Macrowine 2021
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 DNA and type of grain: which factor does better explain sensory differences of sessile and pedunculate oaks?

DNA and type of grain: which factor does better explain sensory differences of sessile and pedunculate oaks?

Abstract

Sessile oak and pedunculate oak have shown several differences of interest for enological purposes. Tannic and aromatic composition among sessile oak or pedonculate oak has been well studied. Sessile oak is generally more aromatic than pedunculated, while the later is more tannic. This scientific point of view is rarely applied to classify oak in cooperages. Most coopers use the type of grain to distinguish wide and thin grain. While the former leads to barrels with less aromas and more tannins, often oriented to alcohols, the later is more aromatic and convenient for wine ageing. Does the traditional cooper grading by grain have a link with species in the chemical expression of oak? A protocol has been built to monitor the effect of the two species from the tree to the barrel, and the wine aged in them. In this study the first results observed during the yard seasoning are presented. Several oak trees from the same plot in the Forêt Domaniale de Saint Palais, France were studied. Recent developments of DNA tests can identify oak species or hybrid (instead of morphological determination that can be approximate). DNA tests were performed on each tree to identify their species. After excluding hybrids, only pure sessile oak and pure pedunculate oak were considered and separated into two batches. Staves were split from each oak batch, classified according to their type of grain and put in the yard for 24 months of seasoning. Chemical, sensory and also wood microflora analyses have been made at the beginning (T0), after 6 months (T6), after 12 months (T12) and after 18 months (T18) of seasoning. Among the sessile oak, two groups can be distinguished. The former is extremely rich in lactones whereas the later is poorer and can be considered as a “neighbor” of pedunculate oak that is poor in lactones but richer in tannins. Pedunculate oak is homogeneous whether its grain is tight or wide. Sessile oak seems to be impacted by the type of grain. The richer group is related to only thin grain while the poorer is made of mainly wide grain. Tastings on oak shavings showed that sessile oak has spicy, fresh and pastry aromas whereas pedunculate oak was acetic. Moreoever the later showed a more important and varied microflora. These first three steps of the yard seasoning have shown that the grain have a true effect on the aromatic composition of sessile oak. Are these differences kept along yard seasoning, barrel making and wine ageing?

Publication date: May 17, 2024

Issue: Macrowine 2016

Type: Poster

Authors

Marie Mirabel*, Rémi Teissier du Cros, Vincent Renouf

*Chêne & Cie

Contact the author

Tags

IVES Conference Series | Macrowine | Macrowine 2016

Citation

Related articles…

Sensory and nephelometric analysis of tannin fractions obtained by ultrafiltration of red wines

The assessment of red wine mouthfeel relies primarily on the sensory description of its tannic properties. This evaluation could be improved by gaining a better understanding of the physicochemical properties of these tannins. Hence, the objectives of the present study were threefold: (1) to gain an insight into the sensory properties of subpopulations of proanthocyanidic tannins of different molecular sizes obtained through several ultrafiltration steps, (2) to quantify the kinetics of haze formation of these proanthocyanidic tannins in a dynamic polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) precipitation test, (3) to determine whether a correlation exists between the sensory and the precipitation data.

Field-grown Sauvignon Blanc berries react to increased exposure by controlling antioxidant homeostasis and displaying UV acclimation responses that are influenced by the level of ambient light

Leaf removal in the bunch zone is a common viticultural practice with several objectives, yet it has been difficult to conclusively link the physiological mechanism(s) and metabolic berry impact to this widely practiced treatment. We used a field-omics approach1 in a Sauvignon blanc high altitude model vineyard, showing that the early leaf removal in the bunch zone caused quantifiable and stable responses (over years) in the microclimate where the main perturbation was increased exposure. We provide an explanation for how leaf removal leads to the shifts in grape metabolites typically linked to this treatment and confirm anecdotal evidence and previous reports that leaf removal treatment at an early stage of berry development affects “quality-associated” metabolites (monoterpenes and norisoprenoids).

Metabolomics of grape polyphenols as a consequence of post-harvest drying: on-plant dehydration vs warehouse withering

A method of suspect screening analysis to study grape metabolomics, was developed [1]. By performing ultra-high performance liquid chromatography (UHPLC) – high-resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS) analysis of the grape extract, averaging 320-450 putative grape compounds are identified which include mainly polyphenols. Identification of metabolites is performed by a new HRMS-database of putative grape and wine compounds expressly constructed (GrapeMetabolomics) which currently includes around 1,100 entries.

Characterizing the effects of nitrogen on grapevines with different scion/rootstock combinations: agronomic, metabolomic and transcriptomic approaches

Most vineyards are grafted and include a variety (Vitis vinifera) grafted over a wild Vitis rootstock (hybrids of V. berlandieri, riparia and rupestris). Grape berry quality at harvest depends on a subtle balance between acidity and the concentrations of sugars, polyphenols and precursors of aroma compounds. The mechanisms controlling the balance of sugars/acids/polyphenols are influenced by the abiotic environment, in particular nitrogen supply, and interact with the genotypes of both the scion variety and the rootstock. Previous work suggests that some of the effects of water stress are in fact linked to a nitrogen deficiency driven indirectly by the reduction of water absorption.

Testing the effectiveness of Cell-Wall material from grape pomace as fining agent for red wines

Lately several works highlighted the capacity of grape cell-wall material (CWM) to interact with proanthocyanidins (PA), indicating its potential use as fining agent for red wines.1–4 However, those studies were performed by using purified PAs and very high doses of CWM (almost ten-fold higher than those used in wine industry for other commercial fining agents). The present study focuses on the applicability of CWM from Cabernet sauvignon pomace as fining agent for red wines under real winery conditions. Grapes of cultivar Cabernet sauvignon were harvested at three different maturity levels
(unripe, mature, and overripe) and used for red winemaking. The pomace of such vinifications were used as source of CWM, and applied into red wines at two different concentrations: 0.2 g/L and 2.5 g/L.