GiESCO 2019 banner
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 GiESCO 9 GiESCO 2019 9 Is early defoliation a sustainable management practice for mediterranean vineyards? Case studies at the portuguese lisbon winegrowing region

Is early defoliation a sustainable management practice for mediterranean vineyards? Case studies at the portuguese lisbon winegrowing region

Abstract

Context and purpose of the study ‐ Recently early defoliation (ED) has been tested in several high‐ yielding grapevine varieties and sites aiming at reducing cluster compactness and hence, regulating yield and susceptibility to botrytis bunch rot infection. The reported results have been generally positive, encouraging growers to use this canopy management technique as an alternative for replacing the conventional time‐consuming cluster thinning and, simultaneously, as a sustainable practice to reduce the use of fungicides. However, ED increases berry sunburn risks and/or can induce carry‐over effects on vigor and node fruitfulness as shown in the two case studies reported in this work.

Material and methods ‐ Two ED experiments were set up at a commercial vineyard located in the Lisbon winegrowing region with the varieties Aragonez, syn. Tempranillo (2013‐2015) and Semillon (2018). In both experiments the ED treatment was compared with the non‐defoliated (ND; control) using a randomized complete block design with 4 replicates per treatment. The ED treatment consisted of the removal of 5‐6 basal leaves and any laterals at pre‐flowering. Vegetative (leaf area and pruning weight) and reproductive components (%fruit‐set, cluster number, cluster weight, yield) and berry composition were assessed.

Results ‐ In the Aragonez experiment total leaf area at harvest and pruning weight were significantly lower in ED vines. The ED treatment presented also a significantly lower fruit‐set, berry weight, cluster weight and compactness, as well as yield as compared to the control. In the third season ED presented a significantly lower cluster number indicating a negative carry‐over effect on bud initiation induced by the early source limitation. Regarding berry composition, ED showed a higher Brix and a lower titratable acidity than the control but no significant differences were detected on skin anthocyanins. The incidence and severity of botrytis bunch rot infection was significantly higher in the control treatment. In the Semillon experiment the ED treatment showed also a significantly lower leaf area, fruit‐set, berry weight, cluster weight, cluster compactness and yield. No significant differences were detected on berry composition except for Brix where ED showed a significantly higher value. Despite the low pressure of botrytis bunch rot infection the control presented the significantly highest incidence and severity. An heat event occurred during the first week of August induced a severe and significantly higher berry sunburn in the ED treatment. Our results show that pre‐bloom defoliation is a canopy management practice with high potential for regulating grape yield and with benefits for grape health.However, in Mediterranean climates, where water and heat stress can inhibit leaf area compensation, the negative effects observed either on berry sunburn and on node fruitfulness recommends to use this practice with care or even avoid it. 

DOI:

Publication date: June 19, 2020

Issue: GIESCO 2019

Type: Article

Authors

Carlos M. LOPES (1), Marta VENDEIRO, Ricardo EGIPTO (1), Olfa ZARROUK (2), M. Manuela CHAVES (2)

(1) LEAF, Instituto Superior de Agronomia, Universidade de Lisboa, Portugal
(2) Instituto de Tecnologia Química e Biológica, Oeiras, Portugal

Contact the author

Keywords

early defoliation, fruit‐set, grapevine, botrytis rot, berry sunburn

Tags

GiESCO 2019 | IVES Conference Series

Citation

Related articles…

Evolution of biogenic amines content in wine during sample conservation – method optimisation for analysis of biogenicamines

The present paper reports the development of an optimized method for simultaneous analysis of
8 biogenic amines (Histamine, Methylamine, Ethylamine, Tyramine, Putrescine, Cadaverine, Phenethylamine, and Isoamylamine). It is based on a method developed by Gomez-Alonso et al. in 2007.

Evaluation of mannoprotein formation by different yeast strains by enzymatic analysis of mannose and tribological estimation of astringency

A positive role of mannoproteins on wine stability and red wine mouth sensations has been widely described. Commercial mannoproteins are available and some yeast strains are offered with a higher formation of mannoproteins.

HOW DO ROOTSTOCKS AFFECT CABERNET SAUVIGNON AROMATIC EXPRESSION?

Grape quality potential for wine production is strongly influenced by environmental parameters such as climate and agronomic factors such as rootstock. Several studies underline the effect of rootstock on vegetative growth of the scions [1] and on berry composition [2, 3] with an impact on wine quality. Rootstocks are promising agronomic tools for climate change adaptation and in most grape-growing regions the potential diversity of rootstocks is not fully used and only a few genotypes are planted. Little is known about the effect of rootstock genetic variability on the aromatic composition in wines; thus further investigations are needed.

Response of different nitrogen supplementation on Saccharomyces cerevisiae metabolic response and wine aromatic profile

The wine yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae can highly affect wine aromatic profile by producing and/or mediating the release of a whole range of metabolites (such as thiols, esters, and terpenes), which in turn contribute to enhanced aroma and flavor. These metabolites depend on yeast metabolism activated during fermentation which can constitute the ‘’metabolic footprint’’ of the yeast strain that carried out the process.

An analysis of wine geographical indications from the perspective of the theory of industrial organizations: what are the trade off?

From Porto and then through Bordeaux, Champagne and Bourgogne, wine geographical indications (gi) were the driving models for this form of protection of distinctive signs for collective use. Many studies present the benefits of recognizing a gi for a given region, the challenges of its implementation, as well as the possibilities of promoting territorial development.