Terroir 1996 banner
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 Tools for assessing vine nitrogen status; role of nitrogen uptake in the “terroir” effect

Tools for assessing vine nitrogen status; role of nitrogen uptake in the “terroir” effect

Abstract

Among the numerous nutrients vines extract from the soil, nitrogen is the one that interferes most with vine vigor, yield, berry constitution and wine quality. Many studies relate on the influence of various levels of nitrogen fertilization on vine growth, yield and berry constitution (KLIEWER, 1971; BELL et al., 1979; DELAS et al., 1991; SPAYD et al., 1993; SPAYD et al., 1994). Other papers deal with the depressive effect of cover crop on vine nitrogen supply, which can partly explain the quality-improving effect of this technique (SOYER et al., 1996).
Vine nitrogen uptake is likely to vary to a considerable extend with soil parameters, even when no nitrogen fertilization or cover crop occurs. Figuring among those parameters are: soil organic matter content, C/N ratio of soil organic matter and soil organic matter turnover. The latter depends mainly on soil temperature, soil aeration, soil pH and soil moisture content. Despite considerable empirical evidence, almost no literature is available on vine nitrogen status as a function of soil characteristics and the impact of this status on vine development, berry constitution and wine quality. This might be explained by the lack of accuracy of currently available indicators of vine nitrogen status, such as petiole or leaf blade nitrogen content, or their lack of accessibility, as is true for cane arginine content. In this paper we discuss the use of several forms of nitrogen in grape juice (must) as indicators of vine nitrogen status. The accuracy of these indicators provides the means to differentiate nitrogen offer by the soil in “terroir” studies and assess its impact on berry quality potential.

DOI:

Publication date: February 24, 2022

Issue: Terroir 2000

Type: Article

Authors

Cornelis VAN LEEUWEN (1, 2), Philippe FRIANT (1), Enzo RONCO (3), Cyril JOURDAN (2), Jean-Pierre SOYER (4), Christian MOLOT (4) and Xavier CHONE (2)

(1) ENITA de Bordeaux, 1 Crs du Général de Gaulle, F 33175 Gradignan Cedex
(2) Faculté d’OEnologie, 351 Cours de la Libération, F 33405 Talence Cedex
(3) Faculta’ di Farmacia, Universita’ degli studi di Torino, Italia
(4) INRA Agronomie, Domaine de la Grande Ferrade, F 33140 Villenave d’Ornon

Contact the author

Tags

Terroir 2000

Citation

Related articles…

Typology of wines in touch with environmental factors of terroirs and grapevine. Application to the Chinon vineyard

According to the vintage, it may be difficult for vine growers to make a decision regarding the type of wine in relation with the soils.

Soils and plant material in prestigious Bordeaux vineyards impacts on yield and quality

High resolution soil maps (scale : 1/3000) were created for seven of the most prestigious red wine producing estates in Bordeaux, covering in total approximately 400 ha.

Diversificazione e valorizzazione di produzioni tipiche sul territorio: I cesanesi

The zone in which the Cesanese vines are cultivated has a secular tradition of red wine­making. This zone is placed between the Simbruini mountains slopes and the surrounding hills and has pedologicai variability but a very homogeneous microclimate.

Effect of Botrytis cinerea and esca on phenolic composition of berries and wines

This study showed that Botrytis cinerea could degrade the phenolic compounds by its enzymatic activity. It led to a diminution of skin’s anthocyanins from 20 % to 50 % and an increase level up to 40 % of individual proanthocyanins, 30 % of the %G and 25% of the %P.

Unravel the underlying mechanisms of delaying ripening techniques in grapevine

In a scenario of changing climate conditions, grapevine is significantly affected at multiple levels. Advancements in phenology and berry ripening, however, are the major dynamics of the generalized increase in average temperature and evaporative demand, negatively affecting berry quality and productivity. The aim of this work was to unravel the underlying mechanisms of bunch-zone auxin application (NAA; 1-Naphthaleneacetic acid) and source-limiting canopy management approaches in delaying berry ripening. In randomized block design experiments, control vines were compared to vines treated with NAA, subjected to apical-to-bunch defoliation or antitranspirant application (n=10-to-42 plants per treatment).