GiESCO 2019 banner
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 GiESCO 9 Under trellis cover crop induces grapevine tolerance to bunch rot

Under trellis cover crop induces grapevine tolerance to bunch rot

Abstract

Context and purpose of the study – Botrytis bunch rot occurrence is one of the most important limitations for the wine industry in humid environments. A positive correlation between grapevine growth and susceptibility to fungal pathogens has been found. In theory the effect of grapevine vegetative growth on bunch rot expression results from direct effects (cluster architecture, nitrogen status among others) and indirect ones (via microclimate). However, a reduction in bunch rot incidence can be achieved in some circumstances without major vine growth reduction. The present study was aimed to test the general hypothesis that bunch rot susceptibility is affected by vine vigor, but other factors associated with grapevine vegetative expression could be even more relevant.

Material and methods – The experiment was conducted over three growing seasons in Southern Uruguay. We tested Vertical Shoot Positioned (VSP) versus Lyra trellis systems with conventional flour management consisting alleyway tall fescue with 1.0 m wide weed-free strips under the trellis (VSP-H and Lyra-H), and VSP with under-trellis cover crop (VSP-UTCC). UTCC consists in the full cover of the vineyard soil with tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea). In all treatments, deficit drip irrigation was provided at mid-day stem potential (SWP) thresholds of -0.9 MPa. Treatments were arranged in a split-plot randomized block design with trellis system (Lyra vs VSP) as main plots and flour management schemes (H vs UTCC) as subplots. Shoot growth rate, SWP, berry size, berry composition (titratable acidity, Brix, and yeast available nitrogen) and bunch rot incidence and severity were monitored over the seasons, as well as final vine yield, cluster weights, berryfirmness and pruning weights.

Results – In VSP-H and Lyra-H treatments Botrytis bunch rot incidence progressively increased with pruning weight per meter of cordon length (PW/m). However, even associated with an increased number of shoots per vine, Lyra significantly reduce vine vigor, average disease occurrence was comparable between both trellis systems. Contrarily, bunch rot incidence was every season remarkably lower in VSP-UTCC compared to Herbicide treatments (Lyra-H and VSP-H) even when vegetative development (shoot elongation rate, PW/m, PAR%) and fruit maturation (TSS, titratable acidity) was compared to Lyra-H. Associated with berry weight, bunch size was significantly reduced by VSP-UTCC treatment.These may underline the important role of cluster architecture in the lower B. cinerea infection. However, the strong difference observed in disease occurrence between UTCC and H treatment in our study could not be explained by just this factor since UTCC also significantly affected other bunch rot infection triggers (reduced juice N levels and increased berry firmness). Botrytis bunch rot is a complex disease, and many of the three-way interactions (host, environment and pathogen) are poorly understood. Our results don’t allow to identify the specific mechanism by which UTCC induced a higher tolerance to botrytis bunch rot, however a clear effect on pathogen or host plant behavior was detected. Its seems to be more related to direct factors than indirect ones associated with canopy microclimate.

DOI:

Publication date: September 20, 2023

Issue: GiESCO 2019

Type: Poster

Authors

Andrés CONIBERTI1*, Virginia FERRARI1, Edgardo DISEGNA1, Mario GARCIA PETILLO2, Alan N. LAKSO3

1 Programa Fruticultura, Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria, Canelones Uruguay
2 Departamento de Suelos y Aguas, Facultad de Agronomia, UdelaR., Montevideo, Uruguay
3 Department of Horticulture, College of Agriculture and Life Science, Cornell University. Geneva, NY USA

Contact the author

Keywords

Tannat, Botrytis bunch rot, under trellis cover crop, Fescue, vine vigor

Tags

GiESCO | GiESCO 2019 | IVES Conference Series

Citation

Related articles…

Recent advances in our understanding of the impact of climate change on wine grape production

According to the last IPCC report, the scale of recent climate changes are unprecedented over many centuries. Each of the last four decades has been successively warmer than any decade since 1850. Projections for the future foresee that temperature could reach +3.3°C to +5.7°C under the most pessimistic scenario. It is also projected that every region will face more concurrent and multiple changes in climatic impact-drivers. The frequency of extreme climate events is also likely to increase, as well as the occurrence of indirect constraints. These evolving climatic conditions are alrealdy affecting and will continue to affect the suitability of traditional wine grape production areas, but also create opportunities in new locations.

Synthesis of the contribution of the Giesco (group of international experts of vitivinicultural systems for cooperation) to the study of terroirs

Since 1998, the GiESCO (previously named GESCO: Groupe d’Etude des Systèmes de COnduite de la vigne) has provided the scientific community with relevant contributions to the study of terroirs. Here is a synthesis of the main terroir-related fields and the major ideas the GiESCO has developed: Basic Terroir Unit and climate, Vine Ecophysiology and microclimate – moderate drought, Vineyard heterogeneity and new technologies, Viticultural Terroir Unit and canopy management, Terroir – Territory and man.

Mechanization of pre-flowering leaf removal under the temperate-climate conditions of Switzerland

Grapevine leaf removal (LR) in the cluster area is typically done between fruit set and cluster closure to create an unfavorable microclimate for fungal diseases, such as Botrytis cinerea and powdery mildew. Grape growers are now turning their attention to pre-flowering LR, which has additional benefits under certain conditions. When applied before flowering, LR strongly affects fruit set and thus the number of berries per cluster. It is therefore a good yield control tool, replacing time-consuming manual cluster thinning (Poni et al. 2006). It also improves berry structure, that is, skin thickness, skin-to-pulp ratio, and berry composition (total soluble solids, titratable acidity, and polyphenols) (Palliotti et al. 2012; Komm and Moyer 2015). By exacerbating competition for assimilates between reproductive and vegetative organs, pre-flowering LR also poses some risks. Excessive yield loss at the same year’s harvest due to a too low fruit set rate is the main concern: intensive pre-flowering LR (100% of the cluster area) can induce up to 50% yield loss in potted vines (Poni et al. 2005). Other parameters, such as cool climatic conditions during flowering, also affect fruit set rate and make it difficult to predict potential yield at harvest. Repeated and overly intensive preflowering LR can have repercussions over time and induce a decline in bud fruiting and plant vigor (Risco et al. 2014).

Evolution of flavonols during Merlot winemaking processes

The phenomenon of quercetin precipitation in wine (flanovol haze), has been manifested for many years in several wine-producing regions

Oxidation vs reduction: the fate of tannins, pigments, vscs, color,SO2 and metabolomic fingerprint

The management of oxygen during winemaking and aging is a big issue in order to achieve high quality wines. The correct amount of O2 improves aroma, astringency, bitterness and color, however an excess of oxygen promotes the appearance of yellow