Terroir 2004 banner
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 Shoot positioning: effect on physiological, vegetative and reproductive parameters

Shoot positioning: effect on physiological, vegetative and reproductive parameters

Abstract

[English version below]

On a étudié durant deux saisons de croissance (2002/2003 et 2003/2004) l’effet de l’orientation vertical des rameaux sur les paramètres physiologiques, végétatifs et reproductifs dans la région de Stellenbosch dans un vignoble du cépage Merlot sur 99 R conduite à espalier et taillé a cordon coursonné. Les vignes étaient espacées 2.7 x 1.5 m. L’irrigation a été appliquée quand la baie avait la dimension d’un pois et a la véraison.
Les rameaux ont été placés verticalement à la nouaison ,à la dimension d’un pois de la baie, à la véraison et trois semaines après la véraison. Après leur placement vertical les rameaux ont été tout de suite écimés à 100-155cm. Le positionnement vertical et l’écimage des rameaux n’ont pas eu aucun effet sur la croissance des entre cœurs, mais ils ont eu un effet fort sur la position de les entre coeurs sur la longueur du rameau principal. Depuis la nouaison et jusqu’à la véraison on a eu une bonne distribution de la lumière qui a favorit l’uniformité de la maturation et la qualité du raisin. Le potentiel hydrique foliaire et le potentiel de tige des feuilles basales et apicales et l’activité photosynthétique sont diminués durant le cycle végétatif. Une régression significative a été trouvée pour les feuilles apicales entre la tige et le potentiel de tige et le potentiel hydrique foliaire.
Le placement vertical des rameaux jusqu’à la véraison a induit un’augmentation significative du degré °Brix, du contenu d’acide malique et du saccharose, et une faible diminution de l’acide tartrique. Le niveau du glucose a été le plus haute dans les traitements dimension d’un pois et véraison. Aucune différence significative entre les traitements a été trouve pour le pH. L’époque de traitement pre-véraison a amélioré la couleur de la peau de la baie.
Aucune difficulté pratique a été vérifiée quand les rameaux ont été manipulés dans les première époque tandis que à les époques véraison et post-véraison on a eu difficulté à manipuler les rameaux a cause de la lignification et de la présence des vrilles. Les grappes sont très sensibles aux dommages et à la pourriture. Il s’agit de considérations importantes dans les terroirs où la gestion soigneuse du vignoble est très difficile.

The effect of vertical shoot positioning and topping at different times during two growth seasons (2002/03 and 2003/04) on physiological, vegetative and reproductive parameters was investigated in a vertically trellised Merlot/R99 vineyard located in the Stellenbosch area. Vines were spaced 2.7 x 1.5 m in north-south orientated rows. Micro-sprinkler irrigation was applied at pea size berry and at véraison stages. Shoots were positioned at berry set, pea size, véraison and post-véraison stages (3 weeks after véraison). After being positioned, they were immediately topped. Before positioning the canopy was in a “natural” condition with shoots hanging freely. Soil water typically varied according to the progress in the season and with soil depth, decreasing towards the end of the season and increasing with depth. The primary shoot length of the positioned shoots was on average approximately 100 – 115 cm, being restricted by the relatively low trellising system. Shoot positioning and topping had no marked effect on the growth of secondary shoots, but they had a noticeable effect on the position of secondary shoots along the length of the primary shoots. Pea-size shoot positioning induced slightly lower light conditions in the bunch zone, because of the low position of secondary shoot development on primary shoots. In spite of this, pre-vèraison shoot positioning treatments allowed good all-round light distribution, which would promote uniform bunch ripening and grape quality. The basal and apical stem and leaf water potential and photosynthetic activity decreased during the season as the leaves aged and the plants lost water. A significant correlation was found for apical leaves between stem and leaf water potential. 
Earlier shoot positioning (up to véraison) significantly increased the °Balling level of the must. Early shoot positioning (up to véraison) increased malic acid and sucrose contents, whereas tartaric acid contents were slightly reduced and glucose contents were higher in pea size and véraison treatments. No significant differences between treatments were found for must pH. The earlier shoots were positioned, the more water was lost by the skins, resulting in a concentration of skin contents. Pre-véraison shoot positioning and topping improved the colour of the skins. 
No practical difficulty was experienced when shoots were positioned early in the season, i.e. at berry set and pea size stages, whereas at and after véraison proper vertical positioning was primarily restricted by shoot lignification and the tightness of tendrils on the wires. Bunches were also very sensitive to damage, which led to bunch rot and a reduction in yield. These are important considerations in terroirs where timely management is difficult. 

