Macrowine 2021
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 Directed Evolution of Oenococcus oeni: optimising yeast-bacteria interactions for improved malolactic fermentation

Directed Evolution of Oenococcus oeni: optimising yeast-bacteria interactions for improved malolactic fermentation

Abstract

Malolactic fermentation (MLF) is a secondary step in the vinification process and it follows alcoholic fermentation (AF) which is predominantly carried out by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. These two processes result in the degradation of metabolites to produce secondary metabolites which also contribute to the final wine flavour and quality. AF results in the production of ethanol and carbon dioxide from sugars and MLF stems from the degradation of L-malic acid (a dicarboxylic acid) to L-lactic acid (a monocarboxylic acid). The latter process results in a smoother texture as the acidity of the wine is reduced by the process, it also adds to the flavour complexity of the wine. The species responsible for this fermentation step belong to the Pediococci, Lactobacilli and Oenococci genera. Only Oenococcus oeni and Lactobacillus plantarum have been commercialised. The former is the dominant species that is often found in both spontaneous and inoculated fermentations. In spite of inoculation MLF is quite unstable and a successful fermentation is not always guaranteed. Sluggish or stuck fermentations may occur due to many physico-chemical factors. Also, the interactions between the yeast and bacteria during the vinification process play an important role in the success of MLF. Therefore, appropriate selection of strains is important, unfortunately selecting strains is time consuming and limited only to specific winemaking conditions. To overcome this, research has investigated strain improvement, however recombinant technology is controversial. The use of non-recombinant techniques such as mutagenesis, hybridisation and Directed Evolution has become popular. The aim of this study is to optimise yeast-bacteria interactions by use of Directed Evolution as a tool to improve lactic acid bacteria, in this way, try and guarantee the success of MLF. Two S. cerevisiae strains (Cross Evolution® and EC1118®) were used as selective pressures for O oeni S5 populations. The bacterial populations were exposed to synthetic wine fermentations for 30 and 50 generations after which 30 bacterial isolates were evolved using both yeast and were characterised for fermentation efficacy. The results show that the general performance of the isolates was improved in comparison to the parental strain. Only 3 isolates after 30 generations showed a specific improvement when inoculated with ‘driver’ yeast than with other yeast strains. After 50 generations all the strains showed improvement in terms of fermentation rates, but not all strains had a higher fermentation efficacy in comparison to the parent strain. This study shows the potential of Directed Evolution as a tool for strain improvement using a biotic selective pressure as opposed to physico-chemical selective pressures. It also, shows the possibility of improving yeast-bacteria interactions by having a tailor-made pair for successful AF and MLF.

Publication date: May 17, 2024

Issue: Macrowine 2016

Type: Poster

Authors

Seipati Tenyane*, Debra Rossouw, Florian Bauer

*Stellenbosch Universiy

Contact the author

Tags

IVES Conference Series | Macrowine | Macrowine 2016

Citation

Related articles…

Anthropogenic factors in modulations of fungal populations from grapes to wines and their repercussions on wine characteristics

The effects of anthropogenic activities on vineyard (different plant protections) and in winery
(pressing/clarification step, addition of sulfur dioxide) on fungal populations from grape to wine were studied. The studied anthropogenic activities modify the fungal diversity. Thus, lower biodiversity of grapes from organic modality was measured for the three vintages considered compared to biodiversity from ecophyto modality and conventional modality. The pressing / clarification steps strongly modify fungal populations and the influence of the winery flora is highlighted.

Novel contribution to the study of mouth-feel properties in wines

In general, there is a well-established lexicon related to wine aroma and taste properties; however mouth-feel-related vocabulary usually includes heterogeneous, multimodal and personalized terms. Gawel et al.
(2000) published a wheel related to mouthfeel properties of red wine. However, its use in scientific publications has been limited. The authors accepted that the approach had certain limitations as it included redundant and terms with hedonic tone and some others were absent. It is of high interest to generate a mouth-feel lexicon and finding the chemical compound or group of compounds responsible for such properties in red wine. In the present work a chemical fractionation method has been developed.

Moscatel vine-shoot extracts as grapevine biostimulant to increase the varietal aroma of Airén wines

There is a growing interest in the exploitation of vine-shoots waste, since they are often left or burned. Sánchez-Gómez et al. [1] have shown that vines-shoots aqueous extracts have significant contents of bioactive compounds, among which several polyphenols and volatiles are highlighted. Recent studied had demonstrated that the chemical composition of vine-shoots is enhanced when vine-shoots are toasted
[2,3]. The application of vegetable products in the vineyards has led to significant changes towards a more “Sustainable Viticulture”. An innovative foliar application for Airén vine-shoot extracts have been carried out to the vineyard. It has been shown that they act as grape biostimulants, improving certain wine quality characteristics [4].

Prevention of wine oxidation during barrel aging: an innovative method to measure antioxidant

Wine oxidation is a problem that affects the freshness, the aromatic profile, the colour and also the mouthfeel of the wine. It mainly concerns white wines. Oxygen interactions with wine compounds lead to the phenomena cited above that are responsible for the depreciation of these wines. Barrel aging is a crucial step in the wine process because it allows many modifications as wine enrichment, colour stabilization, clarification and also a slow oxygenation of the wine. Effects of the oak barrel have to be known to prevent oxidation of the wine. We have been interested in the main antioxidant compounds released by oak barrels to the wine and we have developed an innovative method to reach directly these antioxidant compounds at the oak stave surface.

DNA and type of grain: which factor does better explain sensory differences of sessile and pedunculate oaks?

Sessile oak and pedunculate oak have shown several differences of interest for enological purposes. Tannic and aromatic composition among sessile oak or pedonculate oak has been well studied. Sessile oak is generally more aromatic than pedunculated, while the later is more tannic. This scientific point of view is rarely applied to classify oak in cooperages. Most coopers use the type of grain to distinguish wide and thin grain.