Macrowine 2021
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 Oenological features of Sangiovese wine from vinification of whole grape berries

Oenological features of Sangiovese wine from vinification of whole grape berries

Abstract

The present study was performed in a traditional winery located in the viticultural area of Brunello di Montalcino, Siena, Italy, in the vintage 2015. Actually, in this winery Sangiovese grape musts are fermented in large oak barrels by a single strain of Saccharomyces cerevisiae previously isolated in the same winery. Pumping over operations are carried out once or twice a day until the end of alcoholic fermentations. The aim of this work was to investigate on the oenological properties of Sangiovese wine produced with the traditional winemaking process adopted by the winery under study obtained from the fermentation of whole berries compared to that from crushed grape must. In particular, two lots of 65q of Sangiovese grapes from the same 3ha vineyard were vinified in 150hL oak barrels. Grapes of the first lot were destemmed using a vibrating destemmer that was able to maintain the berry integrity, the others with a traditional crusher-destemmer. After barrels filling, the temperature of whole berry grape must was lower than that of crushed grape must (22°C vs 24°C). The growth of S. cerevisiae strain, inoculated at 5×10^5cell/mL, was slower in whole berry grape must due to the lower mass temperature and the progressive rupture of berries which caused a sort of dilution of yeast population during their exponential growth phase. Indeed, the maximum population density was reached at the third day of fermentation in the crushed grape must (over 8×10^7 cell/mL) while in the whole berry must was reached at day 6 (about 3.5×10^7cell/mL). The warming profile of crushed grapes vinification was faster and reached higher temperature (3.7°C/day up to Tmax of 38.9°C at day 4) than that recorded in whole berry vinification (1.7°C/day up to Tmax of 33.8°C at day 7). In the former, the yeast population dropped rapidly as a consequence of high temperature and high ethanol content (about 11% at day 4) leading to a faster decrease in mass temperature and making it necessary a second inoculum of the S. cerevisiae strain at day 11 to ensure the completion of the alcoholic fermentation. Conversely, the progressive rupture of cooler berries in the whole berry vinification limited the temperature rise, favored the yeast activity, and lead to a slower decrease of mass temperature after day 8 at which about 95% of sugars were fermented. Wines were racked at day 26 (crushed grapes) and 27 (whole berry grapes). Residual sugars were below 1g/L with an ethanol content ranging from 13.8 to 13.5% in crushed and whole grapes wines, respectively. No differences were found on color intensity and total phenolic index. However, wine from crushed grapes vinification possessed higher contents of hydroxybenzoic acids (+27%) and flavan-3-ol monomers (+20%) whereas wine produced by whole berry vinification were characterized by higher contents of anthocyanin glucosides (+33%) and flavonols (+41%). Such differences are potentially able to influence several long-term sensory quality.

Publication date: May 17, 2024

Issue: Macrowine 2016

Type: Poster

Authors

Yuri Romboli*, Giacomo Buscioni, Massimo Vincenzini, Silvia Mangani

*Department of Management of Agriculture

Contact the author

Tags

IVES Conference Series | Macrowine | Macrowine 2016

Citation

Related articles…

Grape metabolites, aroma precursors and the complexities of wine flavour

A critical aspect of wine quality from a consumer perspective is the overall impression of wine flavour, which is formed by the interplay of volatile aroma compounds, their precursors, and taste and matrix components. Grapes contribute some potent aroma compounds, together with a large pool of non-volatile precursors (e.g. glycoconjugates and amino acid conjugates). Aroma precursors can break down through chemical hydrolysis reactions, or through the action of yeast or enzymes, significantly changing the aroma profile of a wine during winemaking and storage. In addition, glycoconjugates of monoterpenes, norisoprenoids and volatile phenols, together with sulfur-conjugates in wine, provide a reservoir of additional flavour through the in-mouth release of volatiles which may be perceived retro-nasally.

Fining-Derived Allergens in Wine: from Detection to Quantification

Since 2012, EU Commission approved compulsory labeling of wines treated with allergenic additives or processing aids “if their presence can be detected in the final product” (EU Commission Implementing Regulation No. 579/2012 of 29 June 2012). The list of potential allergens to be indicated on wine labels comprises sulphur dioxide and milk- and egg- derived fining agents, including hen egg lysozyme, which is usually added in wines as preservative. In some non-EU countries, the list includes gluten, tree nuts and fish gelatins. With the exception of lysozyme, all these fining proteins were long thought to be totally removed by subsequent winemaking processings (e.g. bentonite addition).

The commercial yeast strain as a significant source of variance for tyrosol and hydroxytyrosol in white wine

Tyrosol (TYR) and hydroxytyrosol (HYT) are bioactive phenols present in olive oil and wine, basic elements of the Mediterranean diet. TYR is reported in the literature for its interesting antioxidant, cardioprotective and anti-inflammatory properties. In wine, its concentration can reach values as high as about 40 mg/L
[Pour Nikfardjam et al. 2007] but, more frequently, this phenol – derived from yeast metabolism of tyrosine during fermentation – is present at lower levels, generally higher in red wines compared to whites. HYT was measured for the first time by Di Tommaso et al. [1998] in Italian wines – with maximum values of 4.20 mg/L and 1.92 mg/L for red and white wines, respectively – while definitely lower concentrations have been found later in Greek samples.

HEAT BERRY : Sensitivity of berries ripening to higher temperature and impact on phenolic compounds in wine

The grapevine is an important economical crop that is very sensitive to climate changes and microclimate. The observations made during the last decades at a vineyard scale all concur to show the impact of climate change on vine physiology, resulting in accelerated phenology and earlier harvest (Jones and Davis 2000). It is well-known that berry content is affected by the ambient temperature. While the first experiences were primarily conducted on the impact of temperature on anthocyanin accumulation in the grape, few studies have focused on others component of phenolic metabolism, such as tannins.

Metabolomics of grape polyphenols as a consequence of post-harvest drying: on-plant dehydration vs warehouse withering

A method of suspect screening analysis to study grape metabolomics, was developed [1]. By performing ultra-high performance liquid chromatography (UHPLC) – high-resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS) analysis of the grape extract, averaging 320-450 putative grape compounds are identified which include mainly polyphenols. Identification of metabolites is performed by a new HRMS-database of putative grape and wine compounds expressly constructed (GrapeMetabolomics) which currently includes around 1,100 entries.