Macrowine 2021
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 Interaction between the enzymes of central carbon metabolism and anthocyanin biosynthesis during grape berry development

Interaction between the enzymes of central carbon metabolism and anthocyanin biosynthesis during grape berry development

Abstract

Primary and secondary metabolites are major components of grape quality and wine typicity. Their accumulation is interconnected through a complex metabolic network, which is still not well understood. This study aims to investigate how the enzymes of central carbon metabolism interact with anthocyanin biosynthesis during grape berry development: does the accumulation of anthocyanins, which represents a non-negligible diversion of carbon metabolic fluxes, require reprogramming of central enzymes or is it controlled downstream of central metabolism? To this end, 23 enzymes involved in central carbon metabolism pathways have been analyzed in the berries of 3 grape cultivars, which have close genetic background but distinct temporal dynamics of anthocyanin accumulation. The 3 cultivars are 1) cv. Gamay, which has white flesh over berry development; 2) cv. Gamay de Bouze, which is a somatic mutant of cv. Gamay with white flesh at beginning of berry development and starts to accumulate anthocyanins in the flesh at the onset of fruit ripening; 3) cv. Gamay Fréaux, which is a somatic mutant of cv. Gamay de Bouze with flesh accumulating anthocyanins as early as fruit set. The temporal differences of anthocyanin accumulation of the three cultivars make them a valuable model system to study the interaction between primary and secondary metabolisms in grape berry. Berries of the three cultivars have been sampled at 11 times from fruit set to maturity. Primary metabolites (sugars, organic acids, and 21 free amino acids) and anthocyains have been analyzed, in conjunction with qPCR analysis of key genes involved in anthocyanin biosynthesis. The results showed that hexose concentrations are the same in the fleshes of the three cultivars; however, phenylalanine is much lower in the genotype that accumulates more anthocyanins. The expression of key genes involved in the anthocyanin biosynthesis pathway is in line with anthocyanin accumulation in each cultivar. Enzyme activity analysis also showed that enzymes involved in glycolysis (PGI, PGM) were highest in cv. Gamay Fréaux,and lowest in Gamay, in the same order as anthocyanin concentration. These results provide clues to modulate the balance between primary and secondary metabolites in grape berry. Acknowledgement: This work is partly supported by a grant from FR BIE “Biologie Intégrative et Ecologie” at Bordeaux University to ZD and YG.

Publication date: May 17, 2024

Issue: Macrowine 2016

Type: Poster

Authors

Zhanwu Dai*, Christel Renaud, Eric Gomes, Ghislaine Hilbert, Jing Wu, Messa Meddar, Patricia Ballias, Serge Delrot, Yves Gibon

*INRA

Contact the author

Tags

IVES Conference Series | Macrowine | Macrowine 2016

Citation

Related articles…

Metabolomics comparison of non-Saccharomyces yeasts in Sauvignon blanc and Shiraz

Saccharomyces cerevisiae (SC) is the main driver of alcoholic fermentation however, in wine, non-Saccharomyces species can have a powerful effect on aroma and flavor formation. This study aimed to compare untargeted volatile compound profiles from SPME-GC×GC-TOF-MS of Sauvignon blanc and Shiraz wine inoculated with six different non-Saccharomyces yeasts followed by SC. Torulaspora delbrueckii (TD), Lachancea thermotolerans (LT), Pichia kluyveri (PK) and Metschnikowia pulcherrima (MP) were commercial starter strains, while Candida zemplinina (CZ) and Kazachstania aerobia (KA), were isolated from wine grape environments. Each fermentation produced a distinct chemical profile that was unique for both grape musts. The SC-monoculture and CZ-SC sequential fermentations were the most distinctly different in the Sauvignon blanc while the LT-SC sequential fermentations were the most different from the control in the Shiraz fermentations.

On the losses of dissolved CO2 during champagne aging

A misconception lingers in the minds of some wine consumers that Champagne wines don’t age. It’s largely a myth, certainly as far as the best cuvees are concerned. Actually, during the so-called autolysis period of time (in the closed bottle, after the “prise de mousse”), complex chemical reactions take place when the wine remains in contact with the dead yeast cells, which progressively bring complex and very much sought-after aromas to champagne. Nevertheless, despite their remarkable impermeability to liquid and air, caps or natural cork stoppers used to cork the bottles are not 100% hermetic with regard to gas transfers. Gas species therefore very slowly diffuse through the cap or cork stopper, along their respective inverse partial pressure. After the “prise de mousse”, because the partial pressure of CO2 in the bottleneck reaches up to 6 bars (at 12 °C), gaseous CO2 progressively diffuse from the bottle to the ambient air
(where the partial pressure of gaseous CO2 is only of order of 0,0004 bar).

Characterization of non-Saccharomyces yeast and its interaction with Saccharomyces cerevisiae with investigation of fermentation kinetics and aromatic composition

[lwp_divi_breadcrumbs home_text="IVES" use_before_icon="on" before_icon="||divi||400" module_id="publication-ariane" _builder_version="4.20.4" _module_preset="default" module_text_align="center" module_font_size="16px" text_orientation="center"...

Moscatel vine-shoot extracts as grapevine biostimulant to increase the varietal aroma of Airén wines

There is a growing interest in the exploitation of vine-shoots waste, since they are often left or burned. Sánchez-Gómez et al. [1] have shown that vines-shoots aqueous extracts have significant contents of bioactive compounds, among which several polyphenols and volatiles are highlighted. Recent studied had demonstrated that the chemical composition of vine-shoots is enhanced when vine-shoots are toasted
[2,3]. The application of vegetable products in the vineyards has led to significant changes towards a more “Sustainable Viticulture”. An innovative foliar application for Airén vine-shoot extracts have been carried out to the vineyard. It has been shown that they act as grape biostimulants, improving certain wine quality characteristics [4].

DNA and type of grain: which factor does better explain sensory differences of sessile and pedunculate oaks?

Sessile oak and pedunculate oak have shown several differences of interest for enological purposes. Tannic and aromatic composition among sessile oak or pedonculate oak has been well studied. Sessile oak is generally more aromatic than pedunculated, while the later is more tannic. This scientific point of view is rarely applied to classify oak in cooperages. Most coopers use the type of grain to distinguish wide and thin grain.