terclim by ICS banner
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 Activation of retrotransposition in grapevine

Activation of retrotransposition in grapevine

Abstract

Retrotransposons, particularly of the Ty-Copia and Ty-Gypsy superfamilies, represent the most abundant and widespread transposons in many plant genomes. Grapevine is no exception and it is clear that these mobile elements have played a major role in the evolution of Vitaceae genomes. While speculation abounds around the possible role of transposons in plant genomes, outside of the rather obvious involvement of retrotransposition in fueling genome expansion, there is little clarity of the actual role these elements have in both developing new genetic variation and in modulating epigenetic responses within genomes to changing climate. To this end we have been exploring de-novo assembled Sauvignon blanc and Pinot noir genomes with a view to catalogue retrotransposon loci to determine the structural intactness and thus age of insertion variation across a small number of clonal linages of these 2 varietals in an attempt to identify ‘live’ TE loci. Combining insights into insertional patterns with both short and long read transcriptome data has highlighted that only a small number of families and within these families and an even smaller number of discrete loci are responsible for ongoing retrotransposition. We are currently exploring means to alter the epigenomic landscape of grape genomes to allow heightened retrotransposon activity and thus mobilization. We will present how we are tracking this mobility using virus-like protein particle analysis (VLP-seq) to both identify families actively transposing and to study the genomic and epigenomic impact of this mobility prior to purifying selection.

DOI:

Publication date: June 14, 2024

Issue: Open GPB 2024

Type: Article

Authors

Christopher Winefield1*, Suguru Sugiyama1,2, Haniyeh Shahab1,2, Annabel Whibley2, Darrell Lizamore2

1 Department of Wine Food and Molecular Biosciences, Faculty of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Lincoln university, New Zealand
2 Bragato Research Institute, Lincoln University, New Zealand

Contact the author*

Keywords

Grapevine, Transposon, Genomics, Epigenomics, Climate Adaptation

Tags

IVES Conference Series | Open GPB | Open GPB 2024

Citation

Related articles…

Assessing the impact of defoliation on grape volatiles profile and wine odor characteristics in four Greek red varieties (Vitis vinifera L.) using multivariate chemometrics

Context and purpose of the study. Cultivation techniques are widely recognized for their significant impact on the aroma profile of grapes and wines.

Genetic traceability of ‘Nebbiolo’ musts and wines by single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) genotyping assays

AIM: ‘Nebbiolo’ (Vitis vinifera L.) is one of the most ancient and prestigious Italian grape cultivars. It is renowned for its use in producing monovarietal high-quality red wines, such Barolo and Barbaresco. Wine quality and value can be heavily modified if cultivars other than those allowed are employed.

Les propriétés de réflectance du sol de la parcelle sont à considerer comme des paramètres du terroir

Suite à des expérimentations de solarisation artificielle réalisées en 1999 en conditions réelles de culture, à partir de matériels réfléchissants partiellement colorés en vert, en bleu

Leaf removal to regulate fruit ripening in Cabernet-Sauvignon

Aim: Under the effects of climate change it is becoming increasingly common to observe excessively fast sugar accumulation while anthocyanin and flavour development are lagging behind. Understanding the impact of different leaf removal techniques on ripening will provide vineyard managers with a canopy management strategy suitable for

Different yield regulation strategies in semi-minimal-pruned hedge (SMPH) and impact on bunch architecture

Yields in the novel viticulture training system Semi-Minimal-Pruned Hedge (SMPH) are generally higher compared to the traditional Vertical Shoot Positioning (VSP). Excessive yields have a negative impact on the vine and wine quality, which can result in substantial losses in yield in subsequent vintages (alternate bearing) or penalties in fruit quality. Therefore yield regulation is essential. The bunch architecture in SMPH differs from VSP. Generally there is a higher amount but smaller bunches with lower single berry weights in SMPH compared to VSP.