Terroir 2004 banner
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 Cartographie des terroirs viticoles: valorisation des résultats par un logiciel de consultation dynamique de cartes

Cartographie des terroirs viticoles: valorisation des résultats par un logiciel de consultation dynamique de cartes

Abstract

[English version below]

Pour son travail de cartographie et de caractérisation des terroirs, la Cellule Terroirs Viticoles utilise la méthode développée par l’Unité Vigne et Vin du Centre INRA d’Angers. Cette méthode reconnue au niveau international est appliquée dans les vignobles du Val de Loire à l’échelle du 1/10 000e et est valorisée par des éditions d’Atlas Viticoles à destination des viticulteurs et des organismes techniques. Ces atlas comportent une cartographie précise des terroirs (Unités Terroir de Base, caractéristiques des sols…) ainsi que des cartes conseils afin que le viticulteur puisse adapter ses méthodes de culture de la vigne (choix du cépage et du porte-greffe, choix des pratiques agro-viticoles : taille, enherbement…) et ses pratiques oenologiques au terroir de chaque parcelle. A terme, l’utilisation de ces atlas doit permettre l’adéquation du matériel végétal et des pratiques culturales au terroir, et donc de contribuer à une amélioration de la qualité et de la typicité des vins.
Dans le but de rendre plus aisée et plus attractive cette utilisation, la Cellule Terroirs Viticoles propose désormais la consultation des bases cartographiques en version informatisée. Ces dernières sont accessibles grâce à un logiciel permettant une consultation dynamique des différentes cartes à thèmes proposées dans les Atlas Viticoles. Concrètement, le viticulteur peut sur son poste informatique déplacer la carte affichée à l’écran, changer le thème représenté (Unité de Terroir de Base, profondeur de sol…), zoomer sur une zone précise… En se plaçant à l’endroit souhaité sur la carte par l’intermédiaire de la souris, le viticulteur peut d’un seul clic accéder à une multitude d’informations concernant la zone ou la parcelle sélectionnée. Le parcellaire du viticulteur peut également être numérisé et superposé sur les différentes cartes ce qui permet une localisation plus fine et plus rapide pour l’utilisateur.
Cet outil informatique est donc une réelle évolution pour le viticulteur et dans le cas de caves coopératives, il se révèle être un véritable atout technique notamment dans l’élaboration de cuvées terroirs spécifiques. Dans la gamme des produits informatiques proposés aux viticulteurs, l’Atlas Viticole Informatisé vient compléter les différents logiciels de suivis parcellaire et de gestion de cave pour une meilleure garantie de l’authenticité et de la traçabilité du vin.

For its routine work of characterisation and cartography of viticultural terroirs, the CVVL Terroir Cartography Unit uses the method developed by the INRA-Angers Research Unit on Grapevine and Wine. This method, of international recognition, is presently applied to the cartography of the Val de Loire vineyards (scale : 1/10 000) and valorised through the edition of viticultural atlases for the use of the vine-growers and technical institutes. These atlases propose precise maps of the Basic Terroir Units and soil characteristics as well as maps to assist in the choice of the planting material (variety, rootstock) and cultural practices (inter-row grassing). The objective is to optimise the adaptation of the planting material and the cultural practices to the terroir conditions and, therefore, to improve the quality and the typicalness of the resulting wines. 
In order to facilitate this tool and make it more attractive, the Terroir Cartography Unit is now able to propose a computerised version of the cartographic bases. These are accessible through a software that allows for a dynamic consultation of all the thematic maps proposed in the atlases. In a concrete way, the vine-grower can, on his computer, surf and zoom on the maps or change the topic (Basic Terroir Unit, soil depth, soil water reserve, percentage of gravels, etc…). A simple click on a precise location of the pointer gives access to all the information relative to the site. All the plots of a given vine-grower can be digitalised, and superimposed to the different maps, which allows the user for a quicker and more precise localisation of his sites of interest. 
This computerised tool constitutes a real evolution both for the single vine-growers and the co-operatives, as a new and very technical card to elaborate specific terroir wines. It completes the viticultural and enological software proposed to the growers to improve the monitoring of the vine and elaboration of the wine, to better guarantee the authenticity and the traceability of the product. 

