Terroir 1996 banner
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 Caractérisation des terroirs viticoles champenois

Caractérisation des terroirs viticoles champenois

Abstract

Le vignoble champenois s’étend sur 35 300 ha en Appellation d’Origine Contrôlée dont 30 000 sont en production. Il couvre principalement 3 départements: par ordre d’importance, la Marne (68 % de la superficie en appellation), l’Aube (22 %) et l’Aisne (10 %), et de manière plus anecdotique la Haute Marne et la Seine et Mame. C’est un vignoble jeune (pour plus de la moitié de la superficie, les viticulteurs n’ont l’expérience que d’une seule génération de vignes), et morcelé (plus de la moitié des exploitations s’étendent sur moins de 1 ha; la taille moyenne d’une parcelle cadastrale est de 12 ares). En 1990, le Comité Interprofessionnel du Vin de Champagne (CIVC) a lancé une opération de zonage du vignoble champenois à l’échelle de 1/25 000ème (MONCOMBLE et PANIGAI, 1990). Cet organisme, qui assure à la fois des missions de recherche et de développement en matière viticole en Champagne, s’est alors trouvé confronté à 2 types de problèmes concernant son réseau expérimental actuel:

– il est difficile d’extrapoler les données issues d’une parcelle expérimentale à une zone plus large pour établir des cartes thématiques sur l’ensemble du vignoble. Pour pouvoir extrapoler ces résultats ponctuels, il faudrait définir la parcelle expérimentale par des caractéristiques qu’il est possible de spatialiser, par exemple des unités de terroir.
– il est parfois difficile de répondre précisément par manque de référence à des problèmes que les viticulteurs soumettent au CIVC. Les réponses pourraient être affinées s’il était possible de rattacher avec un minimum de données facilement accessibles (sondages à la tarière, mesure de la pente et de l’orientation, etc.) la parcelle du viticulteur qui pose problème à un site expérimental où les informations sont plus exhaustives.

L’objectif est donc de :
– définir des unités de terroir homogène de manière objective et reproductible,
– choisir, au sein de ces unités, des sites représentatifs où il serait possible d’implanter des observatoires de la vigne. Ces observatoires permettront de décrire et de mieux comprendre le fonctionnement de la vigne, voire de caractériser le type de vin pour une année donnée, en relation avec le terroir.
La mise en place de ce réseau impliquera une reconfiguration du réseau expérimental actuel du CIVC. L’objectif n’est pas de multiplier les parcelles expérimentales, ce qui deviendrait ingérable, mais de concentrer sur une trentaine de sites dispersés dans tout le vignoble un maximum de mesures et d’analyses en fonction des conditions de milieu naturel bien définies. Cela n’empêchera pas de conserver quelques sites expérimentaux plus “légers”, pour mieux comprendre la répartition spatiale de certains phénomènes. L’objectif est d’aboutir à 3 niveaux d’analyse:
– les observatoires qui représenteront le niveau le plus fin, mais dont le nombre sera limité à une trentaine de sites. Ce réseau expérimental sera une plate-forme commune et normalisée d’expérimentation à long terme (10 à 15 ans) et deviendra un véritable outil d’aide à la gestion appliquée des vignes. On peut estimer qu’en une quinzaine d’années, le modèle entre la plante et son environnement, selon un type d’année climatique, sera suffisamment stable et robuste pour être utilisable et extrapolable.
– un réseau d’expérimentation “plus léger” concernant certaines thématiques. Comme précédemment, ce réseau sera normalisé. On cherche en effet à éviter les problèmes d’interprétation des résultats à cause de données manquantes.
– des enquêtes réalisées auprès des viticulteurs qui permettent d’avoir de manière rapide une information spatiale sur l’ensemble du vignoble mais dont l’exploitation est parfois difficile du fait d’un manque de référentiel commun.
Les étapes de notre travail (Doledec, 1995) ont été :
– définir l’objet d’étude, “le terroir”, et informatiser les données disponibles. Le terroir est défini comme un ensemble de facteurs du milieu naturel en interaction (sol, sous-sol, relief). Compte tenu de l’hétérogénéité des parcelles (la superficie moyenne d’une parcelle cadastrale est de 12 ares), il est impossible de prendre en compte l’impact de l’homme, notamment par ses techniques culturales pour l’ensemble du vignoble champenois.
– estimer la qualité du jeu de données. Les données issues de la carte des sols font plus spécialement l’objet d’une étude de la justesse des notations utilisées par les techniciens. La comparaison entre la typologie de solums effectuées par le pédologue et celle issue d’une classification statistique permet d’affiner la carte des sols.
– déterminer les composantes principales des terroirs. Le choix de ces composantes repose sur la disponibilité de données informatisables et sur la connaissance d’avis d’experts mettant en évidence la relation entre des paramètres du milieu naturel et le comportement de la vigne.
– croiser les modalités des composantes principales des terroirs, pour aboutir à une carte des terroirs à 1/25000ème. Cette carte a été comparée à un zonage de la précocité de la vigne réalisé par des viticulteurs sur une commune.
– choisir, d’après la carte des terroirs obtenue, des sites potentiels pour l’implantation d’observatoires de la vigne.

