Terroir 2004 banner
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 Shoot positioning: effect on physiological, vegetative and reproductive parameters

Shoot positioning: effect on physiological, vegetative and reproductive parameters

Abstract

[English version below]

On a étudié durant deux saisons de croissance (2002/2003 et 2003/2004) l’effet de l’orientation vertical des rameaux sur les paramètres physiologiques, végétatifs et reproductifs dans la région de Stellenbosch dans un vignoble du cépage Merlot sur 99 R conduite à espalier et taillé a cordon coursonné. Les vignes étaient espacées 2.7 x 1.5 m. L’irrigation a été appliquée quand la baie avait la dimension d’un pois et a la véraison.
Les rameaux ont été placés verticalement à la nouaison ,à la dimension d’un pois de la baie, à la véraison et trois semaines après la véraison. Après leur placement vertical les rameaux ont été tout de suite écimés à 100-155cm. Le positionnement vertical et l’écimage des rameaux n’ont pas eu aucun effet sur la croissance des entre cœurs, mais ils ont eu un effet fort sur la position de les entre coeurs sur la longueur du rameau principal. Depuis la nouaison et jusqu’à la véraison on a eu une bonne distribution de la lumière qui a favorit l’uniformité de la maturation et la qualité du raisin. Le potentiel hydrique foliaire et le potentiel de tige des feuilles basales et apicales et l’activité photosynthétique sont diminués durant le cycle végétatif. Une régression significative a été trouvée pour les feuilles apicales entre la tige et le potentiel de tige et le potentiel hydrique foliaire.
Le placement vertical des rameaux jusqu’à la véraison a induit un’augmentation significative du degré °Brix, du contenu d’acide malique et du saccharose, et une faible diminution de l’acide tartrique. Le niveau du glucose a été le plus haute dans les traitements dimension d’un pois et véraison. Aucune différence significative entre les traitements a été trouve pour le pH. L’époque de traitement pre-véraison a amélioré la couleur de la peau de la baie.
Aucune difficulté pratique a été vérifiée quand les rameaux ont été manipulés dans les première époque tandis que à les époques véraison et post-véraison on a eu difficulté à manipuler les rameaux a cause de la lignification et de la présence des vrilles. Les grappes sont très sensibles aux dommages et à la pourriture. Il s’agit de considérations importantes dans les terroirs où la gestion soigneuse du vignoble est très difficile.

The effect of vertical shoot positioning and topping at different times during two growth seasons (2002/03 and 2003/04) on physiological, vegetative and reproductive parameters was investigated in a vertically trellised Merlot/R99 vineyard located in the Stellenbosch area. Vines were spaced 2.7 x 1.5 m in north-south orientated rows. Micro-sprinkler irrigation was applied at pea size berry and at véraison stages. Shoots were positioned at berry set, pea size, véraison and post-véraison stages (3 weeks after véraison). After being positioned, they were immediately topped. Before positioning the canopy was in a “natural” condition with shoots hanging freely. Soil water typically varied according to the progress in the season and with soil depth, decreasing towards the end of the season and increasing with depth. The primary shoot length of the positioned shoots was on average approximately 100 – 115 cm, being restricted by the relatively low trellising system. Shoot positioning and topping had no marked effect on the growth of secondary shoots, but they had a noticeable effect on the position of secondary shoots along the length of the primary shoots. Pea-size shoot positioning induced slightly lower light conditions in the bunch zone, because of the low position of secondary shoot development on primary shoots. In spite of this, pre-vèraison shoot positioning treatments allowed good all-round light distribution, which would promote uniform bunch ripening and grape quality. The basal and apical stem and leaf water potential and photosynthetic activity decreased during the season as the leaves aged and the plants lost water. A significant correlation was found for apical leaves between stem and leaf water potential. 
Earlier shoot positioning (up to véraison) significantly increased the °Balling level of the must. Early shoot positioning (up to véraison) increased malic acid and sucrose contents, whereas tartaric acid contents were slightly reduced and glucose contents were higher in pea size and véraison treatments. No significant differences between treatments were found for must pH. The earlier shoots were positioned, the more water was lost by the skins, resulting in a concentration of skin contents. Pre-véraison shoot positioning and topping improved the colour of the skins. 
No practical difficulty was experienced when shoots were positioned early in the season, i.e. at berry set and pea size stages, whereas at and after véraison proper vertical positioning was primarily restricted by shoot lignification and the tightness of tendrils on the wires. Bunches were also very sensitive to damage, which led to bunch rot and a reduction in yield. These are important considerations in terroirs where timely management is difficult. 

