Enhancement of the terroir

Abstract

Le terroir est aujourd’hui le facteur de production et de valorisation le plus importante de la filière du vin. Dans un contexte où le défi commercial se déroule tout azimut, la distinction entre pays producteurs traditionnels et « nouveaux » n’est pas seulement une contre position géographique, culturelle et technique mais aussi, et surtout, juridique. En effet, le système des normes présentes dans le « vieux monde » (droits de plantations, décrets de productions, rendements à l’hectare, etc.) qui peut représenter, à court terme sur le marché global, des contraintes au développement et à l’innovation des produits, doit se transformer en opportunité. Mais les menaces deviennent des opportunités, si l’on travaille, de la vigne au marché, en passant par la communication, plutôt sur les éléments de différence que sur ceux d’affinité. Se donner le but d’être différents avant d’être meilleurs.

L’élément « unique » d’un vin, qui peut mettre en exergue les spécificités d’une région, d’une appellation, d’un lieu-dit, d’un site, d’une parcelle, est le terroir. Et l’outil, qui permet de valoriser un terroir est la connaissance, à la bonne échelle, des éléments structuraux, de fonctionnement et d’interaction qui le caractérisent. Mais font partie aussi du terroir d’autres facteurs d’ordre historique, culturel, social et économique qui se sont développés au cours du siècle et qui se sont mélangés et fondus avec la composante géographique du terroir. On pourrait donc, dans l’optique d’une valorisation à 360° d’un vin et de son alentour, concevoir l’esprit géo humain du terroir. Mais pour concevoir cet esprit, il est nécessaire que les acteurs de la filière vin soient capables de réfléchir, au-delà des vignes et des produits, dans une dimension systémique. Les travaux de zonage, qu’à partir des années 80, ont étudié et caractérisé les aires de production, les appellations d’origine et leurs terroirs, ont fort aidé à mettre en exergue les spécificités, à révéler les potentiels qualitatifs, à donner des explications et à mettre au point des outils de valorisation. Il suffit de reprendre les actes des colloques qui ont précédé celui auquel nous sommes en train de participer ainsi que les actes d’autres colloques concernant les paysage viticoles, d’analyser la démarche de l’UNESCO qui a créé un groupe de réflexion « terroirs et cultures » (au pluriel), pour comprendre l’évolution, la perception et l’importance du lien vin-terroir au cours de trois dernières décennies. La lecture et l’analyse des témoignages exposés dans les colloques cités permettent de mieux comprendre le travail qui a été réalisé, mais surtout le travail qui reste à accomplir pour valoriser les terroirs étudiés à travers les informations et les connaissances disponibles.

Aucun produit issu de la terre et du savoir-faire humain a fait l’objet d’autant d’études scientifiques multidisciplinaires et a stimulé des réflexions littéraires et artistiques comme le vin. Une telle richesse bibliographique représente du matériel qu’il faut analyser, adapter et synthétiser pour la valorisation des terroirs à vin. Les spécialistes de marketing ont toujours simplifié la distinction des producteurs de vins en deux catégories:
– Ceux orientés au produit,
– Ceux orientés au marché.
Dans le premier cas, on travaille pour créer des marchés aux vins existants (traditionnels), tandis que dans le deuxième cas, on vise à produire des vins en fonction des exigences des marchés réels ou potentiels. Selon une optique plus moderne, dynamique et évoluée, il serait bien de s’orienter de plus en plus vers le terroir soit pour réaliser des vins spécifiques, soit pour les valoriser sur des marchés de plus en plus exigeants. Les informations disponibles sur le terroir, son environnement géographique et socio-économique, sont des outils à utiliser afin de cibler la caractérisation et de mettre au point les stratégies et les actions, d’individualiser les éléments de valorisation et de protection du « système terroir » et de stimuler les axes d’innovation dans plusieurs aires d’application. Pour résumer les quelques opportunités de valorisation d’un terroir viticole et des paysages associées, on a proposé une matrice permettant de souligner le fort potentiel disponible. Au cours de l’intervention, on analysera, dans les détails, les croisements les plus importants entre les outils et les aires d’application : par exemple l’emploi des résultats d’un zonage pour caractériser le(s) paysage(s), ou pour mettre au point des stratégies de communication.

