Macrowine 2021
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 A combination of biotechnology tools and coopers elements for an alternative the addition of SO2 at the end of the malolactic fermentation in red wines or at the “mutage” for the “liquoreux” wines

A combination of biotechnology tools and coopers elements for an alternative the addition of SO2 at the end of the malolactic fermentation in red wines or at the “mutage” for the “liquoreux” wines

Abstract

In red wines the post-MLF SO2 addition is an essential event. It is also the case for the “mutage” during the elaboration of the “liquoreux”. At these moments SO2 plays an antimicrobial action and an antioxidant effect. But at current pH of wines, ensuring a powerful molecular SO2 has become very difficult. Recent work on Brettanomyces strains have also shown that some strains are resistant up to 1.2 mg / L of molecular SO2. It’s also the case of the some Saccharomuces or Zygosaccharomyces strains suitable to re-ferment “liquoreux” wines after the “mutage”. Biotechnological products are now available for effective antimicrobial actions. Lysozyme inhibits the lactic acid bacteria. Chitosan also acts on the lactic acid bacteria but also efficiently on Brettanomyces. Acid sorbic can be a help to control the development of the undesirable strains yeast strains. On the antioxidant effect oak wood could potentially play a protective role. The development of an electrochemical sensor was used to estimate the influence of different cooperage factors on the antioxydant capacity(CaOx)suitable to be transmit by the wood at the wine. For red wines, during two successive vintages in two different wineries, tests compared classical post-MLF SO2 additions (5 g/hL) in classic new barrels to a treatment with a mixture of lysozyme and chitosan in CaOx optimized barrels. Microbiological monitoring has been done like chemical assays and wines tasted by expert panels. Barrels were also fitted with an innovative device allowing to measure dissolved oxygen without to have to open the barrel. In two different “Sauternes” wineries, test have been done to compare a classic mutage (between 10 and 25 g/hL of SO2) in classic barrels to a half a dose of SO2 and adding a supplement chitosan and sorbic acid in in CaOx optimized barrels. The impact on the microbial flora were investigated as well as the impact on the quality of wine. The innovative device for measuring dissolved oxygen was also used. All these wines were followed until the end of the harvest of breeding, ie on breeding periods of 6-18 months to understand the stability over time of the results. The results show that the test wines are microbiologically more stable than control wines. In the most of the case, always for the wine experiments and often for the “liqoureux”, the dissolved oxygen levels are also lower. Some metabolites (volatile phenols, diacetyl, and acetaldehyde) are less concentrated and colors are more intense and more stable. At the end, the combination of biotechnology tools and CAOX appears of a very efficient has emerged as a very effective technique to reduce the amount of total SO2 in wine as currently requested by consumers and by legislators.

Publication date: May 17, 2024

Issue: Macrowine 2016

Type: Poster

Authors

Vincent Renouf*, Marie Mirabel

*Chêne & Cie

Contact the author

Tags

IVES Conference Series | Macrowine | Macrowine 2016

Citation

Related articles…

An excessive leaf-fruit ratio reduces the yeast assimilable nitrogen in the must

Yeast assimilable nitrogen (YAN) in the grape must is a key variable for wine quality as a source of aroma precursors. In a situation of YAN deficiency, a foliar urea application upon the vine at veraison enhances YAN concentration and facilitates must fermentation. In 2013, Agroscope investigated the impact of leaf-fruit ratio on the nitrogen (N) assimilation and partitioning in grapevine Vitis vinifera cv. Chasselas following foliar-urea application with the aim of improving its efficiency on the YAN concentration.

Monitoring of Pesticide Residues from Vine to Wine

Those previous years, pesticides are often brought to the forefront by media. Questions arose about their toxicity for growers and consumers. Even if a downward trend is underway, the use of pesticides is required to ensure steady quality and quantity of harvests. A large number of active ingredients are authorized but regarding viticulture, mainly insecticides and fungicides are applied, to control pests and diseases and to increase crop yield. Some phytosanitary products, principally fungicides, applied close to the harvest date may frequently be detected in wines.

Microbial stabilization of wines using innovative coiled UV-C reactor process: impact on chemical and organoleptic proprieties

For several years, numerous studies aimed at limiting the use of SO2 in wines (thermal treatments, pulsed electric fields, microwaves …). Processes must be able to preserve the organoleptic qualities of wines with low energy consumption. In this context, ultraviolet radiations (UV-C), at 254 nm, are well known for their germicidal proprieties. In order to inactivate microorganisms in grape juice and wine without affecting the quality of the product, efficiency of UV-C treatment process should be optimized.

Bentonite fining in cold wines: prediction tests, reduced efficiency and possibilities to avoid additional fining treatments

Bentonite fining is widely used to prevent protein haze in white wines. Most wineries use laboratory-scale fining trials to define the appropriate amount of bentonite to be used in the cellar. Those pre-tests need to mimic as much as possible the industrial scale fining procedure to determine the exact amount of bentonite necessary for protein stability. Nevertheless it is frequent that, after fining with the recommended amount of bentonite, wines appear still unstable and need an additional fining treatment. It remains a major challenge to understand why the same wine, fined with the same dosage of the same bentonite, achieves stability in the lab, but not in the cellar.

Influence of SO2 and Zinc on the formation of volatile aldehydes during alcoholic fermentation

Laboratório de Análisis del Aroma y Enologia (LAAE). Department of Analytical Chemistry, Faculty of Sciences, Universidad de Zaragoza, 50009, Zaragoza, Spain, During alcoholic fermentation, fusel (or Strecker) aldehydes are intermediates in the amino acid catabolism to form fusel alcohols following the Ehrlich Pathway (1). One of the main enzymes involved in this pathway is Alcohol Dehydrogenase (ADH), whose activity is highly strain dependent and determines the rate of conversion of aldehydes into fusel alcohols (2). This enzyme has a Zn2+ catalytic binding site, which suggests that the must Zn2+ levels will most likely influence the rate of reduction of aldehydes into alcohols. On the other hand, SO2 is commonly used in winemaking for its antiseptic and antioxidant properties.