OENO IVAS 2019 banner
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 Sensory evaluation of grape berries: predictive power for sensory properties of Sauvignon blanc, Riesling and Pinot noir wines

Sensory evaluation of grape berries: predictive power for sensory properties of Sauvignon blanc, Riesling and Pinot noir wines

Abstract

Sensory analysis of grape berries is a common tool to evaluate the degree of grape maturation and to make sound picking decisions. However, most of it is based on anecdotal knowledge and scientific studies relating berry and wine properties are rather limited [1]. 

Ten grapes of each variety (Sauvignon Blanc, Riesling, Pinot Noir) were picked weekly. Berries were dissected manually to obtain berries with intact peduncles. Using sucrose solutions of different densities, berries were separated into three density fractions of 1.070, 1.080, and 1.090. Three individual berries were assessed of each density group on each picking date. White and red wines were made from grapes picked concurrently with berry samples and were fermented in duplicates [2]. 

For Sauvignon Blanc 13 out of 21 visual, haptic, odor and taste attributes varied significantly among the three picking dates. Firmness and yellow color of the berries and brown color of the seeds and bitter berry skins yielded the largest F-ratios. Green notes in pulp and skin decreased during ripening. Variation of grape berry density yielded 14 significant attributes, including sweet and sour taste as well as fruity perception [2]. 

In a PCA the first PC was governed by ripe versus unripe attributes, while PC2 was dominated by presence versus absence of green odors in pulp and skin. Sensory evaluation revealed better grouping by density than grouping by picking date. 

Correlating berry and wine sensory brown seeds and sweet pulp correlated with increased peach and passionfruit notes in the wines. However, no correlation was found for green notes depicted in berries and green bell pepper nuances in the wines or fruity aspects in the berry and passion fruit / peach intensities in the wine. 

In conclusion, berry sensory yields a good characterization of the ripening process as well as technological grape properties, but is rather limited in the prediction of wine sensory properties. 

[1] Winter, E, Whiting, J., Rousseau, J. Berry Sensory Assessment, 2004, Winetitles, Adelaide, Australia 
[2] Nopora, J., Klink, S., Fischer, U. Reifeprüfung – Aussagekraft der Beerensensorik bei der Reifemessung, 2018, Der Deutsche Weinbau 17/18, pg. 26-30

DOI:

Publication date: June 19, 2020

Issue: OENO IVAS 2019

Type: Article

Authors

Ulrich Fischer, Julia Nopora

Rebschule Freytag, 67435 Lachen-Speyerdorf, Germany
Breitenweg 71, 67435 Neustadt an der Weinstraße, Germany

Contact the author

Keywords

Sensory evaluation, grape berry, grape maturity, wine 

Tags

IVES Conference Series | OENO IVAS 2019

Citation

Related articles…

The effects of antioxidants and gas sparging on New Zealand white wines

This study aims to investigate the effects of different conditions of grape processing or fermentation on the aroma profile of New Zealand white wines.

Extreme vintages affect grape varieties differently: a case study from a cool climate wine region

Eger wine region is located on the northern border of grapevine cultivation zone. In the cool climate, terroir selection is one of the foundations of quality wine making. However, climate change will have a significant impact on these high value-added vineyards. This study presents a case study from 2021 and 2022 with the investigation of three grape varieties (Kadarka, Syrah, Furmint). The experiment was conducted in a steep-sloped vineyard (Nagy-Eged hill) with a southern exposure.

A new approach for sensory characterization of grape. Relationship with chemical composition

Characterize taste and mouthfeel properties of grapes elicited by the phenolic fraction (PF) of grape berries and establish relationships with chemical variables. METHODS: As many as 31 diverse grape lots of Tempranillo Tinto and Garnacha Tinta from three different regions were harvested. Grapes were destemmed and macerated in 15% of ethanol for one week and extracts were submitted to solid phase extraction. The recovered polyphenolic fraction was reconstituted in wine model and characterized by a panel of 21 wine experts employing a list of 23 taste and mouthfeel-related attributes following a rate-k-attributes methodology. RESULTS: Six significant attributes among the 31 samples differed based on ANOVA results: “dry”, “coarse”, “bitter”, “dry on tongue”, “sticky” and “watery”. PCA with VARIMAX algorithm was calculated.

All acids are equal, but some acids are more equal than others: (bio)acidification of wines

Insufficient acidity in grapes from warm(ing) climates is commonly corrected through addition of tartaric acid during vinification, and less so with other organic acids. One alternative approach involves bio-acidification with certain strains of Lachancea thermotolerans (LT) via lactic acid production during fermentation.

Grapevine performances in five areas of ‘Chianti Classico’ Comportement de la vigne en cinq zones des « Chianti Classico »

The research was carried out in the ‘Chianti Classico’ area and it was part of the ‘Chianti Classico 2000’ research project. The performances ‘Sangiovese’ grapevine