DOI:

Publication date: March 25, 2022

Type: Poster

Issue: Terroir 1996

Authors

ANNE FRANCE DOLEDEC (1), M.C. GIRARD (2), D. MONCOMBLE (1), L. PANIGAI (1), M.C. VIRION (1)

(1) Comité Interprofessionnel du Vin de Champagne, 5, rue Henri Martin, 51204 Epemay
(2) Institut National Agronomique, 78850 Thivervai Grignon

Tags

IVES Conference Series | Terroir 1996

Citation

Related articles…

Variety and climatic effects on quality scores in the Western US winegrowing regions

Wine quality is strongly linked to climate. Quality scores are often driven by climate variation across different winegrowing regions and years, but also influenced by other aspects of terroir, including variety. While recent work has looked at the relationship between quality scores and climate across many European regions, less work has examined New World winegrowing regions. Here we used scores from three major rating systems (Wine Advocate, Wine Enthusiast and Wine Spectator) combined with daily climate and phenology data to understand what drives variation across wine quality scores in major regions of the Western US, including regions in California, Oregon and Washington. We examined effects of variety, region, and in what phenological period climate was most predictive of quality. As in other studies, we found climate, based mainly on growing degree day (GDD) models, was generally associated with quality—with higher GDD associated with higher scores—but variety and region also had strong effects. Effects of region were generally stronger than variety. Certain varieties received the highest scores in only some areas, while other varieties (e.g., Merlot) generally scored lower across regions. Across phenological stages, GDD during budbreak was often most strongly associated with quality. Our results support other studies that warmer periods generally drive high quality wines, but highlight how much region and variety drive variation in scores outside of climate.

austrianvineyards.com: online viewer of all designations of Austrian wine

To digitally record and present all the origins of Austrian wines in the same perfect and clear way was the motivation for the Austrian Wine Marketing Board (Austrian Wine) to start with the project in 2018. In June 2021 the results were presented to the public in an online viewer showing all the designations of Austrian wine, available at https://austrianvineyards.com in a largely barrier-free manner. The online viewer provides tailored individual maps fitted to the respective zoom level. The smallest unit of wine-origins in Austria is called Ried and is displayed in a plot-specific manner highlighting areas under vine. Information on the Ried include administrative district, winegrowing municipality, cadastral municipality, large collective vineyard site, specific winegrowing region, generic winegrowing region, winegrowing area and, in many cases, an illustrative picture. Complementary data on the size, elevation (minimum-maximum), orientation (in 8 sectors plus flat) and gradient (minimum, maximum, average) are based on the area under vine according to the EU’s Integrated Administration and Control System. Additional information covers climate data. The diagrams are taken from the monthly breakdown of data in the annals of the Central Institute for Meteorology and Geodynamics, Austria provide a display of values for air temperature, precipitation, and sunshine hours for the reference year and the long-term average. Seasonal aggregated data on temperature, precipitation, and sunshine hours complete the display. Short descriptions with emphasis on geology and soil, field name in historical maps, etymology of the denomination, and main planted variety complements the available information for the main designations in the online viewer. These descriptions are compiled by winegrowers, geologists, historians, and journalists. All the information and data can be extracted to a pdf-file. Printed vineyard maps are also available. Missing content regarding wine origins in Styria will be completed in winter 2021/22.

