terclim by ICS banner
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 Macrowine 9 Macrowine 2025 9 Chemical and biochemical reactions, including grape and wine microorganism’s impact 9 Unveiling the fungal diversity of Falanghina grapes and the role of autochthonous Saccharomyces and non-Saccharomyces yeasts in wine fermentation

Unveiling the fungal diversity of Falanghina grapes and the role of autochthonous Saccharomyces and non-Saccharomyces yeasts in wine fermentation

Abstract

Falanghina, a typical wine from the Sannio (Campania region, Italy), hosts a complex fungal microbiota that significantly influences both fermentation dynamics and sensory characteristics. This study aimed to compare different metabarcoding markers for profiling fungal communities and to characterize the diversity and role of non-Saccharomyces yeasts in natural fermentations. To assess fungal diversity, three DNA barcode markers (ITS1, ITS2, and D1/D2 of 26S rDNA) [1, 2, 3] were evaluated across six Falanghina grape samples and their corresponding musts at different fermentation stages. ITS2 provided the most comprehensive taxonomic resolution, identifying 63 fungal genera, whereas ITS1 and 26S revealed 20 and 17 genera, respectively. The predominant mycobiota included Metschnikowia, Hanseniaspora, Saccharomyces, Pichia, Aureobasidium, and Starmerella. However, culture-based methods enabled the identification of additional genera, such as Candida, Wickerhamomyces, Rhodotorula, and Sarocladium, reinforcing the importance of integrating molecular and traditional approaches. A complementary study focused on the isolation and characterization of non-Saccharomyces yeasts from these fermentations. Fifty-seven biotypes were distinguished based on morpho-physiological traits and enzymatic activities, including β-glucosidase production and ethanol tolerance. ITS sequencing (ITS1-5.8S-ITS2 rDNA) [4] of strains confirmed the presence, in addition to Saccharomyces (S.) cerevisiae, of 13 non-Saccharomyces species, with Metschnikowia (M.) pulcherrima and Hanseniaspora guilliermondii being the most frequently occurring. Notably, microbial composition varied according to the grape’s terroir. Autochthonous selected strains of M. pulcherrima (MP12 and MP24) and S. cerevisiae (BIO3) in 120L vinification trials were tested. Sensory analysis revealed distinct aroma profiles: wines fermented with BIO3 alone exhibited pronounced banana notes, while MP12+BIO3 enhanced pear and exotic fruit aromas, and MP24+BIO3 contributed citrus, grapefruit, floral, and vegetal nuances. These findings highlight the value of ITS2 as a metabarcoding marker for fungal diversity analysis in wine and underscore the potential of non-Saccharomyces yeasts in modulating sensory attributes. Co-inoculation strategies with S. cerevisiae offer promising applications to improve fermentation performance and enhance the aromatic complexity of Falanghina wines.

References

[1] Rué, O., Coton, M., Dugat-Bony, E., Howell, K., Irlinger, F., Legras, J. L., Sicard, D. (2023). Peer Comm. J.3.

[2] Bokulich, NA.; Mills, DA. (2013). Appl. Environ. Microbiol., (79:2519-2526).

[3] Figueroa-Hernández, C., Mota-Gutierrez, J., Ferrocino, I., Hernández-Estrada, Z. J., González-Ríos, O., Cocolin, L., & Suárez-Quiroz, M. L. (2019).  Int. J. Food Microbiol., 301, 41-50.

[4] Esteve-Zarzoso, B., Belloch, C., Uruburu, F., & Querol, A. (1999). Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol., 49(1), 329-337.

Publication date: June 4, 2025

Type: Flash talk

Authors

Ernesto Petruzziello1,*, Mariacarmela Colandrea1, Vincenzo Valentino2, Elisabetta Pittari1, Francesca De Filippis2, Paola Piombino1, Giuseppe Baliotta1

1 Department of Agricultural Sciences, Division of Vine and Wine Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, 83100 Avellino, Italy
2 Task Force on Microbiome Studies, University of Naples Federico II, Via Cinthia, 80126 Naples, Italy

Contact the author*

Keywords

metabarcoding, microbial terroir, wine fermentation, sensory analysis, co-inoculation

Tags

IVES Conference Series | Macrowine | Macrowine 2025

Related articles…

Sensory and chemical effects of postharvest grape cooling on wine quality

Wine cellars are affected by seasonally fluctuating workloads and face challenges especially in the harvest period connected to the required timely processing of the harvested grapes.

White wine lees: unlocking the relationship between chemical composition and antioxidant potential

The wine-making process generates numerous by-products at each stage (crushing, fermentation, ageing), including wine lees, which account for almost 25% of the total quantity.

Crafting wine’s signature: exploring volatile compounds from terroir to aging

The unique characteristics of terroir play a fundamental role in shaping the identity and quality of wines, influencing the aromatic complexity of young wines and their long-term aging potential. The volatile compounds responsible for these aromas are crucial to identifying and appreciating a given wine.

Optimized grape seed protein extraction for wine fining

The extraction of proteins from grape seeds represents a promising strategy to revalorize wine industry by-products. As a natural endogenous fining agent, grape seed protein (GSE) offers an effective solution for wine clarification [1] without requiring label declaration.

Exploring the physico-chemical modification of grape seed extracts to improve their clarifying effect in red wine

During winemaking, some byproducts are obtained, such as grape pomace, which represent 13% of winery byproducts.