Terroir 2004 banner
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 Phenolic extraction during fermentation as affected by ripeness level of Syrah/R99 grapes

Phenolic extraction during fermentation as affected by ripeness level of Syrah/R99 grapes

Abstract

[English version below]

L’extraction phénolique au cours de la fermentation à partir de vendanges de différents degrees de maturité du cépage Syrah/R99 a été etudiée. Cette travail fait parti d’un projet focalisé sur la qualité du raisin et des vins obtenus au cours du millésime 2002. Les vignes sont situées à Stellenbosch (Afrique du Sud) sur un sol Glenrose avec un système de conduite en palissage vertical; la distance entre les rangs orientés nord-sud est de 2.75 m et de 1.5 m entre les souches. Les plantes ont été irriguées par microaspersion après la fermeture de la grappe (baie petit pois) jusqu’à la véraison. Six échantillons de baies ont été prélevés depuis la nouaison jusqu’à deux semaines après la véraison, date qui signale le début des vendanges pour les différents degrés de maturité. Les souches ont été vendangées en six bloques chaque quatre jours puis les raisins sont immédiatement vinifiés.
Les résultats correspondent aux périodes s’échelonnant entre le 17 février et le 24 mars 2002. Les analyses de la baie entière, de l’épiderme et des pépins ont été réalisées sur les raisins et les vins des 6 bloques expérimentaux. Les raisins sont placés à la même temperture de 20ºC avant le début de la fermentation. Les vendanges après être éraflées, foulées et sulfitées sont additionnées d’activateurs puis inoculées par S. cerevisiæ (VIN 13) et fermentent à la tempertaure constante de 24ºC. La durée moyenne de la vinification (fermentation alcoolique + macération postfermentative) a été de 5 jours. Trois pigeages ont été effectués par jour jusqu’au cinquième jour temps où le pressurage est réalisé. Des échantillons d’épiderme de raisins et du moût en fermentation ont été analysés le premier, deuxième, quatrième et cinquième jour après le pressurage. La concentration en sucre, l’acidité totale, le pH, les teneurs en anthocyanes et tanins ainsi que les polyphénols totaux (IPT) sont analysés. De plus, pendant la fermentation, l’évolution de densité colorante (A520 + 420) et de l’IPT (A280) est aussi déterminée. Les proanthocyanidins selon l’analyse du DMAC ont été déterminés dans les pépins des baies et pendant la vinification. Dans les vins, sont analysés le degré alcoolique, l’intensité et la densité colorante, et les polyphénols totaux.
Le contenu maximum de sucre se situe autour du 11 mars (178 jours après le débourrement). Ce maximum d’accumulation est aussi observé pour les anthocyanes, les tanins et les polyphénols totaux des baies, accompagné en parallèle d’une diminution du volume de la baie due à la perte d’eau. Après l’onze de mars, l’extraction des polyphénols totaux n’est pas en relation avec la taille de la baie. L’extraction des polyphénols totaux de l’épiderme au cinquième jour de fermentation est totale après le 17 mars et par la suite la densité colorante et les phenols (IPT) dans l’épiderme se maintiennent constants après cette période. Si on compare les différents degrés de maturité, l’extraction augmente de forme notable après l’onze de mars et l’on observe une diminution plus marquée de la densité colorante et de l’IPT des épidermes le cinquième jour de la fermentation. Le contenu des catéquines dans les pépins n’a pas beaucoup changé pendant la maturation des baies alors que la diminution à la fin de la fermentation pour les pépins de raisins récoltés 6 semaines après la véraison a été très importante, contraire à l’accumulation des sucres. Les valeurs de densité colorante et IPT des vins suivent un modèle similaire à celles trouvées dans les baies.