DOI:

Publication date: January 12, 2022

Issue: Terroir 2004

Type: Article

Authors

E. Goulet (1), D. Rioux (1) and G. Barbeau (2)

(1) Cellule « Terroirs Viticoles », Confédération des Vignerons du Val de Loire, 42 rue Georges Morel, 49071 Beaucouzé Cedex
(2) Unité Vigne et Vin, INRA, 42 rue Georges Morel, 49071 Beaucouzé Cedex

Contact the author

Keywords

Cartographie, terroirs, consultation dynamique de cartes
cartography, terroirs, dynamic map consultation

Tags

IVES Conference Series | Terroir 2004

Citation

Related articles…

Effect of partial net shading on the temperature and radiation in the grapevine canopy, consequences on the grape quality of cv. Gros Manseng in PDO Pacherenc-du-vic-Bilh

As elsewhere, southwestern France vineyards face more recurrent summer heat waves these last years. Among the possibilities of adaptation to this climate changing parameter, the use of net shading is a technique that allow for limiting canopy exposure to radiations. In this trial, we tested net shading installed on one face of the canopy, on a north-south row-oriented plot of cv. Gros Manseng trained on VSP system in the PDO Pacherenc-du-Vic-Bilh. The purpose was to characterize the effects on the ambient canopy temperatures and radiations during the season and to observe the consequences on the composition of grapes and wines. Two sorts of net were used with two levels of obstruction (50% and 75%) of the photosynthesis active radiation (PAR). They have been installed on the west side of the canopy and compared to a netless control. Temperature and PAR sensors registered hourly data during the season. On specific summer day (hot and sunny) manual measurements took also place on bunches (temperature) and in different spots of the canopy (PAR). The results showed that, on clear days, the radiation is lowered by the shade nets respecting the supplier criteria. The effects on the ambient canopy temperature were inconstant on this plot when we observed the data from the global period of shading between fruit set and harvest. However, during hot days (>30°C), the temperature in the canopy was reduced during afternoon and the temperature of the bunch surface was reduced as well comparing to the control. A decrease of the maturity parameters of the berries, sugar and acidity, was also observed. Concerning the wine aromatic potential, no differences clearly appeared.

Grapevine varietal diversity as mitigation tool for climate change: Agronomic and oenologic potential of 14 foreign varieties grown in Languedoc region (France)

Climate change effects in Languedoc include an expected rise in temperatures, increased evapotranspiration as well as more severe and frequent climatic hazards, such as frost, drought periods and heat waves. For winegrowers theses phenomena impact both yield and quality, resulting in more frequent unbalanced wines. Research on identified mitigation tools for vineyard management is necessary to improve resilience of grapevine agrosystems. Varietal assortment is one of them. This study focuses on agronomic and oenologic potential of 14 foreign varieties grown in Languedoc French region. Fourteen grapevine varieties were monitored during 2021 from June until harvest on eight different sites, some of which occurring on more than one site adding up to 21 different modalities: 7 white varieties Alvarinho B, Assyrtiko B (2), Malvasia Istriana B, Parellada B, Verdejo B, Verdelho B, Xarello B, and 7 black varieties Saperavi N (2), Touriga nacional N, Baga N, Aleatico N, Montepulciano N (2), Primitivo N (3), Calabrese N (3). Varietals were compared through the following parameters: phenology was assessed by using the information collected in the Database Network of French Vine Conservatories (INRAE-SupAgro-IFV, 2005-2015). The number of inflorescences for shoots from secondary buds and bourillons and suckers were observed to assess post-bud break frost tolerance potential. Grapevine water status was studied through stem water potential measurement, observation of foliage symptoms of drought, and 𝛿13C on must. Frequencies and intensities of downy mildew, powdery mildew, and black rot attacks were estimated before harvest on leaves and clusters and botrytis at harvest to assess disease susceptibilities. Berry composition was monitored from end of veraison until harvest. Yield and mean bunch weight were also calculated. Varieties were then ranked on a 1-4 scale for each parameter and compared through PCA. Forty two stations of the Mediterranean basin were compared by PCA with the Multicriteria Climatic Classification indicators in order to confront the collected information during 2021 campaign to the hypothesis that plants coming from dry and hot regions are genetically adapted to such climatic conditions.

