terclim by ICS banner
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 Macrowine 9 Macrowine 2025 9 Analysis and composition of grapes, wines, wine spirits 9 Characterization of resistant varieties produced in the context of a search for regional typicality

Characterization of resistant varieties produced in the context of a search for regional typicality

Abstract

Planted between 2018 and 2019, the ‘New Vine’ system is a vineplot, comprising 169 individuals genotypes (5 vines/individual), located on a gravelous soil, in the INRAE Grande-Ferrade site (Villenave d’Ornon, France). These individuals are grapevine genotypes resulting from crosses between Petit Verdot or Cabernet Franc and resistant varieties containing the following pairs of resistance genes: Rpv1+Rpv3 or Rpv1+Rpv10 for downy mildew resistance and Run1+Ren3.2 for powdery mildew resistance [1]. More than 99% of the genome of these genotypes is derived from Vitis vinifera and contains two pairs of resistance genes. Over the last three vintages (2022, 2023, 2024), these varieties have been qualified from a phenotypic, chemical-components and sensory point of view. The aim was to identify the best suited genotypes to Bordeaux vineyards from an agronomic and oenological point of view. The phenological stages and agronomic performances (yield, berry size, etc.) were graded each year up to the harvest date of each individual variety. At maturity, oenological parameters were measured (pH, total acidity, sugars, assimilable nitrogen, acids) using a sequential analyzer (Y400, Byosystems). After harvesting, each individual genotype was vinified in 2 to 3 liters containers following a validated protocol.  After a few months of ageing, the volatile compounds in these wines were measured after extraction by GC-MS and GC-MS/MS protocols in order to obtain a fairly broad identity card of their aromatic profiles [2; 3]. Then, these wines were subjected to a sensory analysis combining categorization evaluation process (typicity and quality by orthonasal evaluation) and CATA. The purpose was to assess the typicality of these wines in relation to Bordeaux wines, as described by Ballester et al. [4]. The CATA allows a rapid, non-exhaustive description of the dominant olfactory and gustatory characteristics of these wines. After three vintages, we have already removed 30% of the individuals in the vine-plot. The results of the sensory analysis in particular, coupled with the agronomic performance and oenological data for these varieties, have enabled us to highlight potential good candidates for future planting in the vineyard, having sensory characteristics and chemical components abundancy compatible with Bordeaux wines expectations. These results shall be confirmed during future vintages and on a larger scale plantations.

References

[1] Merdinoglu, D., Schneider, C., Prado, E., Wiedemann-Merdinoglu, S., & Mestre, P. (2018). OENO One, 52(3), 203‑209.

[2] Thibon, C., Pons, A., Mouakka, N., Redon, P., Méreau, R., & Darriet, P. (2015). Journal of Chromatography A, 1415, 123 133.

[3] Poitou, X., Redon, P., Pons, A., Bruez, E., Delière, L., Marchal, A., Cholet, C., Geny-Denis, L., & Darriet, P. (2021). Food Chemistry, 360, 130120.

[4] Ballester, J., Dacremont, C., Fur, Y. L., & Etiévant, P. (2005). Food Quality and Preference, 16(4), 351 359.

Publication date: June 5, 2025

Type: Oral communication

Authors

Marie-Amélie Alayrac1,*, Cécile Thibon1, Soizic Lacampagne1, Bernard Lafargue2, Sandra Vanbrabant1, Pascaline Redon1, Clarisse Arcens2, Sixtine Blandeau1, Éric Castant2, Romain Courrèges2, Guillaume Arnold3, Laurent Audeguin4, Loïc Le Cunff4, Komlan Avia4, Laurent Charlier5, Laurent Delière2, Yann Raineau6, and Philippe Darriet1

1 Université Bordeaux, Bordeaux Sciences Agro, Bordeaux INP, INRAE, OENO, UMR 1366, ISVV, 33140 Villenave-d’Ornon, France
2 INRAE, UE Vigne Bordeaux, 33140 Villenave d’Ornon, France
3 INRAE, UR 1131 SVQV, Colmar, France
4 IFV, UMT Genovigne, France
5 CIVB, 1 cours du XXX Juillet, 33075 Bordeaux Cedex, France
6 INRAE, UR ETTIS, 33612 Cestas, France

Contact the author*

Keywords

resistant varieties, typicality, micro-vinification, sensory analysis

Tags

IVES Conference Series | Macrowine | Macrowine 2025

Related articles…

Smoke exposure effects on red wines: how much is too much?

Increasing wildfire frequency in the United States has led to the indirect impact of smoke in vineyards, affecting grape quality and wine sensory attributes, commonly called “smoke taint”.

The role of malolactic bacteria metabolism on the organoleptic qualities of wines

Lactic acid bacteria (LAB) are essential microorganisms in winemaking due to their role in malolactic fermentation (MLF) [1]. This process not only ensures the biological stabilization of wine through the decarboxylation of malic acid into lactic acid but also contributes to modifications in the chemical composition of the wine [2][3].

Effects of fast dehydration at low temperature and relative humidity on the phenolic composition of Nebbiolo grapes

Grape postharvest dehydration is a widely used technique for the special wines production, where genetic features, ripeness degree and environmental factors strongly influence the metabolic processes [1].

Unraveling the role of grape cell wall in shaping the fermentation rate, the polyphenolic profile and quality of red wines from disease-resistant and drought-tolerant grapes in Occitanie varietal selection

Climate change and an evolving environmental and societal context call for the exploration of disease-resistant and/or drought-adapted grape varieties that meet the demands of consumers and society.

Exploring the physico-chemical modification of grape seed extracts to improve their clarifying effect in red wine

During winemaking, some byproducts are obtained, such as grape pomace, which represent 13% of winery byproducts.