terclim by ICS banner
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 METABOLIC INTERACTIONS OF SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE COCULTURES: A WAY TO EXTEND THE AROMA DIVERSITY OF CHARDONNAY WINE

METABOLIC INTERACTIONS OF SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE COCULTURES: A WAY TO EXTEND THE AROMA DIVERSITY OF CHARDONNAY WINE

Abstract

Yeast co-inoculations in winemaking have been investigated in various applications, but most often in the context of modulating the aromatic profiles of wines. Our study aimed to characterize S. cerevisiae interactions and their impact on wine by taking an integrative approach. Three cocultures and corresponding pure cultures of S. cerevisiae were characterized according to their fermentative capacities, the chemical composition and aromatic profile of the associated Chardonnay wines. The various strains studied within the cocultures showed different behaviors regarding their development. More than half of the 67 volatile compounds quantified were modulated by interactions, including 18 relevant wine aroma compounds. The main families affected were higher alcohols and their associated esters, vinyl phenols, and fatty acids. Coculture makes it possible to obtain new aromatic expressions that do not exist in the original pure cultures attributed to yeast interactions. The sensory profile of the wines related to the cocultures differed from the wines associated with the pure cultures. However, they also differed from the blends (50/50 v/v) of post AF wines from pure cultures. Based on the exometabolome, this was confirmed. The cocultures were revealed as not being simple additions of two wines represented by blend, thereby indicating complex interactions. High resolution mass spectrometry allowed to highlight thousands of cocultures biomarkers. Most of these biomarkers belonged to metabolic pathways involved in nitrogen metabolism. The latter is therefore a marker of changes associated with interactions between two strains of S. cerevisiae. Despite of preserved fermentative properties, the described interactions in- duced a modification of the chemical composition and sensory profile of the wines from the cocultures. A comprehensive approach by combining different techniques is essential to understand yeast interactions and describe the consequences on wine.

DOI:

Publication date: February 9, 2024

Issue: OENO Macrowine 2023

Type: Article

Authors

Fanny Bordet 1,4, Rémy Romanet1, Florian Bahut1,4, Jordi Ballester2, Camille Eicher1, Cristina Peña3, Vicente Ferreira3, Régis Gou-geon1,5, Anne Julien-Ortiz4, Chloé Roullier-Gall1, Hervé Alexandre1

1. Univ. Bourgogne Franche-Comté, Institut Agro Dijon, PAM UMR A 02.102, 21000 Dijon, France, IUVV, Rue Claude Ladrey, 21000 Dijon, France
2. Centre des Sciences du Goût et de l’Alimentation, Institut Agro Dijon, CNRS, INRA, Université Bourgogne – Franche-Comté, 21000 Dijon, France
3. University of Zaragoza, Dpt. Química Analítica. Facultad de Ciencias, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain
4. Lallemand SAS, 19 rue des Briquetiers, 31000 Blagnac, France
5. DIVVA (Développement Innovation Vigne Vin Aliments) Platform/PAM UMR, IUVV, Rue Claude Ladrey, 21000 Dijon, France

Contact the author*

Keywords

fermentation, interactions, Saccharomyces cervevisiae, metabolomic

Tags

IVES Conference Series | oeno macrowine 2023 | oeno-macrowine

Citation

Related articles…

EFFECT OF WHOLE BUNCH VINIFICATION ON THE ABUNDANCE OF A SWEETENING COMPOUND

In classic red wine-making process, grapes are usually destemmed between harvest and the filling of the vat. However, some winemakers choose to let all or a part of the stems in contact with the juice during vatting, this is called whole bunch vinification. For instance, this practice is traditionally used in some French wine regions, notably in Burgundy, Beaujolais and the Rhone Valley. The choice to keep this part of the grape is likely to affect the sensory properties of wine, as its gustatory perception1,2.

LARGE-SCALE PHENOTYPIC SCREENING OF THE SPOILAGE YEAST BRETTANOMYCES BRUXELLENSIS: UNTANGLING PATTERNS OF ADAPTATION AND SELECTION, AND CONSEQUENCES FOR INNOVATIVE WINE TREATMENTS

Brettanomyces bruxellensis is considered as the main spoilage yeast in oenology. Its presence in red wine leads to off-flavour due to the production of volatile phenols such as 4-vinylphenol, 4-vinylguaiacol, 4-ethylphenol and 4-ethylguaiacol, whose aromatic notes are unpleasant (e.g. animal, leather, horse or pharmaceutical). Beside wine, B. bruxellensis is commonly isolated from beer, kombucha and bioethanol production, where its role can be described as negative or positive. Recent genomic studies unveiled the existence of various populations.

METHYL SALICYLATE, A COMPOUND INVOLVED IN BORDEAUX RED WINES PRODUCED WITHOUT SULFITES ADDITION

Sulfur dioxide (SO₂) is the most commonly used additive during winemaking to protect wine from oxidation and from microorganisms. Thus, since the 18th century, SO₂ was almost systematically present in wines. Recently, wines produced without any addition of SO₂ during all the winemaking process including bottling became more and more popular for consumers. A recent study dedicated to sensory characterization of Bordeaux red wines produced without added SO₂, revealed that such wines were perceived differently from similar wines produced with using SO₂ and were characterized by specific fruity aromas and coolness1,2.

EFFECT OF FUMARIC ACID ON SPONTANEOUS FERMENTATION IN GRAPE MUST

Malolactic fermentation (MLF)¹, the decarboxylation of L-malic acid into L-lactic acid, is performed by lactic acid bacteria (LAB). MLF has a deacidifying effect that may compromise freshness or microbiological stability in wines² and can be inhibited by fumaric acid [E297] (FA). In wine, can be added at a maximum allowable dose of 0.6 g/L³. Its inhibition with FA is being studied as an alternative strategy to minimize added doses of SO₂⁴. In addition, wine yeasts are capable of metabolizing and storing small amounts of FA and during alcoholic fermentation (AF).

HOW DO ROOTSTOCKS AFFECT CABERNET SAUVIGNON AROMATIC EXPRESSION?

Grape quality potential for wine production is strongly influenced by environmental parameters such as climate and agronomic factors such as rootstock. Several studies underline the effect of rootstock on vegetative growth of the scions [1] and on berry composition [2, 3] with an impact on wine quality. Rootstocks are promising agronomic tools for climate change adaptation and in most grape-growing regions the potential diversity of rootstocks is not fully used and only a few genotypes are planted. Little is known about the effect of rootstock genetic variability on the aromatic composition in wines; thus further investigations are needed.