Ecophysiological performance of Vitis rootstocks under water stress

The use of rootstocks tolerant to soil water deficit is an interesting strategy to cope with limited water availability. Currently, several nurseries are breeding new genotypes, but the physiological basis of its responses under water stress are largely unknown. To this end, an ecophysiological assessment of the conventional 110-Richter (110R) and SO4, and the new M1 and M4 rootstocks was carried out in potted ungrafted plants. During one season, these Vitis genotypes were grown under greenhouse conditions and subjected to two water regimes, well-watered and water deficit. Water potentials of plants under water deficit down to < -1.4 MPa, and net photosynthesis (AN) <5 μmol m-2 s-1 did not cause leaf oxidative stress damage compared to well-watered conditions in any of the genotypes. The antioxidant capacity was sufficient to neutralize the mild oxidative stress suffered. Under both treatments, gravimetric differences in daily water use were observed among genotypes, leading to differences in the biomass of root, shoot and leaf. Under well-watered conditions, SO4 and 110R were the most vigorous and M1 and M4 the least. However, under water stress, SO4 exhibited the greatest reduction in biomass while M4 showed the lowest. Remarkably, under these conditions, SO4 reached the least negative stem water potential (Ψstem), while M1 reduced stomatal conductance (gs) and AN the most. In addition, SO4 and M1 genotypes also showed the highest and lowest hydraulic conductance values, respectively. Our results suggest that there are differences in water use regulation among genotypes, not only attributed to differences in stomatal regulation or intrinsic water use efficiency at the leaf level. Therefore, because no differences in canopy-to-root ratio were achieved, it is hypothesized that xylem vessel anatomical differences may be driving the reported differences among rootstocks performance. Results demonstrate that each Vitis rootstock differs in its ecophysiological responses under water stress.

Extreme canopy management for vineyard adaptation to climate change: is it a good idea?

Climate change constitutes an enormous challenge for humankind and for all human activities, viticulture not being an exception. Long-term strategic changes are probably needed the most, but growers also need to deal with short-term changes: summers that are getting progressively warmer, earlier harvest dates and higher pH in musts and wines. In the last 10-15 years, a relevant corpus of research is being developed worldwide in order to evaluate to which extent extreme canopy management operations, aimed at reducing leaf area and, thus, limiting the source to sink ratio, could be useful to delay ripening. Although extreme canopy management can result in relevant delays in harvest dates, longer term studies, as well as detailed analysis of their implications on carbohydrate reserves, bud fertility and future yield are desirable before these practices can be recommended.

Postveraison shoot trimming in Tannat and Merlot: preliminary results on yield components, plant balance and berry composition

There is currently a trend towards the production of wines with low alcohol content. To achieve this, grapes with low sugar content must be used. There are techniques at the vineyard level that can delay ripening and avoid excessive sugar accumulation without, a priori, affecting the final polyphenol content. Postveraison shoot trimming (PVST) is experimentally evaluated for these purposes, but its impact under Uruguayan climatic conditions with high interannual variability is not known. The aim of this work is to assess the PVST in Tannat and Merlot cultivars and their impact on yield components, plant balance and berry primary composition. In this study, two commercial vineyards of 10 years old Tannat and Merlot (grafted on SO4) at Canelones Department were selected. During the 2020-201 growing season, grapevines were submitted to PVST when grapes reached 15º Brix. In a randomized block, trimmed (T) and control (C) plants were evaluated with three repetitions each cultivar. Evaluation of the evolution of primary berry composition during ripening, measurement of yield components and plant balance were performed. For both cultivars, PVST did not affect yield components. Merlot reached 5.4 kg per plant and Tannat 7.1 kg, with not statistical significance between treatments. However, statistical differences were observed in terms of plant balance. In Merlot Ravaz Index reached a difference of 5.3 (12.0 in T and 6.7 in C) meanwhile Tannat reached 3.5 of statistical difference (13.7 in T and 10.2 in C). The tendency to imbalance for the treated plants had an impact on the final grape composition. Merlot grapes showed statistical difference in final total acidity (0.3 g of difference between treatments) while treatments impact final sugar content on Tannat grapes (10.0 g of difference between treatments). Further studies are needed to assess the impact of different canopy management techniques in our conditions.