terclim by ICS banner
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 International Congress on Grapevine and Wine Sciences 9 2ICGWS-2023 9 Oenological compatibility of biocontrol yeasts applied to wine grapes 

Oenological compatibility of biocontrol yeasts applied to wine grapes 

Abstract

Antagonistic yeasts applied to wine grapes must be compatible with the thereafter winemaking process, avoiding competition with the fermentative Saccharomyces cerevisiae or affecting wine flavour. Therefore, fifteen epiphytic yeasts (6 Metschnikowia sp., 6 Hanseniaspora uvarum, 3 Starmerella bacillaris) previously selected for its biocontrol ability against Alternaria on wine grapes were evaluate for possible competition with S. cerevisiae by the Niche Overlap Index (NOI) employing YNB agar media with 10 mM of 17 different carbonate sources present in wine grapes (proline, asparagine, alanine, glutamic acid, tirosine, arginine, lisine, methionine, glicine, malic acid, tartaric acid, fructose, melibiose, raffinose, rhamnose, sucrose, glucose). Also, acetic acid production in YPD-calcium carbonate agar medium, H2S production in Biggy agar medium and the production of “Brett” character or other odour defects in pasteurized must with p-coumaric acid were evaluated. As result, all Metschnikowia sp. strains showed coexistence with S. cerevisiae because the NOI (number of common carbon sources used by the two microorganisms/number of carbon sources used only by the antagonist) was <0.9 (0.42). Meanwhile, all H. uvarum and S. bacillaris strains showed competition with S. cerevisiae (NOI=1) and between them (NOI=1). On the other hand, almost all H. uvarum(5 of 6) and all S. bacillaris strains produced acetic acid, whereas none of the Metschnikowia sp. showed acetic acid production. All the yeasts analysed produced H2S in Biggy agar medium. Nevertheless, the majority of them exhibited no defect or in certain cases a slight solvent or acetate odour (different from “Brett character”) in must. Therefore, among all the biocontrol yeasts evaluated, Metschinikowia sp. strains showed more compatibility features than the rest of the strains and its oenological behaviour should be further studied under vinification conditions.

Acknowledgements: Marie Sklodowska-Curie Research and Innovation Staff Exchange project (872394-vWISE-H2020-MSCA-RISE-2019) – European Comission.

DOI:

Publication date: October 10, 2023

Issue: ICGWS 2023

Type: Poster

Authors

Luciana Paola Prendes1*, María Gabriela Merín 1, Claire Courtel2, Carina Morales3, Juliana Garau1, Vilma Inés Morata de Ambrosini 1

1ICAI (Instituto de Ciencias Aplicadas a la Industria, CONICET-Facultad de Ciencias Aplicadas, UNCuyo), Bernardo de Irigoyen 375, San Rafael (Mendoza), Argentina.
2Oniris (École nationale vétérinaire, agroalimentaire et de l’alimentation de Nantes-Atlantique), Rue de la Géraudière, CS 82225, 44322 Nantes, France.
3Facultad de Ciencias Aplicadas (UNCuyo), Bernardo de Irigoyen 375, San Rafael (Mendoza), Argentina.

Contact the author*

Keywords

biocontrol yeasts, NOI, detrimental oenological characters

Tags

2ICGWS | ICGWS | ICGWS 2023 | IVES Conference Series

Citation

Related articles…

Ability of lactic acid bacterial laccases to degrade biogenic amines and OTA in wine

Two of the most harmful microbial metabolites for human health that can be present in wines and either fermented or raw foods are biogenic amines (BA) and ochratoxine A (OTA). Winemakers are aware of the need to avoid their presence in wine by using different strategies, one of them is the use of enzymes. Some recombinant laccases have been characterized and revealed as potential tools to degrade these toxic compounds in wine[1], specifically biogenic amines[2].

Do wine sulphites affect gut microbiota? An in vitro study of their digestion in the gastrointestinal tract

“Sulphites” and mainly sulphur dioxide (SO2) is by far the most widely used additive (E-220/INS 220) in winemaking and likely the most difficult to replace. The well-known antioxidant, antioxidasic and antimicrobial properties of SO2 make this molecule a practically essential tool, not only in winemaking, but also in the production of other food products. The current trend in winemaking is the reduction of this unfriendly additive due to its negative effects on health and environmental. In particular, it could cause headaches and intolerance/allergic reactions in sensitive individuals. Wine is considered one of the major contributors of exposure of SO2 in the adult population, when this beverage is included in the diet.

Metabolomic profiling of heat-stressed grape berries 

The projected rise in mean air temperatures together with the frequency, intensity, and length of heat waves in many wine-growing regions worldwide will deeply impact grape berry development and quality. Several studies have been conducted and a large set of molecular data was produced to better understand the impact of high temperatures on grape berry development and metabolism[1]. According to these data, it is highly likely that the metabolomic dynamics could be strongly modulated by heat stress (HS).

Effect of foliar application of urea and nano-urea on the cell wall of Monastrell grape skins

The foliar application of urea has been shown to be able to satisfy the specific nutritional needs of the vine as well as to increase the nitrogen composition of the must. On the other hand, the use of nanotechnology could be of great interest in viticulture as it would help to slow down the release of urea and protect it against possible degradation. Several studies indicate that cell wall synthesis and remodeling are affected by nitrogen availability.

Development of a new method for detecting acetic acid bacteria in wine

The presence of acetic acid bacteria in wine can lead to the appearance of acetic acid at concentrations above the perception threshold, causing the wine rejection by the consumer. During the winemaking process, avoiding the presence of acetic acid bacteria is very difficult, as there is always a residual population accompanying the wine[1], and the problem arises with the significant development of these microorganisms that metabolizes large amounts of acetic acid.
The concern of wineries to control the presence of acetic acid bacteria in wines during their conservation is due to the absence of simple and effective analyses that allow the detection of these microorganisms in the initial stages.