Macrowine 2021
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 A combination of biotechnology tools and coopers elements for an alternative the addition of SO2 at the end of the malolactic fermentation in red wines or at the “mutage” for the “liquoreux” wines

A combination of biotechnology tools and coopers elements for an alternative the addition of SO2 at the end of the malolactic fermentation in red wines or at the “mutage” for the “liquoreux” wines

Abstract

In red wines the post-MLF SO2 addition is an essential event. It is also the case for the “mutage” during the elaboration of the “liquoreux”. At these moments SO2 plays an antimicrobial action and an antioxidant effect. But at current pH of wines, ensuring a powerful molecular SO2 has become very difficult. Recent work on Brettanomyces strains have also shown that some strains are resistant up to 1.2 mg / L of molecular SO2. It’s also the case of the some Saccharomuces or Zygosaccharomyces strains suitable to re-ferment “liquoreux” wines after the “mutage”. Biotechnological products are now available for effective antimicrobial actions. Lysozyme inhibits the lactic acid bacteria. Chitosan also acts on the lactic acid bacteria but also efficiently on Brettanomyces. Acid sorbic can be a help to control the development of the undesirable strains yeast strains. On the antioxidant effect oak wood could potentially play a protective role. The development of an electrochemical sensor was used to estimate the influence of different cooperage factors on the antioxydant capacity(CaOx)suitable to be transmit by the wood at the wine. For red wines, during two successive vintages in two different wineries, tests compared classical post-MLF SO2 additions (5 g/hL) in classic new barrels to a treatment with a mixture of lysozyme and chitosan in CaOx optimized barrels. Microbiological monitoring has been done like chemical assays and wines tasted by expert panels. Barrels were also fitted with an innovative device allowing to measure dissolved oxygen without to have to open the barrel. In two different “Sauternes” wineries, test have been done to compare a classic mutage (between 10 and 25 g/hL of SO2) in classic barrels to a half a dose of SO2 and adding a supplement chitosan and sorbic acid in in CaOx optimized barrels. The impact on the microbial flora were investigated as well as the impact on the quality of wine. The innovative device for measuring dissolved oxygen was also used. All these wines were followed until the end of the harvest of breeding, ie on breeding periods of 6-18 months to understand the stability over time of the results. The results show that the test wines are microbiologically more stable than control wines. In the most of the case, always for the wine experiments and often for the “liqoureux”, the dissolved oxygen levels are also lower. Some metabolites (volatile phenols, diacetyl, and acetaldehyde) are less concentrated and colors are more intense and more stable. At the end, the combination of biotechnology tools and CAOX appears of a very efficient has emerged as a very effective technique to reduce the amount of total SO2 in wine as currently requested by consumers and by legislators.

Publication date: May 17, 2024

Issue: Macrowine 2016

Type: Poster

Authors

Vincent Renouf*, Marie Mirabel

*Chêne & Cie

Contact the author

Tags

IVES Conference Series | Macrowine | Macrowine 2016

Citation

Related articles…

Quantification of the production of hydrogen peroxide H2O2 during wine oxidation

Chemical studies aiming at assessing how a wine reacts towards oxidation usually focus on the characterization of wine constituents, such as polyphenols, or oxidation products. As an alternative, the key oxidation intermediate hydrogen peroxide H2O2 has never been quantified, although it plays a pivotal role in wine oxidation. H2O2 is obtained from molecular oxygen as the result of a first cascade of oxidation reactions involving metal ions and polyphenols. The produced H2O2 then reacts in a second cascade of oxidation to produce reactive hydroxyl radicals that can attack almost any chemical substrate in wine.

The impact of different yeasts and harvest time on the wine quality of Beihong and Beimei (<I>V. vinifera x V. amurensis</I>)

Beihong and Beimei are two wine cultivars from ‘Muscat Hamberg’ (V. vinifera L.) and wild V. amurensis Rupr., which were released in China in 2008. Here,two enology practices were reported. Firstly, the impact of different yeasts including D254, GRE, K1, D21 and BDX on dry wine quality of Beihong and Beimei was investigated. For Beihong, among wines fermented by all yeasts, residual sugar content was the lowest, total anthocyanin and resveratrol contents were the highest in the wine by D254. However, the wine by D254 had lower titrable acid than those by the other yeasts except BDX.

Phenolic profiles of minor red grape cultivars autochthonous from the Spanish region of La Mancha

The phenolic profiles of little known red grape cultivars, namely Garnacho, Moribel and Tinto Fragoso, which are autochthonous from the Spanish region of La Mancha (ca. 600,000 ha of vineyards) have been studied over the consecutive seasons of years 2013 and 2014. The study was separately performed over the skins, the pulp and the seeds, and comprised the following phenolic types: anthocyanins, flavonols, hydroxycinnamic acid derivatives (HCADs), total proanthocyanidins (PAs) and their structural features. The selected grape cultivars belong to the Vine Germplasm Bank created in this region in order to preserve the great diversity of genotypes grown in La Mancha.

Effect of intra‐vineyard ripeness variation on the efficiency of commercial enzymes on berry cell wall deconstruction under winemaking conditions

Intra-vineyard variation grape berry ripening occurs within bunches, between bunches on the same vine and between vines. Although it is assumed that such variation also occurs at the grape berry cell wall level, no study to data has investigated in any depth. Here we have used a intra-vineyard panel design to investigate pooled bunches from six vines (per panel) in the context of a winemaking scenario. The dissected vineyard was harvested by separate panels, where each panel was then subjected to a standard winemaking procedure with or without the addition of three different enzyme preparations for maceration.

Correlations between N,S,O-heterocycle levels and age of Champagne base wines

Champagne regulation allows winegrowers to stock small amounts of still wines in order to compensate vintages’ quality shifts mainly due to climate variations. According to their technical requirements and house style some Champagne producers (commonly named “Champagne houses”) use these stored wines in the blend in order to introduce an element of complexity. These wines possess the particularity of being aged on fine lees in thermo-regulated stainless steel tanks. The Champagne house of Veuve Clicquot Ponsardin has several wines stored this way.