Macrowine 2021
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 DNA and type of grain: which factor does better explain sensory differences of sessile and pedunculate oaks?

DNA and type of grain: which factor does better explain sensory differences of sessile and pedunculate oaks?

Abstract

Sessile oak and pedunculate oak have shown several differences of interest for enological purposes. Tannic and aromatic composition among sessile oak or pedonculate oak has been well studied. Sessile oak is generally more aromatic than pedunculated, while the later is more tannic. This scientific point of view is rarely applied to classify oak in cooperages. Most coopers use the type of grain to distinguish wide and thin grain. While the former leads to barrels with less aromas and more tannins, often oriented to alcohols, the later is more aromatic and convenient for wine ageing. Does the traditional cooper grading by grain have a link with species in the chemical expression of oak? A protocol has been built to monitor the effect of the two species from the tree to the barrel, and the wine aged in them. In this study the first results observed during the yard seasoning are presented. Several oak trees from the same plot in the Forêt Domaniale de Saint Palais, France were studied. Recent developments of DNA tests can identify oak species or hybrid (instead of morphological determination that can be approximate). DNA tests were performed on each tree to identify their species. After excluding hybrids, only pure sessile oak and pure pedunculate oak were considered and separated into two batches. Staves were split from each oak batch, classified according to their type of grain and put in the yard for 24 months of seasoning. Chemical, sensory and also wood microflora analyses have been made at the beginning (T0), after 6 months (T6), after 12 months (T12) and after 18 months (T18) of seasoning. Among the sessile oak, two groups can be distinguished. The former is extremely rich in lactones whereas the later is poorer and can be considered as a “neighbor” of pedunculate oak that is poor in lactones but richer in tannins. Pedunculate oak is homogeneous whether its grain is tight or wide. Sessile oak seems to be impacted by the type of grain. The richer group is related to only thin grain while the poorer is made of mainly wide grain. Tastings on oak shavings showed that sessile oak has spicy, fresh and pastry aromas whereas pedunculate oak was acetic. Moreoever the later showed a more important and varied microflora. These first three steps of the yard seasoning have shown that the grain have a true effect on the aromatic composition of sessile oak. Are these differences kept along yard seasoning, barrel making and wine ageing?

Publication date: May 17, 2024

Issue: Macrowine 2016

Type: Poster

Authors

Marie Mirabel*, Rémi Teissier du Cros, Vincent Renouf

*Chêne & Cie

Contact the author

Tags

IVES Conference Series | Macrowine | Macrowine 2016

Citation

Related articles…

Identification of caffeic acid as a major component of Moscatel wine protein sediment

Proteins play a significant role in the colloidal stability and clarity of white wines [1]. However, under conditions of high temperatures during storage or transportation, the proteins themselves can self-aggregate into light-dispersing particles causing the so-called protein haze [2]. Formation of these unattractive precipitates in bottled wine is a common defect of commercial wines, making them unacceptable for sale [3]. Previous studies identified the presence of phenolic compounds in the natural precipitate of white wine [4], contributing to the hypothesis that these compounds could be involved in the mechanism of protein haze formation.

Metabolomic profile of red non-V. vinifera genotypes

Vitis vinifera L. is the most widely cultivated Vitis species which includes numerous cultivars. Owing to their superior quality of grapes, these cultivars were long considered the only suitable for the production of fine wines. However, the lack of resistance genes in V. vinifera against major grapevine pathogens, requires for its cultivation frequent spraying with large amount of fungicides. Thus, the search for alternative and more sustainable methods to control the grapevine pathogens have brought the breeders to focus their attention on other Vitis species. In fact, wild Vitis genotypes present multiple resistance traits against pathogens, such as powdery mildew, downy mildew and phylloxera.

Correlations between sensory characteristics and colloidal content in dry white wines

Must clarification is an important step occurring just after grape extraction in the elaboration of white wine, consisting in a solid-liquid separation. Traditionally, low must turbidity, around 50-150 NTU, is generally reached in white winemaking in order to prevent reductive aromas and facilitating alcoholic fermentation. Alternatively, a higher turbidity (300 NTU or above) can be sought for reasons such as a better expression of grapes identity (terroir), or for getting a must matrix that could supposedly lead to wines having greater ageing potential.

Modulating role of SO2 in white wine protein haze formation

Despite the extensive research performed during the last decades, the multifactorial mechanism responsible for the white wine protein haze formation is not fully characterized. Herein, a new model is proposed, which is based on the experimental identification of sulfur dioxide as a major modulating factor inducing wine protein haze upon heating. As opposed to other reducing agents, such as 2-mercaptoethanol, dithiothreitol and tris(2-carboxyethyl)phosphine hydrochloride (TCEP), the addition of SO2 to must/wine upon heating cleaves intraprotein disulfide bonds, hinders thiol-disulfide exchange during protein interactions and can lead to the formation of novel inter/intraprotein disulfide bonds. Those are eventually responsible for wine protein aggregation which follows a nucleation-growth kinetic model as shown by dynamic light scattering [1].

Using elicitors in different grape varieties. Effect over their phenolic composition

Phenolic compounds are very important in crop plants and have been the subject of a large number of studies. Three main reasons can be cited for optimizing the level of phenolic compounds in crop plants: their physiological role in plants, their technological significance for food processing, and their nutritional characteristics1 Indeed, an enormous diversity of phenolic antioxidants is found in fruits and vegetables, and their presence and roles can be affected or modified by several pre- and postharvest cultural practices and/or food processing technologies (Ruiz-García et al. 2012, Goldman et al. 1999, Tudela et al. 2002). In winegrapes, the technological importance of phenolic compounds, mainly flavonoids, is well-known.