Terroir 2020 banner
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 Soil variability effects on vine rootzones and available water

Soil variability effects on vine rootzones and available water

Abstract

Aim: The aim of this work is educating people about soil variability, vine rootzone depth and readily available water holding capacity. The concept of terroir is readily discussed in the wine industry but many people involved are unable to describe a soil profile and interpret its limitations that impact on vine growth, fruit quality and wine produced. This paper discusses soil physical characteristics important to vine root growth and readily available water holding capacity (RAW).

Background and Results: Identification of the soil texture, structure and coarse fragment content is required to determine a vine rootzone depth and readily available water holding capacity (RAW).  Vine rootzone depths are dependent on soil texture and structure. For example vine roots will penetrate 50 cm into a friable sub-angular or angular blocky clay, but only 30 cm into prismatic, columnar or lenticular clay.  Vine rootzone depths are used to calculate the RAW value (mm) of the soil profile and consequently irrigation management units and design.  Water retention curve data used to calculate RAW values uses the relationship between water content and matric potential (Childs, 1940), which is dependent on soil texture and structure (Hillel, 1982). The predicted rootzone depth and RAW values will therefore be dependent on the changes in a landscape which is part of the concept of terroir.

Three examples of soil profile characteristics from a 40 ha property located on the Fleurieu Peninsula of South Australia are presented:

  • Soil 1 is a yellow Sodosol (Isbell, 1996) with deep sand over massive sandy clay.  The predicted rootzone depth is 70 cm and the RAW value 36 mm.  Vine roots are limited by the massive yellow sandy clay at 40 cm;
  • Soil 2 is a red Chromosol (Isbell, 1996) with shallow sandy clay loam topsoil over friable angular blocky clay and clay soil carbonate in the lower subsoil.  The predicted rootzone depth is 60 cm and the RAW value 36 mm.  Vine roots will colonise 50 cm of the friable clay and will penetrate the soil carbonate in the lower subsoil;
  • Soil 3 is a Calcarosol (Isbell, 1996) with sandy clay loam and 50% calcareous rock fragments to 50 cm, below which is un-weathered calcareous shale rock.  The predicted rootzone depth is restricted by the calcareous rock and the high percentage of coarse fragments reduces the RAW value to 18 mm. 

Conclusions: 

The volume of soil utilised by vine roots and the RAW value are governed by soil physical properties which change with position in the landscape, the concept of terroir.  

Significance and Impact of the Study: Soil profile characterisation is essential to all forms of agriculture and horticulture.  Understanding how soil variability impacts on vine root growth, fruit quality and wine production is the essence of terroir.

DOI:

Publication date: March 17, 2021

Issue: Terroir 2020

Type: Video

Authors

Geoff Kew1*

1Kew Wetherby Soil Survey Pty Ltd, Second Valley, South Australia, Australia, 5204

Contact the author

Keywords

Soil monolith, soil variability, soil profile description, soil horizon, field hand texture, soil structure

Tags

IVES Conference Series | Terroir 2020

Citation

Related articles…

Mouthfeel effects due to oligosaccharides within a wine matrix

The mouthfeel of wine is one of the most important aspects of the organoleptic experience of tasting wine. In wine a great deal is known about certain compositional components and how they impact mouthfeel perception, such as phenolics. But there are other components where little is understood, such as oligosaccharides. Saccharides in general are found in very low concentrations with wine, especially compared to conventional foods. There is very little information about how oligosaccharides influence the mouthfeel perception of wine.

Tools for terroir classification for the grape variety Kékfrankos

A 3-year study was carried out in order to evaluate the ecophysiology, yield and quality characteristics of Vitis vinifera L. cv. Kékfrankos (syn. Limberger) at Eger-Nagyeged hill (steep slope) and at Eger-Kőlyuktető (flat) vineyard sites located in the Eger wine region, Hungary.

Impact of canopy management on thiol precursors in white grapes: a six-year field study

The mechanisms behind thiol precursor accumulation in grapes remain incompletely understood, nor are the ways in which they can be improved by agronomic practices. A six-year field trial studied the physiological response of the Swiss white cultivar Vitis vinifera Arvine, rich in varietal thiols and precursors, to canopy management, i.e. leaf removal and canopy height.. Five treatments were set up in a randomized block design to assess the impacts of 1) pre-flowering LR (i.e. pre-flowering or full-flowering stages) and 2) compensating for the leaf area removed in the cluster zone by increasing the trimming height (i.e. 100 or 150 cm canopy height), compared with a non-defoliated control treatment.
Intensive pre-flowering LR severely reduced yield potential (–47% on average) and reduced the concentration of 3-mercaptohexanol precursors (P-3MH) in the must (–21%; p-value < 0.10).

Merging two genomes: a holistic approach to disentangle rootstock-mediated drought and recovery responses

Viticulture is facing many challenges due to climate change effects with increasingly attention to save resources, such as water, considering that drought events have been predicted to dramatically increase over the next future. Thanks to the -omics techniques, research pushed forward knowledge to deepen facets of drought response in diverse grapevine-rootstock combinations. However, the regulatory mechanisms orchestrating adaptation strategies during drought and recovery in grafted grapevines need further exploration. Herein, we combined ecophysiological, biochemical and molecular approaches to unravel drought and recovery-induced changes in potted Nebbiolo (NE) plants grafted onto three different rootstocks (3309, Kober5BB, Gravesac), by analysing root and leaf tissues.

Using a grape compositional model to predict harvest time and influence wine style

Linking wine composition to fruit composition is difficult due to the numerous biochemical pathways and substrate transformations that occur during fermentation