Macrowine 2021
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 Oenological features of Sangiovese wine from vinification of whole grape berries

Oenological features of Sangiovese wine from vinification of whole grape berries

Abstract

The present study was performed in a traditional winery located in the viticultural area of Brunello di Montalcino, Siena, Italy, in the vintage 2015. Actually, in this winery Sangiovese grape musts are fermented in large oak barrels by a single strain of Saccharomyces cerevisiae previously isolated in the same winery. Pumping over operations are carried out once or twice a day until the end of alcoholic fermentations. The aim of this work was to investigate on the oenological properties of Sangiovese wine produced with the traditional winemaking process adopted by the winery under study obtained from the fermentation of whole berries compared to that from crushed grape must. In particular, two lots of 65q of Sangiovese grapes from the same 3ha vineyard were vinified in 150hL oak barrels. Grapes of the first lot were destemmed using a vibrating destemmer that was able to maintain the berry integrity, the others with a traditional crusher-destemmer. After barrels filling, the temperature of whole berry grape must was lower than that of crushed grape must (22°C vs 24°C). The growth of S. cerevisiae strain, inoculated at 5×10^5cell/mL, was slower in whole berry grape must due to the lower mass temperature and the progressive rupture of berries which caused a sort of dilution of yeast population during their exponential growth phase. Indeed, the maximum population density was reached at the third day of fermentation in the crushed grape must (over 8×10^7 cell/mL) while in the whole berry must was reached at day 6 (about 3.5×10^7cell/mL). The warming profile of crushed grapes vinification was faster and reached higher temperature (3.7°C/day up to Tmax of 38.9°C at day 4) than that recorded in whole berry vinification (1.7°C/day up to Tmax of 33.8°C at day 7). In the former, the yeast population dropped rapidly as a consequence of high temperature and high ethanol content (about 11% at day 4) leading to a faster decrease in mass temperature and making it necessary a second inoculum of the S. cerevisiae strain at day 11 to ensure the completion of the alcoholic fermentation. Conversely, the progressive rupture of cooler berries in the whole berry vinification limited the temperature rise, favored the yeast activity, and lead to a slower decrease of mass temperature after day 8 at which about 95% of sugars were fermented. Wines were racked at day 26 (crushed grapes) and 27 (whole berry grapes). Residual sugars were below 1g/L with an ethanol content ranging from 13.8 to 13.5% in crushed and whole grapes wines, respectively. No differences were found on color intensity and total phenolic index. However, wine from crushed grapes vinification possessed higher contents of hydroxybenzoic acids (+27%) and flavan-3-ol monomers (+20%) whereas wine produced by whole berry vinification were characterized by higher contents of anthocyanin glucosides (+33%) and flavonols (+41%). Such differences are potentially able to influence several long-term sensory quality.

Publication date: May 17, 2024

Issue: Macrowine 2016

Type: Poster

Authors

Yuri Romboli*, Giacomo Buscioni, Massimo Vincenzini, Silvia Mangani

*Department of Management of Agriculture

Contact the author

Tags

IVES Conference Series | Macrowine | Macrowine 2016

Citation

Related articles…

Effect of intra‐vineyard ripeness variation on the efficiency of commercial enzymes on berry cell wall deconstruction under winemaking conditions

Intra-vineyard variation grape berry ripening occurs within bunches, between bunches on the same vine and between vines. Although it is assumed that such variation also occurs at the grape berry cell wall level, no study to data has investigated in any depth. Here we have used a intra-vineyard panel design to investigate pooled bunches from six vines (per panel) in the context of a winemaking scenario. The dissected vineyard was harvested by separate panels, where each panel was then subjected to a standard winemaking procedure with or without the addition of three different enzyme preparations for maceration.

On the losses of dissolved CO2 during champagne aging

A misconception lingers in the minds of some wine consumers that Champagne wines don’t age. It’s largely a myth, certainly as far as the best cuvees are concerned. Actually, during the so-called autolysis period of time (in the closed bottle, after the “prise de mousse”), complex chemical reactions take place when the wine remains in contact with the dead yeast cells, which progressively bring complex and very much sought-after aromas to champagne. Nevertheless, despite their remarkable impermeability to liquid and air, caps or natural cork stoppers used to cork the bottles are not 100% hermetic with regard to gas transfers. Gas species therefore very slowly diffuse through the cap or cork stopper, along their respective inverse partial pressure. After the “prise de mousse”, because the partial pressure of CO2 in the bottleneck reaches up to 6 bars (at 12 °C), gaseous CO2 progressively diffuse from the bottle to the ambient air
(where the partial pressure of gaseous CO2 is only of order of 0,0004 bar).

Identification of caffeic acid as a major component of Moscatel wine protein sediment

Proteins play a significant role in the colloidal stability and clarity of white wines [1]. However, under conditions of high temperatures during storage or transportation, the proteins themselves can self-aggregate into light-dispersing particles causing the so-called protein haze [2]. Formation of these unattractive precipitates in bottled wine is a common defect of commercial wines, making them unacceptable for sale [3]. Previous studies identified the presence of phenolic compounds in the natural precipitate of white wine [4], contributing to the hypothesis that these compounds could be involved in the mechanism of protein haze formation.

Full automation of oenological fermentations and its application to the processing of must containing high sugar or acetic acid concentrations

Climate change and harvest date decisions have led to the evolution of must quality over the last decades. Increases in must sugar concentrations are among the most obvious consequences, quantitatively. Saccharomyces cerevisiae is a robust and acid tolerant organism. These properties, its sugar to ethanol conversion rate and ethanol tolerance make it the ideal production organism for wine fermentations. Unfortunately, high sugar concentrations may affect S. cerevisiae and lead to growth inhibition or yeast lysis, and cause sluggish or stuck fermentations. Even sublethal conditions cause a hyperosmotic stress response in S. cerevisiae which leads to increased formation of fermentation by-products, including acetic acid, which may exceed legal limits in some wines.

Development of a new sustainable filtering media for wine and beer clarification and sterilisation

Different separation techniques are frequently used during vinification process. Nowadays, clarification and microbiological stabilization of wine or beer can be done using precoat filters or crossflow filters to remove yeast and bacteria. Kieselguhr powders are the most used filter aids for precoat filtration. Their crystalline structure and their pulverulent nature induce ecotoxicological risks when used. Moreover, regeneration and reuse of these filter aids is not efficient and the filtration waste requires cost effective retreatment.