Terroir 1996 banner
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 Tools for assessing vine nitrogen status; role of nitrogen uptake in the “terroir” effect

Tools for assessing vine nitrogen status; role of nitrogen uptake in the “terroir” effect

Abstract

Among the numerous nutrients vines extract from the soil, nitrogen is the one that interferes most with vine vigor, yield, berry constitution and wine quality. Many studies relate on the influence of various levels of nitrogen fertilization on vine growth, yield and berry constitution (KLIEWER, 1971; BELL et al., 1979; DELAS et al., 1991; SPAYD et al., 1993; SPAYD et al., 1994). Other papers deal with the depressive effect of cover crop on vine nitrogen supply, which can partly explain the quality-improving effect of this technique (SOYER et al., 1996).
Vine nitrogen uptake is likely to vary to a considerable extend with soil parameters, even when no nitrogen fertilization or cover crop occurs. Figuring among those parameters are: soil organic matter content, C/N ratio of soil organic matter and soil organic matter turnover. The latter depends mainly on soil temperature, soil aeration, soil pH and soil moisture content. Despite considerable empirical evidence, almost no literature is available on vine nitrogen status as a function of soil characteristics and the impact of this status on vine development, berry constitution and wine quality. This might be explained by the lack of accuracy of currently available indicators of vine nitrogen status, such as petiole or leaf blade nitrogen content, or their lack of accessibility, as is true for cane arginine content. In this paper we discuss the use of several forms of nitrogen in grape juice (must) as indicators of vine nitrogen status. The accuracy of these indicators provides the means to differentiate nitrogen offer by the soil in “terroir” studies and assess its impact on berry quality potential.

Download the PDF

DOI:

Publication date: February 24, 2022

Issue: Terroir 2000

Type: Article

Authors

Cornelis VAN LEEUWEN (1, 2), Philippe FRIANT (1), Enzo RONCO (3), Cyril JOURDAN (2), Jean-Pierre SOYER (4), Christian MOLOT (4) and Xavier CHONE (2)

(1) ENITA de Bordeaux, 1 Crs du Général de Gaulle, F 33175 Gradignan Cedex
(2) Faculté d’OEnologie, 351 Cours de la Libération, F 33405 Talence Cedex
(3) Faculta’ di Farmacia, Universita’ degli studi di Torino, Italia
(4) INRA Agronomie, Domaine de la Grande Ferrade, F 33140 Villenave d’Ornon

Contact the author

Tags

Terroir 2000

Citation

Related articles…

Nitrogen isotope ratio (δ15N) as a tool to trace the major nitrogen source in vineyards

Aim: to elucidate if it is possible to detect variations in the source of nitrogen (organic vs. inorganic) measuring nitrogen isotope ratio (δ15N) in berries and to examine the degree of variation occurring for this parameter naturally within a vineyard.

Read More

Pinot noir: an endemic or a flexible variety?

Pinot noir has its historical roots in Burgundy and is generally considered as an endemic vine variety which means that its adaptation is very specific to this environment

Read More

100 guardians for 100 vines

G.r.a.s.p.o. Is not only the acronym for gruppo di ricerca per la salvaguardia e preservazione dell’originalità viticola di ogni territorio (‘research group for the safeguard and preservation of the originality of every territory’s grapes’), and is not just the italian synonym for ‘raspo’ (‘peduncle’) as treccani dictionary mentions: in the veneto dialect it is the whole bunch of grapes.

Read More

Deciphering the function and regulation of VviEPFL9 paralogs to modulate stomatal density in grapevine through New Genomic Techniques

Stomata are microscopic pores mainly located in leaf epidermis, allowing gas exchanges between plants and atmosphere. Stomatal initiation relies on the transcription factor SPEECHLESS which is mainly regulated by the MAP kinase cascade, in turn controlled by small signaling peptides, the Epidermal Patterning Factors (EPF and EPF-Like), namely EPF1, EPF2 and EPFL9. While EPF1 and EPF2 induce the inhibition of SPEECHLESS, their antagonist, EPFL9, stabilizes it, leading to stomatal formation. In grapevine, there are two paralogs for EPFL9, VviEPFL9-1 and VviEPFL9-2. Despite their structural similarity, it remains unclear whether they are differentially regulated and have distinct roles.

Read More

Rootstock regulation of scion phenotypes: the relationship between rootstock parentage and petiole mineral concentration

Grapevine is grown grafted in most of the world largely because of Phylloxera. Rootstocks not only provide tolerance to Phylloxera, but also ensure the supply of water and mineral nutrients to the scion. Rootstocks are an important means of adaptation to environmental conditions if we want to conserve the typical features of the currently used scion genotypes. To aid this adaptation, we can exploit the large diversity of rootstocks used worldwide. To fully explore this existing rootstock diversity, this work benefits from the unique GreffAdapt vineyard, in which four scion genotypes were studied onto 55 commercial rootstocks in three blocks. The aim of this study was to characterise rootstock regulation of scion mineral status and how it relates to scion development.

Read More