Terroir 2004 banner
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 Role of Harvesting Time/Optimal Ripeness in Zone/Terroir Expression

Role of Harvesting Time/Optimal Ripeness in Zone/Terroir Expression

Abstract

[English version below]

La maturité optimale est définie en fonction du style de vin désiré, qui est fonction du marché. Le sol et le climat ont un effet sur la typicité des vins. Le niveau qualitatif des raisins et des vins, et le potentiel pour obtenir différents styles de vin est déterminé par l’association des caractéristiques naturel du terroir et les technologies mises en œuvres (i.e. les pratiques culturales à moyen et long terme). Les conditions de culture de la vigne doivent permettre une activité optimale des racines, des structures pérennes, de la canopée, des grappes et favoriser l’équilibre entre ces organes jusqu’à l’objectif final : des raisins de qualités différentes pour des styles de vin différents. La gestion et l’analyse des paramètres morphologiques et physiologiques de la canopée et des grappes, dans un environnement donné, est indispensable pour trouver les indicateurs qui peuvent être associés à une qualité de raisin et un style de vin. Ce point n’a pas été systématiquement étudié.
Dans cet article, un bref rappel de l’impact potentiel du terroir et des pratiques culturales court et long terme sera donné. La partie principale indiquera les résultats d’une collaboration de recherche faite sur Syrah/99R dans un vignoble de la région de Stellenbosch, Afrique du Sud. L’objectif a été de définir les paramètres de l’environnement, de la canopée et des grappes utilisables comme indicateurs pratiques et pertinents de la qualité du raisin en relation avec un style de vin. Les vignes sont conduites en Espalier (2,75m x 1,5m), les rangs sont orientés nord – sud, le vignoble est en pente orientée est. Une irrigation par micro aspersion est appliquée de la nouaison à la véraison. La hauteur de végétation est de 1,4 m, avec 2 hauteurs de fils de palissage. Les vignes sont palissées et écimées. Des prélèvements ont été réalisés tous les 15 jours depuis la nouaison jusqu’à la véraison. A partir de la véraison (14°Brix) des prélèvements de raisin ont été réalisés tous les 4 jours et jusqu’à sur-maturation, pour réaliser des mini vinifications. A chaque stade de prélèvement les paramètres du microclimat ont été mesurés. L’évolution végétative, reproductive et physiologique de la plante a été étudiée. Les fermentations ont été contrôlées pour chaque mini-vinifications. Les vins ont été analysés. Les similitudes et les variations dans l’évolution des paramètres et leurs ratio ont été analysées et interprétées.
Les résultats sont discutés en relation avec la performance de la canopée, l’allocation de carbone, les relations avec l’état hydrique de la vigne, le rendement, ainsi que le contenu en sucre, en acides organiques, en anthocyanes, en phénols et en tanins totaux des baies. L’ensemble est corrélé à la qualité des vins et à leurs composition. Les ratios des indicateurs sont testés pour déterminer la qualité optimale du raisin et la date de vendange en relation avec le style de vin. La pertinence et l’applicabilité des indicateurs sont discutées.

Optimal ripeness is defined according to the style of wine that is required. The latter is ultimately dictated by the market. Soil and climate may have a dictating effect on typical expression of wine. The level of grape and wine quality achieved and the potential for obtaining different styles of wine are determined by the integrated effect of the natural characteristics of the terroir and technological intervention (long and short term cultivation practices). The growth conditions that the grapevine is subjected to should allow optimal metabolic activity in roots, permanent structure, canopy and grapes and the potential for these organs to develop and support each other until the desired grape quality and style is reached. Monitoring of morphological and physiological parameters in the canopy and grapes, ultimately displaying the integrated effect of the growth environment, is critical in our quest for finding indicators that may be associated with a particular grape and wine style. This has not been systematically investigated.
Results of collaborative research done on a Shiraz/R99 vineyard in the Stellenbosch region, South Africa, with the purpose of defining environmental, canopy and grape parameters that may be suitable as eventual practical indicators for obtaining particular styles of grapes and wine, are presented. Vines were vertically trellised and spaced 2.75 x 1.5 m in north-south orientated rows on a Glenrosa soil and a west-facing slope. Microsprinkler-irrigation was applied at pea berry size and at vèraison stages. The 1.4 m canopies were shoot-positioned and topped. Fortnightly sampling was done from berry set up to two weeks post-véraison, after which harvesting for wine making was done approximately every four days. Microclimate, vegetative, reproductive and physiological parameters were investigated and changes during alcoholic fermentation monitored at each harvesting stage. Wines were made and analysed. Similarities in patterns as well as various ratios between the different parameters were investigated. Results are argued against canopy performance, carbon allocation, water relations, production level, and sugar, acidity, anthocyanin, phenolic and tannin contents of the grapes as well as wine quality and composition. Ratios for potential practical use in determining optimal grape quality, time of harvesting and expected wine style are discussed.