DOI:

Publication date: January 12, 2022

Issue: Terroir 2004

Type: Article

Authors

A. Pisciotta (1), R. Di Lorenzo (1) M.G.Barbagallo (1), C.G. Volschenk (2) & J.J. Hunter (2)

(1) Dipartimento di Colture Arboree, Università degli Studi di Palermo, Viale delle Scienze 11, 90128 – Palermo, Sicily, Italy
(2) ARC Infruitec-Nietvoorbij, Private Bag X5026, 7599 Stellenbosch, South Africa

Contact the author

Keywords

Merlot, shoot positioning, vegetative growth, reproductive growth, photosynthesis, water potential, light interception, grape composition

Tags

IVES Conference Series | Terroir 2004

Citation

Related articles…

Green berries on Gewürztraminer (Vitis vinifera L.) in South Tyrol (Italy)

The grape variety Gewürztraminer is known to be affected by two physiological disorders namely berry shrivel and bunch stem necrosis. During the season 2014 we noticed a new symptomatology type of ripening disorder on the variety. The new symptom showed not all berries fallowing the normal maturation stages, but single berries remaining at a soft but green stage till harvest. The broad distribution of these so called “green berries” symptoms in different production sites of our region, caused huge damage due to the difficulty of eliminating single berries per bunch before harvesting. Therefore, the Research Centre Laimburg began to investigate the reasons and origins of this new symptom. This work shows the results of first attempts to find causes for the symptom as well as the resulting approach to mitigate symptoms. Applications of magnesium leaf fertilizer showed first promising results against this putative disorder. To study the causal effect of the green berries 30 symptomatic vineyards in 2014 have been selected for a monitoring during the season 2016. To evaluate the foliar nutrient treatment two vineyards have been selected for application of magnesium sulfate and magnesium chloride. Leaf and berry nutrient analysis, as well as the main quality parameters during ripening have been performed. As soon as “green berries” symptoms appeared, incidence and severity have been evaluated. Most of the symptomatic vineyards of the 2016 monitoring showed light to clear magnesium deficit symptoms on their foliage. Only during the seasons 2020 and 2021 “green berries” symptoms could be found in the leaf fertilizer treatment vineyards. Both seasons showed a significant effect of the magnesium treatments to reduce the incidence and severity of the symptom. It seems that the appearance of the “green berries” symptom on Gewürztraminer is correlated to a disturbed uptake of magnesium of the vines.

Sustainable fertilisation of the vineyard in Galicia (Spain)

Excessive fertilization of the vineyard leads to low quality grapes, increased costs and a negative impact on the environment. In order to establish an integrated management system aimed at a sustainable fertilization of the vineyards, nutritional reference levels were established. For this purpose, 30 representative vineyards of the Albariño variety were studied, in which soil and petiole analyses were carried out for two years and grape yield and quality at harvest were measured. In both years of study, soil pH, calcium, sodium and cation exchange capacity were positively correlated with calcium content and negatively correlated with manganese in grapes. Irrigated vineyards had higher levels of aluminium in soil and lower levels of calcium in petiole. Climatic conditions were very different in the years of the study. The year 2019 was colder than usual, in 2020 there was a marked water stress with high summer temperatures. This resulted in medium-high acidity in grapes in 2019 and low acidity in 2020, with sugar levels being similar both years. A very marked decrease in must amino nitrogen was observed in 2020, with ammonia nitrogen remaining stable. The correlation of acidity and sugar values in grapes with soil and petiole analysis data made it possible to establish reference levels for the nutritional diagnosis of the Albariño variety in this region. Based on these results, an easy-to-use TIC application is currently being created for grapegrowers, aimed at improving the sustainability of the vineyard through reasoned fertilization. This study has now been extended to other Galician vine varieties.

