Terroir 2004 banner
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 Role of Harvesting Time/Optimal Ripeness in Zone/Terroir Expression

Role of Harvesting Time/Optimal Ripeness in Zone/Terroir Expression

Abstract

[English version below]

La maturité optimale est définie en fonction du style de vin désiré, qui est fonction du marché. Le sol et le climat ont un effet sur la typicité des vins. Le niveau qualitatif des raisins et des vins, et le potentiel pour obtenir différents styles de vin est déterminé par l’association des caractéristiques naturel du terroir et les technologies mises en œuvres (i.e. les pratiques culturales à moyen et long terme). Les conditions de culture de la vigne doivent permettre une activité optimale des racines, des structures pérennes, de la canopée, des grappes et favoriser l’équilibre entre ces organes jusqu’à l’objectif final : des raisins de qualités différentes pour des styles de vin différents. La gestion et l’analyse des paramètres morphologiques et physiologiques de la canopée et des grappes, dans un environnement donné, est indispensable pour trouver les indicateurs qui peuvent être associés à une qualité de raisin et un style de vin. Ce point n’a pas été systématiquement étudié.
Dans cet article, un bref rappel de l’impact potentiel du terroir et des pratiques culturales court et long terme sera donné. La partie principale indiquera les résultats d’une collaboration de recherche faite sur Syrah/99R dans un vignoble de la région de Stellenbosch, Afrique du Sud. L’objectif a été de définir les paramètres de l’environnement, de la canopée et des grappes utilisables comme indicateurs pratiques et pertinents de la qualité du raisin en relation avec un style de vin. Les vignes sont conduites en Espalier (2,75m x 1,5m), les rangs sont orientés nord – sud, le vignoble est en pente orientée est. Une irrigation par micro aspersion est appliquée de la nouaison à la véraison. La hauteur de végétation est de 1,4 m, avec 2 hauteurs de fils de palissage. Les vignes sont palissées et écimées. Des prélèvements ont été réalisés tous les 15 jours depuis la nouaison jusqu’à la véraison. A partir de la véraison (14°Brix) des prélèvements de raisin ont été réalisés tous les 4 jours et jusqu’à sur-maturation, pour réaliser des mini vinifications. A chaque stade de prélèvement les paramètres du microclimat ont été mesurés. L’évolution végétative, reproductive et physiologique de la plante a été étudiée. Les fermentations ont été contrôlées pour chaque mini-vinifications. Les vins ont été analysés. Les similitudes et les variations dans l’évolution des paramètres et leurs ratio ont été analysées et interprétées.
Les résultats sont discutés en relation avec la performance de la canopée, l’allocation de carbone, les relations avec l’état hydrique de la vigne, le rendement, ainsi que le contenu en sucre, en acides organiques, en anthocyanes, en phénols et en tanins totaux des baies. L’ensemble est corrélé à la qualité des vins et à leurs composition. Les ratios des indicateurs sont testés pour déterminer la qualité optimale du raisin et la date de vendange en relation avec le style de vin. La pertinence et l’applicabilité des indicateurs sont discutées.

Optimal ripeness is defined according to the style of wine that is required. The latter is ultimately dictated by the market. Soil and climate may have a dictating effect on typical expression of wine. The level of grape and wine quality achieved and the potential for obtaining different styles of wine are determined by the integrated effect of the natural characteristics of the terroir and technological intervention (long and short term cultivation practices). The growth conditions that the grapevine is subjected to should allow optimal metabolic activity in roots, permanent structure, canopy and grapes and the potential for these organs to develop and support each other until the desired grape quality and style is reached. Monitoring of morphological and physiological parameters in the canopy and grapes, ultimately displaying the integrated effect of the growth environment, is critical in our quest for finding indicators that may be associated with a particular grape and wine style. This has not been systematically investigated.
Results of collaborative research done on a Shiraz/R99 vineyard in the Stellenbosch region, South Africa, with the purpose of defining environmental, canopy and grape parameters that may be suitable as eventual practical indicators for obtaining particular styles of grapes and wine, are presented. Vines were vertically trellised and spaced 2.75 x 1.5 m in north-south orientated rows on a Glenrosa soil and a west-facing slope. Microsprinkler-irrigation was applied at pea berry size and at vèraison stages. The 1.4 m canopies were shoot-positioned and topped. Fortnightly sampling was done from berry set up to two weeks post-véraison, after which harvesting for wine making was done approximately every four days. Microclimate, vegetative, reproductive and physiological parameters were investigated and changes during alcoholic fermentation monitored at each harvesting stage. Wines were made and analysed. Similarities in patterns as well as various ratios between the different parameters were investigated. Results are argued against canopy performance, carbon allocation, water relations, production level, and sugar, acidity, anthocyanin, phenolic and tannin contents of the grapes as well as wine quality and composition. Ratios for potential practical use in determining optimal grape quality, time of harvesting and expected wine style are discussed.

