Macrowine 2021
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 Oenological features of Sangiovese wine from vinification of whole grape berries

Oenological features of Sangiovese wine from vinification of whole grape berries

Abstract

The present study was performed in a traditional winery located in the viticultural area of Brunello di Montalcino, Siena, Italy, in the vintage 2015. Actually, in this winery Sangiovese grape musts are fermented in large oak barrels by a single strain of Saccharomyces cerevisiae previously isolated in the same winery. Pumping over operations are carried out once or twice a day until the end of alcoholic fermentations. The aim of this work was to investigate on the oenological properties of Sangiovese wine produced with the traditional winemaking process adopted by the winery under study obtained from the fermentation of whole berries compared to that from crushed grape must. In particular, two lots of 65q of Sangiovese grapes from the same 3ha vineyard were vinified in 150hL oak barrels. Grapes of the first lot were destemmed using a vibrating destemmer that was able to maintain the berry integrity, the others with a traditional crusher-destemmer. After barrels filling, the temperature of whole berry grape must was lower than that of crushed grape must (22°C vs 24°C). The growth of S. cerevisiae strain, inoculated at 5×10^5cell/mL, was slower in whole berry grape must due to the lower mass temperature and the progressive rupture of berries which caused a sort of dilution of yeast population during their exponential growth phase. Indeed, the maximum population density was reached at the third day of fermentation in the crushed grape must (over 8×10^7 cell/mL) while in the whole berry must was reached at day 6 (about 3.5×10^7cell/mL). The warming profile of crushed grapes vinification was faster and reached higher temperature (3.7°C/day up to Tmax of 38.9°C at day 4) than that recorded in whole berry vinification (1.7°C/day up to Tmax of 33.8°C at day 7). In the former, the yeast population dropped rapidly as a consequence of high temperature and high ethanol content (about 11% at day 4) leading to a faster decrease in mass temperature and making it necessary a second inoculum of the S. cerevisiae strain at day 11 to ensure the completion of the alcoholic fermentation. Conversely, the progressive rupture of cooler berries in the whole berry vinification limited the temperature rise, favored the yeast activity, and lead to a slower decrease of mass temperature after day 8 at which about 95% of sugars were fermented. Wines were racked at day 26 (crushed grapes) and 27 (whole berry grapes). Residual sugars were below 1g/L with an ethanol content ranging from 13.8 to 13.5% in crushed and whole grapes wines, respectively. No differences were found on color intensity and total phenolic index. However, wine from crushed grapes vinification possessed higher contents of hydroxybenzoic acids (+27%) and flavan-3-ol monomers (+20%) whereas wine produced by whole berry vinification were characterized by higher contents of anthocyanin glucosides (+33%) and flavonols (+41%). Such differences are potentially able to influence several long-term sensory quality.

Publication date: May 17, 2024

Issue: Macrowine 2016

Type: Poster

Authors

Yuri Romboli*, Giacomo Buscioni, Massimo Vincenzini, Silvia Mangani

*Department of Management of Agriculture

Contact the author

Tags

IVES Conference Series | Macrowine | Macrowine 2016

Citation

Related articles…

Interactions of wine polyphenols with dead or living Saccharomyces cerevisiae Yeast Cells and Cell Walls: polyphenol location by microscopy

Tannin, anthocyanins and their reaction products play a major role in the quality of red wines. They contribute to their sensory characteristics, particularly colour and astringency. Grape tannins and anthocyanins are extracted during red wine fermentation. However, their concentration and composition change over time, due to their strong chemical reactivity1. It is also well known that yeasts influence the wine phenolic content, either through the release of metabolites involved in the formation of derived pigments1, or through polyphenol adsorption2,3.

Use of computational modelling for selecting adsorbents for improved fining of wine

The occurrence of faults and taints in wine, such as those caused by microbial spoilage or various taints, have resulted in significant financial losses to wine producers. The wine industry commits significant financial resources towards fining and taint removal processes each year. Fining involves the addition of one or more adsorptive substrates to juice or wine to bind certain components, thus reducing their concentration [1]. However, these processes are often not selective and can also remove desirable flavour and aroma compounds.

Interest and impact of PVP/PVI (Polyvinylpyrrolidone/ Polyvinylimidazole) on winemaking and final quality of wines

Céline Sparrow a, Christophe Morge a, a SOFRALAB SAS, 79, av. A.A. Thévenet – CS 11031 – 51530 Magenta, France Consumers’ health and security force authorities to limit, in wine as in others food industry products, the concentration in « dangerous » molecules. Therefore the legal limit in heavy metals keeps on decreasing. As per proof EU regulation just decrease the stain concentration in wine from 0,2 to 0,15 mg/l. Certain changes , such as sodium arsenite treatment in vines, disappearance of brass in wineries to the benefit of stainless steel, limit even more the concentration of heavy metals in wines. But the use of copper derivates in vines treatments is difficult to replace. In the case of wine and its elaboration, the problem is even more complex. Indeed, regulation forces the wine producers to control the concentration of certain heavy metals in final wines.

Fining-Derived Allergens in Wine: from Detection to Quantification

Since 2012, EU Commission approved compulsory labeling of wines treated with allergenic additives or processing aids “if their presence can be detected in the final product” (EU Commission Implementing Regulation No. 579/2012 of 29 June 2012). The list of potential allergens to be indicated on wine labels comprises sulphur dioxide and milk- and egg- derived fining agents, including hen egg lysozyme, which is usually added in wines as preservative. In some non-EU countries, the list includes gluten, tree nuts and fish gelatins. With the exception of lysozyme, all these fining proteins were long thought to be totally removed by subsequent winemaking processings (e.g. bentonite addition).

Spontaneous fermentation dynamics of indigenous yeast populations and their effect on the sensory properties of Riesling

Varietal Riesling aroma relies strongly on the formation and liberation of bound aroma compounds. Floral monoterpenes, green C6-alcohols, fruity C13-norisoprenoids and spicy volatile phenols are predominantly bound to disaccharides, which are produced and stored in the grape berry during berry maturation. Grape processing aims to extract maximum amount of the precursors from the berry skin to increase the potential for a strong varietal aroma in the wine. Subsequent yeast selection plays an important part in this process.