Macrowine 2021
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 Directed Evolution of Oenococcus oeni: optimising yeast-bacteria interactions for improved malolactic fermentation

Directed Evolution of Oenococcus oeni: optimising yeast-bacteria interactions for improved malolactic fermentation

Abstract

Malolactic fermentation (MLF) is a secondary step in the vinification process and it follows alcoholic fermentation (AF) which is predominantly carried out by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. These two processes result in the degradation of metabolites to produce secondary metabolites which also contribute to the final wine flavour and quality. AF results in the production of ethanol and carbon dioxide from sugars and MLF stems from the degradation of L-malic acid (a dicarboxylic acid) to L-lactic acid (a monocarboxylic acid). The latter process results in a smoother texture as the acidity of the wine is reduced by the process, it also adds to the flavour complexity of the wine. The species responsible for this fermentation step belong to the Pediococci, Lactobacilli and Oenococci genera. Only Oenococcus oeni and Lactobacillus plantarum have been commercialised. The former is the dominant species that is often found in both spontaneous and inoculated fermentations. In spite of inoculation MLF is quite unstable and a successful fermentation is not always guaranteed. Sluggish or stuck fermentations may occur due to many physico-chemical factors. Also, the interactions between the yeast and bacteria during the vinification process play an important role in the success of MLF. Therefore, appropriate selection of strains is important, unfortunately selecting strains is time consuming and limited only to specific winemaking conditions. To overcome this, research has investigated strain improvement, however recombinant technology is controversial. The use of non-recombinant techniques such as mutagenesis, hybridisation and Directed Evolution has become popular. The aim of this study is to optimise yeast-bacteria interactions by use of Directed Evolution as a tool to improve lactic acid bacteria, in this way, try and guarantee the success of MLF. Two S. cerevisiae strains (Cross Evolution® and EC1118®) were used as selective pressures for O oeni S5 populations. The bacterial populations were exposed to synthetic wine fermentations for 30 and 50 generations after which 30 bacterial isolates were evolved using both yeast and were characterised for fermentation efficacy. The results show that the general performance of the isolates was improved in comparison to the parental strain. Only 3 isolates after 30 generations showed a specific improvement when inoculated with ‘driver’ yeast than with other yeast strains. After 50 generations all the strains showed improvement in terms of fermentation rates, but not all strains had a higher fermentation efficacy in comparison to the parent strain. This study shows the potential of Directed Evolution as a tool for strain improvement using a biotic selective pressure as opposed to physico-chemical selective pressures. It also, shows the possibility of improving yeast-bacteria interactions by having a tailor-made pair for successful AF and MLF.

Publication date: May 17, 2024

Issue: Macrowine 2016

Type: Poster

Authors

Seipati Tenyane*, Debra Rossouw, Florian Bauer

*Stellenbosch Universiy

Contact the author

Tags

IVES Conference Series | Macrowine | Macrowine 2016

Citation

Related articles…

DNA and type of grain: which factor does better explain sensory differences of sessile and pedunculate oaks?

Sessile oak and pedunculate oak have shown several differences of interest for enological purposes. Tannic and aromatic composition among sessile oak or pedonculate oak has been well studied. Sessile oak is generally more aromatic than pedunculated, while the later is more tannic. This scientific point of view is rarely applied to classify oak in cooperages. Most coopers use the type of grain to distinguish wide and thin grain.

IBMP-Polypenol interactions: Impact on volatility and sensory perception in model wine solution

3-Isobutyl-2-methoxypyrazine (IBMP) is one of the key molecules in wine aroma with a bell pepper aroma and a very low threshold in wine, 1-6 ng/L for white wine and 10-16 ng/L in red wine1. The differences in these thresholds are likely due to IBMP-non volatile matrix interactions. It has indeed been shown that polyphenols may influence the volatility of flavor compounds2. In the present study, we focus on IBMP-polyphenols interactions in relation to volatility and sensory perception in model wine solution. Methods: 1. GC-MS Static Headspace Analysis: Samples were analyzed by Static headspace analysis with an Agilent 7890A gas chromatograph coupled to HP 5975C mass spectrometry detector (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA).

The moment of preharvest elicitor application influence its final effect on winegrapes quality

Phenolic compounds are secondary metabolites of grapes. Plants produce a wide variety of this type of metabolites through diverse biosynthesis pathways and their production is sometimes a response to external stimuli, either environmental or biotic stresses. Some of them may act as chemical defenses against pathogens or herbivores and their synthesis is increased when the attack exists. However, it is remarkable that the synthesis of these interesting compounds can be activated even when the stimulus is not present, with the use of elicitors. These are substances that when applied exogenously trigger the biosynthetic pathways conducting to the synthesis of these defense compounds.

Comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography coupled with Tof-MS, a powerful tool for analysis of the volatomes of grapes and wines

Comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography (GCxGC) has emerged as a powerful analytical technique for unraveling the volatile composition of complex matrices. This work will present three applications of GCxGC Tof-MS to the oenological field, aimed to identify novel biomarkers to be used in the quality control process of the wine industry. Comprehensive mapping of volatile compounds was conducted in a large sample of 70 sparkling wines, produced by 48 different wineries across 6 vintages and representative of the two main production areas for premium Italian sparkling wines (Franciacorta (FC) and Trentodoc (TN)), using HS-SPME followed by GCxGC-Tof-MS and multivariate analysis. Selection and identification of 196 putative biomarkers allowed clear separation of sparkling wines from FC and TN.

Effect of supplementation with inactive yeast during alcoholic fermentation in base wine for sparkling

INTRODUCTION: Foam stability of sparkling wines is significantly favored by the presence of surface active agents such as proteins and polysaccharides [1]. For that reason, the renowned sparkling wines are aged after the second fermentation in contact with the lees for several months (even years). Thereby wines are enriched in these macromolecules due to yeast autolysis. Since this practice is slow and costly, winemakers are seeking for alternative procedures to increase their concentration in base wines. In that sense, the supplementation with inactive yeast during alcoholic fermentation has been proposed [2]. The aim of this study was to determine whether this new strategy is really useful for enriching base wines in macromolecules and for improving foam properties of the base wines.