Macrowine 2021
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 Impact of smoke exposure on the chemical composition of grapes

Impact of smoke exposure on the chemical composition of grapes

Abstract

Vineyard exposure to smoke can lead to grapes and wine which exhibit objectionable smoky and ashy aromas and flavours, more commonly known as ‘smoke taint’ [1, 2]. In the last decade, significant bushfires have occurred around the world, including near wine regions in Australia, Canada, South Africa and the USA, as a consequence of the warmer, drier conditions associated with climate change. Considerable research has subsequently been undertaken to determine the chemical, sensory and physiological consequences of grapevine exposure to smoke. The sensory attributes associated with smoke-tainted wine have been linked to the presence of several smoke-derived volatile phenols, such as guaiacols, syringols and cresols [2]. These volatile phenols have been shown to accumulate in grapes in glycoconjugate forms, following grapevine exposure to smoke [3, 4]. However, their mode of entry, and therefore the factors influencing their uptake from smoke by grapevine leaves and fruit, have not as yet, been adequately investigated. This study aimed to investigate the extent to which berry physiology, in particular, the development of the berry cuticle and epicuticular wax, influences the uptake of volatile compounds from smoke. Potted Chardonnay and Shiraz grapevines were exposed to smoke for 60 minutes, at approximately one week prior to maturity. Fruit samples were collected immediately after smoke treatment, and again at maturity (i.e. one week later), for imaging (using an environmental scanning electron microscope) to identify any differences in the physiology of control and smoke-affected berries. Fruit sampled at maturity was also analysed by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry and ultrahigh performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry to determine concentrations of volatile phenols and their glycoconjugates, respectively. The potential for a commercial particle film, i.e. kaolin, to act as a protective barrier against smoke, was also investigated, by comparing the volatile phenol and glycoconjugate concentrations of fruit harvested from grapevines treated with kaolin and/or smoke.

Literature: 1. Kennison, K.R., et al., Smoke-derived taint in wine: The release of smoke-derived volatile phenols during fermentation of Merlot juice following grapevine exposure to smoke. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 2008, 56(16): 7379-7383. 2. Parker, M., et al., Contribution of several volatile phenols and their glycoconjugates to smoke-related sensory properties of red wine. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 2012, 60(10): 2629-2637. 3. Hayasaka, Y., et al., Identification of a beta-D-glucopyranoside precursor to guaiacol in grape juice following grapevine exposure to smoke. Analytica Chimica Acta, 2010, 660(1-2): 143-148. 4. Ristic, R., et al., The effect of winemaking techniques on the intensity of smoke taint in wine. Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research, 2011, 17(2): S29-S40.

Publication date: May 17, 2024

Issue: Macrowine 2016

Type: Article

Authors

Lieke Van der Hulst*, Christopher Ford, Kerry Wilkinson, Natoiya Lloyd, Rachel Burton

*University of Adelaide

Contact the author

Tags

IVES Conference Series | Macrowine | Macrowine 2016

Citation

Related articles…

How do different oak treatment affect the sensory composition of Chenin blanc wines over time?

Wooden barrels have been the preferred method for oak maturation for wines, but the use of alternative oak products, such as staves and oak chips have increased in South Africa due to lower production costs. This study investigated the effect of different oak products used during fermentation and ageing on the sensory profile, degree of liking and perceived quality of a South African Chenin blanc wine. The different wine treatments included an unoaked tank control wine, wines matured in 5th fill barrels, wines matured in new barrels from three different cooperages, and wines matured in 5th fill barrels with stave inserts from two different cooperages.

Fining-Derived Allergens in Wine: from Detection to Quantification

Since 2012, EU Commission approved compulsory labeling of wines treated with allergenic additives or processing aids “if their presence can be detected in the final product” (EU Commission Implementing Regulation No. 579/2012 of 29 June 2012). The list of potential allergens to be indicated on wine labels comprises sulphur dioxide and milk- and egg- derived fining agents, including hen egg lysozyme, which is usually added in wines as preservative. In some non-EU countries, the list includes gluten, tree nuts and fish gelatins. With the exception of lysozyme, all these fining proteins were long thought to be totally removed by subsequent winemaking processings (e.g. bentonite addition).

Molecular cloning and characterization of UDP-glucose: furaneol glucosyltransferase gene from Japanese

2,5-Dimethyl-4-hydroxy-3(2H)-furanone (furaneol) is an important aroma compound in fruits, such as pineapple and strawberry, and is reported to contribute to the strawberry-like note in some wines. Several grapevine species are used in winemaking, and furaneol is one of the characteristic aroma compounds in wines made from American grape (Vitis labrusca) and its hybrid grape, similar to methyl anthranilate. Muscat Bailey A is a hybrid grape variety [V. labrusca (Bailey) x V. vinifera (Muscat Hamburg)], and its wine is one of the most popular in Japan. The inclusion of Muscat Bailey A in the ‘International List of Vine and Varieties and their Synonyms’ managed by the ‘International Organisation of Vine and Wine (OIV)’ in 2013 has further fueled its popularity among winemakers and researchers worldwide.

Identification of caffeic acid as a major component of Moscatel wine protein sediment

Proteins play a significant role in the colloidal stability and clarity of white wines [1]. However, under conditions of high temperatures during storage or transportation, the proteins themselves can self-aggregate into light-dispersing particles causing the so-called protein haze [2]. Formation of these unattractive precipitates in bottled wine is a common defect of commercial wines, making them unacceptable for sale [3]. Previous studies identified the presence of phenolic compounds in the natural precipitate of white wine [4], contributing to the hypothesis that these compounds could be involved in the mechanism of protein haze formation.

Quantification of the production of hydrogen peroxide H2O2 during wine oxidation

Chemical studies aiming at assessing how a wine reacts towards oxidation usually focus on the characterization of wine constituents, such as polyphenols, or oxidation products. As an alternative, the key oxidation intermediate hydrogen peroxide H2O2 has never been quantified, although it plays a pivotal role in wine oxidation. H2O2 is obtained from molecular oxygen as the result of a first cascade of oxidation reactions involving metal ions and polyphenols. The produced H2O2 then reacts in a second cascade of oxidation to produce reactive hydroxyl radicals that can attack almost any chemical substrate in wine.