Terroir 2010 banner
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 International Terroir Conferences 9 Terroir 2010 9 Geology and Soil: effects on wine quality (T2010) 9 Evaluation of two transmittance meters in estimating chlorophyll and nitrogen concentrations in grapevine cultivars

Evaluation of two transmittance meters in estimating chlorophyll and nitrogen concentrations in grapevine cultivars

Abstract

Two transmittance-based chlorophyll meters (SPAD-502 and CCM-200) were evaluated in estimating chlorophyll (Chl) and nitrogen (N) levels in grapevine leaves. The study was conducted in a fertilization experiment [0 (N0), 60 (N1) and 120 (N2) kg N/ha] during the summer 2009, in two commercial vineyards located in Northern Greece and planted with cvs Cabernet-Sauvignon and Xinomavro (Vitis vinifera L.). When data were pooled over cultivars and samplings, leaves of N2 vines had the highest N and Chl content, as well as SPAD and CCM readings, followed by the respective values of N1. However, neither of the devices could detect the seasonal decline in leaf N and Chl content. Significant relationships between extracted Chl and measured leaf N were found in both cultivars. A strong linear function related SPAD and CCM readings in both cultivars. Total Chl and N were strongly correlated with SPAD and CCM readings in Cabernet Sauvignon (p<0.001) while relationships were poor for SPAD and not significant for CCM in Xinomavro. The results suggest that non-destructive chlorophyll estimations by transmittance-based meters are not applicable in all situations without specific estimations by transmittance-based meters are not applicable in all situations without specific calibrations necessary to improve their utility and accuracy over grapevine cultivars.

DOI:

Publication date: December 3, 2021

Issue: Terroir 2010

Type: Article

Authors

D. Taskos (1), K. Karakioulakis (2), N. Theodorou (2), J.T. Tsialtas (3), E. Zioziou (2), N. Nikolaou(2), S. Koundouras (2)

(1) Boutari S.A., Goumenissa Winery, 613 00 Goumenissa, Greece
(2) Laboratory of Viticulture, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 541 24, Thessaloniki, Greece
(3) NAGREF, Cotton and Industrial Plants Institute, 574 00 Sindos, Greece

Contact the author

Keywords

SPAD-502, CCM-200, chlorophyll, nitrogen, grapevine, N fertilization

Tags

IVES Conference Series | Terroir 2010

Citation

Related articles…

Grapevine responses to Botrytis cinerea infection: noble rot versus grey rot

The intricate relationship between the necrotrophic pathogen Botrytis cinerea and grape berries (Vitis vinifera spp.) can lead to the development of either the desirable noble rot (NR) or the unfavourable grey rot (GR), depending on the prevailing weather conditions.

Investigation of VvDXS function and its effects on muscat flavor levels

In the present study the connection between the positional candidate gene VvDXS and muscat flavor was evaluated by investigating the expression profiles in the berries from a Muscat-type cultivar and a neutral cultivar and its nucleotide diversity of full ORF on grapevine accessions.

Deconstructing the soil component of terroir: from controversy to consensus

Wine terroir describes the collectively recognized relation between a geographical area and the distinctive organoleptic characteristics of the wines produced in it. The overriding objective in terroir studies is therefore to provide scientific proof relating the properties of terroir components to wine quality and typicity. In scientific circles, the role of climate (macro-, meso- and micro-) on grape and wine characteristics is well documented and accepted as the most critical. Moreover, there has been increasing interest in recent years about new elements with possible importance in shaping wine terroir like berry/leaf/soil microbiology or even aromatic plants in proximity to the vineyard conferring flavors to the grapes. However, the actual effect of these factors is also dependent on complex interactions with plant material (variety/clone, rootstock, vine age) and with human factors.
The contribution of soil, although a fundamental component of terroir and extremely popular among wine enthusiasts, remains a much-debated issue among researchers. The role of geology is probably the one mostly associated by consumers with the notion of terroir with different parent rocks considered to give birth to different wine styles. However, the relationship between wine properties and the underlying parent material raises a lot of controversy especially regarding the actual existence of rock-derived flavors in the wine (e.g. minerality). As far as the actual soil properties are concerned, the effect of soil physical properties is generally regarded as the most significant (e.g sandy soils being associated with lighter wines while those on clay with colored and tannic ones) mostly through control of water availability which ultimately modifies berry ripening conditions either directly by triggering biosynthetic pathways, or indirectly by altering vigor and yield components. The role of soil chemistry seems to be weakly associated to wine sensory characteristic, although N, K, S and Ca, but also soil pH, are often considered important in the overall soil effect.
Recently, in the light of evidence provided by precision agriculture studies reporting a high variability of vineyard soils, the spatial scale should also be taken into consideration in the evaluation of the soil effects on wines. While it is accepted that soil effects become more significant than climate on a local level, it is not clear whether these micro-variations of vineyard soils are determining in the terroir effect. Moreover, as terroir is not a set of only natural factors, the magnitude of the contribution of human-related factors (irrigation, fertilization, soil management) to the soil effect still remains ambiguous. Lastly, a major shortcoming of the majority of works about soil effects on wine characteristics is the absence of connection with actual vine physiological processes since all soil effects on grape and wine chemistry and sensorial properties are ultimately mediated through vine responses.
This article attempts to breakdown the main soil attributes involved in the terroir effect to suggest an improved understanding about soil’s true contribution to wine sensory characteristics. It is proposed that soil parameters per se are not as significant determining factors in the terroir effect but rather their mutual interactions as well as with other natural and human factors included in the terroir concept. Consequently, similarly to bioclimatic indices, composite soil indices (i.e. soil depth, water holding capacity, fertility, temperature etc), incorporating multiple soil parameters, might provide a more accurate and quantifiable means to assess the relative weight of the soil component in the terroir effect.

Crossed approaches to experimental economics and sensory analysis regarding noble rot sweet wines perception

Noble rot sweet wines are reputed wines, traditionally elaborated according to a singular vinification process involving the harvesting of overripe grapes under the action of the ascomycete fungus Botrytis cinerea.

Elucidating white wines peptides: An analytical breaktrough

The chemistry of wine is particularly complex due to biochemical and chemical interactions that significantly modify its organoleptic characteristics and stability over time. Aging on lees is a well-known practice during which various compounds are released, ensuring wines oxidative stability and its overall sensory quality [1,2].