Macrowine 2021
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 Correlations between N,S,O-heterocycle levels and age of Champagne base wines

Correlations between N,S,O-heterocycle levels and age of Champagne base wines

Abstract

Champagne regulation allows winegrowers to stock small amounts of still wines in order to compensate vintages’ quality shifts mainly due to climate variations. According to their technical requirements and house style some Champagne producers (commonly named “Champagne houses”) use these stored wines in the blend in order to introduce an element of complexity. These wines possess the particularity of being aged on fine lees in thermo-regulated stainless steel tanks. The Champagne house of Veuve Clicquot Ponsardin has several wines stored this way. The oldest of these wines dates back to 1988. The role of lees and ageing in a low-pH (<=3) as in Champagne leads to several modifications of wine composition1. Lees are known to affect wine redox potential and liberate protein and free amino acids. These conditions combined with extended ageing result in the required environment for the Maillard chemical reaction whose aromatic molecules including sulphur, oxygen and nitrogen heterocycles (such as thiazole, furan and pyrazines derivatives) may have a sensory impact on wine2. The 50 mono-varietal wines aged from 1 to 28 years, have been provided by Veuve Clicquot Ponsardin wherein some wines aromatic heterocycles were determined by the SPME-GC-MS method3. To identify any possible correlation between these aromatic compounds end their precursors, 21 amino acids were determined by HPLC-fluorimetry method4. The most interesting result highlights a strong correlation between certain heterocycle concentrations and age of wine. That suggests these compounds as potential indicators of lees ageing. As such they can be considered as potential key compounds of the bouquet of aged Champagnes. The principle outcome of these assays has revealed for the first time in Champagne base wines that aromatic heterocycles concentration are correlated with wine age.

1. Alexandre, H. & Guilloux-Benatier, M. Yeast autolysis in sparkling wine – A review. Aust. J. Grape Wine Res. 12, 119–127 (2006). 2. Marchand, S., De Revel, G. & Bertrand, A. Approaches to wine aroma: Release of aroma compounds from reactions between cysteine and carbonyl compounds in wine. J. Agric. Food Chem. 48, 4890–4895 (2000). 3. Burin, V. M., Marchand, S., De Revel, G. & Bordignon-Luiz, M. T. Development and validation of method for heterocyclic compounds in wine: Optimization of HS-SPME conditions applying a response surface methodology. Talanta 117, 87–93 (2013). 4. Pripis-Nicolau, L., De Revel, G., Marchand, S., Beloqui, A. A. & Bertrand, A. Automated HPLC method for the measurement of free amino acids including cysteine in musts and wines; first applications. J. Sci. Food Agric. 81, 731–738 (2001).

Publication date: May 17, 2024

Issue: Macrowine 2016

Type: Poster

Authors

Nicolas Le Menn*, Delphine Laborde, DEMARVILLE Dominique, Gilles De Revel, Richard Marchal, Stéphanie Marchand

*ISVV

Contact the author

Tags

IVES Conference Series | Macrowine | Macrowine 2016

Citation

Related articles…

Intelligent article to control the internal pressure in continue in bottles

An intelligent packaging might, among others, provide information and allow monitoring of the quality of the packed product or its surrounding environment. A recent project on micro-flow wine bottles closed with aluminium screw cap and tightness liner, highlighted the importance of monitoring the internal overpressure continuously, in real-time and at least for 72 hours, since the internal pressure on the tightness liner and the micro-flow are related. Real-time and continuous measurements are not the standard methods of measurement of the overpressure, yet. The most used equipment for the determination of the pressure in wine bottle is the aphrometer, a destructive device that supplies a single value of pressure.

Application of high power ultrasounds during red wine vinification

Wine color is one of the main organoleptic characteristics influencing its quality. It is of especial interest in red vinifications due to the economic resources that wineries have to invest for the extraction of the phenolic compounds responsible of wine color, compounds that are mainly located inside the skin cell vacuoles. Moreover, these phenolic compounds not only influence color but also other organoleptic properties such as body, mouthfeel, astringency and flavour. The transference of phenolic compounds from grapes to must during vinification is closely related with the type of grapes and the winemaking technique.

Extraction of polyphenols from grape marc by supercritical fluid extraction (SFE) and evaluation of their ‘bioavailability’ as dietary supplements

In the winemaking process, several compounds that remain in the grape skins and seeds after the fermentation stage are bioactive-compounds (substances with potential beneficial effects on health) that can be extracted in order to recovery valuable substances with a high commercial value for the cosmetic, food (nutraceuticals) and pharmaceutical industries. The skins contain significant amounts of bioactive substances such as tannins (16-27%) and other polyphenolic compounds (2-6.5%) in particular, catechins, anthocyanins, proanthocyanins, quercetin , ellagic acid and resveratrol.

Fining-Derived Allergens in Wine: from Detection to Quantification

Since 2012, EU Commission approved compulsory labeling of wines treated with allergenic additives or processing aids “if their presence can be detected in the final product” (EU Commission Implementing Regulation No. 579/2012 of 29 June 2012). The list of potential allergens to be indicated on wine labels comprises sulphur dioxide and milk- and egg- derived fining agents, including hen egg lysozyme, which is usually added in wines as preservative. In some non-EU countries, the list includes gluten, tree nuts and fish gelatins. With the exception of lysozyme, all these fining proteins were long thought to be totally removed by subsequent winemaking processings (e.g. bentonite addition).

Reaction Mechanisms of Copper and Iron with Hydrogen Sulfide and Thiols in Model Wine

Fermentation derived sulfidic off-odors due to hydrogen sulfide (H2S) and low molecular weight thiols are commonly encountered in wine production and removed by Cu(II) fining. However, the mechanism underlying Cu(II) fining remains poorly understood, and generally results in increased Cu concentration that lead to deleterious reactions in finished wine. The present study describes a mechanistic investigation of the iron and copper mediated reaction of H2S, cysteine, 3-sulfanylhexan-1-ol, and 6-sulfanylhexan-1-ol with oxygen. The concentrations of H2S, thiols, oxygen, and acetaldehyde were monitored over time. It was found that Cu(II) was rapidly reduced by both H2S and thiols to Cu(I).