Influence of different netting systems on physiology and agronomic performance of cvs. ‘Barbera’ and ‘Malvasia di Candia Aromatica’ grapevines grown in a Mediterranean environment
Abstract
Anti-hail nets can protect canopies and reduce heat stress, although their effectiveness depends on multiple factors and requires further study. The research evaluated if and how different shading nets affect grapevine physiology and agronomic performance in a Mediterranean environment. The trial was run in two vineyards from Colli Piacentini planted with cvs. Malvasia di Candia Aromatica (MACA) and Barbera (BA). Anti-hail nets (AHN), shading nets (SN), and anti-rain nets (ARN) were compared to a control (C). Nets were installed after budburst and lifted before harvest. Sentinel vines were monitored throughout key phenological stages for leaf gas exchange and stem water potential, while yield components, berry sunburn, and fruit composition were assessed at harvest. Gas exchange measurements considered leaf position and canopy side, preserving natural leaf orientation. Despite nets resulting in differential canopy shading according to commercial properties, physiological responses were less than proportional. Net type influenced photosynthesis in both cultivars, but to a different extent. In cv. BA, SN achieved the highest assimilation rates (+0.69 µmol m⁻² s⁻¹ compared with C on DOY 176), despite experiencing 35% lower PAR than C vines. AHN showed rates comparable to C, whereas ARN exhibited the lowest values. In cv. MACA, photosynthesis was reduced under ARN compared to C on DOY 203, while SN preserved assimilation rates similar to C vines. In BA vines, C and ARN exhibited the lowest ΨST values (-1.06 MPa on DOY 203), while SN had the highest (-0.96 MPa). In MACA, the difference in ΨST between SN and C mirrored that observed in Barbera (-1.10 MPa vs -1.20 MPa, respectively). Nets did not affect yield or basic fruit composition but significantly reduced bunch sunburn in both cultivars. Across all net types, sunburn incidence was reduced by 73–97% compared with the control, with effectiveness proportional to the degree of shading (SN > AHN > ARN). Ongoing analyses aim to address the effects of net type, cultivar, and row orientation, and to assess their influence on cluster microclimate, anthocyanin synthesis, and organic acid metabolism.
References
Bondada, B. R., & Keller, M. (2012). Not All Shrivels Are Created Equal—Morpho-Anatomical and Compositional Characteristics Differ among Different Shrivel Types That Develop during Ripening of Grape (<i>Vitis vinifera</i> L.) Berries. American Journal of Plant Sciences, 03(07), 879–898. https://doi.org/10.4236/ajps.2012.37105
Choné, X., Van Leeuwen, C., Dubordieu, Denis, & Gaudillère, Jean Pierre. (2001). Stem Water Potential is a Sensitive Indicator of Grapevine Water Status. Annals of Botany, 87(4), 477–483. https://doi.org/10.1006/anbo.2000.1361
Crouchett-Rojas, R., Araya-Alman, M., Verdugo-Vásquez, N., Fourment, M., & Gutiérrez-Gamboa, G. (2025). Shading Nets: A Current Viticultural Strategy to Mitigate the Negative Impacts of Global Warming on Grape and Wine Quality. Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research, 2025(1), 9729885. https://doi.org/10.1155/ajgw/9729885
Martínez-Lüscher, J., Chen, C. C. L., Brillante, L., & Kurtural, S. K. (2020). Mitigating Heat Wave and Exposure Damage to “Cabernet Sauvignon” Wine Grape With Partial Shading Under Two Irrigation Amounts. Frontiers in Plant Science, 11, 579192. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.579192
Miccichè, D., De Rosas, M. I., Ferro, M. V., Di Lorenzo, R., Puccio, S., & Pisciotta, A. (2023). Effects of artificial canopy shading on vegetative growth and ripening processes of cv. Nero d’Avola (Vitis vinifera L.). Frontiers in Plant Science, 14, 1210574. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2023.1210574
Ortoidze, T., & Düring, H. (2001). Light utilisation and thermal dissipation in light- and shade-adapted leaves of Vitis genotypes. Vitis – Journal of Grapevine Research, 40(3), 131–136. https://doi.org/10.5073/vitis.2001.40.131-136
Palliotti, A., Tombesi, S., Silvestroni, O., Lanari, V., Gatti, M., & Poni, S. (2014). Changes in vineyard establishment and canopy management urged by earlier climate-related grape ripening: A review. Scientia Horticulturae, 178, 43–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2014.07.039
Poni, S., Frioni, T., & Gatti, M. (2023). Summer pruning in Mediterranean vineyards: Is climate change affecting its perception, modalities, and effects? Frontiers in Plant Science, 14, 1227628. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2023.1227628
Acknowledgments
This work has been carried out within the framework of the project LIFE VINOSHIELD funded by the European Union (grant number LIFE-2023-SAP-CLIMA-CCA, Project # 101158020).
Issue: Terclim 2026
Type: Oral
Authors
1 Department of Sustainable Crop Production, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Via Emilia Parmense 84, Piacenza 29122, Italy
Contact the author*
Keywords
grapevine physiology, abiotic stress, light gradient, fruit zone microclimate, adaptation to climate change