important part of the winemaking process of white wines, and in this work we present the results of protein stabilization of different monovarietal wines (Xarel.lo, Chardonnay, and Muscat) by a continuous stabilizing filtration process using a column packed with zirconium oxide operating in a continuous regime in a closed loop at pilot scale.

Better understand the soil wet bulb formation with subsurface or aerial drip irrigation in viticulture

The gradual change in rainfall patterns experienced in the south of France vineyards, especially around the Mediterranean sea, means that the vines are increasingly subject to summer drought. The winegrowers developped the use of irrigation techniques to ensure the maintenance of competitive yields in the production of wines under Protected Geographical Indication label. In practice, drip irrigation pipes can be installed above the ground or buried into the soil as well as at different distances from the vine row. The objective of this study was to examine the profiles of the wet bulbs of the soil obtained from two drip irrigation systems : aerial drip located under the vine row and subsurface drip placed in the middle of the inter-row. This experiment took place over two consecutive seasons (2020-2021) on a 3.4 ha Viognier plot in the Mediterranean region (PGI Oc, France) on sandy clay soil. The annual rainfalls were less than 400 mm. Soil water content probes were installed at different depths (20 – 40 – 60 – 80 cm) and at different lateralities from the vine row (30 – 60 – 90 – 120 cm) to control the formation of the soil wet bulb during irrigation. The mapping and the analysis of the data allowed a better understanding and differentiation of the water percolation when irrigating with subsurface or aerial drip. For the same amount of water and without differences of vine water status, it is shown that in a subsurface drip irrigation situation, the size of the wet bulb formed is larger than in aerial drip irrigation system.

Pedicel lenticel diversity of cultivars and their influence on cell death and berry shrivel

Shrinking berries are the common symptoms of Berry Shrivel (BS) and Late-Season-Dehydration (LSD) in grapevine cultivars.

Les terroirs : variae causarum figurae

The jurist feels like an intruder when talking about terroirs. He looks at the press and tries to understand. We can read there about the cooking festival of May 30, 1996 which “..highlights products whose quality depends on a region”, that Camembert du pays d’Auge is the only one to be protected, I was thinking of camembert from Normandy, that 80% of Greek feta is made in the Netherlands, I thought it was in Denmark, and that the European Community protects geographical indications of IGP origin, probably a new category replacing the indications protected areas (1). I also learned that distributors are asking for more local products because “they come to confuse the cards in the part engaged with the big brands”. Carrefour has its “Terroirs and drawers”, Prisunic its “Vent d’Ouest”, Intermarché “Les bouquets du terroir”, Monoprix “Les terroirs de France” (2), Promodés and its brand “Reflets de France” for the “Continent” hypermarkets (3). At the same time it is asserted that “The term is a mere common noun. Unprotectable and therefore unprotected” (4).