Phenolic (tannin and anthocyanin) extraction during fermentation of Syrah grapes was investigated as part of an elaborate study to determine parameters that would indicate high grape quality and different grape and wine styles. A Syrah/R99 vineyard, situated in the Stellenbosch region (South Africa), was used. Vines are vertically trained and spaced 2.75 x 1.5 m in north-south orientated rows on a Glenrosa soil and a west-facing slope. Microsprinkler-irrigation was applied at pea berry size and at vèraison stages. Canopies were suckered, shoot-positioned and topped, whereas leaves were removed at two stages. Fortnightly sampling was done from berry set up to two weeks post-véraison, after which grapes were harvested for analyses and winemaking approximately every four days. Six wines were made per ripeness level.
Results obtained during the ripening period of the 2002/2003 growth season (from 17 February to 24 March) are reported. Whole berries, skins, seeds, pomace and wine were analysed for each ripeness level. Grapes of all harvests were cooled to the same temperature (20 ºC) before processing. Grapes were destemmed, crushed and the pomace inoculated with commercial yeast (VIN 13). Alcoholic fermentation took place at a controlled temperature of 24 ºC (di-ammonium phosphate and SO2 were added). The skins were pushed through three times per day. Fermentation on the skins averaged five days, after which the pomace was pressed. Skins and juice were analysed on the first, second and fourth day during fermentation. On the fifth day after crushing (at pressing), skins, juice and seeds were analysed. Total soluble solids, titratable acidity, pH, anthocyanins, tannins and phenolics were analysed in the whole berries. Evolution of colour density (A520 + 420) and total phenolic content (absorbance at 280nm) was monitored in the pomace and skins. Proanthocyanidin content (DMAC analysis) was determined in the seeds from intact berries and in the seeds after pressing. The degree of alcohol, phenolics, colour intensity and colour density were determined in the different wines.
The 0Balling of the berries reached a high at approximately 11 March (178 days after bud burst). This pattern was similar to that of the anthocyanin, tannin and total phenolic contents of the berry (whole berry extraction) and coincided with the reduction in berry size due to water loss. After 11 March extraction of the different phenolic compounds seemed not to be affected by the decrease in berry size. From 17 March no further extraction from the skins (skin extraction after 5 days of fermentation) occurred, hence the stable colour density and total phenolic patterns of the skins during this period. The colour density and total phenolic content of the skins during fermentation showed a clear distinction between harvest dates with higher extraction occurring from 11 March to the last harvest date, resulting in low remaining values in the skins after five days of fermentation. The proanthocyanidin content of the seeds only slightly decreased during the course of ripening. However, the seeds were heavily depleted during fermentation of the harvests following that at approximately 6 weeks after véraison, a trend which is completely opposite to the sugar content of the berries. The colour density and total phenolic content of the wine followed similar patterns to those of the berries

DOI:

Publication date: January 12, 2022

Issue: Terroir 2004

Type: Article

Authors

M. Nadal (1), N. Volschenk (2) and J.J. Hunter (2)

(1) Departament de Bioquimica i Biotecnologia, Facultat d’Enologia de Tarragona, CerTA, Ramón y Cajal 70, 43003 Tarragona
(2) ARC Infruitec-Nietvoorbij, Private Bag X5026, 7599 Stellenbosch, South Africa

Contact the author

Keywords

Grapevine, Shiraz, fermentation, phenols, ripeness level, skins, seeds, wine

Tags

IVES Conference Series | Terroir 2004

Citation

Related articles…

Climate change impacts: a multi-stress issue

With the aim of producing premium wines, it is admitted that moderate environmental stresses may contribute to the accumulation of compounds of interest in grapes. However the ongoing climate change, with the appearance of more limiting conditions of production is a major concern for the wine industry economic. Will it be possible to maintain the vineyards in place, to preserve the current grape varieties and how should we anticipate the adaptation measures to ensure the sustainability of vineyards? In this context, the question of the responses and adaptation of grapevine to abiotic stresses becomes a major scientific issue to tackle. An abiotic stress can be defined as the effect of a specific factor of the physico-chemical environment of the plants (temperature, availability of water and minerals, light, etc.) which reduces growth, and for a crop such as the vine, the yield, the composition of the fruits and the sustainability of the plants. Water stress is in many minds, but a systemic vision is essential for at least two reasons. The first reason is that in natural environments, a single factor is rarely limiting, and plants have to deal with a combination of constraints, as for example heat and drought, both in time and at a given time. The second reason is that plants, including grapevine, have central mechanisms of stress responses, as redox regulatory pathways, that play an important role in adaptation and survival. Here we will review the most recent studies dealing with this issue to provide a better understanding of the grapevine responses to a combination of environmental constraints and of the underlying regulatory pathways, which may be very helpful to design more adapted solutions to cope with climate change.

Upscaling the integrated terroir zoning through digital soil mapping: a case study in the Designation of Origin Campo de Borja

homogeneous zones by intersecting several partial zonings of major factors that influence vineyard growth. Each of them follows specific process from their corresponding disciplines. Soil zoning specifically refers to a Soil Resource Inventory map that has traditionally been generated by conventional soil mapping methods. These methods have shortcomings in reaching fine cartographic and categorical details and involve significant expenses, which undermines their applicability. A new framework named Digital Soil Mapping has introduced quantitative models by statistical techniques to establish soil-landscape relationships and is able to provide intensive scale cartography.

In the present study, a microzoning at 1:10.000 scale is generated from an initial zoning, where the conventional soil map with polytaxic map units is replaced by a new one from digital techniques that disaggregates them. The comparison between the zonings considers a quantitative evaluation of capability for each Homogeneous Terroir Unit by means of the Viticultural Quality Index and its categorization based on its distribution by map. The spatial intersection of both maps gives rise to a confusion matrix in which the flows of class variations after the substitution are assessed.

The results show a five-fold increase in the number of Homogeneous Terroir Units identified and a larger differentiation among them, evidenced by a wider range in the capability index distribution. Both elements are accompanied by an increase in the detection of areas of higher potential within previously undervalued uniform zones.These features are a direct effect of the improvements brought by Digital Soil Mapping techniques and would verify the advantages of their implementation in the Integrated Terroir zoning. Eventually, such new highly detailed terroir units would benefit precision viticulture and sustainable management practices.