VINIoT – Precision viticulture service

The project VINIoT pursues the creation of a new technological vineyard monitoring service, which will allow companies in the wine sector in the SUDOE space to monitor plantations in real time and remotely at various levels of precision. The system is based on spectral images and an IoT architecture that allows assessing parameters of interest viticulture and the collection of data at a precise scale (level of grape, plant, plot or vineyard) will be designed. In France, three subjects were specifically developed: evaluation of maturity, of water stress, and detection of flavescence dorée. For the evaluation of maturity, it has been decided first to work at the berry scale in the laboratory, then at the bunch scale and finally in the vineyard. The acquisition of the spectral hyperstal image as well as the reference analyzes to measure the maturity, were carried out in the laboratory after harvesting the berries in a maturity monitoring context. This work focuses on a case study to predict sugar content of three different grape varieties: Syrah, Fer Servadou and Mauzac. A robust method called Roboost-PLSR, developed in the framework of this work (Courand et al., 2022), to improve prediction model performance was applied on spectra after the acquirement of hyperspectral images. Regarding the evaluation of water stress, to work with a significant variability in terms of water status, it has been worked first with potted plants under 2 different water regimes. The facilities have allowed the supervision of irrigation and micro-climatic conditions. The regression models on agronomic variables (stomatal conductance, water potential, …) are studied. To detect flavescence dorée, the experimental plan has consisted of work at leaf scale in the laboratory first, and then in the field. To detect the disease from hyper-spectral imaging, a combination of multivariate curve resolution-alternating least squares (MCR-ALS) and factorial discriminant analysis (FDA) was proposed. This strategy proved the potential towards the discrimination of healthy and infected leaves by flavescence dorée based on the use of hyperspectral images (Mas Garcia et al., 2021).

Biodiversity in the vineyard agroecosystem: exploring systemic approaches

Biodiversity conservation and restoration are essential for guarantee the provision of ecosystem services associated to vineyard agroecosystem such as climate regulation trough carbon sequestration and control of pests and diseases. Most of published research dealing with the complexity of the vineyard agroecosystems emphasizes the necessity of innovative approaches, including the integration of information at different temporal and spatial scales and development of systemic analysis based on modelling. A biodiversity survey was conducted in the Franciacorta wine-growing area (Lombardy, Italy), one of the most important Italian wine-growing regions for sparkling wine production, considering a portion of the territory of 112 ha. The area was divided into several Environmental Units (EUs), defined as a whole vineyard or portion of vineyard homogenous in terms of four agronomic characteristics: planting year, planting density, cultivar, and training system. In each EU a set of compartments was identified and characterised by specific variables. The compartments are meteorology, morphology (altitude, slope, aspect, row orientation, and solar irradiance), ecological infrastructures and management. The landscape surrounding EU was also characterised in terms of land-use in a buffer zone of 500 m. For each component a specific methodology was identified and applied. Different statistical approaches were used to evaluate the method to integrate the information related to different compartments within the EU and related to the buffer zone. These approaches were also preliminarily evaluated for their ability to describe the contribution of biodiversity and landscape components to ecosystem services. This methodological exploration provides useful indication for the development of a fully systemic approach to structural and functional biodiversity in vineyard agroecosystems, contributing to promote a multifunctional perspective for the all wine-growing sector.

Metabolomic discrimination of grapevine water status for Chardonnay and Pinot noir

Water status impact in viticulture has been widely explored, as it strongly affects grapevine physiology and grape chemical composition. It is considered as a key component of vitivinicultural terroir. Most of the studies concerning grapevine water status have focused on either physiological traits, or berry compounds, or traits involved in wine quality. Here, the response of grapevine to water availability during the ripening period is assessed through non-targeted metabolomics analysis of grape berries by ultra-high resolution mass spectrometry. The grapevine water status has been assessed during 2 consecutive years (2019 & 2020), through carbon isotope discrimination on juices from berries collected at maturity (21.5 brix approx.) for 2 Vitis vinifera cv. Pinot noir (PN) and Chardonnay (CH). A total of 220 grape juices were collected from 5 countries worldwide (Italy; Argentina; France; Germany; Portugal). Measured δ13C (‰) varied from -28.73 to -22.6 for PN, and from -28.79 to -21.67 for CH. These results also clearly revealed higher water stress for the 2020 vintage. The same grape juices have been analysed by Fourier Transform Ion Cyclotron Resonance Mass Spectrometry (FT-ICR-MS) and Liquid Chromatography coupled to Mass Spectrometry (LC-qTOF-MS), leading to the detection of up to 4500 CHONS containing elemental compositions, and thus likely tens of thousands of individual compounds, which include fatty acids, organic acids, peptides, phenolics, also with high levels of glycosylation. Multivariate statistical analysis revealed that up to 160 elemental compositions, covering the whole range of detected masses (100 –1000 m/z), were significantly correlated to the observed gradients of water status. Examples of chemical markers, which are representative of these complex fingerprints, include various derivatives of the known abscisic acid (ABA), such as phaesic acid or abscisic acid glucose ester, which are significantly correlated with higher water stress, regardless of the variety. Cultivar-specific behaviours could also be identified from these fingerprints. Our results provide an unprecedented representation of the metabolic diversity, which is involved in the water status regulation at the grape level, and which could contribute to a better knowledge of the grapevine mitigation strategy in a climate change context.