Terroir 2012 banner
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 Viticultural practices: past, present and future

Viticultural practices: past, present and future

Abstract

Practices in viticulture have greatly evolved in the last five decades. There were three objectives: improvement in the quality of the products, reduction in the production costs through mechanization, and protection of the environment. In terms of soil management, the combination of different techniques such as soil tillage, chemical weeding and cover-cropping, allowed to reach these three objectives in most cases. Insuring an adequate nitrogen supply to the grapevine was proved to play a key role, since nitrogen deficiency could impair the wine quality. The role of integrated water supply was pointed out, since moderate water restriction was favourable for the wine quality. In terms of vine training, a special interest was given to the winter pruning, keeping in mind the respect for the sap flows and trying to limit the expansion of the wood diseases, since the entirely mechanical pruning was rather inconclusive. Thresholds of leaf/fruit ratios were established and the canopy management during the summer such as leaf removal and shoot tipping were adapted accordingly. The objective was also to minimise the risk of diseases. The control of the yield has become one of the main concerns in viticulture. Although cluster thinning before maturation used to be unimaginable, it is today a common practice in all the vineyards concerned about wine quality and vine longevity. The concept of sustainability will go on influencing the evolution of the practices in viticulture.

DOI:

Publication date: October 1, 2020

Issue: Terroir 2012

Type: Article

Authors

François MURISIER, Vivian ZUFFEREY, Jean-Laurent SPRING

Station de recherche Agroscope Changins-Wädenswil ACW, CH-1260 Nyon

Contact the author

Keywords

soil and water management, vine management, yield, quality

Tags

IVES Conference Series | Terroir 2012

Citation

Related articles…

Foliar application of urea improved the nitrogen composition of Chenin grapes

The nitrogen composition of the grapes directly affects the developments of alcoholic fermentation and influences the final aromatic composition of the wines. The aim of this study was to determine the effect and efficiency of foliar applications of urea on the nitrogen composition of grapes. This study was carried out during 2023 vintage and in the Chenin vineyard located in Estacion Experimental Mendoza (Argentina). Three urea concentrations 3, 6 and 9 Kg N/ha (C1, C2, and C3, respectively) and control (T) were applied in this vineyard at veraison. In all solutions were added 1ml/l of Tween 80 ® surfactant.

French regulations related to vineyard spraying and examples of devices developed in France and around the world to limit the risks of point-source pollution

Managing pests in vineyards presents a major challenge for winegrowers, who are seeking effective solutions to control diseases and pests.

Proposta per un parco produttivo agrovitivinicolo dei “colli piacentini”

Le Dipartimento di Progettazione dell ‘Architettura del Politecnico di Milano et l’Istituto di Viticoltura della Facoltà d’Agraria di Piacenza dell’Università Cattolica del Sacra Cuore, ont elaboré une proposition pour réaliser, dans l’aire de colline de la province de Piacenza, un Parco Produttivo Agrovitivinicolo.

Oenotannins addition in wine: can be the modulation of redox potential predictable?

The purpose of this research was to study the interaction between oenotannins and wine matrix in order to design a targeted oenotannins addition for modulating the redox status of wine. It is in fact known that oenotannins can regulate the redox potential of musts and wines since they are electroactive substances (1).

Analysis of mousy off-flavour wines

Winemakers are increasingly experimenting with new techniques, such as spontaneous fermentation, prolonged yeast contact, higher pH, minimal sulphur dioxid, filtration and clarification or oxidative ageing. Along with this, the risk of microbial spoilage increases, and so the off-flavour mousiness, long time underestimated, is becoming more frequent. Characteristic of the mousy off-flavour is the delayed perception after swallowing the wine. After a few seconds the flavour appears, reminiscent of a dirty mouse cage. There are three known compounds that cause mousy off-flavor: 2-ethyltetrahydropyridine, 2-acetyltetrahydopyridine, and 2-acetylpyrroline. Yeasts such as Dekkera/Brettanomyces and heterofermentative lactic acid bacteria like Lactobacillus hilgardii can release these compounds.