GiESCO 2019 banner
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 GiESCO 9 GiESCO 2019 9 Grape ripening and wine style: synchronized evolution of aromatic composition of shiraz wines from hot and temperate climates of Australia

Grape ripening and wine style: synchronized evolution of aromatic composition of shiraz wines from hot and temperate climates of Australia

Abstract

Context and purpose of the study ‐ Grape ripening is a process driven by the interactions between grapevine genotypes and environmental factors. Grape composition is largely responsible for the production and final concentrations of most wine aroma compounds even though many compounds in wines (aromatic and non‐aromatic) are substantially transformed during fermentation and wine ageing. The aim of this study was to investigate if a common pattern in grape/wine flavour plasticity related to ripening exists irrespective of a grape growing region. A further aim was to identify and highlight compounds present in Shiraz grapes and wines in which plasticity is directly related to grape ripening and is consistent over several vintages.

Material and methods ‐ Commercial vineyards of Shiraz were chosen in two Australian wine geographical indication (GI) regions: Griffith (warm to hot climate) and Orange (temperate to temperate‐warm climate). In these vineyards, own rooted vines were grown under drip irrigation, and trellised to a sprawling training system and in vertical shoot positioning for Orange. Sequential harvests were performed using berry sugar accumulation as a physiological indicator of grape maturity. At each harvest date, triplicates of 100 berries were collected and frozen in liquid nitrogen in the field for later chemical analyses. Approximately 60 kg of grape per replicate were randomly harvested at each harvest date and small scale vinifications carried out. Amino acids in grapes were analysed by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) coupled to fluorescence detector. Grape volatiles analyses were performed with gas chromatography coupled to mass detection (GC‐MS). Juice was analysed for set of parameters relating to the technical maturity of grapes (total soluble solids, titratable acidity and pH) and yeast assimilable nitrogen was measured. Wine aromatic compounds were quantitated by HS‐SPME‐GC‐MS. Descriptive sensory evaluation with predefined descriptors was conducted approximately six months after bottling.

Results ‐ Irrespective of the macro and meso climates, differences in both grape and wine chemical analyses and wine sensory description produced a clear separation of samples according to the harvest stage. Shiraz wines from the first harvest (H1) were associated with red fruit descriptors and higher perception of acidity. Wines from the third harvest (H3) were correlated with dark fruit characters and a higher alcohol. Later harvest dates resulted in higher concentrations of some amino acids in the Shiraz grapes, with higher alcohol acetates, ethyl esters (ethyl propanoate and ethyl butyrate) of short chain fatty acids and dimethyl sulphide in the wines. Conversely, concentrations of (Z)-3‐hexenol, ethyl isobutyrate, ethyl leucate and ethyl dihydrocinammate were lower in these wines compared to earlier harvest dates. Observed trends were significant and consistent across two vintages and two different GIs. From the plateau of berry sugar accumulation, no direct nexus was observed between berry sugar concentration and grape and wine flavour evolution. This study also demonstrated a common evolution of Shiraz grapes, influencing the chemical and sensory properties of the subsequent wine.

DOI:

Publication date: June 19, 2020

Issue: GiESCO 2019

Type: Article

Authors

Katja ŠUKLJE (1,3), Guillaume ANTALICK (1,4), Campbell MEEKS (1), John BLACKMAN (1,2), Alain DELOIRE (1,5), Leigh SCHMIDTKE (1,2)

(1) National Wine and Grape Industry Centre, Charles Sturt University, Locked Bag 588, Wagga Wagga, NSW 2678, Australia
(2) School of Agricultural and Wine Sciences, Charles Sturt University, Locked Bag 588, Wagga Wagga, NSW 2678, Australia
Present addresses: 3 Hacquetova 17, 1000 Ljubljana,
(4) Wine research centre, University of Nova Gorica, Glavni trg 8, 5271 Vipava, Slovenia
(5) Montpellier SupAgro‐IHEV‐BE, 2 Place Pierre Viala, 34060 Montpellier, France

