Terroir 1996 banner
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 Nivel de infección y saneamiento del virus del entrenudo corto (GFLV) en el cv. de vid Pedro Ximenez en la denominación de origen Montilla-Moriles (DOMM)

Nivel de infección y saneamiento del virus del entrenudo corto (GFLV) en el cv. de vid Pedro Ximenez en la denominación de origen Montilla-Moriles (DOMM)

Abstract

Mediante análisis por test ELISA de hojas de vides (Vitis vinifera L.) del cv. Pedro Ximénez, procedentes de 28 parcelas experimentales distribuidas por la DOMM, se determinó el número de cepas infectadas por el virus del entrenudo corto infeccioso (GFLV). Cinco de las parcelas, no mostraron planta virótica alguna; otras siete, presentaron bajo nivel de contaminación (< 15 %); en otras cinco parcelas, el número de plantas atacadas estuvo comprendido entre el 15 y el 30 %, es decir, ya tuvieron un nivel notable de ataque, y por último, en las 11 parcelas restantes el número de plantas afectadas superó el 30 %, lo que se consideró como un grado de infección muy elevado. No se encontró relación entre el número de cepas viróticas y la edad o la densidad de la plantación, o el tipo de portainjerto empleado. Sin embargo, pudieron establecerse agrupaciones territoriales de parcelas con niveles similares de contaminación, lo que pudo estar relacionado con el uso de material, infectado para realizar los injertos y/o la presencia de Xiphinema index en la zona, como las causas más importantes en la transmisión del virus.
No obstante la variabilidad indicada en cuanto al porcentaje de plantas viróticas, el conjunto de la DOMM se consideró como bastante afectado. Por ello, interesó el saneamiento del material, lo que se logró a nivel del 92 % por cultivo “in vitro” de meristemos. Se observó que la planta saneada creció mejor in vitro que la afectada por entrenudo corto.
Este trabajo ha sido realizado en colaboración con la Dirección General de Investigación y Formación Agraria de la Consejería de Agricultura y Pesca de la Junta de Andalucía.

DOI:

Publication date: February 24, 2022

Issue: Terroir 2000

Type: Article

Authors

M. Cantos (1), C. Weiland (2), F. Pérez-Camacho (3) and A. Troncoso (1)

(1) Instituto de Recursos Naturales y Agrobiolog a de Sevilla. C.S.I.C. Avda. Reina Mercedes 10. Apdo 1052. Estafeta Puerto. 41080 Sevilla. España
(2) Departamento. CC. Agroforestales. E.P.S. Universidad de Huelva. España
(3) Departamento de Agronom a. E.T.S.I.A. Universidad de C rdoba. España

Tags

IVES Conference Series | Terroir 2000

Citation

Related articles…

Climate, Viticulture, and Wine … my how things have changed!

The planet is warmer than at any time in our recorded past and increasing greenhouse emissions and persistence in the climate system means that continued warming is highly likely. Climate change has already altered the basic framework of growing grapes for wine production worldwide and will likely continue to do so for years to come. The wine sector can continue to play an important role in leading the agricultural sector in addressing climate change. From developing on…

Extreme canopy management for vineyard adaptation to climate change: is it a good idea?

Climate change constitutes an enormous challenge for humankind and for all human activities, viticulture not being an exception. Long-term strategic changes are probably needed the most, but growers also need to deal with short-term changes: summers that are getting progressively warmer, earlier harvest dates and higher pH in musts and wines. In the last 10-15 years, a relevant corpus of research is being developed worldwide in order to evaluate to which extent extreme canopy management operations, aimed at reducing leaf area and, thus, limiting the source to sink ratio, could be useful to delay ripening. Although extreme canopy management can result in relevant delays in harvest dates, longer term studies, as well as detailed analysis of their implications on carbohydrate reserves, bud fertility and future yield are desirable before these practices can be recommended.

