terclim by ICS banner
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 International Congress on Grapevine and Wine Sciences 9 2ICGWS-2023 9 Water and nutritional savings shape non-structural carbohydrates in grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) cuttings

Water and nutritional savings shape non-structural carbohydrates in grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) cuttings

Abstract

Global changes and sustainability challenge researchers in saving water and nutrients. The response of woody crops, which can be forced at facing more drought events during their life, is particularly important. Vitis vinifera can be an important model for its relevance in countries subjected to climate changes and its breeding, requiring cuttings plantation and strong pruning.

Drought leads to an impairment between growth and reserves which can be a key point in the survival of plantings. This work aims at understanding the role of non-structural carbohydrates (NSC) in: i) the maintenance of hydraulic function in cuttings subjected to water deficit and limited nitrogen: ii) identify the best regime of water and nitrogen to achieve a correct compromise between plant growth and NSC.

Cuttings of two different cultivars and three rootstocks of grapevine, were grown in pots under different water and nitrogen regimes. During the vegetative season, morphological and physiological traits were measured. Particularly, NSC content analysis were performed in roots, rootstocks, shoots and canes on blooming and on cane ripening period.

During early vegetative phases, plants under water deficit shown a reduced growth and lower water potential respect well-watered plants. At the end of the vegetative season, NSC was affected also by the type of cultivar or rootstock. Nitrogen does not seem to have any effect on carbohydrates content.

Our results suggest that imposing a controlled water deficit to grapevine from budburst, can support plants to accumulate NSC, useful to help cutting survival and face incoming drought events.

DOI:

Publication date: October 3, 2023

Issue: ICGWS 2023

Type: Article

Authors

Pichierri A.1,2*, More Authors2: Gargiulo S.1,2, Sivilotti P. 2, De Luca E.3, Zambon Y. 3, Bruna M.2, Tomasin A.2, Casolo V. 2

1University of Trieste, Department of Life Sciences, Via Licio Giorgieri 5, 34127 Trieste, Italy   
2University of Udine, Department of Food, Environmental, and Animal Sciences, Via delle Scienze 206, 33100 Udine, Italy
3VCR Research center, Via Ruggero Forti, 33095, San Giorgio della Richinvelda, Italy

Contact the author*

Keywords

woody crops, reserves, drought, nutritional deficit, plant survival

Tags

2ICGWS | ICGWS | ICGWS 2023 | IVES Conference Series

Citation

Related articles…

Valorization of grapevine leaves: screening of polyphenol composition in 50 cultivars

Grapevine leaves are known to contain different polyphenols such as flavonols, catechins and stilbenes, which are known to act as main contributors for plant defense against pathogens (1). While the composition for some major cultivars has been studied, there is lack of systematic comparison about the content of these compounds in the wide ecodiversity of Vitis vinifera cv. Recent advances in Mass Spectrometry-based Metabolomics allow a wider and more sensitive description of these polyphenols, as instance of those present in leaves (2). Such information could help to better explain leaf traits regarding the development of the leaf or to the plant tolerance to a pathogen. Moreover, these compounds offer appealing applications for human health due to their antioxidant activities.

Investigation of cellulose nanofiber-based films used as a protective layer to reduce absorption of smoke phenols into wine grapes

Volatile phenols from wildfire smoke are absorbed by wine grapes, resulting in undesirable smoky and ashy sensory attributes in the affected wine.[1] Unfortunately the severity of wildfires is increasing, particularly when grapes are ripening on the vine. The unwanted flavors of the wine prompted a need for solutions to prevent the uptake of smoke compounds into wine grapes. Films using cellulose nanofibers as the coating forming matrix were developed as an innovative means to prevent smoke phenols from entering Pinot noir grapes. Different film formulations were tested by incorporating low methoxy pectin or chitosan.

Assessing the Effectiveness of Electrodialysis in Controlling Brettanomyces Growth in Wine

Brettanomyces yeast can negatively impact the quality and stability of wines, posing a significant challenge to winemakers. [1] This study aims to develop novel management practices to limit Brettanomyces impact on wines by evaluating the effectiveness of electrodialysis (ED) technology in removing magnesium (Mg2+) from wine to prevent the development of Brettanomyces yeast. The ED technique utilizes charged membranes to extract ions from the wine, and it is considered an alternative to cold stabilization that requires less energy. [2]

Drought responses of grapevine cultivars under different environments

Using grapevine genetic diversity is one of the strategies to adapt viticulture to climate change. In this sense, assessing the plasticity of cultivars in their responses to environmental conditions is essential. For this purpose, the drought tolerance of Grenache, Tempranillo and Semillon cultivars grafted onto SO4 was evaluated at two experimental vineyards, one located in Valencia (Spain) and the other in Bordeaux (France). This was done by assessing gas exchange parameters, water relations and leaf hydraulic traits at the end of the season.

Ultra-High Pressure Homogenization (UHPH): a technique that allows the reduction of SO2 in winemaking

Ultra-High Pressure Homogenization (UHPH) is an innovative, efficient and non-thermal technology that can be applied at different stages in winemaking in order to reduce or avoid the use of sulphites. During 2022 vintage, a batch of Xarel·lo must was processed by UHPH at 300 MPa with an inlet temperature (Ti) of 4 ºC. In order to verify the influence of the UHPH treatment in wine characteristics, alcoholic fermentations with this must (UHPH) were carried out and compared with a control batch (without SO2 addition (C)) and a sulphited batch, in which 60 mg/L of total SO2 (SO2) were added.