Macrowine 2021
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 Ethyl esters interact with the major wine Thaumatin Like Protein VVTL1

Ethyl esters interact with the major wine Thaumatin Like Protein VVTL1

Abstract

The interactions among aromatic compounds and proteins is an important issue for the quality of foods and beverages. In wine, the loss of flavor after vinification is associated to bentonite treatment and this effect can be the result of the removal of aroma compounds which are bound wine proteins. This phenomenon was recently demonstrated for long chain fatty acids and their ethyl esters (1). Since these latter compounds are spectroscopically silent, their association with proteins is not easy to measure. Therefore, the binding of ethyl esters to a wine protein has been analyzed by studying the modifications of the protein structure (which indicates protein-ligand interactions) by Synchrotron Radiation Circular Dichroism (SRCD) spectroscopy (2). The effects induced by the addition of ethyl esters (from hexanoate to dodecanoate) on the secondary structure and stability of a purified Thaumatin like-protein (VVTL1), the most abundant wine protein, was studied in a wine model solution (12% ethanol, 5 g/l mesotartaric acid, pH 3.2). As demonstrated by UV-photo denaturation assays (20 repeated consecutive scans in the far UV-region of protein), the secondary structure of VVTL1 was only slightly affected by the presence of the selected aroma esters, but protein stability was increased by the addiction of octanoate, decanoate and dodecanoate ethyl esters. On the contrary, in the presence of ethyl hexanoate protein stability decreases. These data were further confirmed by SRCD thermal denaturation assay. The results here reported demonstrate that the content of ordered structure and the protein photo and thermal stability of the main wine protein VVTL1 is modified by ethyl esters of different chain length, indicating the existence of a binding phenomenon. Therefore esters interactions with proteins may occur in wine and that this fact can modulate both the effect of bentonite treatments and the perception of the wine aroma.

(1) Vincenzi et al., 2015. J. Agric. Food Chem., 63, 2314 (2) Hussain R. et al., 2012. Spectroscopic Analysis: Synchrotron Radiation Circular Dichroism, in: Comprehensive Chirality, 8, Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 438-448.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We thank Diamond Light Source for access to beamline B23 (SM8034) that contributed to the results presented here. This research has received funding from the European Community’s Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013) under grant agreement nº 226716.

Publication date: May 17, 2024

Issue: Macrowine 2016

Type: Poster

Authors

Andrea Curioni*, Diana Gazzola, Mattia Di Gaspero, Paolo Ruzza, Simone Vincenzi

*Università di Padova

Contact the author

Tags

IVES Conference Series | Macrowine | Macrowine 2016

Citation

Related articles…

IBMP-Polypenol interactions: Impact on volatility and sensory perception in model wine solution

3-Isobutyl-2-methoxypyrazine (IBMP) is one of the key molecules in wine aroma with a bell pepper aroma and a very low threshold in wine, 1-6 ng/L for white wine and 10-16 ng/L in red wine1. The differences in these thresholds are likely due to IBMP-non volatile matrix interactions. It has indeed been shown that polyphenols may influence the volatility of flavor compounds2. In the present study, we focus on IBMP-polyphenols interactions in relation to volatility and sensory perception in model wine solution. Methods: 1. GC-MS Static Headspace Analysis: Samples were analyzed by Static headspace analysis with an Agilent 7890A gas chromatograph coupled to HP 5975C mass spectrometry detector (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA).

Chemical markers in wine related to low levels of yeast available nitrogen in the grape

Nitrogen is an important nutrient of yeast and its low content in grape must is a major cause for sluggish fermentations. To prevent problems during fermentation, a supplementation of the must with ammonium salts or more complex nitrogen mixtures is practiced in the cellar. However this correction seems to improve only partially the quality of wine [1]. In fact, yeast is using nitrogen in many of its metabolic pathways and depending of the sort of the nitrogen source (ammonium or amino acids) it produces different flavor active compounds. A limitation in amino acids can lead to a change in the metabolic pathways of yeast and consequently alter wine quality.

Influence of wood chips addition during alcoholic fermentation on wine phenolic composition

This study investigates the effect of wood chips addition during the alcoholic fermentation on the phenolic
composition of the produced wines. A series of wood chips, originating from American, French, Slavonia
oak and Acacia were added at the beginning of wine alcoholic fermentation. Besides, a mixture consisting
of 50% French and 50% Americal oak chips were added during the experimentation. The wine samples
were analyzed one month after the end of malolactic fermentation, examining various chemical
parameters such as total anthocyanins, total phenolic content, tannins combined with protein (BSA) and
ellagitannin content.

Effect of different foliar nitrogen applications on the must amino acids and glutathione composition in Cabernet Sauvignon vineyard

Cabernet Sauvignon is one of the most important winegrape varieties in Chile. However, temperature raise and decreased rainfall due to climate change can lead to grape quality decrease in certain areas. Amino acids are essential as nitrogen source for yeast but also directly affect grape quality serving as precursors of certain volatile compounds that enhance the wine bouquet. Besides, glutathione is an important tripeptide acting as antioxidant, preventing the appearance of browning pigments in must and exerts a protective effect in volatile compounds.

Improving the phenolic composition of cv tempranillo wines by blending grapes of different ripening state

The aim of this work was to reduce the alcohol content of Tempranillo wine. Tempranillo wines were produced by grapes harvested at different ripening dates (August 11 which was 21 oBrix and September 28 with 25 oBrix). At the second date, the Tempranillo wines were elaborated as follows: grapes were destemmed, crushed and collected into 50 L stainless-steel vats. Before preferementative maceration in cold, 50 % (M1) and 70 % (M2) of the must have been replaced by the same percentage of must from the first harvest. In addition, a control wine (C) was performed with only grapes from the second harvest.