terclim by ICS banner
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 Macrowine 9 Macrowine 2025 9 Analysis and composition of grapes, wines, wine spirits 9 Characterization of resistant varieties produced in the context of a search for regional typicality

Characterization of resistant varieties produced in the context of a search for regional typicality

Abstract

Planted between 2018 and 2019, the ‘New Vine’ system is a vineplot, comprising 169 individuals genotypes (5 vines/individual), located on a gravelous soil, in the INRAE Grande-Ferrade site (Villenave d’Ornon, France). These individuals are grapevine genotypes resulting from crosses between Petit Verdot or Cabernet Franc and resistant varieties containing the following pairs of resistance genes: Rpv1+Rpv3 or Rpv1+Rpv10 for downy mildew resistance and Run1+Ren3.2 for powdery mildew resistance [1]. More than 99% of the genome of these genotypes is derived from Vitis vinifera and contains two pairs of resistance genes. Over the last three vintages (2022, 2023, 2024), these varieties have been qualified from a phenotypic, chemical-components and sensory point of view. The aim was to identify the best suited genotypes to Bordeaux vineyards from an agronomic and oenological point of view. The phenological stages and agronomic performances (yield, berry size, etc.) were graded each year up to the harvest date of each individual variety. At maturity, oenological parameters were measured (pH, total acidity, sugars, assimilable nitrogen, acids) using a sequential analyzer (Y400, Byosystems). After harvesting, each individual genotype was vinified in 2 to 3 liters containers following a validated protocol.  After a few months of ageing, the volatile compounds in these wines were measured after extraction by GC-MS and GC-MS/MS protocols in order to obtain a fairly broad identity card of their aromatic profiles [2; 3]. Then, these wines were subjected to a sensory analysis combining categorization evaluation process (typicity and quality by orthonasal evaluation) and CATA. The purpose was to assess the typicality of these wines in relation to Bordeaux wines, as described by Ballester et al. [4]. The CATA allows a rapid, non-exhaustive description of the dominant olfactory and gustatory characteristics of these wines. After three vintages, we have already removed 30% of the individuals in the vine-plot. The results of the sensory analysis in particular, coupled with the agronomic performance and oenological data for these varieties, have enabled us to highlight potential good candidates for future planting in the vineyard, having sensory characteristics and chemical components abundancy compatible with Bordeaux wines expectations. These results shall be confirmed during future vintages and on a larger scale plantations.

References

[1] Merdinoglu, D., Schneider, C., Prado, E., Wiedemann-Merdinoglu, S., & Mestre, P. (2018). OENO One, 52(3), 203‑209.

[2] Thibon, C., Pons, A., Mouakka, N., Redon, P., Méreau, R., & Darriet, P. (2015). Journal of Chromatography A, 1415, 123 133.

[3] Poitou, X., Redon, P., Pons, A., Bruez, E., Delière, L., Marchal, A., Cholet, C., Geny-Denis, L., & Darriet, P. (2021). Food Chemistry, 360, 130120.

[4] Ballester, J., Dacremont, C., Fur, Y. L., & Etiévant, P. (2005). Food Quality and Preference, 16(4), 351 359.

Publication date: June 5, 2025

Type: Oral communication

Authors

Marie-Amélie Alayrac1,*, Cécile Thibon1, Soizic Lacampagne1, Bernard Lafargue2, Sandra Vanbrabant1, Pascaline Redon1, Clarisse Arcens2, Sixtine Blandeau1, Éric Castant2, Romain Courrèges2, Guillaume Arnold3, Laurent Audeguin4, Loïc Le Cunff4, Komlan Avia4, Laurent Charlier5, Laurent Delière2, Yann Raineau6, and Philippe Darriet1

1 Université Bordeaux, Bordeaux Sciences Agro, Bordeaux INP, INRAE, OENO, UMR 1366, ISVV, 33140 Villenave-d’Ornon, France
2 INRAE, UE Vigne Bordeaux, 33140 Villenave d’Ornon, France
3 INRAE, UR 1131 SVQV, Colmar, France
4 IFV, UMT Genovigne, France
5 CIVB, 1 cours du XXX Juillet, 33075 Bordeaux Cedex, France
6 INRAE, UR ETTIS, 33612 Cestas, France

Contact the author*

Keywords

resistant varieties, typicality, micro-vinification, sensory analysis

Tags

IVES Conference Series | Macrowine | Macrowine 2025

Related articles…

Highlighting a link between the structure of mannoproteins and their foaming properties in sparkling wines

Effervescence and foaming properties are the main visual characteristics assessed by the consumer during
sparkling wine tasting.

Effect of ozone treatments in wine production of young and short-term aged white wines: destructive and non-destructive evaluation of main quality attributes

The main aim of WiSSaTech project (PRIN P2022LXY3A), supported by Italian Ministero dell’Università e della Ricerca and NextGenerationEU program, is to investigate eco-friendly and safe alternatives to sulphur dioxide (SO2) in wine production.

A multivariate statistical process control (MSPC) system for red wine fermentations combining forecasting, process boundaries and monitoring with infrared spectroscopy calibrations

The wine industry continuously seeks innovative approaches to improve process monitoring and quality control, particularly during the fermentation process, where multivariate statistical process monitoring (MSPM) has emerged as a valuable tool [1].

Assessing the potential of fermentative skin contact in white winemaking on phenolic, colour, and sensory traits

Fermentative maceration in white wine production, involving extended contact with grape skins and seeds, has gained interest in recent years. The impact of this winemaking technique on wine composition and sensory properties remains underexplored.

Effect of must temperature and aspergillopepsin-I supplementation on PR-protein derived peptides

Protein instability in wines is challenging, and despite many efforts to find satisfactory alternatives to bentonite, both in terms of stability and quality, the solutions are limited in the wine industry.