Terroir 1996 banner
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 El Malvasía en la isla de la Palma

El Malvasía en la isla de la Palma

Abstract

El tema que me corresponde tratar en esta mini conferencia sobre “Caracterización vitivinícola de las Malvasías en Canarias”, es por razones obvias la parte que atañe a la Isla de La Palma.
Voy a comenzar por la faceta histórica, para pasar luego a la tradición, zonas de cultivo, descripción de la parra, modalidad cultural, el vino y sus atributos organolépticos.
Hablar del malvasía de Canarias es mencionar al malvasía que más fama ha alcanzado a escala universal. William Shakespeare que vivió entre 1564 y 1616 lo inmortalizó citándolo en alguna de sus obras, lo mismo que Sir Walter Scott en la época romántica. Pero fue el veneciano Carlo Goldoni (1707-1792) quien contribuyó a populalizarlo, al citarlo en multitud de ocasiones a través de una extensa producción teatral que alcanzó las 250 obras. Como ejemplo de esta popularidad hay una calle que lleva el nombre de “Malvasía” en la ciudad de Treviso, cercana a Venecia.
Pero hablar del malvasía de Canarias no es hablar de algo mítico; es hablar de algo tangible que continúa en la actualidad y al parecer con renovadas ansias de popularizarlo de nuevo. Estas iniciativas son dignas de aplauso.
A la isla de La Palma le corresponde un protagonismo fundamental en este aspecto. Sin duda alguna las parras llegaron a la isla procedentes de Madeira y de allí pasaron al resto de las islas productoras.
Madeira fue descubierta en 1418 por Juan Gonçalvez Zarco y pronto fue colonizada. La Palma, cuya conquista tuvo lugar en 1493, se aprovechó de la cercanía de Madeira para su desarrollo agrícola y ganadero. Cuando La Palma fue incorporada a la corona española, Madeira llevaba ya 75 años como isla colonizada, con una importante estructura productiva.
La tradición oral también dice que llegaron a La Palma sarmientos de malvasía procedentes de la isla de Lípari, cercana a Sicilia, donde se conserva actualmente una pequeña producción semejante en métodos y calidad a la malvasía palmera.
Voy a basar esta pequeña charla en mi experiencia como viticultor-bodeguero y en una larga tradición familiar que arranca de mis antepasados en torno al año 1700. Uno de mis bisabuelos, Pedro Cabrera, fue el principal cosechero de malvasía dulce de la isla de La Palma y falleció prematuramente en Cuba a finales del siglo XIX. Con su desaparición se interrumpe la producción familiar a gran escala, que recuperó mi extinto padre Elías Carballo Cabrera en torno a 1945, y quien en 1957 realizó la última exportación de vino malvasía dulce a la isla de Cuba. A mí me ha correspondido potenciar y modernizar la producción. Otras familias de la zona de Fuencaliente como los Morera, los Hernández Monterrey o los Hernández Díaz, han sido también destacados productores.
La producción principal de malvasía quedó reducida a Fuencaliente, junto a pequeñas cantidades en el Hoyo de Mazo y Las Breñas.
La microzona de los Llanos Negros, situada en el término municipal de Fuencaliente, al pie del volcán de San Antonio (1677), reviste unas características muy especiales: Es un terreno cubierto de picón, procedente del mencionado volcán, cuyo espesor es de 1.5 a 3 metros. El suelo anterior a la erupción está bajo la capa de picón que se asemeja a una inmensa esponja; se recarga de agua cuando llueve y la suministra al sistema radicular de la planta de forma paulatina. Por esta razón, para plantar la viña hay que excavar zanjas que lleguen al suelo productivo.
Esta microzona está situada a unos 450 metros de altitud sobre el nivel del mar y vuelta al suroeste, resguardada del alisio por el tramo final de la cordillera Cumbre Vieja-Teneguía. La pluviometría media en la década 1990-2000, fue de 385 litros por metro cuadrado y año, con lluvias procedentes del noroeste y suroeste, con algunas ocasionales del norte.
La parra de malvasía es la más vigorosa y la que tiene un mayor desarrollo leñoso, dándose el caso de parras con más de 100 años que aún conservan una buena producción. Es una variedad muy sensible al frío, al viento, a las enfermedades criptogámicas mildiu y oidio, y la más apetecida por los conejos. Pese a todo es la reina por la exquisita calidad de sus uvas para vinificar.
La variedad que se cultiva en Fuencaliente es la “blanca fina”, que tiene abundantes y largos sarmientos y unas hojas pentalobuladas con senos laterales tan marcados que la hacen fácilmente reconocible. Sus racimos son medianos, con baya elíptica pequeña de color ambarino y su producción es irregular.
La forma de cultivo es la de tendido bajo con horquetas para suspender las cepas y sarmientos de forma gradual y a medida que crecen los racimos captar mejor el calor del suelo.
En los Llanos Negros los rayos directos del sol entran avanzada la mañana para encontrarse con abundantes serenadas, donde el prolongado sol de la tarde confiere a los racimos un color inicial a manzanilla, que con la lenta maduración cambian a amarillo dorado y finalmente en la sobremaduración a oro viejo adornado con alegres pasas.
De aquí surge un vino dulce de poesía nacido en un lugar único, que tiene su más profundo secreto en la maduración prolongada y que con toda justicia se le ha descrito como un “tesoro enológico mundial”. ¿Por qué se le denomina así?. Este primor de vino, “boccata de Cardenali” según la expresión franca de un renombrado catador, es un vino naturalmente dulce cuya vinificación se realiza con las levaduras propias de la uva y cuya fermentación se para de forma natural debido a la alta concentración de azúcares que hay inicialmente en el mosto (18-19 ºBé).
La vendimia de sus uvas es la última; la cantidad de horas de exposición a la luz indirecta del sol por las mañanas y los suaves rescoldos de un sol sensual en los ocasos, hacen que se completen de una forma gradual los azúcares, para producir un caldo con fragancia de embrujo muy marcada, propio únicamente de un malvasía naturalmente dulce según la legislación. Fantásticos aromas, sabor dulce con acidez equilibrada y gusto sumamente delicado, que permanece largo tiempo en el paladar. En la imaginación del catador entran los colores, olores y sabores que se identifican con los más exquisitos de la naturaleza y que, con espontáneo entusiasmo, dedican a esta gloria fuencalentera, palmera y canaria.
En suma, un vino logrado en una microzona privilegiada, con un suelo singular en régimen de secano y la pluviometría adecuada, hijo de la reina de las parras, bendecido por el toque y encanto natural conferido por sus propias levaduras; en fin, un vino para aperitivo o postre, una auténtica ambrosía que no puede faltar en las grandes celebraciones y que ha dado renombre a la Isla junto a otras producciones emblemáticas como la seda y el tabaco.
Estamos ante un producto exquisito de primer orden que no ha sido suficientemente valorado y que tiene una fama histórica bien ganada. Esperamos los productores que este vino vuelva a ocupar un lugar merecido como uno de los mejores entre los mejores del mundo.
Deseamos que la cata que al final de este acto se va a realizar confirme estas palabras.

