Macrowine 2021
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 Impact of elemental sulfur (S0) residues in Sauvignon blanc juice on the formation of the varietal thiols 3-mercapto hexanol and 3-mercaptohexyl acetate

Impact of elemental sulfur (S0) residues in Sauvignon blanc juice on the formation of the varietal thiols 3-mercapto hexanol and 3-mercaptohexyl acetate

Abstract

Elemental sulfur is a fungicide used by grape growers to control the development of powdery mildew, caused by the fungus Erysiphe necator. This compound is effective, cheap and has a low toxicity with no withholding period recommended. However, high levels of S0 residues in the harvested grapes can lead to the formation of reductive sulfur compounds that can impart taints and faults to the wine. Hydrogen sulphide (H2S) is a very volatile and unpleasant sulfur compound which formation is connected to high residues of S0 in juice (10 – 100 mg/L). These residues can be minimized with pressing and clarification of the juice prior to fermentation, but may increase during prolonged maceration. At the same time, H2S can play a role on the formation of the important varietal thiols 3-mercapto hexanol (3MH) and 4-mercapto-4-methylpentan-2-one (4MMP) as the direct sulfur donor to E-2-hexenal or mesityl oxide, respectively. Sauvignon blanc juices from three different locations was obtained at a commercial winery in Marlborough, New Zealand. One sample (A) was collected from the receival bin and pressed to obtain 25 L of juice. Two other samples (B and C) were collected from the commercial pressing operation. The samples were cold settled, racked to glass bottles (700 mL of juice), and then 0, 2, 10 or 50 mg/L of a wettable elemental sulfur compound was added. The fermentation was carried out using Saccharomyces cerevisiae (EC1118) at 15°C. The juices showed quite different potential to produce 3MH and 3MHA, and without any added sulfur, juice A produced a high amount of 3MH (6,000 ng/L), while juices B and C showed signs of oxidation and little 3MH was formed (< 600 ng/L). The addition of 50 mg/L of elemental sulfur caused a 1.7-fold increment in 3MH for juice A. For juice B detectable levels of 3MH and 3MHA were only observed for the extreme addition of 50 mg/L S0, which led to a 20-fold increase in 3MH production for juice C. Even though the results showed a clear relation between S0 in juice and varietal thiols in wine, the deliberate increase in the fungicide use close to harvest needs to be carefully managed, as levels of unwanted reductive sulfur compounds including H2S, methanethiol and carbon disulfide in the final wine were found to increase with the higher elemental sulfur additions.

Publication date: May 17, 2024

Issue: Macrowine 2016

Type: Poster

Authors

Leandro Dias Araujo*, Bruno Fedrizzi, Paul Kilmartin, Suzanne Callerot, Wessel du Toit

*University of Auckland

Contact the author

Tags

IVES Conference Series | Macrowine | Macrowine 2016

Citation

Related articles…

Characterization of non-Saccharomyces yeast and its interaction with Saccharomyces cerevisiae with investigation of fermentation kinetics and aromatic composition

[lwp_divi_breadcrumbs home_text="IVES" use_before_icon="on" before_icon="||divi||400" module_id="publication-ariane" _builder_version="4.20.4" _module_preset="default" module_text_align="center" module_font_size="16px" text_orientation="center"...

Ethyl esters interact with the major wine Thaumatin Like Protein VVTL1

The interactions among aromatic compounds and proteins is an important issue for the quality of foods and beverages. In wine, the loss of flavor after vinification is associated to bentonite treatment and this effect can be the result of the removal of aroma compounds which are bound wine proteins. This phenomenon was recently demonstrated for long chain fatty acids and their ethyl esters (1). Since these latter compounds are spectroscopically silent, their association with proteins is not easy to measure.

Effect of the winemaking technology on the phenolic compounds, foam parameters in sparklig wines

Contribution Sparkling wines elaborated following the traditional method undergo a second fermentation in closed bottles of base wines, followed by aging of wines with lees for at least 9 months. Most of the sparkling wines elaborated are white and rosé ones, although the production of red ones is highly increasing. One of the initial problems in red sparkling wine processing is to obtain suitable base wines that should have moderate alcohol content and astringency and adequate color intensity; which is difficult to obtain when grapes must be harvested at low phenolic and industrial maturity stage. The low phenolic maturity degree in the red grapes makes essential to choose an adequate winemaking methodology to obtain the base wines because the extracted polyphenols will vary according the winemaking technique: carbonic maceration or destemmed-crushed grapes.

Use of chitosan as a secondary antioxidant in juices and wines

Chitosan is a polysaccharide produced from the deacetylation of chitin extracted from crustaceous and fungi. In winemaking chitosan is mainly used in the clarification of grape juice and wine, stabilization of white wines, removal of metals and to prevent wine spoilage by undesired microorganisms. The addition of chitosan to model wine systems was able to retard browning, reduce levels of metallic ions (Fe and Cu) and to protect varietal thiols due to its antiradical activity1. The present experiment was planned in order to evaluate the use of chitosan as a secondary antioxidant at three different stages of Sauvignon blanc fermentation and winemaking. Sauvignon blanc juices from three different locations were obtained at a commercial winery in Marlborough, New Zealand. One lots of grapes was collected from a receival bin and pressed into juice with a water-bag press, and a further juice sample was collected from a commercial pressing operation. Chitosan (1 g/L, low molecular weight, 75 – 85% deacetylated) was added to the juice after pressing, after cold settling, after fermentation, or at all these stages. Controls without any chitosan additions were also prepared.

Foam characteristics of white, rosé and red sparkling wines elaborated by the champenoise method

Contribution Foam is the characteristic that differentiates sparkling wines from still wines, being the first sensory attribute that tasters and consumers perceive and that determines the final quality of sparkling wines [1]. The foaming properties mainly depend on the chemical composition of wines [2-3], and different factors involved in wine composition will have an effect on foam quality. In Spain, the sparkling wine market focuses on the production of white and rosé sparkling wine, with very low production of red sparkling wines. However, this type of wines is elaborated in countries like Australia, South-Africa, Argentina, Italy or Portugal, with a great acceptance by consumers. No studies on the foaming characteristics of red sparkling wines have been found.