Macrowine 2021
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 Colour assessment of port wines using colorimetric and spectrophotometric methods

Colour assessment of port wines using colorimetric and spectrophotometric methods

Abstract

Colour is an important quality parameter in wines and is the result of a complex mixture of pigments (including anthocyanins and their derivatives, quinones, xanthyllium compounds, etc.). Red wine colour changes over time as pigments react between themselves and with other wine macromolecules (particularly polyphenols). During wine tasting, colour is normally assessed on the outer rim of the wine profile in a tilted glass, since most wines are too opaque to be analysed in the middle of the glass. Therefore, depending on the depth of observation considered, the perception of wine colour can be different. The precise measurement of wine colour is usually done using molecular (UV-VIS) spectrophotometric methods. In the current official (OIV) method, the transmittance spectrum of a particular sample is measured and used to calculate CIE L*a*b* parameters, which define a single (predominant) colour for a particular wine. Reflectance colorimetry is an alternative well-established method for measuring colour in foodstuffs, which can also be used in transparent samples (such as wines) as long as a reflective background is used. In this work, a reflectance colorimeter was used to measure CIE L*a*b* colour parameters of Port wine samples of different categories at different depths, in Petri dishes. The obtained results were compared with the parameters obtained using the OIV method. Representative profiles of Lightness (L*), Hue (H*) and Chroma (C*) vs. wine depths were obtained using Port wine samples from different categories and ages. Wines from the same category exhibited similar colour (depth) profiles, with Tawny-styled wines showing a more linear profile than Ruby-styled wines regarding the L* and H* parameters. Good correlations between the colorimetric and OIV methods were obtained for the L* (Ruby:R >= 0.97; Tawny:R > 0.86) and H* parameters (Ruby:R >= 0.90; Tawny >= 0.91) with the C* parameter giving inferior results, particularly in Tawny-style wines (Ruby:R >= 0.87; Tawny >= 0.29). The results suggest the colorimetric method can be used as an alternative to the OIV method for estimating the L* and H* parameters (the most important for wine colour definition), being quicker and more informative.

Publication date: May 17, 2024

Issue: Macrowine 2016

Type: Poster

Authors

Francisco Silva*, Bento Amaral, Cristina Silva, Francisco Campos, Manuel Ferreira, Natalia Ribeiro, Tomas Simões

*Escola Sup. Biotecnologia – UCP

Contact the author

Tags

IVES Conference Series | Macrowine | Macrowine 2016

Citation

Related articles…

Full automation of oenological fermentations and its application to the processing of must containing high sugar or acetic acid concentrations

Climate change and harvest date decisions have led to the evolution of must quality over the last decades. Increases in must sugar concentrations are among the most obvious consequences, quantitatively. Saccharomyces cerevisiae is a robust and acid tolerant organism. These properties, its sugar to ethanol conversion rate and ethanol tolerance make it the ideal production organism for wine fermentations. Unfortunately, high sugar concentrations may affect S. cerevisiae and lead to growth inhibition or yeast lysis, and cause sluggish or stuck fermentations. Even sublethal conditions cause a hyperosmotic stress response in S. cerevisiae which leads to increased formation of fermentation by-products, including acetic acid, which may exceed legal limits in some wines.

Application of high power ultrasounds during red wine vinification

Wine color is one of the main organoleptic characteristics influencing its quality. It is of especial interest in red vinifications due to the economic resources that wineries have to invest for the extraction of the phenolic compounds responsible of wine color, compounds that are mainly located inside the skin cell vacuoles. Moreover, these phenolic compounds not only influence color but also other organoleptic properties such as body, mouthfeel, astringency and flavour. The transference of phenolic compounds from grapes to must during vinification is closely related with the type of grapes and the winemaking technique.

Enological evaluation of the attitude of the grapevine fumin to give varietal wines

Initiatives have been ongoing in recent years to safeguard biodiversity in the oenological sector via a process of enhancement of ancient varieties, under a pressure of a market strongly oriented towards production deriving from native vines of specific geographical zones. In that sense, Aosta Valley
(Italy) has raised the need to preserve and characterize its minority vine varieties which have the potentiality to give varietal wines. Fumin represents the 7% of the production of the region with 16 hectares of vineyards and 753 hectolitres of derived wine. Due to its large phenolic potential, strong astringency and deep colour, it has long been, and is still today, assembled or blended with other varieties as occurs, for example, for the Torrette.

Interactions of wine polyphenols with dead or living Saccharomyces cerevisiae Yeast Cells and Cell Walls: polyphenol location by microscopy

Tannin, anthocyanins and their reaction products play a major role in the quality of red wines. They contribute to their sensory characteristics, particularly colour and astringency. Grape tannins and anthocyanins are extracted during red wine fermentation. However, their concentration and composition change over time, due to their strong chemical reactivity1. It is also well known that yeasts influence the wine phenolic content, either through the release of metabolites involved in the formation of derived pigments1, or through polyphenol adsorption2,3.

Field-grown Sauvignon Blanc berries react to increased exposure by controlling antioxidant homeostasis and displaying UV acclimation responses that are influenced by the level of ambient light

Leaf removal in the bunch zone is a common viticultural practice with several objectives, yet it has been difficult to conclusively link the physiological mechanism(s) and metabolic berry impact to this widely practiced treatment. We used a field-omics approach1 in a Sauvignon blanc high altitude model vineyard, showing that the early leaf removal in the bunch zone caused quantifiable and stable responses (over years) in the microclimate where the main perturbation was increased exposure. We provide an explanation for how leaf removal leads to the shifts in grape metabolites typically linked to this treatment and confirm anecdotal evidence and previous reports that leaf removal treatment at an early stage of berry development affects “quality-associated” metabolites (monoterpenes and norisoprenoids).