terclim by ICS banner
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 Macrowine 9 Macrowine 2025 9 Analysis and composition of grapes, wines, wine spirits 9 Exploring microbial interactions between Saccharomyces cerevisiae and non-Saccharomyces yeast starters in vinification

Exploring microbial interactions between Saccharomyces cerevisiae and non-Saccharomyces yeast starters in vinification

Abstract

Winemaking is a complex microbial process involving the co-existence and interactions of various microorganisms [1]. Although, commercially available Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains could be inoculated and accomplish a well-controlled must fermentation, the growing recognition of the role of non-Saccharomyces yeasts, increases the interest in using diverse species in mixed inoculated fermentations, where yeast interactions are crucial [2]. The aim of this study was to investigate the microbial interactions between indigenous and commercial S. cerevisiae strains and two commercial and one indigenous non-Saccharomyces species used as fermentation starters under laboratory conditions. The microbial combinations were assessed for their fermentation kinetics and population dynamics. Subsequently, fermentations were conducted using three monovarietal grape musts from Greek varieties, monitoring CO2 emissions and microbial population dynamics throughout the process [3]. The resulting wines were analyzed for their oenological properties and evaluated through sensory descriptive analysis [4]. Overall, all fermentation were completed successfully. More specifically, sequential inoculation with the first commercial non-Saccharomyces exhibited a significantly lower fermentation rate (~0.4 g/L/h) and rapid population reduction within 24 hours, while the other two strains enhanced fermentation rates and persisted until the completion of the process. Notably, sequential inoculation with the indigenous non-Saccharomyces strain resulted in the predominance of this species (~8.5 log CFU/mL), followed by S. cerevisiae population (~8 log CFU/mL). The second commercial non-Saccharomyces strain exhibited neutral interactions with S. cerevisiae, making it the most promising for further study. Moreover, wines fermented with the latter non-Saccharomyces strain maintained neutral interactions with S. cerevisiae strains and showed no significant differences in oenological properties, including total acidity, volatile acidity, ethanol yield and pH values, compared to those fermented with S. cerevisiae monocultures. Sensory analysis revealed that the inoculation strategy influenced the aromatic profile, with co-inoculated fermentations enhancing floral attributes.

Aknowledgements

The research project entitled «reLees» is implemented in the framework of H.F.R.I call “Basic research Financing (Horizontal support of all Sciences)” under the National Recovery and Resilience Plan “Greece 2.0” funded by the European Union – NextGenerationEU (H.F.R.I. Project Number:15100).

References

[1] Barata, A., Malfeito-Ferreira, M., and Loureiro, V. (2012). International Journal of Food Microbiology 153(3):243–59.

[2] Bordet, F., Joran, A., Klein, G., Roullier-Gall, C., Alexandre, H. (2020). Microorganisms 8(4):1–33.

[3] Renault, P., Coulon, j., de Revel, G., Barbe, J.C., and Bely, M. (2015). International Journal of Food Microbiology, 207:40–48.

[4] Tzamourani, A., Evangelou, A., Ntourtoglou, G., Lytra, G., Paraskevopoulos, I. and Dimopoulou, M. (2024). Applied Sciences, 14(4):1522.

Publication date: June 4, 2025

Type: Poster

Authors

Aikaterini Tzamourani1,*, Angeliki Kasioura1, Artemis Tsioka1, George Ntourtoglou1, Danai Gkizi1, Alexandra Evangelou1, Panagiotis Arapitsas1, Maria Dimopoulou1

1 Department of Wine, Vine and Beverage Sciences, School of Food Science, University of West Attica, 28 Ag. Spyridonos St., 12243 Egaleo, Greece

Contact the author*

Keywords

yeast interactions, non-Saccharomyces, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Greek wines

Tags

IVES Conference Series | Macrowine | Macrowine 2025

Related articles…

Study of the fruity aroma of red wines through perceptual interactions among volatile compounds in the context of climate change for the Bordeaux vineyard

The fruity aroma of red wines is described by a wide range of descriptors, ranging from fresh fruits to ripe and jammy fruits, to candied fruits and prunes notes [1]. The fruity quality of a red wine is characterized by notes of fresh and jammy red- and black-berry fruits.

Identification of novel aromatic precursors in winemaking grapes using an optimized fractionation and UHPLC-MS analysis

Winemaking grapes contain a diverse array of non-volatile precursors that become noticeable only after hydrolysis reactions or molecular rearrangements, during which aroma compounds are generated and released [1]. Among these, glycosidic precursors are the most abundant and play a key role in the development of wine aroma [2].

Optimized grape seed protein extraction for wine fining

The extraction of proteins from grape seeds represents a promising strategy to revalorize wine industry by-products. As a natural endogenous fining agent, grape seed protein (GSE) offers an effective solution for wine clarification [1] without requiring label declaration.

Colloidal color stabilization in wine: A comparative study of Saccharomyces and non-Saccharomyces mannoproteins

Structure-function relationships between the polysaccharide part of S. cerevisiae Mannoprotein Pools (MPs) and their potential to interact with anthocyanins and Protein-Tannins aggregates was previously assessed [1,2].

Investigating perceptual interactions of fruity aromas in Bordeaux red wines through addition and reconstitution sensory studies

Fruity aromas, characterized by red and black fruit descriptors, are central to the identity of Bordeaux red wines [1,2]. Despite extensive research focused on identifying and quantifying volatile compounds that contribute to fruity aromas in wine, the mechanisms underlying their interactions and sensory perception remain poorly understood [3].