Underpinning terroir with data: rethinking the zoning paradigm

Agriculture, natural resource management and the production and sale of products such as wine are increasingly data-driven activities. Thus, the use of remote and proximal crop and soil sensors to aid management decisions is becoming commonplace and ‘Agtech’ is proliferating commercially; mapping, underpinned by geographical information systems and complex methods of spatial analysis, is widely used. Likewise, the chemical and sensory analysis of wines draws on multivariate statistics; the efficient winery intake of grapes, subsequent production of wines and their delivery to markets relies on logistics; whilst the sales and marketing of wines is increasingly driven by artificial intelligence linked to the recorded purchasing behaviour of consumers. In brief, there is data everywhere!

Opinions will vary on whether these developments are a good thing. Those concerned with the ‘mystique’ of wine, or the historical aspects of terroir and its preservation, may find them confronting. In contrast, they offer an opportunity to those interested in the biophysical elements of terroir, and efforts aimed at better understanding how these impact on vineyard performance and the sensory attributes of resultant wines. At the previous Terroir Congress, we demonstrated the potential of analytical methods used at the within-vineyard scale in the development of Precision Viticulture, in contributing to a quantitative understanding of regional terroir. For this conference, we take this approach forward with examples from contrasting locations in both the northern and southern hemispheres. We show how, by focussing on the vineyards within winegrowing regions, as opposed to all of the land within those regions, we might move towards a more robust terroir zoning than one derived from a mixture of history, thematic mapping, heuristics and the whims of marketers. Aside from providing improved understanding by underpinning terroir with data, such methods should also promote improved management of the entire wine value chain.

Measurement of redox potential as a new analytical winegrowing tool

Excell laboratory has initiated the development of an analytical method based on electrochemistry to evaluate the ability of wines to undergo or resist to oxidative phenomena. Electrochemistry is a powerful tool to probe reactions involving electron transfers and offers possibility of real-time measurements. In that context, the laboratory has implemented electrochemical analysis to assess oxidation state of different wine matrices but also in order to evaluate oxidative or reduced character of leaf and soil. Initially, our laboratory focused on dosage of compounds involved in responses of plant stresses and we were also interested in microbiological activity of soils. These analyses were compared with the measurement of redox potential (Eh) and pH which are two fundamental variables involved in the modulation of plant metabolism. Indeed, the variation of redox states of the plant reflects its biological activity but also its capacity to absorb nutriments. The Eh-pH conditions mainly determine metabolic processes involved in soil and leaf and our goal is to determine if this combined analytical approach will be sufficiently precise to detect biological evolutions (plant health, parasitic attack…).

Teasing apart terroir: the influence of management style on native yeast communities within Oregon wineries and vineyards

Newer sequencing technologies have allowed for the addition of microbes to the story of terroir. The same environmental factors that influence the phenotypic expression of a crop also shape the composition of the microbial communities found on that crop. For fermented goods, such as wine, that microbial community ultimately influences the organoleptic properties of the final product that is delivered to customers. Recent studies have begun to study the biogeography of wine-associated microbes within different growing regions, finding that communities are distinct across landscapes. Despite this new knowledge, there are still many questions about what factors drive these differences. Our goal was to quantify differences in yeast communities due to management style between seven pairs of conventional and biodynamic vineyards (14 in total) throughout Oregon, USA. We wanted to answer the following questions: 1) are yeast communities distinct between biodynamic vineyards and conventional vineyards? 2) are these differences consistent across a large geographic region? 3) can differences in yeast communities be tied to differences in metabolite profiles of the bottled wine? To collect our data we took soil, bark, leaf, and grape samples from within each vineyard from five different vines of pinot noir. We also collected must and a 10º brix sample from each winery. Using these samples, we performed 18S amplicon sequencing to identify the yeast present. We then used metabolomics to characterize the organoleptic compounds present in the bottled wine from the blocks the year that we sampled. We are actively in the process of analysing our data from this study.