Terroir 2004 banner
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 Role of Harvesting Time/Optimal Ripeness in Zone/Terroir Expression

Role of Harvesting Time/Optimal Ripeness in Zone/Terroir Expression

Abstract

[English version below]

La maturité optimale est définie en fonction du style de vin désiré, qui est fonction du marché. Le sol et le climat ont un effet sur la typicité des vins. Le niveau qualitatif des raisins et des vins, et le potentiel pour obtenir différents styles de vin est déterminé par l’association des caractéristiques naturel du terroir et les technologies mises en œuvres (i.e. les pratiques culturales à moyen et long terme). Les conditions de culture de la vigne doivent permettre une activité optimale des racines, des structures pérennes, de la canopée, des grappes et favoriser l’équilibre entre ces organes jusqu’à l’objectif final : des raisins de qualités différentes pour des styles de vin différents. La gestion et l’analyse des paramètres morphologiques et physiologiques de la canopée et des grappes, dans un environnement donné, est indispensable pour trouver les indicateurs qui peuvent être associés à une qualité de raisin et un style de vin. Ce point n’a pas été systématiquement étudié.
Dans cet article, un bref rappel de l’impact potentiel du terroir et des pratiques culturales court et long terme sera donné. La partie principale indiquera les résultats d’une collaboration de recherche faite sur Syrah/99R dans un vignoble de la région de Stellenbosch, Afrique du Sud. L’objectif a été de définir les paramètres de l’environnement, de la canopée et des grappes utilisables comme indicateurs pratiques et pertinents de la qualité du raisin en relation avec un style de vin. Les vignes sont conduites en Espalier (2,75m x 1,5m), les rangs sont orientés nord – sud, le vignoble est en pente orientée est. Une irrigation par micro aspersion est appliquée de la nouaison à la véraison. La hauteur de végétation est de 1,4 m, avec 2 hauteurs de fils de palissage. Les vignes sont palissées et écimées. Des prélèvements ont été réalisés tous les 15 jours depuis la nouaison jusqu’à la véraison. A partir de la véraison (14°Brix) des prélèvements de raisin ont été réalisés tous les 4 jours et jusqu’à sur-maturation, pour réaliser des mini vinifications. A chaque stade de prélèvement les paramètres du microclimat ont été mesurés. L’évolution végétative, reproductive et physiologique de la plante a été étudiée. Les fermentations ont été contrôlées pour chaque mini-vinifications. Les vins ont été analysés. Les similitudes et les variations dans l’évolution des paramètres et leurs ratio ont été analysées et interprétées.
Les résultats sont discutés en relation avec la performance de la canopée, l’allocation de carbone, les relations avec l’état hydrique de la vigne, le rendement, ainsi que le contenu en sucre, en acides organiques, en anthocyanes, en phénols et en tanins totaux des baies. L’ensemble est corrélé à la qualité des vins et à leurs composition. Les ratios des indicateurs sont testés pour déterminer la qualité optimale du raisin et la date de vendange en relation avec le style de vin. La pertinence et l’applicabilité des indicateurs sont discutées.

Optimal ripeness is defined according to the style of wine that is required. The latter is ultimately dictated by the market. Soil and climate may have a dictating effect on typical expression of wine. The level of grape and wine quality achieved and the potential for obtaining different styles of wine are determined by the integrated effect of the natural characteristics of the terroir and technological intervention (long and short term cultivation practices). The growth conditions that the grapevine is subjected to should allow optimal metabolic activity in roots, permanent structure, canopy and grapes and the potential for these organs to develop and support each other until the desired grape quality and style is reached. Monitoring of morphological and physiological parameters in the canopy and grapes, ultimately displaying the integrated effect of the growth environment, is critical in our quest for finding indicators that may be associated with a particular grape and wine style. This has not been systematically investigated.
Results of collaborative research done on a Shiraz/R99 vineyard in the Stellenbosch region, South Africa, with the purpose of defining environmental, canopy and grape parameters that may be suitable as eventual practical indicators for obtaining particular styles of grapes and wine, are presented. Vines were vertically trellised and spaced 2.75 x 1.5 m in north-south orientated rows on a Glenrosa soil and a west-facing slope. Microsprinkler-irrigation was applied at pea berry size and at vèraison stages. The 1.4 m canopies were shoot-positioned and topped. Fortnightly sampling was done from berry set up to two weeks post-véraison, after which harvesting for wine making was done approximately every four days. Microclimate, vegetative, reproductive and physiological parameters were investigated and changes during alcoholic fermentation monitored at each harvesting stage. Wines were made and analysed. Similarities in patterns as well as various ratios between the different parameters were investigated. Results are argued against canopy performance, carbon allocation, water relations, production level, and sugar, acidity, anthocyanin, phenolic and tannin contents of the grapes as well as wine quality and composition. Ratios for potential practical use in determining optimal grape quality, time of harvesting and expected wine style are discussed.