DOI:

Publication date: February 24, 2022

Issue: Terroir 2000 

Type: Article

Authors

ANTONIO CARBALLO PÉREZ

Tags

IVES Conference Series | Terroir 2000

Citation

Related articles…

Green berries on Gewürztraminer (Vitis vinifera L.) in South Tyrol (Italy)

The grape variety Gewürztraminer is known to be affected by two physiological disorders namely berry shrivel and bunch stem necrosis. During the season 2014 we noticed a new symptomatology type of ripening disorder on the variety. The new symptom showed not all berries fallowing the normal maturation stages, but single berries remaining at a soft but green stage till harvest. The broad distribution of these so called “green berries” symptoms in different production sites of our region, caused huge damage due to the difficulty of eliminating single berries per bunch before harvesting. Therefore, the Research Centre Laimburg began to investigate the reasons and origins of this new symptom. This work shows the results of first attempts to find causes for the symptom as well as the resulting approach to mitigate symptoms. Applications of magnesium leaf fertilizer showed first promising results against this putative disorder. To study the causal effect of the green berries 30 symptomatic vineyards in 2014 have been selected for a monitoring during the season 2016. To evaluate the foliar nutrient treatment two vineyards have been selected for application of magnesium sulfate and magnesium chloride. Leaf and berry nutrient analysis, as well as the main quality parameters during ripening have been performed. As soon as “green berries” symptoms appeared, incidence and severity have been evaluated. Most of the symptomatic vineyards of the 2016 monitoring showed light to clear magnesium deficit symptoms on their foliage. Only during the seasons 2020 and 2021 “green berries” symptoms could be found in the leaf fertilizer treatment vineyards. Both seasons showed a significant effect of the magnesium treatments to reduce the incidence and severity of the symptom. It seems that the appearance of the “green berries” symptom on Gewürztraminer is correlated to a disturbed uptake of magnesium of the vines.

