Macrowine 2021
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 Ethyl esters interact with the major wine Thaumatin Like Protein VVTL1

Ethyl esters interact with the major wine Thaumatin Like Protein VVTL1

Abstract

The interactions among aromatic compounds and proteins is an important issue for the quality of foods and beverages. In wine, the loss of flavor after vinification is associated to bentonite treatment and this effect can be the result of the removal of aroma compounds which are bound wine proteins. This phenomenon was recently demonstrated for long chain fatty acids and their ethyl esters (1). Since these latter compounds are spectroscopically silent, their association with proteins is not easy to measure. Therefore, the binding of ethyl esters to a wine protein has been analyzed by studying the modifications of the protein structure (which indicates protein-ligand interactions) by Synchrotron Radiation Circular Dichroism (SRCD) spectroscopy (2). The effects induced by the addition of ethyl esters (from hexanoate to dodecanoate) on the secondary structure and stability of a purified Thaumatin like-protein (VVTL1), the most abundant wine protein, was studied in a wine model solution (12% ethanol, 5 g/l mesotartaric acid, pH 3.2). As demonstrated by UV-photo denaturation assays (20 repeated consecutive scans in the far UV-region of protein), the secondary structure of VVTL1 was only slightly affected by the presence of the selected aroma esters, but protein stability was increased by the addiction of octanoate, decanoate and dodecanoate ethyl esters. On the contrary, in the presence of ethyl hexanoate protein stability decreases. These data were further confirmed by SRCD thermal denaturation assay. The results here reported demonstrate that the content of ordered structure and the protein photo and thermal stability of the main wine protein VVTL1 is modified by ethyl esters of different chain length, indicating the existence of a binding phenomenon. Therefore esters interactions with proteins may occur in wine and that this fact can modulate both the effect of bentonite treatments and the perception of the wine aroma.

(1) Vincenzi et al., 2015. J. Agric. Food Chem., 63, 2314 (2) Hussain R. et al., 2012. Spectroscopic Analysis: Synchrotron Radiation Circular Dichroism, in: Comprehensive Chirality, 8, Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 438-448.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We thank Diamond Light Source for access to beamline B23 (SM8034) that contributed to the results presented here. This research has received funding from the European Community’s Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013) under grant agreement nº 226716.

Publication date: May 17, 2024

Issue: Macrowine 2016

Type: Poster

Authors

Andrea Curioni*, Diana Gazzola, Mattia Di Gaspero, Paolo Ruzza, Simone Vincenzi

*Università di Padova

Contact the author

Tags

IVES Conference Series | Macrowine | Macrowine 2016

Citation

Related articles…

Effect of the winemaking technology on the phenolic compounds, foam parameters in sparklig wines

Contribution Sparkling wines elaborated following the traditional method undergo a second fermentation in closed bottles of base wines, followed by aging of wines with lees for at least 9 months. Most of the sparkling wines elaborated are white and rosé ones, although the production of red ones is highly increasing. One of the initial problems in red sparkling wine processing is to obtain suitable base wines that should have moderate alcohol content and astringency and adequate color intensity; which is difficult to obtain when grapes must be harvested at low phenolic and industrial maturity stage. The low phenolic maturity degree in the red grapes makes essential to choose an adequate winemaking methodology to obtain the base wines because the extracted polyphenols will vary according the winemaking technique: carbonic maceration or destemmed-crushed grapes.

Evidence for terroir effect associated with botrytisation relatively to compounds implicated in typical aromas of noble rot sweet wines

Recent studies have demonstrated the role of certain lactones, particularly 2-nonen-4-olide, and volatile thiols (3-sulfanylhexan-1-ol) in the over ripped aromas of noble rot sweet wines (Stamatopoulos et al. 2014ab). These compounds are partly formed during the maturation and under the activity of B. cinerea on grapes. This research was carried out in the vineyard of Sauternes with aim to better understand their genesis depending on the grape over-ripening on two different soil types during 3 vintages. Thus, the study was conducted, with the Sémillon grape, during vintages 2012, 2014 & 2015, at 4 stages of over-maturation of the grapes (healthy, pourri plein, pourri roti, pourri roti + 15 days) considering two vineyard plots with different soil characteristics (calcosol & peyrosol) planted with the 315 Sémillon clone and grafted on 101-14 rootstock respectively in 1981 and 1980 and cultivated with the same vineyard management. Volatile lactones were assayed by liquid-liquid extraction followed by GC/MS analysis and the precursors of 3-sulfanylhexanol by an adaptation of the method by Capone et al. 2010 (SPE-
UPLC/FTMS).

Metabolomics comparison of non-Saccharomyces yeasts in Sauvignon blanc and Shiraz

Saccharomyces cerevisiae (SC) is the main driver of alcoholic fermentation however, in wine, non-Saccharomyces species can have a powerful effect on aroma and flavor formation. This study aimed to compare untargeted volatile compound profiles from SPME-GC×GC-TOF-MS of Sauvignon blanc and Shiraz wine inoculated with six different non-Saccharomyces yeasts followed by SC. Torulaspora delbrueckii (TD), Lachancea thermotolerans (LT), Pichia kluyveri (PK) and Metschnikowia pulcherrima (MP) were commercial starter strains, while Candida zemplinina (CZ) and Kazachstania aerobia (KA), were isolated from wine grape environments. Each fermentation produced a distinct chemical profile that was unique for both grape musts. The SC-monoculture and CZ-SC sequential fermentations were the most distinctly different in the Sauvignon blanc while the LT-SC sequential fermentations were the most different from the control in the Shiraz fermentations.

New molecular evidence of wine yeast-bacteria interaction unraveled by untargeted metabolomic profiling

Bacterial malolactic fermentation (MLF) has a considerable impact on wine quality. The yeast strain used for primary fermentation can consistently stimulate (MLF+ phenotype) or inhibit (MLF- phenotype) malolactic bacteria and the MLF process as a function of numerous winemaking practices, but the molecular evidence behind still remains a mystery. In this study, such evidence was elucidated by the direct comparison of extracellular metabolic profiles of MLF+ and MLF- yeast phenotypes. Untargeted metabolomics combining ultrahigh-resolution FT-ICR-MS analysis, powerful machine learning methods and a comprehensive wine metabolite database, discovered around 800 putative biomarkers and 2500 unknown masses involved in phenotypic distinction.

Directed Evolution of Oenococcus oeni: optimising yeast-bacteria interactions for improved malolactic fermentation

Malolactic fermentation (MLF) is a secondary step in the vinification process and it follows alcoholic fermentation (AF) which is predominantly carried out by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. These two processes result in the degradation of metabolites to produce secondary metabolites which also contribute to the final wine flavour and quality. AF results in the production of ethanol and carbon dioxide from sugars and MLF stems from the degradation of L-malic acid (a dicarboxylic acid) to L-lactic acid (a monocarboxylic acid). The latter process results in a smoother texture as the acidity of the wine is reduced by the process, it also adds to the flavour complexity of the wine.