Macrowine 2021
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 How pressing techniques affect must composition and wine quality of Pinot blanc

How pressing techniques affect must composition and wine quality of Pinot blanc

Abstract

This study investigates how the sensory profile of Pinot Blanc is affected from different maceration and pressing techniques. Grapes were sourced from four vineyards in the village Tramin in South Tyrol. For the experiment 200 kg of grapes from each vineyard site were hand picked the day before harvest for the commercial winery took place. Grapes were stored over night at 4°C, homogenized and processed in the experimental winery at Laimburg research centre the day after harvest. Four different pressing techniques were applied in duplicates of 100kg each. Treatments were composed as follows: (1) “classic”, pre-installed press program with 120 minutes and crumbling after each pressure step, (2) “cremant”, gentle and sequential press program with 180 minutes and fewer crumbling steps (3) “maceration” consisted of a 120 minutes cold soak followed by a very quick press program of 30 minutes and (4) “long pressing” consisted of a two hours maceration during the press program once the free run juice was drained. To track the evolution and extraction kinetics of pH, total acidity, tartaric acid, malic acid, total polyphenols and catechins, juice samples were taken after each cycle and analyzed right away in the laboratory. At approximately 150 kPa pressure the must is divided in fraction one and fraction two what corresponds to the press-wine. Two experimental wines are made out of each batch of grapes: one contains only must from the first fraction, and the other is a combination of fraction one and two in the original proportion. Sensory evaluation took place 6 and 18 months after harvest. Chemical must composition depends on the processing technique in the winery. Total acidity, pH, malic acid and polyphenol content of the must are affected from the chosen press program. Nonetheless the absolute content of the chemical components is different for the different pressing techniques; the trend of the extraction of these must components remains more or less the same during the pressing procedure. An exception was potassium, which showed a different behaviour in the “cremant” press-program. The different pressing techniques had an impact on the sensory profile of the wines. In the aroma profile, wines from the maceration treatment were marked best; whereas for the mouth-feel parameters the control wines achieved slightly better marks. Wines pressed with the “cremant” program were described as less complex, thinner and more acidity driven. Wines from treatment “long pressing” were reductive, less fruity ending up with a low overall quality. Two hours maceration followed by quick pressing showed interesting results. This might be a promising option to save press-capacity and to process more fruit in the short period of harvest. Further, for overall wine quality it was beneficial to use the entire must; wines made without the press-fraction are described as too light, not as complex and not as typical.

Publication date: May 17, 2024

Issue: Macrowine 2016

Type: Poster

Authors

Konrad Pixner*

*Laimburg

Contact the author

Tags

IVES Conference Series | Macrowine | Macrowine 2016

Citation

Related articles…

Modulating role of SO2 in white wine protein haze formation

Despite the extensive research performed during the last decades, the multifactorial mechanism responsible for the white wine protein haze formation is not fully characterized. Herein, a new model is proposed, which is based on the experimental identification of sulfur dioxide as a major modulating factor inducing wine protein haze upon heating. As opposed to other reducing agents, such as 2-mercaptoethanol, dithiothreitol and tris(2-carboxyethyl)phosphine hydrochloride (TCEP), the addition of SO2 to must/wine upon heating cleaves intraprotein disulfide bonds, hinders thiol-disulfide exchange during protein interactions and can lead to the formation of novel inter/intraprotein disulfide bonds. Those are eventually responsible for wine protein aggregation which follows a nucleation-growth kinetic model as shown by dynamic light scattering [1].

Impact of varying ethanol and carbonation levels on the odor threshold of 1,1,6-trimethyl-1,2-dihydronaphtalene (petrol off-flavor) and role of berry size and Riesling clones

1,1,6-trimethyl-1,2-dihydronaphtelene (TDN) evokes the odor of “petrol” in wine, especially in the variety Riesling. Increasing UV-radiation due to climate change intensifies formation of carotenoids in the berry skins and an increase of TDN-precursors1. Exploring new viticultural and oenological strategies to limit TDN formation in the future requires precise knowledge of TDN thresholds in different matrices. Thresholds reported in the literature vary substantially between 2 µg/L up to 20 µg/L2,3,4 due to the use of different methods. As Riesling grapes are used for very different wine styles such as dry, sweet or sparkling wines, it is essential to study the impact of varying ethanol and carbonation levels.

Use of chitosan as a secondary antioxidant in juices and wines

Chitosan is a polysaccharide produced from the deacetylation of chitin extracted from crustaceous and fungi. In winemaking chitosan is mainly used in the clarification of grape juice and wine, stabilization of white wines, removal of metals and to prevent wine spoilage by undesired microorganisms. The addition of chitosan to model wine systems was able to retard browning, reduce levels of metallic ions (Fe and Cu) and to protect varietal thiols due to its antiradical activity1. The present experiment was planned in order to evaluate the use of chitosan as a secondary antioxidant at three different stages of Sauvignon blanc fermentation and winemaking. Sauvignon blanc juices from three different locations were obtained at a commercial winery in Marlborough, New Zealand. One lots of grapes was collected from a receival bin and pressed into juice with a water-bag press, and a further juice sample was collected from a commercial pressing operation. Chitosan (1 g/L, low molecular weight, 75 – 85% deacetylated) was added to the juice after pressing, after cold settling, after fermentation, or at all these stages. Controls without any chitosan additions were also prepared.

Grape byproducts as source of resveratrol oligomers for the development of antifungal extracts

Grape canes are a non-recycled byproduct of wine industry (1-5 tons per hectare per year) containing valuable phytochemicals of medicine and agronomical interest. Resveratrol and wine polyphenols are known to exert a plethora of health-promoting effects including antioxidant capacity, cardioprotection, anticancer activity, anti-inflammatory effects, and estrogenic/antiestrogenic properties (Guerrero et al. 2009). Additionally, resveratrol is a major phytoalexin produced by plants in response to various stresses and promotes disease resistance (Chang et al. 2011). Our project aims to develop polyphenol-rich grape cane extracts to fight phytopathogenic or clinically relevant fungi. We initiate the project with the development of analytical methods to analyze resveratrol mono- and oligomers (dimers, trimers and tetramers) from grape canes and we evaluate their potential activity against clinically relevant opportunistic fungal pathogens (Houillé et al. 2014).

Grape metabolites, aroma precursors and the complexities of wine flavour

A critical aspect of wine quality from a consumer perspective is the overall impression of wine flavour, which is formed by the interplay of volatile aroma compounds, their precursors, and taste and matrix components. Grapes contribute some potent aroma compounds, together with a large pool of non-volatile precursors (e.g. glycoconjugates and amino acid conjugates). Aroma precursors can break down through chemical hydrolysis reactions, or through the action of yeast or enzymes, significantly changing the aroma profile of a wine during winemaking and storage. In addition, glycoconjugates of monoterpenes, norisoprenoids and volatile phenols, together with sulfur-conjugates in wine, provide a reservoir of additional flavour through the in-mouth release of volatiles which may be perceived retro-nasally.