Water deficit differentially impacts the performances and the accumulation of grape metabolites of new varieties tolerant to fungi

The use of resistant varieties is a long-term but promising solution to reduce chemical input in viticulture. Several important breeding programs in Europe and abroad are now releasing a range of new hybrids performing well regarding fungi susceptibility and producing good quality wines. Unfortunately, insufficient attention is paid by the breeders to the adaptation of these varieties to climatic changes, notably to the increased climatic demand and water deficit (WD). Thus, prior to the adoption of such varieties by the wine industry in Mediterranean regions, there is a need to consider their suitability to WD. This study aimed to characterize the different drought-strategies adopted by 6 new resistant varieties selected by INRAE in comparison to Syrah. To allow the assessment of long-term impacts of WD, field-grown vines were exposed to contrasted WD from 2018 to 2021 under a semi-arid Mediterranean climate. A gradient of WD was applied in the field and controlled through plant measurements at the single plant level. Grape development was non-destructively monitored to determine the arrest of berry phloem unloading. The impacts of WD on berry composition, including water, primary metabolites (sugars, organic acids), secondary metabolites (anthocyanins, thiols precursors) and main cations contents, were assessed at this specific stage. Results showed different varietal responses during the year and inter-annual acclimation in terms of plant water use efficiency, biomass accumulation, as well as yield components and berry composition. WD differentially reduced the accumulation of primary metabolites at plant and berry levels, but it little changed their concentrations in the fruits at the ripe stage. Moreover, WD differentially impacted the accumulation of secondary metabolites and major cations between the varieties. In the talk, we’ll present the main results regarding the WD impacts on fruit metabolites and enlarge the reflection about the practical assessment of the grapevine acclimation to WD.

Influence of agronomic practices in soil water content in mid-mountain vineyards

In the context of LIFE project MIDMACC (LIFE18 CCA/ES/001099), several pilots have been installed in vineyards in mid mountain areas of Catalonia (NE Spain) to test well stablished agronomic practices to increase the adaptation of Mediterranean mid mountain to climate change. Soil water content (SWC) at three different depths (15, 30 and 45cm) was measured in continuum from August 2020. One pilot (WC) included a well-established green cover (GC), a new GC (NC) and a conventional soil management (CM, tilling+herbicides). NC presented an intermediate state between WC and CM, responding similarly to CM in autumn but quickly reaching similar SWC to WC, then following the same evolution till next spring, with CM presenting lower values along autumn and winter. Then vegetation activation decreased SWC in all plots, (much slower in CM, lacking GC). Sensibility to spring rains is again intermediate for NC, which joins SWC evolution of CM by the end of spring till next autumn. It is expected that NC will resemble WC more and more as its GC develops. In the pilot combining vine training (VSP vs Gobelet) and hillside management (slope vs terrace), no clear pattern could be related with these conditions. However, both terraces seem to be more sensitive to spring rains. A third pilot included new vineyards (7 and 1 year old). In the new vineyard (N), higher canopy development, a spontaneous green cover and row straw resulted in a slower SWC dynamic, not so sensitive to rains but conserving more soil water in spring and most of summer, even with presumably a higher water extraction by vines. In the newest vineyard (VN) the deepest sensor is still sensitive to rain events all over the year and SWC is always highest at this depth, revealing small water capture by vines.

