Macrowine 2021
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 Impact of smoke exposure on the chemical composition of grapes

Impact of smoke exposure on the chemical composition of grapes

Abstract

Vineyard exposure to smoke can lead to grapes and wine which exhibit objectionable smoky and ashy aromas and flavours, more commonly known as ‘smoke taint’ [1, 2]. In the last decade, significant bushfires have occurred around the world, including near wine regions in Australia, Canada, South Africa and the USA, as a consequence of the warmer, drier conditions associated with climate change. Considerable research has subsequently been undertaken to determine the chemical, sensory and physiological consequences of grapevine exposure to smoke. The sensory attributes associated with smoke-tainted wine have been linked to the presence of several smoke-derived volatile phenols, such as guaiacols, syringols and cresols [2]. These volatile phenols have been shown to accumulate in grapes in glycoconjugate forms, following grapevine exposure to smoke [3, 4]. However, their mode of entry, and therefore the factors influencing their uptake from smoke by grapevine leaves and fruit, have not as yet, been adequately investigated. This study aimed to investigate the extent to which berry physiology, in particular, the development of the berry cuticle and epicuticular wax, influences the uptake of volatile compounds from smoke. Potted Chardonnay and Shiraz grapevines were exposed to smoke for 60 minutes, at approximately one week prior to maturity. Fruit samples were collected immediately after smoke treatment, and again at maturity (i.e. one week later), for imaging (using an environmental scanning electron microscope) to identify any differences in the physiology of control and smoke-affected berries. Fruit sampled at maturity was also analysed by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry and ultrahigh performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry to determine concentrations of volatile phenols and their glycoconjugates, respectively. The potential for a commercial particle film, i.e. kaolin, to act as a protective barrier against smoke, was also investigated, by comparing the volatile phenol and glycoconjugate concentrations of fruit harvested from grapevines treated with kaolin and/or smoke.

Literature: 1. Kennison, K.R., et al., Smoke-derived taint in wine: The release of smoke-derived volatile phenols during fermentation of Merlot juice following grapevine exposure to smoke. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 2008, 56(16): 7379-7383. 2. Parker, M., et al., Contribution of several volatile phenols and their glycoconjugates to smoke-related sensory properties of red wine. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 2012, 60(10): 2629-2637. 3. Hayasaka, Y., et al., Identification of a beta-D-glucopyranoside precursor to guaiacol in grape juice following grapevine exposure to smoke. Analytica Chimica Acta, 2010, 660(1-2): 143-148. 4. Ristic, R., et al., The effect of winemaking techniques on the intensity of smoke taint in wine. Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research, 2011, 17(2): S29-S40.

Publication date: May 17, 2024

Issue: Macrowine 2016

Type: Article

Authors

Lieke Van der Hulst*, Christopher Ford, Kerry Wilkinson, Natoiya Lloyd, Rachel Burton

*University of Adelaide

Contact the author

Tags

IVES Conference Series | Macrowine | Macrowine 2016

Citation

Related articles…

Comparison of aroma-related compounds of carbonic maceration and traditional young red winemaking in case of Merlot by means of targeted metabolomic approach

Winemaking decisions and techniques are known to affect the final aromatic composition of red wines. Winemakers put a constant effort into the improved controlling of vinification procedures to achieve better quality. Anyway an increased customer’s demand for uniqueness is often forcing them to adjust and offer new and new interesting products. To support the producers, an improved knowledge on aromatic potential as affected by classical and alternative strategies is needed.

WineMetrics: A new approach to unveil the “wine-like aroma” chemical feature

“The Human being has an excellent ability to detect and discriminate odors but typically has great difficulty in identifying specific odorants”(1). Furthermore, “from a cognitive point of view the mechanism used to judge wines is closer to pattern recognition than descriptive analysis.” Therefore, when one wants to reveal the volatile “wine-like feature” pattern recognition techniques are required. Sensomics is one of the most recent “omics”, i.e. a holistic perspective of a complex system, which deals with the description of substances originated from microorganism metabolism that are “active” to human senses (2). Depicting the relevant volatile fraction in wines has been an ongoing task in recent decades to which several research groups have allocated important resources. The most common strategy has been the “target approach” in order to identify the “key odorants” for a given wine varietal.

Dissecting the polysaccharide‐rich grape cell wall matrix during the red winemaking process, using high‐throughput and fractionation methods

Limited information is available on grape wall-derived polymeric structure/composition and how this changes during fermentation. Commercial winemaking operations use enzymes that target the polysaccharide-rich polymers of the cell walls of grape tissues to clarify musts and extract pigments during the fermentations. In this study we have assessed changes in polysaccharide composition/ turnover throughout the winemaking process by applying recently developed cell wall profiling approaches to both wine and pomace polysaccharides. The methods included gas chromatography for monosaccharide composition (GC-MS), infra-red (IR) spectroscopy and comprehensive microarray polymer profiling
(CoMPP) using cell wall probes.

A combination of biotechnology tools and coopers elements for an alternative the addition of SO2 at the end of the malolactic fermentation in red wines or at the “mutage” for the “liquoreux” wines

In red wines the post-MLF SO2 addition is an essential event. It is also the case for the “mutage” during the elaboration of the “liquoreux”. At these moments SO2 plays an antimicrobial action and an antioxidant effect. But at current pH of wines, ensuring a powerful molecular SO2 has become very difficult. Recent work on Brettanomyces strains have also shown that some strains are resistant up to 1.2 mg / L of molecular SO2. It’s also the case of the some Saccharomuces or Zygosaccharomyces strains suitable to re-ferment “liquoreux” wines after the “mutage”.

Grape metabolites, aroma precursors and the complexities of wine flavour

A critical aspect of wine quality from a consumer perspective is the overall impression of wine flavour, which is formed by the interplay of volatile aroma compounds, their precursors, and taste and matrix components. Grapes contribute some potent aroma compounds, together with a large pool of non-volatile precursors (e.g. glycoconjugates and amino acid conjugates). Aroma precursors can break down through chemical hydrolysis reactions, or through the action of yeast or enzymes, significantly changing the aroma profile of a wine during winemaking and storage. In addition, glycoconjugates of monoterpenes, norisoprenoids and volatile phenols, together with sulfur-conjugates in wine, provide a reservoir of additional flavour through the in-mouth release of volatiles which may be perceived retro-nasally.