DOI:

Publication date: January 12, 2022

Issue: Terroir 2004

Type: Article

Authors

J.J. Hunter (1), A. Pisciotta (2), C.G.Volschenk (1), E. Archer (3), V. Novello (4), E. Kraeva (5), A. Deloire (5), M. Nadal (6)

(1) ARC Infruitec-Nietvoorbij, Private Bag X5026, 7599 Stellenbosch, South Africa
(2) Dipartimento di Colture Arboree, Università degli Studi di Palermo, Viale delle Scienze 11, 90128 Palermo, Sicily, Italy
(3) Lusan Premium Wines, PO Box 104, 7599 Stellenbosch, South Africa
(4) Dipartimento di Colture Arboree, Via Leonardo da Vinci 44, I 10095 Grugliasco (TO), Italy
(5) Agro Montpellier, UMR 1083 « Sciences pour l’œnologie et la Viticulture », 2 place Viala, 34060 Montpellier cedex 1, France
(6) Departament de Bioquimica i Biotecnologia, Facultat d’Enologia de Tarragona, Ramón y Cajal 70, 43003 Tarragona, Spain

Contact the author

Keywords

Grapevine, Shiraz, physiology, grape composition, ripeness level, wine quality, wine style

Tags

IVES Conference Series | Terroir 2004

Citation

Related articles…

Organic recycled mulches in sustainable viticulture: assessment of spontaneous plants communities and weed coverage

In recent years, developing more efficient and sustainable viticulture management has been essential due to the impact of climate change in semiarid regions. For this reason, the use of recycled organic mulching (ROM) in the vineyard has become an interesting strategy to cope with water stress, isolated soil from extreme temperatures and improving soil humidity, control the presence of weeds and therefore reduce the inputs of herbicides and improve soil fertility. This work aimed to analyse the effect of three different organic mulches [straw (S), grape pruning debris (GPD) and spent mushroom compost (SMC)] and two traditional soil management techniques [herbicide (H) and interrow (IN)] on weed coverage and the spontaneous plant communities’ presence. Data sampling was collected throughout the vine vegetative cycle of 2021 in La Rioja, Spain. The different soil management techniques had a clear effect on weed coverage and his development during the vine vegetative cycle. SMC and H were the treatments with the highest and the lowest coverage percentage, respectively. IN had a delayed weed emergence at the beginning of the vine vegetative cycle, but finally it reached maximum values nearby SMC. GPD and S had similar effects on weed emergence, reaching 25-30% of the maximum coverage values. A total of 29 herbaceous species were identified during the vegetative cycle, some of them very isolated and occasional. Principal component analysis (PCAs) showed a good association between spontaneous species and treatments, furthermore, specific species-treatment associations were found. Moreover, three clear groups of herbaceous communities were identified by cluster analysis. This study provides interesting information about the effect of different alternative soil management on herbaceous plant coverage and weed species communities which could contribute to making more sustainable viticulture.

Climate change impacts: a multi-stress issue

With the aim of producing premium wines, it is admitted that moderate environmental stresses may contribute to the accumulation of compounds of interest in grapes. However the ongoing climate change, with the appearance of more limiting conditions of production is a major concern for the wine industry economic. Will it be possible to maintain the vineyards in place, to preserve the current grape varieties and how should we anticipate the adaptation measures to ensure the sustainability of vineyards? In this context, the question of the responses and adaptation of grapevine to abiotic stresses becomes a major scientific issue to tackle. An abiotic stress can be defined as the effect of a specific factor of the physico-chemical environment of the plants (temperature, availability of water and minerals, light, etc.) which reduces growth, and for a crop such as the vine, the yield, the composition of the fruits and the sustainability of the plants. Water stress is in many minds, but a systemic vision is essential for at least two reasons. The first reason is that in natural environments, a single factor is rarely limiting, and plants have to deal with a combination of constraints, as for example heat and drought, both in time and at a given time. The second reason is that plants, including grapevine, have central mechanisms of stress responses, as redox regulatory pathways, that play an important role in adaptation and survival. Here we will review the most recent studies dealing with this issue to provide a better understanding of the grapevine responses to a combination of environmental constraints and of the underlying regulatory pathways, which may be very helpful to design more adapted solutions to cope with climate change.