Assessment of climate change impacts on water needs and growing cycle on grapevine in three DOs of NE Spain

This study assessed the suitability of grapevine growing in three DOs (Empordà, Pla de Bages and Penedès) of Catalonia (NE Spain) over the 21st century. For this purpose, an estimation of water needs and agroclimatic and phenological indicators was made. Climate change impacts were estimated at 1 km pixel resolution using temperature and precipitation projections from several general circulation models (GCM) and two climate change scenarios: RCP 4.5 (stabilization scenario) and RCP 8.5 (worst-case scenario). Potential crop evapotranspiration (following FAO procedure) and a daily water balance considering soil water holding capacity were used to estimate actual evapotranspiration of vines and, finally, water needs. Dynamics would be similar in the three DOs studied although the magnitude of impact differs. Water needs would be 2 and 3 times greater (ranging from 0 to more than 1500 m3/ha) than current water needs at both climate change scenarios. Moreover, blooming date would advance from 3 to 6 weeks, harvest date from 1 to 2.5 months, resulting in growing cycles from 10 to 80 days shorter. It should also be noted that frost risk would decrease from 6 to 76%, the number of days with temperatures above 30ºC during ripening would rise from 48 to 500% and tropical nights (minimum temperature >20ºC) at ripening would increase from 28 to 150%, depending on the scenario and the DOs. The impacts of climate change in the three DOs could result in significant limitations for grapevine cultivation and wine production if adaptive strategies are not applied. This result could serve as a basis for the design of specific and particular adaptation strategies to improve and maintain vineyards in the DOs studied and could be extrapolated to similar DOs and regions.

Deconstructing the soil component of terroir: from controversy to consensus

Wine terroir describes the collectively recognized relation between a geographical area and the distinctive organoleptic characteristics of the wines produced in it. The overriding objective in terroir studies is therefore to provide scientific proof relating the properties of terroir components to wine quality and typicity. In scientific circles, the role of climate (macro-, meso- and micro-) on grape and wine characteristics is well documented and accepted as the most critical. Moreover, there has been increasing interest in recent years about new elements with possible importance in shaping wine terroir like berry/leaf/soil microbiology or even aromatic plants in proximity to the vineyard conferring flavors to the grapes. However, the actual effect of these factors is also dependent on complex interactions with plant material (variety/clone, rootstock, vine age) and with human factors.
The contribution of soil, although a fundamental component of terroir and extremely popular among wine enthusiasts, remains a much-debated issue among researchers. The role of geology is probably the one mostly associated by consumers with the notion of terroir with different parent rocks considered to give birth to different wine styles. However, the relationship between wine properties and the underlying parent material raises a lot of controversy especially regarding the actual existence of rock-derived flavors in the wine (e.g. minerality). As far as the actual soil properties are concerned, the effect of soil physical properties is generally regarded as the most significant (e.g sandy soils being associated with lighter wines while those on clay with colored and tannic ones) mostly through control of water availability which ultimately modifies berry ripening conditions either directly by triggering biosynthetic pathways, or indirectly by altering vigor and yield components. The role of soil chemistry seems to be weakly associated to wine sensory characteristic, although N, K, S and Ca, but also soil pH, are often considered important in the overall soil effect.
Recently, in the light of evidence provided by precision agriculture studies reporting a high variability of vineyard soils, the spatial scale should also be taken into consideration in the evaluation of the soil effects on wines. While it is accepted that soil effects become more significant than climate on a local level, it is not clear whether these micro-variations of vineyard soils are determining in the terroir effect. Moreover, as terroir is not a set of only natural factors, the magnitude of the contribution of human-related factors (irrigation, fertilization, soil management) to the soil effect still remains ambiguous. Lastly, a major shortcoming of the majority of works about soil effects on wine characteristics is the absence of connection with actual vine physiological processes since all soil effects on grape and wine chemistry and sensorial properties are ultimately mediated through vine responses.
This article attempts to breakdown the main soil attributes involved in the terroir effect to suggest an improved understanding about soil’s true contribution to wine sensory characteristics. It is proposed that soil parameters per se are not as significant determining factors in the terroir effect but rather their mutual interactions as well as with other natural and human factors included in the terroir concept. Consequently, similarly to bioclimatic indices, composite soil indices (i.e. soil depth, water holding capacity, fertility, temperature etc), incorporating multiple soil parameters, might provide a more accurate and quantifiable means to assess the relative weight of the soil component in the terroir effect.