Macrowine 2021
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 Correlations between N,S,O-heterocycle levels and age of Champagne base wines

Correlations between N,S,O-heterocycle levels and age of Champagne base wines

Abstract

Champagne regulation allows winegrowers to stock small amounts of still wines in order to compensate vintages’ quality shifts mainly due to climate variations. According to their technical requirements and house style some Champagne producers (commonly named “Champagne houses”) use these stored wines in the blend in order to introduce an element of complexity. These wines possess the particularity of being aged on fine lees in thermo-regulated stainless steel tanks. The Champagne house of Veuve Clicquot Ponsardin has several wines stored this way. The oldest of these wines dates back to 1988. The role of lees and ageing in a low-pH (<=3) as in Champagne leads to several modifications of wine composition1. Lees are known to affect wine redox potential and liberate protein and free amino acids. These conditions combined with extended ageing result in the required environment for the Maillard chemical reaction whose aromatic molecules including sulphur, oxygen and nitrogen heterocycles (such as thiazole, furan and pyrazines derivatives) may have a sensory impact on wine2. The 50 mono-varietal wines aged from 1 to 28 years, have been provided by Veuve Clicquot Ponsardin wherein some wines aromatic heterocycles were determined by the SPME-GC-MS method3. To identify any possible correlation between these aromatic compounds end their precursors, 21 amino acids were determined by HPLC-fluorimetry method4. The most interesting result highlights a strong correlation between certain heterocycle concentrations and age of wine. That suggests these compounds as potential indicators of lees ageing. As such they can be considered as potential key compounds of the bouquet of aged Champagnes. The principle outcome of these assays has revealed for the first time in Champagne base wines that aromatic heterocycles concentration are correlated with wine age.

1. Alexandre, H. & Guilloux-Benatier, M. Yeast autolysis in sparkling wine – A review. Aust. J. Grape Wine Res. 12, 119–127 (2006). 2. Marchand, S., De Revel, G. & Bertrand, A. Approaches to wine aroma: Release of aroma compounds from reactions between cysteine and carbonyl compounds in wine. J. Agric. Food Chem. 48, 4890–4895 (2000). 3. Burin, V. M., Marchand, S., De Revel, G. & Bordignon-Luiz, M. T. Development and validation of method for heterocyclic compounds in wine: Optimization of HS-SPME conditions applying a response surface methodology. Talanta 117, 87–93 (2013). 4. Pripis-Nicolau, L., De Revel, G., Marchand, S., Beloqui, A. A. & Bertrand, A. Automated HPLC method for the measurement of free amino acids including cysteine in musts and wines; first applications. J. Sci. Food Agric. 81, 731–738 (2001).

Publication date: May 17, 2024

Issue: Macrowine 2016

Type: Poster

Authors

Nicolas Le Menn*, Delphine Laborde, DEMARVILLE Dominique, Gilles De Revel, Richard Marchal, Stéphanie Marchand

*ISVV

Contact the author

Tags

IVES Conference Series | Macrowine | Macrowine 2016

Citation

Related articles…

Supramolecular approaches to the study of the astringency elicited by wine phenolic compounds

The objective of this study is to review the scientific evidences and to advance into the knowledge of the molecular mechanisms of astringency. Astringency has been described as the drying, roughing and puckering sensation perceived when some food and beverages are tasted (1). The main, but possibly not the only, mechanism for the astringency is the precipitation of salivary proteins (2,3). Between phenolic compounds found in red wines, flavan-3-ols are the group usually related to the development of this sensation. Other compounds, phenolic or not, like anthocyanins, polysaccharides and mannoproteins could act modifying or modulating astringency perception by hindering the interaction between flavanols and salivary proteins either because of their interaction with the flavanols or because of their interaction with the salivary proteins.

The commercial yeast strain as a significant source of variance for tyrosol and hydroxytyrosol in white wine

Tyrosol (TYR) and hydroxytyrosol (HYT) are bioactive phenols present in olive oil and wine, basic elements of the Mediterranean diet. TYR is reported in the literature for its interesting antioxidant, cardioprotective and anti-inflammatory properties. In wine, its concentration can reach values as high as about 40 mg/L
[Pour Nikfardjam et al. 2007] but, more frequently, this phenol – derived from yeast metabolism of tyrosine during fermentation – is present at lower levels, generally higher in red wines compared to whites. HYT was measured for the first time by Di Tommaso et al. [1998] in Italian wines – with maximum values of 4.20 mg/L and 1.92 mg/L for red and white wines, respectively – while definitely lower concentrations have been found later in Greek samples.

Field-grown Sauvignon Blanc berries react to increased exposure by controlling antioxidant homeostasis and displaying UV acclimation responses that are influenced by the level of ambient light

Leaf removal in the bunch zone is a common viticultural practice with several objectives, yet it has been difficult to conclusively link the physiological mechanism(s) and metabolic berry impact to this widely practiced treatment. We used a field-omics approach1 in a Sauvignon blanc high altitude model vineyard, showing that the early leaf removal in the bunch zone caused quantifiable and stable responses (over years) in the microclimate where the main perturbation was increased exposure. We provide an explanation for how leaf removal leads to the shifts in grape metabolites typically linked to this treatment and confirm anecdotal evidence and previous reports that leaf removal treatment at an early stage of berry development affects “quality-associated” metabolites (monoterpenes and norisoprenoids).

Grape metabolites, aroma precursors and the complexities of wine flavour

A critical aspect of wine quality from a consumer perspective is the overall impression of wine flavour, which is formed by the interplay of volatile aroma compounds, their precursors, and taste and matrix components. Grapes contribute some potent aroma compounds, together with a large pool of non-volatile precursors (e.g. glycoconjugates and amino acid conjugates). Aroma precursors can break down through chemical hydrolysis reactions, or through the action of yeast or enzymes, significantly changing the aroma profile of a wine during winemaking and storage. In addition, glycoconjugates of monoterpenes, norisoprenoids and volatile phenols, together with sulfur-conjugates in wine, provide a reservoir of additional flavour through the in-mouth release of volatiles which may be perceived retro-nasally.

A preliminary study of clonal selection in cv. Viura in relation to varietal aroma profile

Viura is a synonym for Macabeo and currently it is the most widely planted white grape variety in D.O.Ca. Rioja, with 3,569 ha, representing 84% of the white grape cultivated area. It is a generous-yielding grape, presenting low values of titratable acidity and with large and compact clusters which makes it susceptible to Botrytis cinerea. Thus, this variety not always satisfies the wine grower’s prospects. Nowadays, the available plant material is scarce, moreover, it was selected on the basis of other quality criteria, not currently requested.