Optimizing stomatal traits for future climates

Stomatal traits determine grapevine water use, carbon supply, and water stress, which directly impact yield and berry chemistry. Breeding for stomatal traits has the strong potential to improve grapevine performance under future, drier conditions, but the trait values that breeders should target are unknown. We used a functional-structural plant model developed for grapevine (HydroShoot) to determine how stomatal traits impact canopy gas exchange, water potential, and temperature under historical and future conditions in high-quality and hot-climate California wine regions (Napa and the Central Valley). Historical climate (1990-2010) was collected from weather stations and future climate (2079-99) was projected from 4 representative climate models for California, assuming medium- and high-emissions (RCP 4.5 and 8.5). Five trait parameterizations, representing mean and extreme values for the maximum stomatal conductance (gmax) and leaf water potential threshold for stomatal closure (Ψsc), were defined from meta-analyses. Compared to mean trait values, the water-spending extremes (highest gmax or most negative Ysc) had negligible benefits for carbon gain and canopy cooling, but exacerbated vine water use and stress, for both sites and climate scenarios. These traits increased cumulative transpiration by 8 – 17%, changed cumulative carbon gain by -4 – 3%, and reduced minimum water potentials by 10 – 18%. Conversely, the water-saving extremes (lowest gmax or least negative Ψsc) strongly reduced water use and stress, but potentially compromised the carbon supply for ripening. Under RCP 8.5 conditions, these traits reduced transpiration by 22 – 35% and carbon gain by 9 – 16% and increased minimum water potentials by 20 – 28%, compared to mean values. Overall, selecting for more water-saving stomatal traits could improve water-use efficiency and avoid the detrimental effects of highly negative canopy water potentials on yield and quality, but more work is needed to evaluate whether these benefits outweigh the consequences of minor declines in carbon gain for fruit production.

Is wine terroir a valid concept under a changing climate?

The OIV[i] defines terroir as a concept referring to an area in which collective knowledge of the interactions between the physical and biological environment (soil, topography, climate, landscape characteristics and biodiversity features) and vitivinicultural practices develops, providing distinctive wine characteristics. Those are perceptible in the taste of wine, which drives consumer preference and, therefore, wine’s value in the marketplace. Geographical indications (GI) are recognized regulatory constructs formalizing and protecting the nexus between wine taste and the terroir generating it. Despite considering updates, GIs do not consider the nexus as a dynamic one and do not anticipate change, namely of climate. Being climate a fundamental feature of terroir, it strongly impacts wine characteristics, such as taste. According to IPCC[ii], many widespread, rapid and unprecedented changes of climate occurred, some being irreversible over hundreds to thousands of years. Climatic shifts and atmospheric-driven extreme events have been widely reported worldwide. Recent climatic trends are projected to strengthen in upcoming decades, whereas extremes are expected to increase in frequency and intensity, forcing wines away from GI definitions. Geographical shifts of viticultural suitability are projected, often moving into regions and countries different from current ones. Some authors propose adaptation in viticulture, winemaking and product innovation. We show evidence of climate changing wine characteristics in the Douro valley, home of 270-year-old Port GI. We discuss herein resist or adapt stances for when climate changes the nexus between terroir and wine characteristics. Using the MED-GOLD[iii] dashboard, a tool allowing for easy visual navigation of past and future climates, we demonstrate how policymakers can identify future moments, throughout the 21st century under different emission scenarios, when GI specifications will likely need updates (e.g., boundaries, varieties) to reduce climate-change impacts.

The combined effects of climate, soils, and deficit irrigation on yield and quality of Touriga Nacional under high atmospheric demand in the Douro Region

Global warming is one of the biggest environmental, social and economic threats in several viticultural regions. In the Douro Valley, changes are expected in the coming years, namely an increase in temperature and a decrease in precipitation. These changes are likely to have consequences for the production and quality of wine.
The aim of this study was to explore the effects of different soil characteristics combined with several deficit irrigation strategies, managed throughout ETc references and predawn leaf water potentials thresholds, on physiology, yield, and qualitative attributes on the Touriga Nacional variety under years of mild to severe water and heat stress.
The studies were conducted over seven years (2015 to 2021) in two plots of a commercial vineyard located at Quinta do Ataíde (Symington Family Estates) planted in 2011 and 2014 at 170 meters elevation, growing under three water regimes: non-irrigated (NI) and two deficit irrigation strategies (30% and 60% ETc) assessed weekly by Ψpd. The site has an annual rainfall below 500 mm, with high atmospheric demand. Climate data was collected from a weather station, located on site. Berry ripening was followed weekly for fruit analysis. At harvest, yield, vigour and pruning weight per vine were determined from 90 vines by treatment. Each season at veraison the NDVI Index was accessed by a drone. The soils physic-chemistry in the experimental blocs were analysed and grouped by SWHC. Delta C-13 analyses were also performed per treatment in two years.Irrigation had a positive effect on yield per vine, mostly due to an increase in berry and cluster weight, and fertility index through the years. A significant increase in sugar content, colour and phenols was observed with deficit irrigation in some years, but vine vigour related to soil characteristics had by far the greatest impact on quality.