Macrowine 2021
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 How pressing techniques affect must composition and wine quality of Pinot blanc

How pressing techniques affect must composition and wine quality of Pinot blanc

Abstract

This study investigates how the sensory profile of Pinot Blanc is affected from different maceration and pressing techniques. Grapes were sourced from four vineyards in the village Tramin in South Tyrol. For the experiment 200 kg of grapes from each vineyard site were hand picked the day before harvest for the commercial winery took place. Grapes were stored over night at 4°C, homogenized and processed in the experimental winery at Laimburg research centre the day after harvest. Four different pressing techniques were applied in duplicates of 100kg each. Treatments were composed as follows: (1) “classic”, pre-installed press program with 120 minutes and crumbling after each pressure step, (2) “cremant”, gentle and sequential press program with 180 minutes and fewer crumbling steps (3) “maceration” consisted of a 120 minutes cold soak followed by a very quick press program of 30 minutes and (4) “long pressing” consisted of a two hours maceration during the press program once the free run juice was drained. To track the evolution and extraction kinetics of pH, total acidity, tartaric acid, malic acid, total polyphenols and catechins, juice samples were taken after each cycle and analyzed right away in the laboratory. At approximately 150 kPa pressure the must is divided in fraction one and fraction two what corresponds to the press-wine. Two experimental wines are made out of each batch of grapes: one contains only must from the first fraction, and the other is a combination of fraction one and two in the original proportion. Sensory evaluation took place 6 and 18 months after harvest. Chemical must composition depends on the processing technique in the winery. Total acidity, pH, malic acid and polyphenol content of the must are affected from the chosen press program. Nonetheless the absolute content of the chemical components is different for the different pressing techniques; the trend of the extraction of these must components remains more or less the same during the pressing procedure. An exception was potassium, which showed a different behaviour in the “cremant” press-program. The different pressing techniques had an impact on the sensory profile of the wines. In the aroma profile, wines from the maceration treatment were marked best; whereas for the mouth-feel parameters the control wines achieved slightly better marks. Wines pressed with the “cremant” program were described as less complex, thinner and more acidity driven. Wines from treatment “long pressing” were reductive, less fruity ending up with a low overall quality. Two hours maceration followed by quick pressing showed interesting results. This might be a promising option to save press-capacity and to process more fruit in the short period of harvest. Further, for overall wine quality it was beneficial to use the entire must; wines made without the press-fraction are described as too light, not as complex and not as typical.

Publication date: May 17, 2024

Issue: Macrowine 2016

Type: Poster

Authors

Konrad Pixner*

*Laimburg

Contact the author

Tags

IVES Conference Series | Macrowine | Macrowine 2016

Citation

Related articles…

Colour assessment of port wines using colorimetric and spectrophotometric methods

Colour is an important quality parameter in wines and is the result of a complex mixture of pigments
(including anthocyanins and their derivatives, quinones, xanthyllium compounds, etc.). Red wine colour changes over time as pigments react between themselves and with other wine macromolecules
(particularly polyphenols). During wine tasting, colour is normally assessed on the outer rim of the wine profile in a tilted glass, since most wines are too opaque to be analysed in the middle of the glass. Therefore, depending on the depth of observation considered, the perception of wine colour can be different.

Reduction of herbaceous aromas by wine lactic acid bacteria mediated degradation of volatile aldehydes

Consumers typically prefer wines with floral and fruity aromas over those presenting green-pepper, vegetal or herbaceous notes. Pyrazines have been identified as causatives for herbaceous notes in wines, especially Bordeaux reds. However, pyrazines are not universally responsible for herbaceousness, and several other wine volatile compounds are known to produce distinct vegetal/herbaceous aromas in wines. Specifically, volatile aldehydes elicit sensations of herbaceousness or grassiness and have been described in wines well above their perception thresholds.

Attractiveness and sweetness of red wines: Synergies between American oak barrels and mannoproteins

In partnership with a Bordeaux property wanting to improve the quality of its second wine, the effects of two factors, American oak barrels and mannoproteins were studied. Their impact on the attractiveness and sweetness of wines were characterized during two successive vintages (2012 and 2013). Vinification took place with a homogeneous batch of Cabernet Sauvignon. The wine was then divided up into various groups of five barrels of French and American oak, new or reused. Analyses of volatile and non-volatile wood compounds were undertaken at four months and eight months of wood ageing, by LC-MS and GC-MS.

To a better understanding of the impact of vine nitrogen status on volatile thiols from plot to transcriptome level

Volatile thiols contribute largely to the organoleptic characteristics and typicity of Sauvignon blanc wines. Among this family of odorous compounds, 3-sulfanylhexan-1-ol (3SH) and 4-methyl-4-sulfanylpentan-2-one (4MSP) have a major impact on wine flavor. These thiols are formed during alcoholic fermentation by the yeast from odorless and non-volatile precursors found in the berry and the must. The effect of vine nitrogen status on 3SH and 4MSP in Sauvignon blanc wine and on the glutathionylated and cysteinylated precursors of 3SH (Glut-3SH and Cys-3SH) was investigated in this study.

Fining-Derived Allergens in Wine: from Detection to Quantification

Since 2012, EU Commission approved compulsory labeling of wines treated with allergenic additives or processing aids “if their presence can be detected in the final product” (EU Commission Implementing Regulation No. 579/2012 of 29 June 2012). The list of potential allergens to be indicated on wine labels comprises sulphur dioxide and milk- and egg- derived fining agents, including hen egg lysozyme, which is usually added in wines as preservative. In some non-EU countries, the list includes gluten, tree nuts and fish gelatins. With the exception of lysozyme, all these fining proteins were long thought to be totally removed by subsequent winemaking processings (e.g. bentonite addition).