Macrowine 2021
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 Influence of SO2 and Zinc on the formation of volatile aldehydes during alcoholic fermentation

Influence of SO2 and Zinc on the formation of volatile aldehydes during alcoholic fermentation

Abstract

Laboratório de Análisis del Aroma y Enologia (LAAE). Department of Analytical Chemistry, Faculty of Sciences, Universidad de Zaragoza, 50009, Zaragoza, Spain, During alcoholic fermentation, fusel (or Strecker) aldehydes are intermediates in the amino acid catabolism to form fusel alcohols following the Ehrlich Pathway (1). One of the main enzymes involved in this pathway is Alcohol Dehydrogenase (ADH), whose activity is highly strain dependent and determines the rate of conversion of aldehydes into fusel alcohols (2). This enzyme has a Zn2+ catalytic binding site, which suggests that the must Zn2+ levels will most likely influence the rate of reduction of aldehydes into alcohols. On the other hand, SO2 is commonly used in winemaking for its antiseptic and antioxidant properties. This molecule is highly reactive and can form strong associations (alkylhydroxy sulfonates) with aldehydes. Levels of SO2 present in the alcoholic fermentation could then, at least theoretically, prevent the reduction of aldehydes to alcohols. Aldehydes could accumulate under the form of non-volatile adducts which could be released back once SO2 levels drop with aging or oxidation contributing to the development of oxidation off-odors (3). A set-up of fermentations of synthetic must containing known content of amino acids and nitrogen sources as well as elements necessary to the yeast metabolism were prepared. Different levels of Zinc or SO2 were tested. Three different commercial Saccharomyces cereviase yeast strains were selected for fermentation. Fusel alcohols and Strecker aldehydes were determined in the finished wines by GC-FID and GC-MS, respectively. Results confirm that all the factors are significant and that must Zn and SO2 levels influence the presence of Strecker aldehydes in the final wine.

1. Hazelwood, L. A.; Daran, J. M.; van Maris, A. J.; Pronk, J. T.; Dickinson, J. R., The Ehrlich pathway for fusel alcohol production: a century of research on Saccharomyces cerevisiae metabolism. Appl Environ Microbiol 2008, 74, 2259-66. 2. Singh, R.; Kunkee, R. E., Alcohol Dehydrogenase Activities of Wine Yeasts in Relation to Higher Alcohol Formation. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 1976, 32, 666 – 670. 3. Bueno, M.; Franco-Luesma, E.; Carrascon, V.; Ferreira, V., Evaluation of key and bound aroma carbonyls in wine for a better understanding of their release or formation through oxidation. Flavour Science. Proceedings of the XIV Weurman Flavour Research Symposium 2015, 397-402.

Publication date: May 17, 2024

Issue: Macrowine 2016

Type: Poster

Authors

Inês Oliveira*, Mónica Bueno, Purificación Hernández-Orte, Vicente Ferreira

*University of Zaragoza

Contact the author

Tags

IVES Conference Series | Macrowine | Macrowine 2016

Citation

Related articles…

The impact of branched chain and aromatic amino acids on fermentation kinetics and aroma biosynthesis by wine yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae

One of the major determinants of wine quality is the aroma. Wine aroma is the human perception of the matrix of grape and yeast derived volatiles and their interaction that contribute to flavour wine. Most common are higher alcohols, ester and aldehydes. In previous studies the formation of characteristic volatile compounds have been linked to the metabolism of branched-chain and aromatic amino acids
(BCAAs) in synthetic grape must. Here we report on an investigation to assess the impact of the initial amino acid concentration on the production of aroma compounds by the industrial yeast VIN13 grown in both synthetic and real grape musts.

Metabolomics comparison of non-Saccharomyces yeasts in Sauvignon blanc and Shiraz

Saccharomyces cerevisiae (SC) is the main driver of alcoholic fermentation however, in wine, non-Saccharomyces species can have a powerful effect on aroma and flavor formation. This study aimed to compare untargeted volatile compound profiles from SPME-GC×GC-TOF-MS of Sauvignon blanc and Shiraz wine inoculated with six different non-Saccharomyces yeasts followed by SC. Torulaspora delbrueckii (TD), Lachancea thermotolerans (LT), Pichia kluyveri (PK) and Metschnikowia pulcherrima (MP) were commercial starter strains, while Candida zemplinina (CZ) and Kazachstania aerobia (KA), were isolated from wine grape environments. Each fermentation produced a distinct chemical profile that was unique for both grape musts. The SC-monoculture and CZ-SC sequential fermentations were the most distinctly different in the Sauvignon blanc while the LT-SC sequential fermentations were the most different from the control in the Shiraz fermentations.

Dissecting the polysaccharide‐rich grape cell wall matrix during the red winemaking process, using high‐throughput and fractionation methods

Limited information is available on grape wall-derived polymeric structure/composition and how this changes during fermentation. Commercial winemaking operations use enzymes that target the polysaccharide-rich polymers of the cell walls of grape tissues to clarify musts and extract pigments during the fermentations. In this study we have assessed changes in polysaccharide composition/ turnover throughout the winemaking process by applying recently developed cell wall profiling approaches to both wine and pomace polysaccharides. The methods included gas chromatography for monosaccharide composition (GC-MS), infra-red (IR) spectroscopy and comprehensive microarray polymer profiling
(CoMPP) using cell wall probes.

Glutathione content evolution during spontaneous alcoholic fermentations of Sangiovese grapes

Glutathione is a tripeptide (γ-Glu-Cys-Gly), which can occur in grapes, in must and in wine prevalently in the reduced form as well as in the oxidized form as glutathione disulfide. The importance of the reduced form of glutathione lies in its antioxidant activity. In must, it limits browning by reducing o-quinones produced by polyphenol oxidase activity on hydroxycinnamic acids; in wine, it exerts a protective effect on various aromatic compounds. Glutathione concentration in wine is lower than in grape juice and variable as it depends on several factors, ranging from the native content of grapes to winemaking technique.

Quantification of red wine phenolics using ultraviolet-visible, near and mid-infrared spectroscopy combined with chemometrics

The use of multivariate statistics to correlate chemical data to spectral information seems as a valid alternative for the quantification of red wine phenolics. The advantages of these techniques include simplicity and cost effectiveness together with the limited time of analysis required. Although many
publications on this subject are nowadays available in the literature most of them only reported feasibility
studies. In this study 400 samples from thirteen fermentations including five different cultivars plus 150
wine samples from a varying number of vintages were submitted to spectrophotometric and chromatographic phenolic analysis.