Deconstructing the soil component of terroir: from controversy to consensus

Wine terroir describes the collectively recognized relation between a geographical area and the distinctive organoleptic characteristics of the wines produced in it. The overriding objective in terroir studies is therefore to provide scientific proof relating the properties of terroir components to wine quality and typicity. In scientific circles, the role of climate (macro-, meso- and micro-) on grape and wine characteristics is well documented and accepted as the most critical. Moreover, there has been increasing interest in recent years about new elements with possible importance in shaping wine terroir like berry/leaf/soil microbiology or even aromatic plants in proximity to the vineyard conferring flavors to the grapes. However, the actual effect of these factors is also dependent on complex interactions with plant material (variety/clone, rootstock, vine age) and with human factors.
The contribution of soil, although a fundamental component of terroir and extremely popular among wine enthusiasts, remains a much-debated issue among researchers. The role of geology is probably the one mostly associated by consumers with the notion of terroir with different parent rocks considered to give birth to different wine styles. However, the relationship between wine properties and the underlying parent material raises a lot of controversy especially regarding the actual existence of rock-derived flavors in the wine (e.g. minerality). As far as the actual soil properties are concerned, the effect of soil physical properties is generally regarded as the most significant (e.g sandy soils being associated with lighter wines while those on clay with colored and tannic ones) mostly through control of water availability which ultimately modifies berry ripening conditions either directly by triggering biosynthetic pathways, or indirectly by altering vigor and yield components. The role of soil chemistry seems to be weakly associated to wine sensory characteristic, although N, K, S and Ca, but also soil pH, are often considered important in the overall soil effect.
Recently, in the light of evidence provided by precision agriculture studies reporting a high variability of vineyard soils, the spatial scale should also be taken into consideration in the evaluation of the soil effects on wines. While it is accepted that soil effects become more significant than climate on a local level, it is not clear whether these micro-variations of vineyard soils are determining in the terroir effect. Moreover, as terroir is not a set of only natural factors, the magnitude of the contribution of human-related factors (irrigation, fertilization, soil management) to the soil effect still remains ambiguous. Lastly, a major shortcoming of the majority of works about soil effects on wine characteristics is the absence of connection with actual vine physiological processes since all soil effects on grape and wine chemistry and sensorial properties are ultimately mediated through vine responses.
This article attempts to breakdown the main soil attributes involved in the terroir effect to suggest an improved understanding about soil’s true contribution to wine sensory characteristics. It is proposed that soil parameters per se are not as significant determining factors in the terroir effect but rather their mutual interactions as well as with other natural and human factors included in the terroir concept. Consequently, similarly to bioclimatic indices, composite soil indices (i.e. soil depth, water holding capacity, fertility, temperature etc), incorporating multiple soil parameters, might provide a more accurate and quantifiable means to assess the relative weight of the soil component in the terroir effect.

Genotypic variability in root architectural traits and putative implications for water uptake in grafted grapevine

Root system architecture (RSA) is important for soil exploration and edaphic resources acquisition by the plant, and thus contributes largely to its productivity and adaptation to environmental stresses, particularly soil water deficit. In grafted grapevine, while the degree of drought tolerance induced by the rootstock has been well documented in the vineyard, information about the underlying physiological processes, particularly at the root level, is scarce, due to the inherent difficulties in observing large root systems in situ. The objectives of this study were to determine genetic differences in the root architectural traits and their relationships to water uptake in two Vitis rootstocks genotypes (RGM, 140Ru) differing in their adaptation to drought. Young rootstocks grafted upon the Riesling variety were transplanted into cylindrical tubes and in 2D rhizotrons under two conditions, well watered and moderate water stress. Root traits were analyzed by digital imaging and the amount of transpired water was measured gravimetrically twice a week. Root phenotyping after 30 days reveal substantial variation in RSA traits between genotypes despite similar total root mass; the drought-tolerant 140Ru showed higher root length density in the deep layer, while the drought-sensitive RGM was characterised by shallow-angled root system development with more basal roots and a larger proportion of fine roots in the upper half of the tube. Water deficit affected canopy size and shoot mass to a greater extent than root development and architectural-related traits for both 140Ru and RGM, suggesting vertical distribution of roots was controlled by genotype rather than plasticity to soil water regime. The deeper root system of 140Ru as compared to RGM correlated with greater daily water uptake and sustained stomata opening under water-limited conditions but had little effect on above-ground growth. Our results highlight that grapevine rootstocks have constitutively distinct RSA phenotypes and that, in the context of climate change, those that develop an extensive root network at depth may provide a desirable advantage to the plant in coping with reduced water resources.

Is wine terroir a valid concept under a changing climate?

The OIV[i] defines terroir as a concept referring to an area in which collective knowledge of the interactions between the physical and biological environment (soil, topography, climate, landscape characteristics and biodiversity features) and vitivinicultural practices develops, providing distinctive wine characteristics. Those are perceptible in the taste of wine, which drives consumer preference and, therefore, wine’s value in the marketplace. Geographical indications (GI) are recognized regulatory constructs formalizing and protecting the nexus between wine taste and the terroir generating it. Despite considering updates, GIs do not consider the nexus as a dynamic one and do not anticipate change, namely of climate. Being climate a fundamental feature of terroir, it strongly impacts wine characteristics, such as taste. According to IPCC[ii], many widespread, rapid and unprecedented changes of climate occurred, some being irreversible over hundreds to thousands of years. Climatic shifts and atmospheric-driven extreme events have been widely reported worldwide. Recent climatic trends are projected to strengthen in upcoming decades, whereas extremes are expected to increase in frequency and intensity, forcing wines away from GI definitions. Geographical shifts of viticultural suitability are projected, often moving into regions and countries different from current ones. Some authors propose adaptation in viticulture, winemaking and product innovation. We show evidence of climate changing wine characteristics in the Douro valley, home of 270-year-old Port GI. We discuss herein resist or adapt stances for when climate changes the nexus between terroir and wine characteristics. Using the MED-GOLD[iii] dashboard, a tool allowing for easy visual navigation of past and future climates, we demonstrate how policymakers can identify future moments, throughout the 21st century under different emission scenarios, when GI specifications will likely need updates (e.g., boundaries, varieties) to reduce climate-change impacts.