Sustaining wine identity through intra-varietal diversification

With contemporary climate change, cultivated Vitis vinifera L. is at risk as climate is a critical component in defining ecologically fitted plant materiel. While winegrowers can draw on the rich diversity among grapevine varieties to limit expected impacts (Morales-Castilla et al., 2020), replacing a signature variety that has created a sense of local distinctiveness may lead to several challenges. In order to sustain wine identity in uncertain climate outcomes, the study of intra-varietal diversity is important to reflect the adaptive and evolutionary potential of current cultivated varieties. The aim of this ongoing study is to understand to what extent can intra-varietal diversity be a climate change adaptation solution. With a focus on early (Sauvignon blanc, Riesling, Grolleau, Pinot noir) to moderate late (Chenin, Petit Verdot, Cabernet franc) ripening varieties, data was collected for flowering and veraison for the various studied accessions (from conservatory plots) and clones. For these phenological growing stages, heat requirements were established using nearby weather stations (adapted from the GFV model, Parker et al., 2013) and model performances were verified. Climate change projections were then integrated to predict the future behaviour of the intra-varietal diversity. Study findings highlight the strong phenotypic diversity of studied varieties and the importance of diversification to enhance climate change resilience. While model performances may require improvements, this study is the first step towards quantifying heat requirements of different clones and how they can provide adaptation solutions for winegrowers to sustain local wine identity in a global changing climate. As genetic diversity is an ongoing process through point mutations and epigenetic adaptations, perspective work is to explore clonal data from a wide variety of geographic locations.

Grapevine varietal diversity as mitigation tool for climate change: Agronomic and oenologic potential of 14 foreign varieties grown in Languedoc region (France)

Climate change effects in Languedoc include an expected rise in temperatures, increased evapotranspiration as well as more severe and frequent climatic hazards, such as frost, drought periods and heat waves. For winegrowers theses phenomena impact both yield and quality, resulting in more frequent unbalanced wines. Research on identified mitigation tools for vineyard management is necessary to improve resilience of grapevine agrosystems. Varietal assortment is one of them. This study focuses on agronomic and oenologic potential of 14 foreign varieties grown in Languedoc French region. Fourteen grapevine varieties were monitored during 2021 from June until harvest on eight different sites, some of which occurring on more than one site adding up to 21 different modalities: 7 white varieties Alvarinho B, Assyrtiko B (2), Malvasia Istriana B, Parellada B, Verdejo B, Verdelho B, Xarello B, and 7 black varieties Saperavi N (2), Touriga nacional N, Baga N, Aleatico N, Montepulciano N (2), Primitivo N (3), Calabrese N (3). Varietals were compared through the following parameters: phenology was assessed by using the information collected in the Database Network of French Vine Conservatories (INRAE-SupAgro-IFV, 2005-2015). The number of inflorescences for shoots from secondary buds and bourillons and suckers were observed to assess post-bud break frost tolerance potential. Grapevine water status was studied through stem water potential measurement, observation of foliage symptoms of drought, and 𝛿13C on must. Frequencies and intensities of downy mildew, powdery mildew, and black rot attacks were estimated before harvest on leaves and clusters and botrytis at harvest to assess disease susceptibilities. Berry composition was monitored from end of veraison until harvest. Yield and mean bunch weight were also calculated. Varieties were then ranked on a 1-4 scale for each parameter and compared through PCA. Forty two stations of the Mediterranean basin were compared by PCA with the Multicriteria Climatic Classification indicators in order to confront the collected information during 2021 campaign to the hypothesis that plants coming from dry and hot regions are genetically adapted to such climatic conditions.

Modeling island and coastal vineyards potential in the context of climate change

Climate change impacts regional and local climates, which in turn affects the world’s wine regions. In the short term, these modifications rises issues about maintaining quality and style of wine, and in a longer term about the suitability of grape varieties and the sustainability of traditional wine regions. Thus, adaptation to climate change represents a major challenge for viticulture. In this context, island and coastal vineyards could become coveted areas due to their specific climatic conditions. In regions subject to warming, the proximity of the sea can moderate extremes temperatures, which could be an advantage for wine. However, coastal and island areas are particular prized spaces and subject to multiple pressures that make the establishment or extension of viticulture complex.
In this perspective, it seems relevant to assess the potentialities of coastal and island areas for viticulture. This contribution will present a spatial optimization model that tends to characterize most suitable agroclimatic patterns in historical or emerging vineyards according to different scenarios. Thanks to an in-depth bibliography a global inventory of coastal and insular vineyards on a worldwide scale has been realized. Relevant criteria have been identified to describe the specificities of these vineyards. They are used as input data in the optimization process, which will optimize some objectives and spatial aspects. According to a predefined scenario, the objectives are set in three main categories associated with climatic characteristics, vineyards characteristics and management strategies. At the end of this optimization process, a series of maps presents the different spatial configurations that maximize the scenario objectives.