DOI:

Publication date: January 12, 2022

Issue: Terroir 2004

Type: Article

Authors

A. Pisciotta (1), R. Di Lorenzo (1) M.G.Barbagallo (1), C.G. Volschenk (2) & J.J. Hunter (2)

(1) Dipartimento di Colture Arboree, Università degli Studi di Palermo, Viale delle Scienze 11, 90128 – Palermo, Sicily, Italy
(2) ARC Infruitec-Nietvoorbij, Private Bag X5026, 7599 Stellenbosch, South Africa

Contact the author

Keywords

Merlot, shoot positioning, vegetative growth, reproductive growth, photosynthesis, water potential, light interception, grape composition

Tags

IVES Conference Series | Terroir 2004

Citation

Related articles…

A multidisciplinary approach to evaluate the effects of the training system on the performance of “Aglianico del Vulture” vineyards

Vineyards are complex agro-ecosystems with high spatial and temporal variability. An efficient training system may counteract the adverse effects of this variability. Moreover, considering the climate change issues, choosing an efficient training system that enhances water use and protects the vines from radiative thermal stress has become a priority for the farmers. A multidisciplinary approach that assesses the soil-crop-yield-wine relationships of vineyards in a distributed and holistic way could bring added knowledge on the behavior of the different training systems. This ongoing research aimed to implement a multidisciplinary approach to study the behavior of “Aglianico del Vulture” grapevines trained with two different systems: a spurred cordon (SC) and an “Alberello in parete” (AL), grown in a high-quality wine production area of Basilicata region (Italy). The approach merged several methods and scales of soil, ecophysiology, must/wine quality, and spectral data collection to assess the influence of the training system. Homogeneous zones (HZs) in both training systems were defined through a procedure based on geomorphological classification, unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV) images analysis, and a traditional soil survey supported by geophysical scanning. During the 2021 season, TDR probes monitored soil water content, while grapevine health status was assessed using eco-physiological measurements (LWP, chlorophyll content, PSII photosynthetic efficiency, LAI, and point-based field spectroscopy). These grapevine in-vivo measurements validated the spectral vegetation indexes (NDVI, RENDVI, CVI, and TVI) derived from the UAV multispectral imagery, which monitored the grapevine status in a distributed and non-invasive way. Grape yield, quality of berries, must and wine were measured to assess the effects of the training systems. The first experimental year results showed the variability of the vineyards and revealed relationships among soil parameters, crop characteristics, and vegetation indices of the SC and AL training systems. This multidisciplinary study could bring new insights into the vineyard training system’s effects on grape yield and wine quality.

Short-term relationships between climate and grapevine trunk diseases in southern French vineyards

[lwp_divi_breadcrumbs home_text="IVES" use_before_icon="on" before_icon="||divi||400" module_id="publication-ariane" _builder_version="4.19.4" _module_preset="default" module_text_align="center" module_font_size="16px" text_orientation="center"...

Soil, vine, climate change – what is observed – what is expected

To evaluate the current and future impact of climate change on Viticulture requires an integrated view on a complex interacting system within the soil-plant-atmospheric continuum under continuous change. Aside of the globally observed increase in temperature in basically all viticulture regions for at least four decades, we observe several clear trends at the regional level in the ratio of precipitation to potential evapotranspiration. Additionally the recently published 6th assessment report of the IPCC (The physical science basis) shows case-dependent further expected shifts in climate patterns which will have substantial impacts on the way we will conduct viticulture in the decades to come.
Looking beyond climate developments, we observe rising temperatures in the upper soil layers which will have an impact on the distribution of microbial populations, the decay rate of organic matter or the storage capacity for carbon, thus affecting the emission of greenhouse gases (GHGs) and the viscosity of water in the soil-plant pathway, altering the transport of water. If the upper soil layers dry out faster due to less rainfall and/or increased evapotranspiration driven by higher temperatures, the spectral reflection properties of bare soil change and the transport of latent heat into the fruiting zone is increased putting a higher temperature load on the fruit. Interactions between micro-organisms in the rhizosphere and the grapevine root system are poorly understood but respond to environmental factors (such as increased soil temperatures) and the plant material (rootstock for instance), respectively the cultivation system (for example bio-organic versus conventional). This adds to an extremely complex system to manage in terms of increased resilience, adaptation to and even mitigation of climate change. Nevertheless, taken as a whole, effects on the individual expressions of wines with a given origin, seem highly likely to become more apparent.

