Macrowine 2021
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 DNA and type of grain: which factor does better explain sensory differences of sessile and pedunculate oaks?

DNA and type of grain: which factor does better explain sensory differences of sessile and pedunculate oaks?

Abstract

Sessile oak and pedunculate oak have shown several differences of interest for enological purposes. Tannic and aromatic composition among sessile oak or pedonculate oak has been well studied. Sessile oak is generally more aromatic than pedunculated, while the later is more tannic. This scientific point of view is rarely applied to classify oak in cooperages. Most coopers use the type of grain to distinguish wide and thin grain. While the former leads to barrels with less aromas and more tannins, often oriented to alcohols, the later is more aromatic and convenient for wine ageing. Does the traditional cooper grading by grain have a link with species in the chemical expression of oak? A protocol has been built to monitor the effect of the two species from the tree to the barrel, and the wine aged in them. In this study the first results observed during the yard seasoning are presented. Several oak trees from the same plot in the Forêt Domaniale de Saint Palais, France were studied. Recent developments of DNA tests can identify oak species or hybrid (instead of morphological determination that can be approximate). DNA tests were performed on each tree to identify their species. After excluding hybrids, only pure sessile oak and pure pedunculate oak were considered and separated into two batches. Staves were split from each oak batch, classified according to their type of grain and put in the yard for 24 months of seasoning. Chemical, sensory and also wood microflora analyses have been made at the beginning (T0), after 6 months (T6), after 12 months (T12) and after 18 months (T18) of seasoning. Among the sessile oak, two groups can be distinguished. The former is extremely rich in lactones whereas the later is poorer and can be considered as a “neighbor” of pedunculate oak that is poor in lactones but richer in tannins. Pedunculate oak is homogeneous whether its grain is tight or wide. Sessile oak seems to be impacted by the type of grain. The richer group is related to only thin grain while the poorer is made of mainly wide grain. Tastings on oak shavings showed that sessile oak has spicy, fresh and pastry aromas whereas pedunculate oak was acetic. Moreoever the later showed a more important and varied microflora. These first three steps of the yard seasoning have shown that the grain have a true effect on the aromatic composition of sessile oak. Are these differences kept along yard seasoning, barrel making and wine ageing?

Publication date: May 17, 2024

Issue: Macrowine 2016

Type: Poster

Authors

Marie Mirabel*, Rémi Teissier du Cros, Vincent Renouf

*Chêne & Cie

Contact the author

Tags

IVES Conference Series | Macrowine | Macrowine 2016

Citation

Related articles…

Fingerprinting the origin of rosé wines with a new high throughput polyphenomics method

Wine is a widely consumed alcoholic beverage with a high commercial value. More specifically, the worldwide consumption of rosé wine has increased by 20% since 2002[1]. But because of its high commercial value, it can become a subject of fraud, and authenticity control is necessarily required. More than one hundred polyphenols have been recently quantified in various rosé wines [2]. They are key components defining color, taste and quality of wines. Their amount and composition depend on many different factors such as grape variety, winemaking and age of the wine. In this study, the influence of geographic origin of some rosé French wines was investigated. An original and very fast UPLC-QTOF-MS method was developed and used to predict the geographic origin authenticity of rosé wines.

Metabolomics of grape polyphenols as a consequence of post-harvest drying: on-plant dehydration vs warehouse withering

A method of suspect screening analysis to study grape metabolomics, was developed [1]. By performing ultra-high performance liquid chromatography (UHPLC) – high-resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS) analysis of the grape extract, averaging 320-450 putative grape compounds are identified which include mainly polyphenols. Identification of metabolites is performed by a new HRMS-database of putative grape and wine compounds expressly constructed (GrapeMetabolomics) which currently includes around 1,100 entries.

Novel contribution to the study of mouth-feel properties in wines

In general, there is a well-established lexicon related to wine aroma and taste properties; however mouth-feel-related vocabulary usually includes heterogeneous, multimodal and personalized terms. Gawel et al.
(2000) published a wheel related to mouthfeel properties of red wine. However, its use in scientific publications has been limited. The authors accepted that the approach had certain limitations as it included redundant and terms with hedonic tone and some others were absent. It is of high interest to generate a mouth-feel lexicon and finding the chemical compound or group of compounds responsible for such properties in red wine. In the present work a chemical fractionation method has been developed.

Impact of non-fruity compounds on red wines fruity aromatic expression: the role of higher alcohols

A part, at least, of the fruity aroma of red wines is the consequence of perceptive interactions between various aromatic compounds, particularly ethyl esters and acetates, which may contribute to the perception of fruity aromas, specifically thanks to synergistic effects.1,2 The question of the indirect impact of non-fruity compounds on this particular aromatic expression has not yet been widely investigated. Among these compounds higher alcohols (HA) represent the main group, from a quantitative standpoint, of volatiles in many alcoholic beverages. Moreover, some bibliographic data suggested their contribution to the aromatic complexity by either increasing or masking flavors of wine, depending of their concentrations.

Interest and impact of PVP/PVI (Polyvinylpyrrolidone/ Polyvinylimidazole) on winemaking and final quality of wines

Céline Sparrow a, Christophe Morge a, a SOFRALAB SAS, 79, av. A.A. Thévenet – CS 11031 – 51530 Magenta, France Consumers’ health and security force authorities to limit, in wine as in others food industry products, the concentration in « dangerous » molecules. Therefore the legal limit in heavy metals keeps on decreasing. As per proof EU regulation just decrease the stain concentration in wine from 0,2 to 0,15 mg/l. Certain changes , such as sodium arsenite treatment in vines, disappearance of brass in wineries to the benefit of stainless steel, limit even more the concentration of heavy metals in wines. But the use of copper derivates in vines treatments is difficult to replace. In the case of wine and its elaboration, the problem is even more complex. Indeed, regulation forces the wine producers to control the concentration of certain heavy metals in final wines.