DOI:

Publication date: January 12, 2022

Issue: Terroir 2004

Type: Article

Authors

J.J. Hunter (1), A. Pisciotta (2), C.G.Volschenk (1), E. Archer (3), V. Novello (4), E. Kraeva (5), A. Deloire (5), M. Nadal (6)

(1) ARC Infruitec-Nietvoorbij, Private Bag X5026, 7599 Stellenbosch, South Africa
(2) Dipartimento di Colture Arboree, Università degli Studi di Palermo, Viale delle Scienze 11, 90128 Palermo, Sicily, Italy
(3) Lusan Premium Wines, PO Box 104, 7599 Stellenbosch, South Africa
(4) Dipartimento di Colture Arboree, Via Leonardo da Vinci 44, I 10095 Grugliasco (TO), Italy
(5) Agro Montpellier, UMR 1083 « Sciences pour l’œnologie et la Viticulture », 2 place Viala, 34060 Montpellier cedex 1, France
(6) Departament de Bioquimica i Biotecnologia, Facultat d’Enologia de Tarragona, Ramón y Cajal 70, 43003 Tarragona, Spain

Contact the author

Keywords

Grapevine, Shiraz, physiology, grape composition, ripeness level, wine quality, wine style

Tags

IVES Conference Series | Terroir 2004

Citation

Related articles…

Pruned vine biomass exclusion from a clay loam vineyard soil – examining the impact on physical/chemical properties

The wine industry worldwide faces increasing challenges to achieve sustainable levels of carbon emission mitigation. This project seeks to establish the feasibility of harvesting winter pruned vineyard biomass (PVB) for potential use in carbon footprint reduction, through its use as a renewable biofuel for energy production. In order to make this recommendation, technical issues such as the potential environmental impact, chemical composition and fuel suitability, and logistical challenges of harvesting biomass needs to be understood to compare with the results from similar studies. Of particular interest is the role PVB plays as a carbon source in vineyard soils and what effect annual removal might have on soil carbon sequestration. A preliminary trial was established in the Waite Campus vineyard (University of Adelaide) to test current management strategies. Vines are grown in a Eutrophic, Red Dermosol clay loam soil with well managed midrow swards. A comparison was undertaken of mid-row treatments in two 0.25 Ha blocks (Shiraz and Semillon), including annual cultivation for seed bed preparation, the deliberate exclusion of PVB (25 years) and incorporation of PVB (13 years) at an average of 3.4 and 5.5 Mg/Ha-1 for Shiraz and Semillon respectively. In both 0-10cm and 10-30cm soil core sample depths, combined soil carbon % measures in the desired range of 1.80 to 3.50, were not significantly different between treatments or cultivars and yielded an estimated 42 Mg/ha-1 of sequestered soil carbon. Other key physical and chemical measures were likewise not significantly different between treatments. Preliminary results suggest that in a temperate zone vineyard, managed such as the one used in this study, there is no long term negative impact on soil carbon sequestration through removing PVB. This implies that growers could confidently harvest PVB for use in several end fates including as a bio fuel.

Variety and climatic effects on quality scores in the Western US winegrowing regions

Wine quality is strongly linked to climate. Quality scores are often driven by climate variation across different winegrowing regions and years, but also influenced by other aspects of terroir, including variety. While recent work has looked at the relationship between quality scores and climate across many European regions, less work has examined New World winegrowing regions. Here we used scores from three major rating systems (Wine Advocate, Wine Enthusiast and Wine Spectator) combined with daily climate and phenology data to understand what drives variation across wine quality scores in major regions of the Western US, including regions in California, Oregon and Washington. We examined effects of variety, region, and in what phenological period climate was most predictive of quality. As in other studies, we found climate, based mainly on growing degree day (GDD) models, was generally associated with quality—with higher GDD associated with higher scores—but variety and region also had strong effects. Effects of region were generally stronger than variety. Certain varieties received the highest scores in only some areas, while other varieties (e.g., Merlot) generally scored lower across regions. Across phenological stages, GDD during budbreak was often most strongly associated with quality. Our results support other studies that warmer periods generally drive high quality wines, but highlight how much region and variety drive variation in scores outside of climate.

