Macrowine 2021
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 Effect of post-harvest ozone treatments on the skin phenolic composition and extractability of red winegrapes cv Nebbiolo and Barbera

Effect of post-harvest ozone treatments on the skin phenolic composition and extractability of red winegrapes cv Nebbiolo and Barbera

Abstract

Wine industry is looking forward for innovative, safe and eco-friendly antimicrobial products allowing the reduction of chemical treatments in the grape defense and the winemaking process that can affect negatively the quality of the product. Ozone has been tested in food industry giving good results in preventing fungi and bacteria growth on a wide spectrum of vegetables and fruits, due to its oxidant activity and ability to attack numerous cellular constituents. Ozone leaves no chemical residues on the food surface, decomposing itself rapidly in oxygen. Gaseous ozone has been already tested for table grapes storage and on wine grapes during withering. In particular, ozone has been suggested as phenolic compounds elicitor, stimulating chemical defense mechanisms such as the synthesis of polyphenols, and as enhancer of cellular membrane and cell walls degradation phenomena. Phenolic compounds are strongly linked to the red wine quality, and their extraction depends on the grape variety, winemaking technique and cell wall degradation. In this work, Vitis vinifera L. cv Nebbiolo and Barbera, chosen for their different anthocyanin profiles, were post-harvest treated for 24 and 72 hours with gaseous ozone (30 µL/L). Untreated samples were used as control with the aim of investigating possible indirect physico-chemical effects of this sanitizing treatment on berry skin phenolic composition. Skin phenolic extractability was assessed during maceration (6, 24, 48, 96, 168 and 240 hours) using a wine-like solution, particularly for total anthocyanins (TA), proanthocyanidins (PRO) and flavanols reactive to vanillin (FRV), and anthocyanin profiles were also determined. Ozone did not affect significantly the final extraction yield of TA, PRO and FRV in Barbera; although anthocyanin extractability was higher in control rather than in ozone-treated samples during the first stages of maceration. Otherwise, Nebbiolo was positively influenced by the treatment because ozone increased significantly TA extraction (68.6, 64.2 and 59.9% for 24 hours ozone-treated berries, 72 hours ozone-treated berries and control samples, respectively). PRO and FRV extractability also showed an increase in both ozone-treated samples compared to the control (+8.6-9.1% for PRO and +7.3-11.7% for FRV). No significant differences were found among treatments for individual anthocyanins, whereas the variety and maceration time strongly affected the anthocyanin profile. In our experimental conditions, ozone enhanced phenolic compounds extractability in Nebbiolo grapes while it did not show significant effects on Barbera. Therefore, the use of ozone as sanitizing agent in the red varieties winemaking process can be considered because it did not negatively affect the extractability of skin anthocyanins and flavanols.

Publication date: May 17, 2024

Issue: Macrowine 2016

Type: Poster

Authors

Maria Alessandra Paissoni*, Cristian Carboni, Fabrizio Torchio, Francesco Cravero, Kalliopi Rantsiou, Luca Cocolin, Luca Rolle, Pierre-Louis Teissedre, Simone Giacosa, Susana Río Segade, Vasileios Englezos, Vincenzo Gerbi

*Università di Torino

Contact the author

Tags

IVES Conference Series | Macrowine | Macrowine 2016

Citation

Related articles…

Use of computational modelling for selecting adsorbents for improved fining of wine

The occurrence of faults and taints in wine, such as those caused by microbial spoilage or various taints, have resulted in significant financial losses to wine producers. The wine industry commits significant financial resources towards fining and taint removal processes each year. Fining involves the addition of one or more adsorptive substrates to juice or wine to bind certain components, thus reducing their concentration [1]. However, these processes are often not selective and can also remove desirable flavour and aroma compounds.

Ageing of sweet wines: oxygen evolution according to bung and barrel type

Barrel ageing is a crucial step in the wine process because it allows many changes to the wine as enrichment, colour stabilization, clarification and also a slow oxygenation. Effects of the oak barrel have to be known to prevent oxidation of the wine. The type of bung used during ageing is also a parameter to consider. Ageing sweet wines in barrel is a real challenge. These wines may need some oxygen at the beginning of ageing but they should be protected at the end of their maturation, to avoid oxidation.

On the losses of dissolved CO2 during champagne aging

A misconception lingers in the minds of some wine consumers that Champagne wines don’t age. It’s largely a myth, certainly as far as the best cuvees are concerned. Actually, during the so-called autolysis period of time (in the closed bottle, after the “prise de mousse”), complex chemical reactions take place when the wine remains in contact with the dead yeast cells, which progressively bring complex and very much sought-after aromas to champagne. Nevertheless, despite their remarkable impermeability to liquid and air, caps or natural cork stoppers used to cork the bottles are not 100% hermetic with regard to gas transfers. Gas species therefore very slowly diffuse through the cap or cork stopper, along their respective inverse partial pressure. After the “prise de mousse”, because the partial pressure of CO2 in the bottleneck reaches up to 6 bars (at 12 °C), gaseous CO2 progressively diffuse from the bottle to the ambient air
(where the partial pressure of gaseous CO2 is only of order of 0,0004 bar).

Directed Evolution of Oenococcus oeni: optimising yeast-bacteria interactions for improved malolactic fermentation

Malolactic fermentation (MLF) is a secondary step in the vinification process and it follows alcoholic fermentation (AF) which is predominantly carried out by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. These two processes result in the degradation of metabolites to produce secondary metabolites which also contribute to the final wine flavour and quality. AF results in the production of ethanol and carbon dioxide from sugars and MLF stems from the degradation of L-malic acid (a dicarboxylic acid) to L-lactic acid (a monocarboxylic acid). The latter process results in a smoother texture as the acidity of the wine is reduced by the process, it also adds to the flavour complexity of the wine.

Chemical markers in wine related to low levels of yeast available nitrogen in the grape

Nitrogen is an important nutrient of yeast and its low content in grape must is a major cause for sluggish fermentations. To prevent problems during fermentation, a supplementation of the must with ammonium salts or more complex nitrogen mixtures is practiced in the cellar. However this correction seems to improve only partially the quality of wine [1]. In fact, yeast is using nitrogen in many of its metabolic pathways and depending of the sort of the nitrogen source (ammonium or amino acids) it produces different flavor active compounds. A limitation in amino acids can lead to a change in the metabolic pathways of yeast and consequently alter wine quality.