Macrowine 2021
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 Impact of smoke exposure on the chemical composition of grapes

Impact of smoke exposure on the chemical composition of grapes

Abstract

Vineyard exposure to smoke can lead to grapes and wine which exhibit objectionable smoky and ashy aromas and flavours, more commonly known as ‘smoke taint’ [1, 2]. In the last decade, significant bushfires have occurred around the world, including near wine regions in Australia, Canada, South Africa and the USA, as a consequence of the warmer, drier conditions associated with climate change. Considerable research has subsequently been undertaken to determine the chemical, sensory and physiological consequences of grapevine exposure to smoke. The sensory attributes associated with smoke-tainted wine have been linked to the presence of several smoke-derived volatile phenols, such as guaiacols, syringols and cresols [2]. These volatile phenols have been shown to accumulate in grapes in glycoconjugate forms, following grapevine exposure to smoke [3, 4]. However, their mode of entry, and therefore the factors influencing their uptake from smoke by grapevine leaves and fruit, have not as yet, been adequately investigated. This study aimed to investigate the extent to which berry physiology, in particular, the development of the berry cuticle and epicuticular wax, influences the uptake of volatile compounds from smoke. Potted Chardonnay and Shiraz grapevines were exposed to smoke for 60 minutes, at approximately one week prior to maturity. Fruit samples were collected immediately after smoke treatment, and again at maturity (i.e. one week later), for imaging (using an environmental scanning electron microscope) to identify any differences in the physiology of control and smoke-affected berries. Fruit sampled at maturity was also analysed by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry and ultrahigh performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry to determine concentrations of volatile phenols and their glycoconjugates, respectively. The potential for a commercial particle film, i.e. kaolin, to act as a protective barrier against smoke, was also investigated, by comparing the volatile phenol and glycoconjugate concentrations of fruit harvested from grapevines treated with kaolin and/or smoke.

Literature: 1. Kennison, K.R., et al., Smoke-derived taint in wine: The release of smoke-derived volatile phenols during fermentation of Merlot juice following grapevine exposure to smoke. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 2008, 56(16): 7379-7383. 2. Parker, M., et al., Contribution of several volatile phenols and their glycoconjugates to smoke-related sensory properties of red wine. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 2012, 60(10): 2629-2637. 3. Hayasaka, Y., et al., Identification of a beta-D-glucopyranoside precursor to guaiacol in grape juice following grapevine exposure to smoke. Analytica Chimica Acta, 2010, 660(1-2): 143-148. 4. Ristic, R., et al., The effect of winemaking techniques on the intensity of smoke taint in wine. Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research, 2011, 17(2): S29-S40.

Publication date: May 17, 2024

Issue: Macrowine 2016

Type: Article

Authors

Lieke Van der Hulst*, Christopher Ford, Kerry Wilkinson, Natoiya Lloyd, Rachel Burton

*University of Adelaide

Contact the author

Tags

IVES Conference Series | Macrowine | Macrowine 2016

Citation

Related articles…

The commercial yeast strain as a significant source of variance for tyrosol and hydroxytyrosol in white wine

Tyrosol (TYR) and hydroxytyrosol (HYT) are bioactive phenols present in olive oil and wine, basic elements of the Mediterranean diet. TYR is reported in the literature for its interesting antioxidant, cardioprotective and anti-inflammatory properties. In wine, its concentration can reach values as high as about 40 mg/L
[Pour Nikfardjam et al. 2007] but, more frequently, this phenol – derived from yeast metabolism of tyrosine during fermentation – is present at lower levels, generally higher in red wines compared to whites. HYT was measured for the first time by Di Tommaso et al. [1998] in Italian wines – with maximum values of 4.20 mg/L and 1.92 mg/L for red and white wines, respectively – while definitely lower concentrations have been found later in Greek samples.

Grape metabolites, aroma precursors and the complexities of wine flavour

A critical aspect of wine quality from a consumer perspective is the overall impression of wine flavour, which is formed by the interplay of volatile aroma compounds, their precursors, and taste and matrix components. Grapes contribute some potent aroma compounds, together with a large pool of non-volatile precursors (e.g. glycoconjugates and amino acid conjugates). Aroma precursors can break down through chemical hydrolysis reactions, or through the action of yeast or enzymes, significantly changing the aroma profile of a wine during winemaking and storage. In addition, glycoconjugates of monoterpenes, norisoprenoids and volatile phenols, together with sulfur-conjugates in wine, provide a reservoir of additional flavour through the in-mouth release of volatiles which may be perceived retro-nasally.

Novel contribution to the study of mouth-feel properties in wines

In general, there is a well-established lexicon related to wine aroma and taste properties; however mouth-feel-related vocabulary usually includes heterogeneous, multimodal and personalized terms. Gawel et al.
(2000) published a wheel related to mouthfeel properties of red wine. However, its use in scientific publications has been limited. The authors accepted that the approach had certain limitations as it included redundant and terms with hedonic tone and some others were absent. It is of high interest to generate a mouth-feel lexicon and finding the chemical compound or group of compounds responsible for such properties in red wine. In the present work a chemical fractionation method has been developed.

Using elicitors in different grape varieties. Effect over their phenolic composition

Phenolic compounds are very important in crop plants and have been the subject of a large number of studies. Three main reasons can be cited for optimizing the level of phenolic compounds in crop plants: their physiological role in plants, their technological significance for food processing, and their nutritional characteristics1 Indeed, an enormous diversity of phenolic antioxidants is found in fruits and vegetables, and their presence and roles can be affected or modified by several pre- and postharvest cultural practices and/or food processing technologies (Ruiz-García et al. 2012, Goldman et al. 1999, Tudela et al. 2002). In winegrapes, the technological importance of phenolic compounds, mainly flavonoids, is well-known.

Ethyl esters interact with the major wine Thaumatin Like Protein VVTL1

The interactions among aromatic compounds and proteins is an important issue for the quality of foods and beverages. In wine, the loss of flavor after vinification is associated to bentonite treatment and this effect can be the result of the removal of aroma compounds which are bound wine proteins. This phenomenon was recently demonstrated for long chain fatty acids and their ethyl esters (1). Since these latter compounds are spectroscopically silent, their association with proteins is not easy to measure.