DOI:

Publication date: January 12, 2022

Issue: Terroir 2004

Type: Article

Authors

J.J. Hunter (1), A. Pisciotta (2), C.G.Volschenk (1), E. Archer (3), V. Novello (4), E. Kraeva (5), A. Deloire (5), M. Nadal (6)

(1) ARC Infruitec-Nietvoorbij, Private Bag X5026, 7599 Stellenbosch, South Africa
(2) Dipartimento di Colture Arboree, Università degli Studi di Palermo, Viale delle Scienze 11, 90128 Palermo, Sicily, Italy
(3) Lusan Premium Wines, PO Box 104, 7599 Stellenbosch, South Africa
(4) Dipartimento di Colture Arboree, Via Leonardo da Vinci 44, I 10095 Grugliasco (TO), Italy
(5) Agro Montpellier, UMR 1083 « Sciences pour l’œnologie et la Viticulture », 2 place Viala, 34060 Montpellier cedex 1, France
(6) Departament de Bioquimica i Biotecnologia, Facultat d’Enologia de Tarragona, Ramón y Cajal 70, 43003 Tarragona, Spain

Contact the author

Keywords

Grapevine, Shiraz, physiology, grape composition, ripeness level, wine quality, wine style

Tags

IVES Conference Series | Terroir 2004

Citation

Related articles…

Use of multispectral satellite for monitoring vine water status in mediterranean areas

The development of new generations of multispectral satellites such as Sentinel-2 opens possibilities as to vine water status assessment (Cohen et al., 2019). Based on a three years field campaign, a model of Stem Water Potential (SWP) estimation on vine using four satellite bands in Red, Red-Edge, NIR and SWIR domains was developed (Laroche-Pinel et al., 2021). The model relies on SWP field measures done using a pressure chamber (Scholander et al., 1965), which is a common, robust and precise method to assess vine water status (Acevedo-Opazo et al., 2008). The model was mainly developed from from SWP measures on Syrah N (Laroche Pinel E., 2021).

A large scale monitoring was organized in different vineyards in the Mediterranean region in 2021. 10 varieties amongst the most represented in this area were monitored (Cabernet sauvignon N, Chardonnay B, Cinsault N, Grenache N, Merlot N, Mourvèdre N, Sauvignon B, Syrah N, Vermentino B, Viognier B). The model was used to produce water status maps from Sentinel-2 images, starting from the beginning of June (fruit set) up to September (harvest). The average estimated SWP for each vine was compared to actual field SWP measures done by wine growers or technicians during usual monitoring of irrigation programs. The correlations between mean estimated SWP and mean measured SWP were at the same level than expected by the model. (Laroche Pinel, 2021) The general SWP kinetics were comparable. The estimated SWP would have led to same irrigation decisions concerning the date of first irrigation in comparison with measured SWP.

Acevedo-Opazo, C., Tisseyre, B., Ojeda, H., Ortega-Farias, S., Guillaume, S. (2008). Is it possible to assess the spatial variability of vine water status? OENO One, 42(4), 203.
Cohen, Y., Gogumalla, P., Bahat, I., Netzer, Y., Ben-Gal, A., Lenski, I., … Helman, D. (2019). Can time series of multispectral satellite images be used to estimate stem water potential in vineyards? In Precision agriculture ’19, The Netherlands: Wageningen Academic Publishers, pp. 445–451.
Laroche-Pinel, E., Duthoit, S., Albughdadi, M., Costard, A. D., Rousseau, J., Chéret, V., & Clenet, H. (2021). Towards vine water status monitoring on a large scale using sentinel-2 images. remote sensing, 13(9), 1837.
Laroche-Pinel,E. (2021). Suivi du statut hydrique de la vigne par télédétection hyper et multispectrale. Thèse INP Toulouse, France.
Scholander, P.F., Bradstreet, E.D., Hemmingsen, E.A., & Hammel, H.T. (1965). Sap pressure in vascular plants: Negative hydrostatic pressure can be measured in plants. Science, 148(3668), 339–346.

Delaying irrigation initiation linearly reduces yield with little impact on maturity in Pinot noir

When to initiate irrigation is a critical annual management decision that has cascading effects on grapevine productivity and wine quality in the context of climate change. A multi-site trial was begun in 2021 to optimize irrigation initiation timing using midday stem water potential (ψstem) thresholds characterized as departures from non-stressed baseline ψstemvalues (Δψstem). Plant material, vine and row spacing, and trellising systems were concomitant among sites, while vine age, soil type, and pruning systems varied. Five target Δψstem thresholds were arranged in an RCBD and replicated eight times at each site: 0.2, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8, and 1.0 MPa (T1, T2, T3, T4, and T5, respectively). When thresholds were reached, plots were irrigated weekly at 70% ETc. Yield components and berry composition were quantified at harvest. To better generalize inferences across sites, data were analyzed by ANOVA using a mixed model including site as a random factor. Across sites, irrigation was initiated at Δψstem = 0.24, 0.50, 0.65, 0.93, and 0.98 MPa for T1, T2, T3, T4, and T5, respectively. Consistent significant negative linear trends were found for several key yield and berry composition variables. Yield decreased by 12.9, 15.9, 19.5, and 27.4% for T2, T3, T4, and T5, respectively, compared to T1 (p < 0.0001) across sites that were driven by similarly linear reductions in berry weight (p < 0.0001). Comparatively, berry composition varied little among treatments. Juice total soluble solids decreased linearly from T1 to T5 – though only ranged 0.9 Brix (p = 0.012). Because producers are paid by the ton, and contracts simply stipulate a target maturity level, first-year results suggest that there is no economic incentive to induce moderate water deficits before irrigation initiation, regardless of vineyard site. Subsequent years will further elucidate the carryover effects of delaying irrigation initiation on productivity over the long term.

