terclim by ICS banner
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 Raffinose: a sweet solution for grapevine drought tolerance

Raffinose: a sweet solution for grapevine drought tolerance

Abstract

Water tolerance in plants is often associated with the accumulation of osmotic protectants, which are secondary metabolites that can help the plant to cope with water stress. One of the key osmotic protectants is a sugar called Raffinose, which is synthesized by a family of enzymes called Raffinose synthases. In this work, we focused on one of these enzymes, VviRAF2, which is a gene that shows different expression levels and genetic variants (SNPs) among different grapevine cultivars, ranging from tolerant to susceptible to water stress, and the transcription factors that may regulate the expression of this gene family. We analyzed the transcriptome data of these cultivars and constructed a gene co-expression network based on the reference genome, which revealed the involvement of the MYB transcription factor named ‘AQUILO’. To test the function of VviRAF2 and ‘AQUILO’ in water-stress tolerance, we engineered such genes via Agrobacterium tumefaciens using both, transgenic and cisgenic approach: one VviRAF2 under the control of the 35-s promoter, and another with the insertion of AQUILO controlled by its own promoter. During this study, we performed gene expression experiments on transformed lines to compare the DEGs in response to water-stress. Finally, we present the preliminary results related to stress response underlying the pathways of water stress tolerance.  

DOI:

Publication date: June 13, 2024

Issue: Open GPB 2024

Type: Poster

Authors

Álvaro Vidal Valenzuela1,2,3,4*, José Tomás Matus2, David Navarro-Paya2,Felipe Gainza-Cortés3, Maria Stella Grando4, Olivier Zekri5, Pierre Videau5, Katerina Labonova5, Lorenza Dalla Costa1, Mickael Malnoy1

1 Research and Innovation centre, Fondazione Edmund Mach, Via Mach 1, 38098 San michelle all’adige(TN), Italy
2 Institute for Integrative Systems Biology (I2SysBio), Universitat de València-CSIC, Paterna, 46980, Valencia, Spain
3 Center for Research and Innovation (CII), Viña Concha y Toro, 3550000, Pencahue, Chile
4 Center Agriculture Food Environment (C3A), University of Trento, via E Mach 1, 38010 San Michele all’Adige, Italy
5 Mercier Novatech, Le Champ des Noëls, 85770 – Le gué de velluire, France

Contact the author*

Keywords

Raffinose, Metabolites, Drought, Abiotic stress, sugar

Tags

IVES Conference Series | Open GPB | Open GPB 2024

Citation

Related articles…

Phototropic and geotropic shoot orientation: effect on physiological, vegetative and reproductive parameters

[English version below]

On a étudié l’effet de l’orientation des rameaux sur les paramètres physiologiques, végétatifs et reproductif durant deux saisons de croissance (2002/2003 et 2003/2004) dans la région de Stellenbosch dans une vignoble du cépage Merlot sur 99R conduite en espalier et taillé à cordon coursonné. Les vignes étaient espacées 2.7 x 1.5 m.

Delayed irrigation nearly doubles yield loss compared to anthocyanin gain in Southern Oregon Pinot noir

Irrigation initiation timing is a critical annual management decision that has cascading effects on grapevine productivity and wine quality.

Extreme canopy management for vineyard adaptation to climate change: is it a good idea?

Climate change constitutes an enormous challenge for humankind and for all human activities, viticulture not being an exception. Long-term strategic changes are probably needed the most, but growers also need to deal with short-term changes: summers that are getting progressively warmer, earlier harvest dates and higher pH in musts and wines. In the last 10-15 years, a relevant corpus of research is being developed worldwide in order to evaluate to which extent extreme canopy management operations, aimed at reducing leaf area and, thus, limiting the source to sink ratio, could be useful to delay ripening. Although extreme canopy management can result in relevant delays in harvest dates, longer term studies, as well as detailed analysis of their implications on carbohydrate reserves, bud fertility and future yield are desirable before these practices can be recommended.

Isohydric and anisohydric behavior of 18 wine grape varieties grown in an arid climate

The interest in understanding the water balance of terrestrial plants under drought has led to the creation of the isohydric/anisohydric terminology. The classification was related to an implication-driven framework, where isohydric plants maintain a constant and high leaf water potential through an early and intense closure of their stomata, hence risking carbon starvation. In contrast, anisohydric plants drop their leaf water potential to low values as soil drought is establishing due to insensitive stomata and thus risk mortality through hydraulic failure, albeit maximizing carbon intake. When applied to grapevines, this framework has been elusive, yielding discrepancies in the classification of different wine grape varieties around the world.

Impact of drought stress on concentration and composition of wine proteins in Riesling

Protein haze in white wines is a major technological and economic problem of the wine industry. Field tests were carried out in steep slope vineyards planted with Riesling grapes over 3 dry growing seasons to study the effect of drought stress on the concentration of proteins in the resulting wines. Plots suffering from drought stress were compared with surrounding drip irrigated plots. Riesling grapes were processed into wines by conventional procedures. Protein amounts of the isolated wine colloids of the stressed samples were always higher than those of the watered samples(mean watered 13.8 ± 0.44, mean stressed 17.4 ± 0.40 g 100 g-1). As a consequence, higher bentonite doses were needed to achieve protein haze stability of the drought stressed treatments.