OENO IVAS 2019 banner
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 Coming of age: do old vines actually produce berries with higher enological potential than young vines? A case study on the Riesling cultivar

Coming of age: do old vines actually produce berries with higher enological potential than young vines? A case study on the Riesling cultivar

Abstract

Consumers and the wine industry tend to agree on the ability of old vines to produce fruit that allows the production of wine of superior character. However, despite past and ongoing research, objective evidence of this point of view is still debated and studies on robust, specifically dedicated plots are scarce.

Thus the impact of grapevine age on berry oenological potential and wine quality remains an open question. To try to objectively address the issue, a unique vineyard was established at Geisenheim University, Germany. It was planted in 1971 with cv. Riesling grafted on 5C Teleki. In 1995 and 2012, several rows were uprooted and replanted with the same rootstock/scion combination, resulting in a vineyard with alternate rows of identical plant material, but with different planting dates. The parameters of technical maturity and grape composition at harvest were analyzed during seasons 2014, 2015, 2016 and 2017 combining HPLC and enzymatic methods. Separate micro-vinifications were made for each age group and wine composition was analyzed by a combination of 1H-NMR and SPE-GC-MS.

The results showed that technical maturity parameters (TSS, TA, must pH) were not significantly different across the three grapevine age groups. Berry composition showed little differences in quality-relevant metabolite contents, with the noticeable exceptions of α-amino acid, skin flavonols, free and bound monoterpene and norisoprenoid amounts that were significantly higher in vines planted in 2012 compared to older vines, but only in seasons 2014 and 2015 where soil management practices of the young vines differed. Berries from vines planted in 1971 and 1995 did not exhibit significant differences in berry composition, throughout the four seasons. Wine chemical analysis complemented and confirmed results obtained in berry composition. Wine made from grapes produced by vines planted in 2012 had higher terpene and norisoprenoid amounts, compared to wines made with grapes from the two other vines groups, but only for the 2014 and 2015 vintages. Wines from grapes produced by vines planted in 1971 and 1995 did not exhibit significant differences in composition throughout the four seasons.

conclusion:

In conclusion, even though vines planted in 2012 exhibits significant differences in berry and wine composition for their two first vintages compared to older ones, these differences appeared to vanished once the vines were fully established and soil management practices became uniform.

Acknowledgments:

This work was supported by a PhD grant to K. Bou Nader from the Forschungsring Deutscher Weinbau.

DOI:

Publication date: June 23, 2020

Issue: OENO IVAS 2019

Type: Article

Authors

Khalil Bou Nader (1, 2), Ghislaine Hilbert (1), Doris Rauhut (3), Christel Renaud (1), Otmar Löhnertz (4), Claus-Dieter Patz (5), Rainer Jung (6), Hans-Reiner Schultz (7), Manfred Stoll (2), Eric Gomes (1) 

1 UMR EGFV, Bordeaux Sciences Agro, INRA, Université de Bordeaux, ISVV, Villenave d’Ornon, France 
2 Hochschule Geisenheim University (HGU), Department of General and Organic Viticulture,, Von-Lade-Str. 1, 65366, Geisenheim, Germany 
3 Hochschule Geisenheim University (HGU), Department of Microbiology and Biochemistry, Von-Lade-Str. 1, 65366, Geisenheim, Germany 
4 Hochschule Geisenheim University (HGU), Department of Soil Sciences and Plant Nutrition 
5 Hochschule Geisenheim University (HGU), Department of Beverage Sciences, Von-Lade-Str. 1, 65366, Geisenheim, Germany 
6 Hochschule Geisenheim University (HGU), Department of Oenology, Von-Lade-Str. 1, 65366, Geisenheim, Germany 
7 Hochschule Geisenheim University (HGU), Presidency; Von-Lade-Str. 1, 65366, Geisenheim, Germany

Contact the author

Keywords

Grapevine age, vineyard management, berry composition, primary and secondary metabolites

Tags

IVES Conference Series | OENO IVAS 2019

Citation

Related articles…

Impact of aging on dimethyl sulfide (DMS) in Corvina and Corvinone wines

Dimethyl sulfide (DMS) is a low molecular weight sulfur compound produced in wine during aging by the chemical degradation of S-Methyl-L-methionine (SMM). Investigating the aromatic profile of Amarone commercial wines from different wineries, it was found that DMS presented a high variation in concentration across wine samples ranging from 2.88 to 64.34 μg/L, which potentially can

Molecular characterization of wines nucleophilic potential by ultra-performance liquid chromatography high resolution mass spectrometry

The knowledge about the molecular fraction associated to white wines oxidative stability is still poorly understood.

Unexpected relationships between δ13C, water deficit, and wine grape performance

Water nutrition is crucial for wine grape performance. Thus soil investigation aims at characterizing spatial and temporal variability of available water. A possible strategy

Are Farm to fork strategy goals reasonable and achievable? State of the art of Península de Setubal’s winegrowers

The European Union’s “farm to fork” strategy sets out several objectives to be achieved by farmers, who, among others, relate to increasing biodiversity, protecting soils and reducing the use of pesticides. At a time when the amendments to the national plans of Sustainable Use of pesticides are being discussed, it is important to understand what the Setúbal Peninsula region status is.

IMPACT OF ACIDIFICATION AT BOTTLING BY FUMARIC ACID ON RED WINE AFTER 2 YEARS

Global warming is responsible for a lack of organic acid in grape berries, leading to wines with higher pH and lower titrable acidity. The chemical, microbiological and organoleptic equilibriums are impacted by this change of organic acid concentration. It is common practice to acidify the wine in order to prevent these imbalances that can lead to wine defects and early spoilage. Tartaric acid (TA) is most commonly used by winemaker for wine acidification purposes. Fumaric acid (FA), which is authorized by the OIV in its member states for the inhibition of malolactic fermentation, could also be used as a potential acidification candidate since it has a better acidifying power than tartaric acid.