terclim by ICS banner
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 Macrowine 9 Macrowine 2025 9 Analysis and composition of grapes, wines, wine spirits 9 Characterization of resistant varieties produced in the context of a search for regional typicality

Characterization of resistant varieties produced in the context of a search for regional typicality

Abstract

Planted between 2018 and 2019, the ‘New Vine’ system is a vineplot, comprising 169 individuals genotypes (5 vines/individual), located on a gravelous soil, in the INRAE Grande-Ferrade site (Villenave d’Ornon, France). These individuals are grapevine genotypes resulting from crosses between Petit Verdot or Cabernet Franc and resistant varieties containing the following pairs of resistance genes: Rpv1+Rpv3 or Rpv1+Rpv10 for downy mildew resistance and Run1+Ren3.2 for powdery mildew resistance [1]. More than 99% of the genome of these genotypes is derived from Vitis vinifera and contains two pairs of resistance genes. Over the last three vintages (2022, 2023, 2024), these varieties have been qualified from a phenotypic, chemical-components and sensory point of view. The aim was to identify the best suited genotypes to Bordeaux vineyards from an agronomic and oenological point of view. The phenological stages and agronomic performances (yield, berry size, etc.) were graded each year up to the harvest date of each individual variety. At maturity, oenological parameters were measured (pH, total acidity, sugars, assimilable nitrogen, acids) using a sequential analyzer (Y400, Byosystems). After harvesting, each individual genotype was vinified in 2 to 3 liters containers following a validated protocol.  After a few months of ageing, the volatile compounds in these wines were measured after extraction by GC-MS and GC-MS/MS protocols in order to obtain a fairly broad identity card of their aromatic profiles [2; 3]. Then, these wines were subjected to a sensory analysis combining categorization evaluation process (typicity and quality by orthonasal evaluation) and CATA. The purpose was to assess the typicality of these wines in relation to Bordeaux wines, as described by Ballester et al. [4]. The CATA allows a rapid, non-exhaustive description of the dominant olfactory and gustatory characteristics of these wines. After three vintages, we have already removed 30% of the individuals in the vine-plot. The results of the sensory analysis in particular, coupled with the agronomic performance and oenological data for these varieties, have enabled us to highlight potential good candidates for future planting in the vineyard, having sensory characteristics and chemical components abundancy compatible with Bordeaux wines expectations. These results shall be confirmed during future vintages and on a larger scale plantations.

References

[1] Merdinoglu, D., Schneider, C., Prado, E., Wiedemann-Merdinoglu, S., & Mestre, P. (2018). OENO One, 52(3), 203‑209.

[2] Thibon, C., Pons, A., Mouakka, N., Redon, P., Méreau, R., & Darriet, P. (2015). Journal of Chromatography A, 1415, 123 133.

[3] Poitou, X., Redon, P., Pons, A., Bruez, E., Delière, L., Marchal, A., Cholet, C., Geny-Denis, L., & Darriet, P. (2021). Food Chemistry, 360, 130120.

[4] Ballester, J., Dacremont, C., Fur, Y. L., & Etiévant, P. (2005). Food Quality and Preference, 16(4), 351 359.

Publication date: June 5, 2025

Type: Oral communication

Authors

Marie-Amélie Alayrac1,*, Cécile Thibon1, Soizic Lacampagne1, Bernard Lafargue2, Sandra Vanbrabant1, Pascaline Redon1, Clarisse Arcens2, Sixtine Blandeau1, Éric Castant2, Romain Courrèges2, Guillaume Arnold3, Laurent Audeguin4, Loïc Le Cunff4, Komlan Avia4, Laurent Charlier5, Laurent Delière2, Yann Raineau6, and Philippe Darriet1

1 Université Bordeaux, Bordeaux Sciences Agro, Bordeaux INP, INRAE, OENO, UMR 1366, ISVV, 33140 Villenave-d’Ornon, France
2 INRAE, UE Vigne Bordeaux, 33140 Villenave d’Ornon, France
3 INRAE, UR 1131 SVQV, Colmar, France
4 IFV, UMT Genovigne, France
5 CIVB, 1 cours du XXX Juillet, 33075 Bordeaux Cedex, France
6 INRAE, UR ETTIS, 33612 Cestas, France

Contact the author*

Keywords

resistant varieties, typicality, micro-vinification, sensory analysis

Tags

IVES Conference Series | Macrowine | Macrowine 2025

Related articles…

New insights of translocation of smoke-related volatile phenols in vivo grapevines

The increasing frequency of wildfires in grape-growing regions is seen as a significant risk for the grape and wine industry.

Effect of pre-fermentative cold soaking and use of different enzymes on the chemical and sensory properties of Catarratto wines

The wine industry widely recognizes that early-harvested grapes or those with uneven ripeness at harvest can produce wines with an “unripe fruit” mouthfeel [1,2]. Despite this, it is still unknown which compounds cause these sensory flaws or the most effective winemaking techniques to address them.

Exploring the inhibitor effect of different commercial chitosan-based preparations on malolactic fermentation in rosé wine

Chitosan is a natural polymer of β-D-linked N-acetyl-D-glucosamine units (1,2), that has only recently been approved by OIV for its use in winemaking to help with microbial control, metal chelation, clarification, and reducing contaminants.

Dimethyl sulfide transfer through wine closures during bottle aging: implications for wine aroma management

Dimethyl sulfide (DMS) is a volatile sulfur compound with a complex role in wine aroma, contributing both desirable and undesirable sensory characteristics depending on its concentration (1).

Circular economy strategies to reintegrate grape pomace from cv. Lagrein into the food chain

The project REALISM (regionality and circular economy in food products to counteract the Metabolic Syndrome (M.S.)) was initiated to develop antioxidant-rich food products with the ability to reduce the risk of developing the M.S.