Comparison of imputation methods in long and varied phenological series. Application to the Conegliano dataset, including observations from 1964 over 400 grape varieties

A large varietal collection including over 1700 varieties was maintained in Conegliano, ITA, since the 1950s. Phenological data on a subset of 400 grape varieties including wine grapes, table grapes, and raisins were acquired at bud break, flowering, veraison, and ripening since 1964. Despite the efforts in maintaining and acquiring data over such an extensive collection, the data set has varying degrees of missing cases depending on the variety and the year. This is ubiquitous in phenology datasets with significant size and length. In this work, we evaluated four state-of-the-art methods to estimate missing values in this phenological series: k-Nearest Neighbour (kNN), Multivariate Imputation by Chained Equations (mice), MissForest, and Bidirectional Recurrent Imputation for Time Series (BRITS). For each phenological stage, we evaluated the performance of the methods in two ways. 1) On the full dataset, we randomly hold-out 10% of the true values for use as a test set and repeated the process 1000 times (Monte Carlo cross-validation). 2) On a reduced and almost complete subset of varieties, we varied the percentage of missing values from 10% to 70% by random deletion. In all cases, we evaluated the performance on the original values using normalized root mean squared error. For the full dataset we also obtained performance statistics by variety and by year. MissForest provided average errors of 17% (3 days) at budbreak, 14% (4 days) at flowering, 14.5% (7 days) at veraison, and 17% (3 days) at maturity. We completed the imputations of the Conegliano dataset, one of the world’s most extensive and varied phenological time series and a steppingstone for future climate change studies in grapes. The dataset is now ready for further analysis, and a rigorous evaluation of imputation errors is included.

Local ancient grapevine cultivars to face future viticulture

Among the different strategies to cope with the negative impacts of climate change on viticulture, the exploitation of genetic diversity is one of the most promising to adapt to new conditions and maintain wine production and quality. One of the biggest concerns in the context of climate change is to improve water use efficiency (WUE). In this way, the use of genotypes that present a better response to drought and high WUE is a key issue. In this work, physiological performance analysis was conducted to compare the water deficit stress (WDS) responses of local and widespread grapevines cultivars. Leaf gas exchange, water use efficiency (WUE) at different levels (leaf and long-term WUE (∆13C)), leaf osmotic adjustment and other water relations parameters were determined in plants under well-watered and WDS conditions alongside assessment of the levels of foliar hormones concentrations. Results denote that local cultivars displayed better physiological performance under WDS as compared to the widely-distributed ones. he results corroborate the hypothesis that better stomatal control allows increasing leaf WUE under drought as occurred in the local Callet cv.; but the minority local cultivar Escursac cv. showed high WUE under both treatments. In this case, high WUE can be related to maintaining higher photosynthetic activity under drought. The different mechanisms underlying the better performance under WDS and high WUE of minority local cultivars are discussed.

Climate change impacts: a multi-stress issue

With the aim of producing premium wines, it is admitted that moderate environmental stresses may contribute to the accumulation of compounds of interest in grapes. However the ongoing climate change, with the appearance of more limiting conditions of production is a major concern for the wine industry economic. Will it be possible to maintain the vineyards in place, to preserve the current grape varieties and how should we anticipate the adaptation measures to ensure the sustainability of vineyards? In this context, the question of the responses and adaptation of grapevine to abiotic stresses becomes a major scientific issue to tackle. An abiotic stress can be defined as the effect of a specific factor of the physico-chemical environment of the plants (temperature, availability of water and minerals, light, etc.) which reduces growth, and for a crop such as the vine, the yield, the composition of the fruits and the sustainability of the plants. Water stress is in many minds, but a systemic vision is essential for at least two reasons. The first reason is that in natural environments, a single factor is rarely limiting, and plants have to deal with a combination of constraints, as for example heat and drought, both in time and at a given time. The second reason is that plants, including grapevine, have central mechanisms of stress responses, as redox regulatory pathways, that play an important role in adaptation and survival. Here we will review the most recent studies dealing with this issue to provide a better understanding of the grapevine responses to a combination of environmental constraints and of the underlying regulatory pathways, which may be very helpful to design more adapted solutions to cope with climate change.