DOI:

Publication date: December 22, 2021

Issue: Terroir 2006

Type: Article

Authors

Mario FALCETTI

Secrétaire du groupe d’experts « Zonage vitivinicole » OIV, Paris
Directeur Contadi Castaldi, Franciacorta, Italie
Via Colzano, 32, 25030 Adro, Brescia, Italie

Contact the author

Keywords

terroir, valorisation, marché

Tags

IVES Conference Series | Terroir 2006

Citation

Related articles…

Evaluation of climate change impacts at the Portuguese Dão terroir over the last decades: observed effects on bioclimatic indices and grapevine phenology

In the last decades the growers of the Portuguese Dão winegrowing region (center of Portugal) are experiencing changes in climate that are influencing either grape phenology berry health and ripening. Aiming to study the relationships between climate indices (CI), seasonal weather and grapevine phenology, in this work long-term climate and phenological data collected at the experimental vineyard of the Portuguese Dão research centre between 1958 and 2019 (61 years) for the red variety Touriga Nacional, was analyzed. The trends over time for the classical temperature-based indices (Growing Season Temperature – GST -, Growing Degree Days – GDD, Huglin Index – HI and Cool Night Index – CI) presented a significantly positive slope while the Dryness Index (DI) showed a negative trend over the last 61 years. Regarding grapevine phenology, an average advance of 4.5 days per decade in the harvest day was observed throughout the last 61 years. Consequently, the weather conditions during the ripening period have changed, showing an increasing trend over time in the average temperature (higher magnitude in the maximum than in the minimum temperature) and a decrease in the accumulated rainfall. A regression analysis showed that ~50% of harvest date variability over years was explained by the temperature-based indices variability. These observed effects of climate change on bioclimatic indices and corresponding anticipation of harvest date can still be considered advantageous for the Dão terroir as it allows to achieve an optimal berry ripening before the common equinox rains and, therefore, avoid the potential negative impacts of the rainfall on berry health and composition.

Modeling the suitability of Pinot Noir in Oregon’s Willamette Valley in a changing climate

Air temperature is the key driver of grapevine phenology and a significant environmental factor impacting yield and quality for a winegrape growing region. In this study the optimal downscaled CMIP5 ensemble for computing thegrowing season average temperature (GST) viticulture climate classification index was determined to spatially compute on a decadal basis predictions of the GST climate index and the grapevine sugar ripeness (GSR) model for Pinot Noir throughout the Willamette Valley (WV) American Viticultural Area (AVA). Forecasts for average temperature and a 220 g/L target sugar concentration level were computed using daily Localized Constructed Analogs (LOCA) downscaled CMIP5 historic and Representative Concentration Pathways (RCP) future climate projections of minimum and maximum daily temperature. We explore spatiotemporal trends of the GST climate classification index and Pinot Noir specific applications of the GSR phenology model for the WV AVA. Spatiotemporal computations of the GST climate index and Pinot Noir specific applications of the GSR model enable the opportunity to explore relationships between their computed values with one intent being to provide updated GST ranges that better align with current temperature-based modeling understanding of Pinot Noir grapevine phenology and the viticultural application of LOCA CMIP5 climate projections for the WV AVA. The Pinot Noir specific applications of the GSR model or the GST index with updated bounds indicate that the percent of the WV AVA area suitable for Pinot Noir production is currently at or near its peak value in the upper 80s to lower 90s of this century.

Underpinning terroir with data: rethinking the zoning paradigm

Agriculture, natural resource management and the production and sale of products such as wine are increasingly data-driven activities. Thus, the use of remote and proximal crop and soil sensors to aid management decisions is becoming commonplace and ‘Agtech’ is proliferating commercially; mapping, underpinned by geographical information systems and complex methods of spatial analysis, is widely used. Likewise, the chemical and sensory analysis of wines draws on multivariate statistics; the efficient winery intake of grapes, subsequent production of wines and their delivery to markets relies on logistics; whilst the sales and marketing of wines is increasingly driven by artificial intelligence linked to the recorded purchasing behaviour of consumers. In brief, there is data everywhere!