The plantation frame as a measure of adaptation to climate change

The mechanization of vineyard work originally led to a reduction in planting densities due to the lack of machinery adapted to the vineyard. The current availability of specific machinery makes it possible to establish higher planting densities. In this work, three planting densities (1.40×0.80 m, 1.80×1 m and 2.20×1.20 m, corresponding to 8928, 5555 and 3787 plants/ha respectively) were studied with four varieties autochthonous of Galicia (northwestern Spain): Albariño and Treixadura (white), Sousón and Mencía (red). The vines were trained in a vertical shoot positioning system using a single Royat cordon, and pruned to spurs with two buds each. Agronomic data (yield, pruning wood weight, Ravaz index) and oenological data in must were collected. The higher planting density (1.40×0.80 m) had no significant effect on grape yield per vine in white varieties, although production per hectare was much higher due to the greater number of plants. In red varieties, this planting density resulted in a significantly lower production per vine, compensated by the greater number of plants. In addition, it significantly reduced the Brix degree in the must of the Albariño, Treixadura and Sousón varieties, and increased the total acidity in the latter two and Mencía. It also caused an increase in extractable and total anthocyanins and IPT in red grapes. The effects of high planting density on grapes are of great interest for the adaptation of varieties in the context of climate change. In the future, it could be advisable to modify the limits imposed by the appellations of origin on the planting density of these varieties in order to obtain more balanced wines.

Climate change impacts: a multi-stress issue

With the aim of producing premium wines, it is admitted that moderate environmental stresses may contribute to the accumulation of compounds of interest in grapes. However the ongoing climate change, with the appearance of more limiting conditions of production is a major concern for the wine industry economic. Will it be possible to maintain the vineyards in place, to preserve the current grape varieties and how should we anticipate the adaptation measures to ensure the sustainability of vineyards? In this context, the question of the responses and adaptation of grapevine to abiotic stresses becomes a major scientific issue to tackle. An abiotic stress can be defined as the effect of a specific factor of the physico-chemical environment of the plants (temperature, availability of water and minerals, light, etc.) which reduces growth, and for a crop such as the vine, the yield, the composition of the fruits and the sustainability of the plants. Water stress is in many minds, but a systemic vision is essential for at least two reasons. The first reason is that in natural environments, a single factor is rarely limiting, and plants have to deal with a combination of constraints, as for example heat and drought, both in time and at a given time. The second reason is that plants, including grapevine, have central mechanisms of stress responses, as redox regulatory pathways, that play an important role in adaptation and survival. Here we will review the most recent studies dealing with this issue to provide a better understanding of the grapevine responses to a combination of environmental constraints and of the underlying regulatory pathways, which may be very helpful to design more adapted solutions to cope with climate change.

Using δ13C and hydroscapes as a tool for discriminating cultivar specific drought response

Measurement of carbon isotope discrimination in berry juice sugars at maturity (δ13C) provides an integrated assessment of water use efficiency (WUE) during the period of berry ripening, and when collected over multiple seasons can be used as an indication of drought stress response. Berry juice δ13C measurements were carried out on 48 different varieties planted in a common garden experiment in Bordeaux, France from 2014 through 2021 and were paired with midday and predawn leaf water potential measurements on the same vines in a subset of six varieties. The aim was to discriminate a large panel of varieties based on their stomatal behaviour and potentially identify hydraulic traits characterizing drought tolerance by comparing δ13C and hydroscapes (the visualisation of plant stomatal behaviour as a response to predawn water potential). Cluster analysis found that δ13C values are likely affected by the differing phenology of each variety, resulting in berry ripening of different varieties taking place under different stress conditions within the same year. We accounted for these phenological differences and found that cluster analysis based on specific δ13C metrics created a classification of varieties that corresponds well to our current empirical understanding of their relative drought tolerances. In addition, we analysed the water potential regulation of the subset of six varieties (using the hydroscape approach) and found that it was well correlated with some δ13C metrics. Surprisingly, a variety’s water potential regulation (specifically its minimum critical leaf water potential under water deficit) was strongly correlated to δ13C values under well-watered conditions, suggesting that base WUE may have a stronger impact on drought tolerance than WUE under water deficit. These results give strong insights on the innate WUE of a very large panel of varieties and suggest that studies of drought tolerance should include traits expressed under non-limiting conditions.