Macrowine 2021
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 Evaluation of colloidal stability in white and rosé wines investing Dynamic Light Scattering technology

Evaluation of colloidal stability in white and rosé wines investing Dynamic Light Scattering technology

Abstract

Proteins constitute one of the three main components of grape juice and white wine, phenolic compounds and polysaccharides being the others. A specific group of the total grape-derived proteins resists degradation or adsorption during the winemaking process and remains in finished wine if not removed by the commonplace commercial practice of bentonite fining. While bentonite is effective in removing the problematic proteins, it is claimed to adversely affect the quality of the treated wine under certain conditions, through the removal of colour, flavor and texture compounds. A number of studies have indicated that different protein fractions require distinct bentonite concentrations for protein removal and consequent heat stabilization. The lack of reliable tests assessing risk of protein clouding during bottle storage is a recurring problem of winemakers. The methods used to evaluate wine stability involve inducing haze formation (by heat, trichloroacetic acid, and ethanol) and then measuring of turbidity using spectrophotometers, turbidimeters or nephelometers. Currently used test assessing haze potential involves heating which often cause overdosing of fining agent. Moreover, it was shown that the composition of precipitate formed using above mentioned methods was not the same as naturally formed precipitate. A new and reliable method evaluating the haze potential, relevant to natural haze formation is needed. Different tests have been proposed to assess haze formation in wine. Most of these tests are based upon different types of procedures, leading to protein aggregation and precipitation. Heat stability trials, based on heat-induced precipitation, are the most common. These tests are empirical and do not necessarily reflect changes and destabilization phenomena liable to occur in real wine storage conditions. The fact that the same tests, associated with bentonite fining trials, are used to determine the bentonite doses needed to stabilize wines, leads to doses of bentonite much too high and consequently affecting wine quality. Given that the mechanisms underlying haze formation are still not fully understood, the aim of this work was to investigate the feasibility of using Dynamic light scattering (DLS) to understand the occurrence of haze formation, and the implication of wine compounds (protein, polyphenols, polysaccharides). DLS is a non-invasive, well-established technique for measuring the size and size distribution of molecules and particles typically in the submicron region, and with the latest technology lower than 1 nm. DLS directly measures fluctuations in scattering intensity due to Brownian motion, which are analyzed to determine the translational diffusion coefficient Dt and hence an effective measure of molecular size, the hydrodynamic radius Rh. DLS could also provide a rough measure of size distributions in order to assess populations of aggregates, and characterize the colloidal stability of wines.

Publication date: May 17, 2024

Issue: Macrowine 2016

Type: Poster

Authors

Benoit Bach*, Agnieszka Kosinska Cagnazzo, Julien Ducruet, Marc Mathieu, Wilfried Andlauer

*HES-SO

Contact the author

Tags

IVES Conference Series | Macrowine | Macrowine 2016

Citation

Related articles…

Metabolomics comparison of non-Saccharomyces yeasts in Sauvignon blanc and Shiraz

Saccharomyces cerevisiae (SC) is the main driver of alcoholic fermentation however, in wine, non-Saccharomyces species can have a powerful effect on aroma and flavor formation. This study aimed to compare untargeted volatile compound profiles from SPME-GC×GC-TOF-MS of Sauvignon blanc and Shiraz wine inoculated with six different non-Saccharomyces yeasts followed by SC. Torulaspora delbrueckii (TD), Lachancea thermotolerans (LT), Pichia kluyveri (PK) and Metschnikowia pulcherrima (MP) were commercial starter strains, while Candida zemplinina (CZ) and Kazachstania aerobia (KA), were isolated from wine grape environments. Each fermentation produced a distinct chemical profile that was unique for both grape musts. The SC-monoculture and CZ-SC sequential fermentations were the most distinctly different in the Sauvignon blanc while the LT-SC sequential fermentations were the most different from the control in the Shiraz fermentations.

Monitoring of Pesticide Residues from Vine to Wine

Those previous years, pesticides are often brought to the forefront by media. Questions arose about their toxicity for growers and consumers. Even if a downward trend is underway, the use of pesticides is required to ensure steady quality and quantity of harvests. A large number of active ingredients are authorized but regarding viticulture, mainly insecticides and fungicides are applied, to control pests and diseases and to increase crop yield. Some phytosanitary products, principally fungicides, applied close to the harvest date may frequently be detected in wines.

Characterizing the effects of nitrogen on grapevines with different scion/rootstock combinations: agronomic, metabolomic and transcriptomic approaches

Most vineyards are grafted and include a variety (Vitis vinifera) grafted over a wild Vitis rootstock (hybrids of V. berlandieri, riparia and rupestris). Grape berry quality at harvest depends on a subtle balance between acidity and the concentrations of sugars, polyphenols and precursors of aroma compounds. The mechanisms controlling the balance of sugars/acids/polyphenols are influenced by the abiotic environment, in particular nitrogen supply, and interact with the genotypes of both the scion variety and the rootstock. Previous work suggests that some of the effects of water stress are in fact linked to a nitrogen deficiency driven indirectly by the reduction of water absorption.

Bentonite fining in cold wines: prediction tests, reduced efficiency and possibilities to avoid additional fining treatments

Bentonite fining is widely used to prevent protein haze in white wines. Most wineries use laboratory-scale fining trials to define the appropriate amount of bentonite to be used in the cellar. Those pre-tests need to mimic as much as possible the industrial scale fining procedure to determine the exact amount of bentonite necessary for protein stability. Nevertheless it is frequent that, after fining with the recommended amount of bentonite, wines appear still unstable and need an additional fining treatment. It remains a major challenge to understand why the same wine, fined with the same dosage of the same bentonite, achieves stability in the lab, but not in the cellar.

Full automation of oenological fermentations and its application to the processing of must containing high sugar or acetic acid concentrations

Climate change and harvest date decisions have led to the evolution of must quality over the last decades. Increases in must sugar concentrations are among the most obvious consequences, quantitatively. Saccharomyces cerevisiae is a robust and acid tolerant organism. These properties, its sugar to ethanol conversion rate and ethanol tolerance make it the ideal production organism for wine fermentations. Unfortunately, high sugar concentrations may affect S. cerevisiae and lead to growth inhibition or yeast lysis, and cause sluggish or stuck fermentations. Even sublethal conditions cause a hyperosmotic stress response in S. cerevisiae which leads to increased formation of fermentation by-products, including acetic acid, which may exceed legal limits in some wines.