Opinions will vary on whether these developments are a good thing. Those concerned with the ‘mystique’ of wine, or the historical aspects of terroir and its preservation, may find them confronting. In contrast, they offer an opportunity to those interested in the biophysical elements of terroir, and efforts aimed at better understanding how these impact on vineyard performance and the sensory attributes of resultant wines. At the previous Terroir Congress, we demonstrated the potential of analytical methods used at the within-vineyard scale in the development of Precision Viticulture, in contributing to a quantitative understanding of regional terroir. For this conference, we take this approach forward with examples from contrasting locations in both the northern and southern hemispheres. We show how, by focussing on the vineyards within winegrowing regions, as opposed to all of the land within those regions, we might move towards a more robust terroir zoning than one derived from a mixture of history, thematic mapping, heuristics and the whims of marketers. Aside from providing improved understanding by underpinning terroir with data, such methods should also promote improved management of the entire wine value chain.

Terroir traceability in grapes, musts and wine: results of research on Gewürztraminer and Sauvignon Blanc grape varieties in northern Italy

In the study of terroir, a separate analysis of its many component factors can be of great help in accurately identifying a vineyard’s natural elements that impact wine quality and typicity. This research used a dedicated pluri-disciplinary approach to investigate the ecological characteristics, including geology and geographical features, of 14 vineyards that produce Gewürztraminer and Sauvignon Blanc cultivars in the alpine Alto Adige DOC wine region. Both the geopedological method using Vineyards Geological Identity (VGI) and the new Solar Radiaton Identity (SRI) topoclimatic classification method were used to provide analytical measurements and qualitative/quantitative characterisations. In addition, wide-ranging targeted and untargeted oenological and chemical analyses were carried out on grapes, musts and wines to correlate the soils’ geomineral and physical conditions with the biochemical properties of their fruits and wines. The research identified strong correlations between vineyard geo-identity and wine biofingerprint, confirming a mineral traceability of strontium rubidium ratio and some minerals distinctive to the local geology, such as K, Ca, Ag, Ba and Mn.  The study also discovered that particular geomineral and physical soil conditions of the studied vineyards are related to the different amount of amino acids, primary varietal aromas and polyphenols found in grapes, musts and wines. The research confirmed that winemaking technologies support oenological quality, although in some cases, human practices can overpower certain characteristic elements in wine, erasing the typical imprint left by the vineyards’ natural terroir, which becomes less traceable. Terroir abiotic ecological factors and vineyard identity can be classified in detail using the new VGI and SRI analysis methods to discover interrelationships between geo-pedological and topoclimatic conditions that impact wine quality. These methods are also helpful in identifying which ecological elements are exclusive to a particular vineyard or wine sub-region.

Exploring resilience and competitiveness of wine estates in Languedoc-Roussillon in the recent past: a multi-level perspective

The Languedoc-Roussillon wineries are facing a decline in wine yields particularly PGI yields due to many factors. Climate change is just ones, but is expected to increase in the future. There is also structurally a large heterogeneity of yield profiles among terroirs, varieties and strategies. This work investigates the link between yield, competitiveness and resilience to explore how resilient winegrowers have been in the recent past. To this end two approaches have been combined; (i) an accountancy database analysis at estate scale and (ii) municipality level competitiveness analysis. A new resilience indicator that characterizes the capacity of an estate to absorb yield variation is also defined. The FADN database between 2000 and 2018 of ex-Languedoc-Roussillon (France) and other data are used to analyse the current situation and the past evolution of competitiveness and resilience by type of estate (type of farm: PGI and/or PDO & type of commercialization: bulk and/or bottles). The net margin, which defines competitiveness, is not correlated to yield for all types but depends on the type of commercialization and the level of specialisation. The resilience indicator shows that the net margin of estates specialized in PGI is particularly sensitive to yield declines. We also show that price evolutions seem to compensate the effect of yield losses for the majority of types. Municipality scale analysis shows the links between local pedoclimate, yield, commercialization strategies and price. Overlapping a PDO with a PGI does not always increase a municipality’s PGI competitiveness. It is difficult to make links between causes and effects due to the complexity of the wine production system. Production diversification may be a solution. Resorting to the two level of analysis helps resolving the data gap that is necessary to explore the links between yield and economic performance of the wine estates in the long term.