Macrowine 2021
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 Directed Evolution of Oenococcus oeni: optimising yeast-bacteria interactions for improved malolactic fermentation

Directed Evolution of Oenococcus oeni: optimising yeast-bacteria interactions for improved malolactic fermentation

Abstract

Malolactic fermentation (MLF) is a secondary step in the vinification process and it follows alcoholic fermentation (AF) which is predominantly carried out by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. These two processes result in the degradation of metabolites to produce secondary metabolites which also contribute to the final wine flavour and quality. AF results in the production of ethanol and carbon dioxide from sugars and MLF stems from the degradation of L-malic acid (a dicarboxylic acid) to L-lactic acid (a monocarboxylic acid). The latter process results in a smoother texture as the acidity of the wine is reduced by the process, it also adds to the flavour complexity of the wine. The species responsible for this fermentation step belong to the Pediococci, Lactobacilli and Oenococci genera. Only Oenococcus oeni and Lactobacillus plantarum have been commercialised. The former is the dominant species that is often found in both spontaneous and inoculated fermentations. In spite of inoculation MLF is quite unstable and a successful fermentation is not always guaranteed. Sluggish or stuck fermentations may occur due to many physico-chemical factors. Also, the interactions between the yeast and bacteria during the vinification process play an important role in the success of MLF. Therefore, appropriate selection of strains is important, unfortunately selecting strains is time consuming and limited only to specific winemaking conditions. To overcome this, research has investigated strain improvement, however recombinant technology is controversial. The use of non-recombinant techniques such as mutagenesis, hybridisation and Directed Evolution has become popular. The aim of this study is to optimise yeast-bacteria interactions by use of Directed Evolution as a tool to improve lactic acid bacteria, in this way, try and guarantee the success of MLF. Two S. cerevisiae strains (Cross Evolution® and EC1118®) were used as selective pressures for O oeni S5 populations. The bacterial populations were exposed to synthetic wine fermentations for 30 and 50 generations after which 30 bacterial isolates were evolved using both yeast and were characterised for fermentation efficacy. The results show that the general performance of the isolates was improved in comparison to the parental strain. Only 3 isolates after 30 generations showed a specific improvement when inoculated with ‘driver’ yeast than with other yeast strains. After 50 generations all the strains showed improvement in terms of fermentation rates, but not all strains had a higher fermentation efficacy in comparison to the parent strain. This study shows the potential of Directed Evolution as a tool for strain improvement using a biotic selective pressure as opposed to physico-chemical selective pressures. It also, shows the possibility of improving yeast-bacteria interactions by having a tailor-made pair for successful AF and MLF.

Publication date: May 17, 2024

Issue: Macrowine 2016

Type: Poster

Authors

Seipati Tenyane*, Debra Rossouw, Florian Bauer

*Stellenbosch Universiy

Contact the author

Tags

IVES Conference Series | Macrowine | Macrowine 2016

Citation

Related articles…

Grape metabolites, aroma precursors and the complexities of wine flavour

A critical aspect of wine quality from a consumer perspective is the overall impression of wine flavour, which is formed by the interplay of volatile aroma compounds, their precursors, and taste and matrix components. Grapes contribute some potent aroma compounds, together with a large pool of non-volatile precursors (e.g. glycoconjugates and amino acid conjugates). Aroma precursors can break down through chemical hydrolysis reactions, or through the action of yeast or enzymes, significantly changing the aroma profile of a wine during winemaking and storage. In addition, glycoconjugates of monoterpenes, norisoprenoids and volatile phenols, together with sulfur-conjugates in wine, provide a reservoir of additional flavour through the in-mouth release of volatiles which may be perceived retro-nasally.

Fining-Derived Allergens in Wine: from Detection to Quantification

Since 2012, EU Commission approved compulsory labeling of wines treated with allergenic additives or processing aids “if their presence can be detected in the final product” (EU Commission Implementing Regulation No. 579/2012 of 29 June 2012). The list of potential allergens to be indicated on wine labels comprises sulphur dioxide and milk- and egg- derived fining agents, including hen egg lysozyme, which is usually added in wines as preservative. In some non-EU countries, the list includes gluten, tree nuts and fish gelatins. With the exception of lysozyme, all these fining proteins were long thought to be totally removed by subsequent winemaking processings (e.g. bentonite addition).

Foam characteristics of white, rosé and red sparkling wines elaborated by the champenoise method

Contribution Foam is the characteristic that differentiates sparkling wines from still wines, being the first sensory attribute that tasters and consumers perceive and that determines the final quality of sparkling wines [1]. The foaming properties mainly depend on the chemical composition of wines [2-3], and different factors involved in wine composition will have an effect on foam quality. In Spain, the sparkling wine market focuses on the production of white and rosé sparkling wine, with very low production of red sparkling wines. However, this type of wines is elaborated in countries like Australia, South-Africa, Argentina, Italy or Portugal, with a great acceptance by consumers. No studies on the foaming characteristics of red sparkling wines have been found.

Assessing the effect of oak derived aromas on mouthfeel perception in Chardonnay wine

Mouthfeel is an important quality parameter for Chardonnay wines, particularly those aged in oak. While research on mouthfeel has traditionally focused on the impact of non-aromatic compounds, the role of aroma compounds has largely been over looked. However, in wine as well as other food interactions between retronasal aroma and mouthfeel have been noted. The goal of this research was to investigate the impact of wine aroma on the perception of mouthfeel. Because of the importance of oak aging in the development of Chardonnay mouthfeel, the impact of oak aromas on perceived mouthfeel was explored. Aroma compounds associated with oak (ethyl palmitate, eugenol, furfural, isoeugenol, syringaldehyde, vanillin and whiskey lactone) were added to two different Chardonnay wines; one with no oak influence and one fermented in neutral oak. Low and high concentrations of the compounds were added based on concentrations typically found in barrel aged Chardonnay wine.

Evaluation of Polarized Projective Mapping as a possible tool for attributing South African Chenin blanc dry wine styles

Multiple Factor Analysis (MFA) According to the Chenin blanc Association of South Africa, there are three recognized dry wine styles, Fresh and Fruity (FF), Rich and Ripe Unwooded (RRU), and Rich and Ripe Wooded (RRW), classically attributed with the help of sensory evaluation. One of the “rapid methods” has drawn our attention for the purpose of simplifying and making style attribution for large sample sets, evaluated during different sessions, more robust. Polarized Projective Mapping (PPM) is a hybrid of Projective Mapping (PM) and Polarised Sensory Positioning (PSP). It is a reference-based method in which poles
(references) are used for the evaluation of similarities and dissimilarities between samples.