Macrowine 2021
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 Influence of SO2 and Zinc on the formation of volatile aldehydes during alcoholic fermentation

Influence of SO2 and Zinc on the formation of volatile aldehydes during alcoholic fermentation

Abstract

Laboratório de Análisis del Aroma y Enologia (LAAE). Department of Analytical Chemistry, Faculty of Sciences, Universidad de Zaragoza, 50009, Zaragoza, Spain, During alcoholic fermentation, fusel (or Strecker) aldehydes are intermediates in the amino acid catabolism to form fusel alcohols following the Ehrlich Pathway (1). One of the main enzymes involved in this pathway is Alcohol Dehydrogenase (ADH), whose activity is highly strain dependent and determines the rate of conversion of aldehydes into fusel alcohols (2). This enzyme has a Zn2+ catalytic binding site, which suggests that the must Zn2+ levels will most likely influence the rate of reduction of aldehydes into alcohols. On the other hand, SO2 is commonly used in winemaking for its antiseptic and antioxidant properties. This molecule is highly reactive and can form strong associations (alkylhydroxy sulfonates) with aldehydes. Levels of SO2 present in the alcoholic fermentation could then, at least theoretically, prevent the reduction of aldehydes to alcohols. Aldehydes could accumulate under the form of non-volatile adducts which could be released back once SO2 levels drop with aging or oxidation contributing to the development of oxidation off-odors (3). A set-up of fermentations of synthetic must containing known content of amino acids and nitrogen sources as well as elements necessary to the yeast metabolism were prepared. Different levels of Zinc or SO2 were tested. Three different commercial Saccharomyces cereviase yeast strains were selected for fermentation. Fusel alcohols and Strecker aldehydes were determined in the finished wines by GC-FID and GC-MS, respectively. Results confirm that all the factors are significant and that must Zn and SO2 levels influence the presence of Strecker aldehydes in the final wine.

1. Hazelwood, L. A.; Daran, J. M.; van Maris, A. J.; Pronk, J. T.; Dickinson, J. R., The Ehrlich pathway for fusel alcohol production: a century of research on Saccharomyces cerevisiae metabolism. Appl Environ Microbiol 2008, 74, 2259-66. 2. Singh, R.; Kunkee, R. E., Alcohol Dehydrogenase Activities of Wine Yeasts in Relation to Higher Alcohol Formation. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 1976, 32, 666 – 670. 3. Bueno, M.; Franco-Luesma, E.; Carrascon, V.; Ferreira, V., Evaluation of key and bound aroma carbonyls in wine for a better understanding of their release or formation through oxidation. Flavour Science. Proceedings of the XIV Weurman Flavour Research Symposium 2015, 397-402.

Publication date: May 17, 2024

Issue: Macrowine 2016

Type: Poster

Authors

Inês Oliveira*, Mónica Bueno, Purificación Hernández-Orte, Vicente Ferreira

*University of Zaragoza

Contact the author

Tags

IVES Conference Series | Macrowine | Macrowine 2016

Citation

Related articles…

Quantification of the production of hydrogen peroxide H2O2 during wine oxidation

Chemical studies aiming at assessing how a wine reacts towards oxidation usually focus on the characterization of wine constituents, such as polyphenols, or oxidation products. As an alternative, the key oxidation intermediate hydrogen peroxide H2O2 has never been quantified, although it plays a pivotal role in wine oxidation. H2O2 is obtained from molecular oxygen as the result of a first cascade of oxidation reactions involving metal ions and polyphenols. The produced H2O2 then reacts in a second cascade of oxidation to produce reactive hydroxyl radicals that can attack almost any chemical substrate in wine.

Monitoring of Pesticide Residues from Vine to Wine

Those previous years, pesticides are often brought to the forefront by media. Questions arose about their toxicity for growers and consumers. Even if a downward trend is underway, the use of pesticides is required to ensure steady quality and quantity of harvests. A large number of active ingredients are authorized but regarding viticulture, mainly insecticides and fungicides are applied, to control pests and diseases and to increase crop yield. Some phytosanitary products, principally fungicides, applied close to the harvest date may frequently be detected in wines.

Novel analytical technologies for wine fingerprinting in and beyond the laboratory

For characterization, sensory designing and authentication rapid analytical technologies have become available. Some, like Proton Transfer Reaction Mass Spectrometry allow a rapid spectrum of the volatile compounds of wines. Combined with chemometrics wines can be characterized. The same approach can be used to calculate the results of virtual mixtures and allow formulation of constant quality blends. Other new techniques and portable devices based on spectroscopy allow measurements on production sites and in grocery stores, even for the smart consumer. We will present some examples of the application of these techniques for authentication of wines, both in the laboratory and on site.

Characterization of various groups of pyranoanthocyanins in Merlot red wine

In red wines, anthocyanins evolve during the wine-making process and ageing. They react with other compounds (such as vinylphenols, acetaldehyde, pyruvic acid…) to form a stable family of compounds called pyranoanthocyanins. Furthermore, the oxidation process can modify the anthocyanic profile of a red wine. It is also interesting to evaluate the occurrence of the different subclasses of pyranoanthocyanins and to characterize their chemical properties. The first objective of this study is to evaluate the occurrence of the different groups of pyranoanthocyanins in an oxidised Merlot wine by a centrifugal partition chromatography strategy. The second goal is to evaluate their relative impact in red wines from Bordeaux region by measuring their concentrations.

Fining-Derived Allergens in Wine: from Detection to Quantification

Since 2012, EU Commission approved compulsory labeling of wines treated with allergenic additives or processing aids “if their presence can be detected in the final product” (EU Commission Implementing Regulation No. 579/2012 of 29 June 2012). The list of potential allergens to be indicated on wine labels comprises sulphur dioxide and milk- and egg- derived fining agents, including hen egg lysozyme, which is usually added in wines as preservative. In some non-EU countries, the list includes gluten, tree nuts and fish gelatins. With the exception of lysozyme, all these fining proteins were long thought to be totally removed by subsequent winemaking processings (e.g. bentonite addition).