terclim by ICS banner
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 Macrowine 9 Macrowine 2025 9 Analysis and composition of grapes, wines, wine spirits 9 Characterization of resistant varieties produced in the context of a search for regional typicality

Characterization of resistant varieties produced in the context of a search for regional typicality

Abstract

Planted between 2018 and 2019, the ‘New Vine’ system is a vineplot, comprising 169 individuals genotypes (5 vines/individual), located on a gravelous soil, in the INRAE Grande-Ferrade site (Villenave d’Ornon, France). These individuals are grapevine genotypes resulting from crosses between Petit Verdot or Cabernet Franc and resistant varieties containing the following pairs of resistance genes: Rpv1+Rpv3 or Rpv1+Rpv10 for downy mildew resistance and Run1+Ren3.2 for powdery mildew resistance [1]. More than 99% of the genome of these genotypes is derived from Vitis vinifera and contains two pairs of resistance genes. Over the last three vintages (2022, 2023, 2024), these varieties have been qualified from a phenotypic, chemical-components and sensory point of view. The aim was to identify the best suited genotypes to Bordeaux vineyards from an agronomic and oenological point of view. The phenological stages and agronomic performances (yield, berry size, etc.) were graded each year up to the harvest date of each individual variety. At maturity, oenological parameters were measured (pH, total acidity, sugars, assimilable nitrogen, acids) using a sequential analyzer (Y400, Byosystems). After harvesting, each individual genotype was vinified in 2 to 3 liters containers following a validated protocol.  After a few months of ageing, the volatile compounds in these wines were measured after extraction by GC-MS and GC-MS/MS protocols in order to obtain a fairly broad identity card of their aromatic profiles [2; 3]. Then, these wines were subjected to a sensory analysis combining categorization evaluation process (typicity and quality by orthonasal evaluation) and CATA. The purpose was to assess the typicality of these wines in relation to Bordeaux wines, as described by Ballester et al. [4]. The CATA allows a rapid, non-exhaustive description of the dominant olfactory and gustatory characteristics of these wines. After three vintages, we have already removed 30% of the individuals in the vine-plot. The results of the sensory analysis in particular, coupled with the agronomic performance and oenological data for these varieties, have enabled us to highlight potential good candidates for future planting in the vineyard, having sensory characteristics and chemical components abundancy compatible with Bordeaux wines expectations. These results shall be confirmed during future vintages and on a larger scale plantations.

References

[1] Merdinoglu, D., Schneider, C., Prado, E., Wiedemann-Merdinoglu, S., & Mestre, P. (2018). OENO One, 52(3), 203‑209.

[2] Thibon, C., Pons, A., Mouakka, N., Redon, P., Méreau, R., & Darriet, P. (2015). Journal of Chromatography A, 1415, 123 133.

[3] Poitou, X., Redon, P., Pons, A., Bruez, E., Delière, L., Marchal, A., Cholet, C., Geny-Denis, L., & Darriet, P. (2021). Food Chemistry, 360, 130120.

[4] Ballester, J., Dacremont, C., Fur, Y. L., & Etiévant, P. (2005). Food Quality and Preference, 16(4), 351 359.

Publication date: June 5, 2025

Type: Oral communication

Authors

Marie-Amélie Alayrac1,*, Cécile Thibon1, Soizic Lacampagne1, Bernard Lafargue2, Sandra Vanbrabant1, Pascaline Redon1, Clarisse Arcens2, Sixtine Blandeau1, Éric Castant2, Romain Courrèges2, Guillaume Arnold3, Laurent Audeguin4, Loïc Le Cunff4, Komlan Avia4, Laurent Charlier5, Laurent Delière2, Yann Raineau6, and Philippe Darriet1

1 Université Bordeaux, Bordeaux Sciences Agro, Bordeaux INP, INRAE, OENO, UMR 1366, ISVV, 33140 Villenave-d’Ornon, France
2 INRAE, UE Vigne Bordeaux, 33140 Villenave d’Ornon, France
3 INRAE, UR 1131 SVQV, Colmar, France
4 IFV, UMT Genovigne, France
5 CIVB, 1 cours du XXX Juillet, 33075 Bordeaux Cedex, France
6 INRAE, UR ETTIS, 33612 Cestas, France

Contact the author*

Keywords

resistant varieties, typicality, micro-vinification, sensory analysis

Tags

IVES Conference Series | Macrowine | Macrowine 2025

Related articles…

Effect of bleaching with different agents on protein hydrolysate characteristics

High temperatures can reduce the phenolic content of grapes, especially anthocyanins and copigments involved in colour stabilisation of red wines [1]. This could make it difficult to maintain stable colour during storage [2].

Characterization of a unique mannan from Starmerella bacillaris for protein stabilization in white wine

Yeast cell wall components are valuable biotechnological tools with applications in oenology and beyond [1], [2].

Key learnings about the chemical bases of wine uniqueness and quality, essential companions for future developments

This presentation aims to demonstrate that the value attributed to wine as we today know it is based on three factors: 1) sensory balance, 2) personality, and 3) bioactivity.

Colour, phenolic, and sensory characteristics of commercial monovarietal white wines produced with maceration

White wines produced with skin and seed contact are of great interest in the wine sector. Maceration, whether performed prior to or concurrently with alcoholic fermentation, or even extended beyond its completion, significantly impacts the chromatic, mouthfeel, and aroma characteristics of these wines.

Insight on Lugana flavor with a new LC-MS method for the detection of polyfunctional thiols

The analysis of polyfunctional thiols in wine is challenging due to their low abundance and instability within a complex matrix. However, volatile thiols are highly aroma-active, making their accurate quantification in wine at low concentrations crucial [1].