GiESCO 2019 banner
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 GiESCO 9 GiESCO 2019 9 Firmness of the grapes. Mechanical tests and definition of indices. Study of the evolution of berry skin resistance during alcoholic fermentation

Firmness of the grapes. Mechanical tests and definition of indices. Study of the evolution of berry skin resistance during alcoholic fermentation

Abstract

Context and purpose of the study: The mechanical strength or firmness of a fruit is considered an important parameter to characterize its state of maturity or conservation, as other parameters such as sugar level or color. The mechanical resistance of grapes influences the integrity and sanitary quality of the harvest. In this study, the mechanical characteristics of grapes berries are studied at harvesting time in order to determine their properties of firmness and the resistance of the berry skin during the alcoholic fermentation. Special indices are defined measuring the energy needed to crush 50% of the initial diameter of the berry. We applied these indices to different varieties and get different results either for the entire berry firmness or for the skin resistance.

Material and methods : To evaluate the firmness of grapes, INRA has developed a tool specifically adapted to measure the skin resistance of the grapes (Penelaup Robot, patented). We used here two grape varieties: Grenache Noir and Carignan Noir.Firmness of the entire berries were measured at harvesting. Right after, the fermentations were conducted at 21°C, in low volume tanks (<1kg) using “French Press” coffee plunger with similar and standard conditions. 1 kg of berries were crushed and poured in the tank. Lalvin ICV OKAY yeast (20 g/hL) and SO2 (250 µL of a 8% solution) were added simultaneously. Cap management was carried out every day during alcoholic fermentation (AF) by submerging pomace with the plunger. The decrease of sugar concentration was monitored by measuring the Brix degree and the density. Fermentations were considered done when the density remained stable (7 to 8 days) with density less than 995. At the end of AF the classical wine chemical parameters were determined. Skin resistance measurements were carried out at the beginning and at the end of AF plus several points in between.

Results: We defined mechanical indices dedicated to the firmness of grapes. Using these indices, the result of this study shows differences in firmness related to the grape varieties: Grenache Noir and Carignan Noir have different mechanical properties. Similarly, during the alcoholic fermentation, the resistance of the skins highlights different properties of the berries immersed in the fermenting must. This had never measured until now. These results give new information on the mechanical properties of the grapes. It would help the winemaker to better choose the type of fermentation and maceration adapted to his grapes depending on the type of wine he wants to produce.

DOI:

Publication date: June 19, 2020

Issue: GiESCO 2019

Type: Article

Authors

Abbal, PHILIPPE (1), Céline PONCET LEGRAND (1), Stephanie CARILLO (1), Magali BES (3), Marie Agnès DUCASSE (4) , Elissa ABI‐HABIB (2), Aude VERHNET (2)

(1) INRA, UMR SPO 2, Place viala, 34060 Montpellier Cedex
(2) SupAgro, 2, Place viala, 34060 Montpellier Cedex
(3) INRA, UMT Minicave, UE Pech Rouge, 11430 Gruissan
(4) IFV, UMT Minicave, Domaine de Pech Rouge, 11430 Gruissan

Contact the author

Keywords

grapes, firmness, rheology, berry skin, fermentation

Tags

GiESCO 2019 | IVES Conference Series

Citation

Related articles…

Exploring resilience and competitiveness of wine estates in Languedoc-Roussillon in the recent past: a multi-level perspective

The Languedoc-Roussillon wineries are facing a decline in wine yields particularly PGI yields due to many factors. Climate change is just ones, but is expected to increase in the future. There is also structurally a large heterogeneity of yield profiles among terroirs, varieties and strategies. This work investigates the link between yield, competitiveness and resilience to explore how resilient winegrowers have been in the recent past. To this end two approaches have been combined; (i) an accountancy database analysis at estate scale and (ii) municipality level competitiveness analysis. A new resilience indicator that characterizes the capacity of an estate to absorb yield variation is also defined. The FADN database between 2000 and 2018 of ex-Languedoc-Roussillon (France) and other data are used to analyse the current situation and the past evolution of competitiveness and resilience by type of estate (type of farm: PGI and/or PDO & type of commercialization: bulk and/or bottles). The net margin, which defines competitiveness, is not correlated to yield for all types but depends on the type of commercialization and the level of specialisation. The resilience indicator shows that the net margin of estates specialized in PGI is particularly sensitive to yield declines. We also show that price evolutions seem to compensate the effect of yield losses for the majority of types. Municipality scale analysis shows the links between local pedoclimate, yield, commercialization strategies and price. Overlapping a PDO with a PGI does not always increase a municipality’s PGI competitiveness. It is difficult to make links between causes and effects due to the complexity of the wine production system. Production diversification may be a solution. Resorting to the two level of analysis helps resolving the data gap that is necessary to explore the links between yield and economic performance of the wine estates in the long term.