Contact the author

Keywords

Grapevine, Australia, Shiraz, warm and temperate climates, sequential harvests, fruit and wine composition, sensory analyses

Tags

GiESCO 2019 | IVES Conference Series

Citation

Related articles…

Within-vineyard variability in grape composition at the estate scale can be assessed through machine-learning modeling of plant water status in space and time. A case study from the hills of Adelaida District AVA, Paso Robles, CA, USA

Aim: Through machine-learning modelling of plant water status from environmental characteristics, this work aims to develop a model able to predict grape phenolic composition in space and time to guide selective harvest decisions at the estate scale.

Mouthfeel effects due to oligosaccharides within a wine matrix

The mouthfeel of wine is one of the most important aspects of the organoleptic experience of tasting wine. In wine a great deal is known about certain compositional components and how they impact mouthfeel perception, such as phenolics. But there are other components where little is understood, such as oligosaccharides. Saccharides in general are found in very low concentrations with wine, especially compared to conventional foods. There is very little information about how oligosaccharides influence the mouthfeel perception of wine.

Effect of irrigation and soil type on root growth and distribution of Vitis vinifera L. cv. Nero d’Avola grown in Sicily

L’essai a été effectué dans un vignoble du cépage Nero d’Avola greffé sur 1103 Paulsen dans un terroir de la D.O.C Alcamo en Sicile. Le système de conduite des vignes était à espalier, la taille à cordon coursonné et l’irrigation à goutte a goutte. On a été confrontés trois types de traitements: A) vignes non irriguées; B) vignes irriguées quand le

Exploring microbial interactions between Saccharomyces cerevisiae and non-Saccharomyces yeast starters in vinification

Winemaking is a complex microbial process involving the co-existence and interactions of various microorganisms [1].

Impact of geographical location on the phenolic profile of minority varieties grown in Spain. II: red grapevines

Because terroir and cultivar are drivers of wine quality, is essential to investigate theirs effects on polyphenolic profile before promoting the implantation of a red minority variety in a specific area. This work, included in MINORVIN project, focuses in the polyphenolic profile of 7 red grapevines minority varieties of Vitis vinifera L. (Morate, Sanguina, Santafe, Terriza Tinta Jeromo Tortozona Tinta) and Tempranillo) from six typical viticulture Spanish areas: Aragón (A1), Cataluña (A2), Castilla la Mancha (A3), Castilla –León (A4), Madrid (A5) and Navarra (A6) of 2020 season. Polyphenolic substances were extracted from grapes. 35 compounds were identified and quantified (mg subtance/kg fresh berry) by HPLC and grouped in anthocyanins (ANT) flavanols (FLAVA), flavonols (FLAVO), hydroxycinnamic (AH), benzoic (BA) acids and stilbenes (ST). Antioxidant activity (AA, mmol TE /g fresh berry) was determined by DPPH method. The results were submitted to a two-way ANOVA to investigate the influence of variety, area and their interaction for each polyphenolic family and cluster analysis was used to construct hierarchical dendrograms, searching the natural groupings among the samples. Sanguina (A3) had the most of total polyphenols while Tempranillo (A5) those of ANT. Sanguina (A2) and (A3) reached the highest values of FLAVO, FLAVA and AA. These two last samples had also the maximum of AA. The effect cultivar and area were significant for all polyphenolic families analyzed. A high variability due to variety (>50%) was observed in FLAVA and the maximum value of variability due to growing area was detected in AA (86.41%), ANT and FLAVO (51%); the interaction variety*zone was significant only for ANT, FLAVO, EST and AA. Finally, dendrograms presented five cluster: i) Sanguina (A2); ii) Sanguina (A3); iii) Tempranillo (A5); iv) Tempranillo (A3); Terriza (A3,A5), Morate (A5,A6); v) Santafé (A1,A6); Tortozona tinta (A1,A3,A6); Tinta Jeromo (A3,A4).