terclim by ICS banner
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 METABOLIC INTERACTIONS OF SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE COCULTURES: A WAY TO EXTEND THE AROMA DIVERSITY OF CHARDONNAY WINE

METABOLIC INTERACTIONS OF SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE COCULTURES: A WAY TO EXTEND THE AROMA DIVERSITY OF CHARDONNAY WINE

Abstract

Yeast co-inoculations in winemaking have been investigated in various applications, but most often in the context of modulating the aromatic profiles of wines. Our study aimed to characterize S. cerevisiae interactions and their impact on wine by taking an integrative approach. Three cocultures and corresponding pure cultures of S. cerevisiae were characterized according to their fermentative capacities, the chemical composition and aromatic profile of the associated Chardonnay wines. The various strains studied within the cocultures showed different behaviors regarding their development. More than half of the 67 volatile compounds quantified were modulated by interactions, including 18 relevant wine aroma compounds. The main families affected were higher alcohols and their associated esters, vinyl phenols, and fatty acids. Coculture makes it possible to obtain new aromatic expressions that do not exist in the original pure cultures attributed to yeast interactions. The sensory profile of the wines related to the cocultures differed from the wines associated with the pure cultures. However, they also differed from the blends (50/50 v/v) of post AF wines from pure cultures. Based on the exometabolome, this was confirmed. The cocultures were revealed as not being simple additions of two wines represented by blend, thereby indicating complex interactions. High resolution mass spectrometry allowed to highlight thousands of cocultures biomarkers. Most of these biomarkers belonged to metabolic pathways involved in nitrogen metabolism. The latter is therefore a marker of changes associated with interactions between two strains of S. cerevisiae. Despite of preserved fermentative properties, the described interactions in- duced a modification of the chemical composition and sensory profile of the wines from the cocultures. A comprehensive approach by combining different techniques is essential to understand yeast interactions and describe the consequences on wine.

DOI:

Publication date: February 9, 2024

Issue: OENO Macrowine 2023

Type: Article

Authors

Fanny Bordet 1,4, Rémy Romanet1, Florian Bahut1,4, Jordi Ballester2, Camille Eicher1, Cristina Peña3, Vicente Ferreira3, Régis Gou-geon1,5, Anne Julien-Ortiz4, Chloé Roullier-Gall1, Hervé Alexandre1

1. Univ. Bourgogne Franche-Comté, Institut Agro Dijon, PAM UMR A 02.102, 21000 Dijon, France, IUVV, Rue Claude Ladrey, 21000 Dijon, France
2. Centre des Sciences du Goût et de l’Alimentation, Institut Agro Dijon, CNRS, INRA, Université Bourgogne – Franche-Comté, 21000 Dijon, France
3. University of Zaragoza, Dpt. Química Analítica. Facultad de Ciencias, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain
4. Lallemand SAS, 19 rue des Briquetiers, 31000 Blagnac, France
5. DIVVA (Développement Innovation Vigne Vin Aliments) Platform/PAM UMR, IUVV, Rue Claude Ladrey, 21000 Dijon, France

Contact the author*

Keywords

fermentation, interactions, Saccharomyces cervevisiae, metabolomic

Tags

IVES Conference Series | oeno macrowine 2023 | oeno-macrowine

Citation

Related articles…

GRAPE SPIRITS FOR PORT WINE PRODUCTION: SCREENING THEIR AROMA PROFILE

Port is a fortified wine, produced from grapes grown in the demarcated Douro region. The fortification process consists in the addition of a grape spirit (77% v/v) to the fermenting juice for fermentation interruption, resulting in remaining residual sugars in the wine and increased alcohol content (19-22%). The approval of grape spirits follows the Appellation (D.O. Port wine) rules1 and it is currently carried out based on analytical control and on sensory evaluation done by the public Institute that upholds the control of the quality of Douro Appellation wines. However, the producers of Port wines would like to have more information about quality markers of grape spirits.

WINE CONSUMER TRADE-OFF BETWEEN ORGANOLEPTIC CHARACTERISTICS AND SUSTAINABLE CLAIMS. AN EXPERIMENT ON RED WINES FROM BORDEAUX REGION

In economics, the perception of wine quality is not limited to sensorial characteristics: an indication of the region of production significantly affects the perception of quality and consumers’ WTP ([1]; [2]). However, [3] or more recently [4] show that even if a wine has an organic label, the taste of wine remains the predominant criterion in consumer preferences. The contribution of our experiment is to evaluate the impact of responsible attributes (organic label, Non Added Sulfites, HVE certification) on the appreciation of several red wines on the market. More than 280 consumers participated to the present study and they perform 25 tastings divided into 5 different sessions. 20 different red wines from Bordeaux Area are tasted.

OENOLOGICAL STRATEGIES FOR THE REMOVAL OF PINKING IN WHITE WINE

The pinking of in white wine is the turning of color from yellow to salmon hue. White wines obtained from certain grape varieties (e.g. Chardonnay, Sauvignon blanc, Riesling, Trebbiano di Lugana) showed to be susceptible to pinking [1] that has been evaluated by an assay providing the addition of hydrogen peroxide. Even if its appearance does not seem to affect the sensory properties [2], strategies are necessary for its removal. Nowadays, the treatment with polyvinylpolipirroline (PVPP) was reported to significantly decrease the pink color [3].

STATISTICAL COMPARISON OF GROWTH PARAMETERS OF NINE BIOPROTECTION STRAINS IMPLEMENTED ON ARTIFICIALLY CONTAMINATED SYNTHETIC MUST

In recent years, consumer demand for products without chemical additives increased, becoming a priority for the wine sector. SO₂ is widely used for its multiple properties including antiseptics, antioxidants and antioxidasics and the strategy of bioprotection in winemaking represents now an alternative to this chemical additive. In oenology, results have highlighted the interest of bioprotection to limit the development of microorganisms like Hanseniaspora uvarum and thus reduce the doses of sulphite. Indeed, this species is considered because of its acetic acid and methyl butyl acetate production, the latter can cover the varietal character of wines.

VOLATILE AND GLYCOSYLATED MARKERS OF SMOKE IMPACT: EVOLUTION IN BOTTLED WINE

Smoke impact in wines is caused by a wide range of volatile phenols found in wildfire smoke. These compounds are absorbed and accumulate in berries, where they may also become glycosylated. Both volatile and glycosylated forms eventually end up in wine where they can cause off-flavors. The impact on wine aroma is mainly attributed to volatile phenols, while in-mouth hydrolysis of glycosylated forms may be responsible for long-lasting “ashy” aftertastes (1).