Effects of graft quality on growth and grapevine-water relations

Climate change is challenging viticulture worldwide compromising its sustainability due to warmer temperatures and the increased frequency of extreme events. Grafting Vitis vinifera L.

Short-term relationships between climate and grapevine trunk diseases in southern French vineyards

[lwp_divi_breadcrumbs home_text="IVES" use_before_icon="on" before_icon="||divi||400" module_id="publication-ariane" _builder_version="4.19.4" _module_preset="default" module_text_align="center" module_font_size="16px" text_orientation="center"...

How can historical cultivars mitigate the effects of climate change?

IFV, INRAe and the national network “Partenaires de la Sélection Vigne” representing 37 organizations from the different wine regions, have been working increasingly closely over the last 2 decades towards the preservation of the French varietal patrimony. There are approximately 600 patrimonial varieties according to INRAe and SupAgro Montpellier experts, including ancient cultivars (400) and intravarietal crossbreeds obtained since the 19th century. In the context of a drastic reduction in such varieties from the mid 1980’s in favor of mainstream varieties, it was essential to carry out an inventory of old vines and vineyards. INRAe Vassal collection plays a key role here as it holds the largest diversity available, along with a rich bibliography and herbariums, offering us the opportunity to document and double check the identity of a cultivar, consolidating the expertise of ampelographers. The work is carried out in several stages, from verifying the existence of a variety in a small region, through to rehabilitation. During this session, the authors present the process that leads to the official registration of a variety. After this, IFV selection center takes over to initiate the process of selection and propagation. A specific focus within regions such as the Alps, Champagne and the South-West will provide details of the full procedure. Bia, Bouysselet, Chardonnay rose, Mecle and the aptly named Tardif, are some of the cultivars that have followed this procedure. Furthermore, a recent regulation established by INAO on “varieties of interest for adaptation purposes” might boost uptake by growers. Since 2006, 36 historical cultivars have been registered. Most of these have been neglected in the past due to late maturity, lack of sugar and high titratable acidity at harvest time. Such characteristics are today considered as positive qualities, not only in mitigation of the effects of climate change, but also as an opportunity for restoring diversity…

Climate projections over France wine-growing region and its potential impact on phenology

Climate change represents a major challenge for the French wine industry. Climatic conditions in French vineyards have already changed and will continue to evolve. One of the notable effects on grapevine is the advancing growing season. The aim of this study is to characterise the evolution of agroclimatic indicators (Huglin index, number of hot days, mean temperature, cumulative rainfall and number of rainy days during the growing season) at French wine-growing regions scale between 1980 and 2019 using gridded data (8 km resolution, SAFRAN) and for the middle of the 21th century (2046-2065) with 21 GCMs statistically debiased and downscaled at 8 km. A set of three phenological models were used to simulate the budburst (BRIN, Smoothed-Utah), flowering, veraison and theoretical maturity (GFV and GSR) stages for two grape varieties (Chardonnay and Cabernet-Sauvignon) over the whole period studied. All the French wine-growing regions show an increase in both temperatures during the growing season and Huglin index. This increase is accompanied by an advance in the simulated flowering (+3 to +9 days), veraison (+6 to +13 days) and theoretical maturity (+6 to +16 days) stages, which are more noticeable in the north-eastern part of France. The climate projections unanimously show, for all the GCMs considered, a clear increase in the Huglin index (+662 to 771 °C.days compared to the 1980-1999 period) and in the number of hot days (+5.6 to 22.6 days) in all the wine regions studied. Regarding rainfall, the expected evolution remains very uncertain due to the heterogeneity of the climates simulated by the 21 models. Only 4 regions out of 21 have a significant decrease in the number of rainy days during the growing season. The two budburst models show a strong divergence in the evolution of this stage with an average difference of 18 days between the two models on all grapevine regions. The theoretical maturity is the most impacted stage with a potential advance between 40 and 23 days according to wine-growing regions.