Rootstock regulation of scion phenotypes: the relationship between rootstock parentage and petiole mineral concentration

Grapevine is grown as a graft since the end of the 19th century. Rootstocks not only provide tolerance to Phylloxera but also ensure the supply of water and mineral nutrients to the scion. Rootstocks are an important mean of adaptation to environmental conditions, because the scion controls the typical features of the grapes and wine. However, among the large diversity of rootstocks worldwide, few of them are commercially used in the vineyard. The aim of this study was to investigate the extent to which rootstocks modify the mineral composition of the petioles of the scion. Vitis vinifera cvs. Cabernet-Sauvignon, Pinot noir, Syrah and Ugni blanc were grafted onto 55 different rootstock genotypes and planted in a vineyard as three replicates of 5 vines. Petioles were collected in the cluster zone with 6 replicates per combination. Petiolar concentrations of 13 mineral elements (N, P, K, S, Mg, Ca, Na, B, Zn, Mn, Fe, Cu, Al) at veraison were determined. Scion, rootstock and the interaction explained the same proportion of the phenotypic variance for most mineral elements. Rootstock genotype showed a significant influence on the petiole mineral element composition. Rootstock effect explained from 7 % for Cu to 25 % for S of the variance. The difference of rootstock conferred mineral status is discussed in relation to vigor and fertility. Rootstocks were also genotyped with 23 microsatellite markers. Data were analysed according to genetic groups in order to determine whether the petiole mineral composition could be related to the genetic parentage of the rootstock. Thanks to a highly powerful design, it is the first time that such a large panel of rootstocks grafted with 4 scions has been studied. These results give the opportunity to better characterize the rootstocks and to enlarge the diversity used in the vineyard.

Pruned vine biomass exclusion from a clay loam vineyard soil – examining the impact on physical/chemical properties

The wine industry worldwide faces increasing challenges to achieve sustainable levels of carbon emission mitigation. This project seeks to establish the feasibility of harvesting winter pruned vineyard biomass (PVB) for potential use in carbon footprint reduction, through its use as a renewable biofuel for energy production. In order to make this recommendation, technical issues such as the potential environmental impact, chemical composition and fuel suitability, and logistical challenges of harvesting biomass needs to be understood to compare with the results from similar studies. Of particular interest is the role PVB plays as a carbon source in vineyard soils and what effect annual removal might have on soil carbon sequestration. A preliminary trial was established in the Waite Campus vineyard (University of Adelaide) to test current management strategies. Vines are grown in a Eutrophic, Red Dermosol clay loam soil with well managed midrow swards. A comparison was undertaken of mid-row treatments in two 0.25 Ha blocks (Shiraz and Semillon), including annual cultivation for seed bed preparation, the deliberate exclusion of PVB (25 years) and incorporation of PVB (13 years) at an average of 3.4 and 5.5 Mg/Ha-1 for Shiraz and Semillon respectively. In both 0-10cm and 10-30cm soil core sample depths, combined soil carbon % measures in the desired range of 1.80 to 3.50, were not significantly different between treatments or cultivars and yielded an estimated 42 Mg/ha-1 of sequestered soil carbon. Other key physical and chemical measures were likewise not significantly different between treatments. Preliminary results suggest that in a temperate zone vineyard, managed such as the one used in this study, there is no long term negative impact on soil carbon sequestration through removing PVB. This implies that growers could confidently harvest PVB for use in several end fates including as a bio fuel.