terclim by ICS banner
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 Open-GPB 9 Open-GPB-2024 9 Flash - New biotechnological tools 9 Enhancing hydric stress tolerance by editing the VviMYB60 promoter with CRISPR/Cas9 

Enhancing hydric stress tolerance by editing the VviMYB60 promoter with CRISPR/Cas9 

Abstract

Climate change presents increasing challenges to viticulture, particularly with rising water stress contributing significantly to yield losses and damages. The identification of the MYB60 transcription factor, which regulates stomatal opening and closing in Arabidopsis thaliana and Vitis vinifera, offers potential solutions. Notably, knockout studies in Arabidopsis have shown reduced stomatal opening and increased drought tolerance in myb60 mutants. Additionally, the grapevine ortholog, VviMYB60, can restore the wild-type phenotype of Arabidopsis myb60 mutants. Further investigation of the Arabidopsis promoter region has revealed that mutations in DOF motifs lead to reduced expression of AtMYB60.

Utilizing the advancements in CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing, this project aims to modify the VviMYB60 promoter region to lower gene expression, thereby reducing stomatal opening in grapevines. Binary vectors for genome editing were constructed to target two specific regions of the VviMYB60 promoter. Agrobacterium-mediated transformation was performed on Chardonnay embryogenic calli, resulting in the successful regeneration of plants under selection conditions. Sanger sequencing analysis of the targeted region confirmed the occurrence of genetic edits in four of the six lines analyzed so far.

To further characterize the edited lines, next-generation sequencing will be utilized, providing a more comprehensive understanding of the mutations, as well as gene expression of VviMYB60 will be evaluated to confirm that the editing reduces its expression. Morphological and physiological parameters will be measured after acclimatation in greenhouse and finally these edited lines will undergo drought tolerance testing to assess their performance.

DOI:

Publication date: June 13, 2024

Issue: Open GPB 2024

Type: Article

Authors

Manuela Campa1*, Loredana Moffa2, Luca Nerva2, Walter Chitarra2, Johan Burger1

1 Genetics Department, Faculty of Agrisciences, Stellenbosch University, 7600 Stellenbosch, South Africa
2 Research Centre for Viticulture and Enology, Council for Agricultural Research and Economics (CREA-VE), Via XXVIII Aprile 26, 31015 Conegliano (Italy)

Contact the author*

Keywords

CRISPR/Cas9, VviMYB60, promoter, drought tolerance, stomatal regulation

Tags

IVES Conference Series | Open GPB | Open GPB 2024

Citation

Related articles…

Grape and wine quality of terraced local variety Pinela (Vitis vinifera L.) under different water management

Climate change is driving global temperatures up together with a reduction of rainfall, posing a risk to grape yields, wine quality, and threatening the historical viticulture areas of Europe.

The ability of wine yeasts fermenting by the addition of exogenous biotin

Research is focused on the increase of the field of obtaining the wine yeast, under physical and chemical conditions. Study of different influences on yeast production is very important for the promotion

Evolution of the amino acids content through grape ripening: Effect of foliar application of methyl jasmonate with or without urea

The parameters that determine the grape quality, and therefore the optimal harvest time, suffer variations during berry ripening, related to climate change, with the widely known problem of the gap between technological and phenolic maturities. However, there are few studies about its incidence on grape nitrogen composition. For this reason, the use of an elicitor, methyl jasmonate (MeJ), alone or with urea, is proposed as a tool to reduce climatic decoupling, allowing to establish the harvest time in order to achieve the optimum grape quality. The aim was to study the effect of MeJ and MeJ+Urea foliar applications on the evolution of Tempranillo amino acids content throughout the grape maturation. Three treatments were foliarly applied, at veraison and 7 days later: control (water), MeJ (10 mM) and MeJ+Urea (10 mM+6 kg N/ha). Grape samples were taken at five stages of maturation: day before the first and second applications, 15 days after the second application (pre-harvest), harvest day, and 15 days after harvest (post-harvest). The amino acids analysis of the samples was carried out by HPLC. Results showed that the evolution of amino acids was similar regardless of the treatment; however, foliar applications influenced the nitrogen compounds content, i.e., there was no qualitative effect but quantitative one. Most of the amino acids reached their maximum concentration in pre-harvest, being higher in grapes from the treatments than in the control. In general, no differences in grape amino acids content were observed between MeJ and MeJ+Urea treatments. Foliar applications with MeJ and MeJ+Urea enhanced the grape amino acids content, without affecting their profile, helping to optimize their quality and allowing to establish a more complete grape ripening standard. Therefore, MeJ and MeJ+Urea foliar applications can be a simple agronomic practice, which has shown promising results in order to enhance the grape quality.

From the current probabilistic approach to a deterministic production process, a clear step towards digital transformation in the wine sector

Currently, to consistently ensure the maintenance of a wine-style while benefiting from the utmost rigor made possible by the winemaking process, the composition of the wine blend is made using sensory control. This is performed after the wine is made with no real possibility of deterministic intervention.

Raman spectroscopy as a rapid method to assess grape polyphenolic maturation and wine malolactic fermentation on site

Wineries can increase their economic and environmental sustainability by optimizing the winemaking procedures, from harvest to wine maturation and conservation. Based on analytical data of the chemical composition and wine sensory evaluation, the enologist makes his own decision regarding the enological interventions at the harvest date selection, winemaking and post-winemaking.