Terroir 1996 banner
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 Caractérisation des terroirs viticoles champenois

Caractérisation des terroirs viticoles champenois

Abstract

Le vignoble champenois s’étend sur 35 300 ha en Appellation d’Origine Contrôlée dont 30 000 sont en production. Il couvre principalement 3 départements: par ordre d’importance, la Marne (68 % de la superficie en appellation), l’Aube (22 %) et l’Aisne (10 %), et de manière plus anecdotique la Haute Marne et la Seine et Mame. C’est un vignoble jeune (pour plus de la moitié de la superficie, les viticulteurs n’ont l’expérience que d’une seule génération de vignes), et morcelé (plus de la moitié des exploitations s’étendent sur moins de 1 ha; la taille moyenne d’une parcelle cadastrale est de 12 ares). En 1990, le Comité Interprofessionnel du Vin de Champagne (CIVC) a lancé une opération de zonage du vignoble champenois à l’échelle de 1/25 000ème (MONCOMBLE et PANIGAI, 1990). Cet organisme, qui assure à la fois des missions de recherche et de développement en matière viticole en Champagne, s’est alors trouvé confronté à 2 types de problèmes concernant son réseau expérimental actuel:

– il est difficile d’extrapoler les données issues d’une parcelle expérimentale à une zone plus large pour établir des cartes thématiques sur l’ensemble du vignoble. Pour pouvoir extrapoler ces résultats ponctuels, il faudrait définir la parcelle expérimentale par des caractéristiques qu’il est possible de spatialiser, par exemple des unités de terroir.
– il est parfois difficile de répondre précisément par manque de référence à des problèmes que les viticulteurs soumettent au CIVC. Les réponses pourraient être affinées s’il était possible de rattacher avec un minimum de données facilement accessibles (sondages à la tarière, mesure de la pente et de l’orientation, etc.) la parcelle du viticulteur qui pose problème à un site expérimental où les informations sont plus exhaustives.

L’objectif est donc de :
– définir des unités de terroir homogène de manière objective et reproductible,
– choisir, au sein de ces unités, des sites représentatifs où il serait possible d’implanter des observatoires de la vigne. Ces observatoires permettront de décrire et de mieux comprendre le fonctionnement de la vigne, voire de caractériser le type de vin pour une année donnée, en relation avec le terroir.
La mise en place de ce réseau impliquera une reconfiguration du réseau expérimental actuel du CIVC. L’objectif n’est pas de multiplier les parcelles expérimentales, ce qui deviendrait ingérable, mais de concentrer sur une trentaine de sites dispersés dans tout le vignoble un maximum de mesures et d’analyses en fonction des conditions de milieu naturel bien définies. Cela n’empêchera pas de conserver quelques sites expérimentaux plus “légers”, pour mieux comprendre la répartition spatiale de certains phénomènes. L’objectif est d’aboutir à 3 niveaux d’analyse:
– les observatoires qui représenteront le niveau le plus fin, mais dont le nombre sera limité à une trentaine de sites. Ce réseau expérimental sera une plate-forme commune et normalisée d’expérimentation à long terme (10 à 15 ans) et deviendra un véritable outil d’aide à la gestion appliquée des vignes. On peut estimer qu’en une quinzaine d’années, le modèle entre la plante et son environnement, selon un type d’année climatique, sera suffisamment stable et robuste pour être utilisable et extrapolable.
– un réseau d’expérimentation “plus léger” concernant certaines thématiques. Comme précédemment, ce réseau sera normalisé. On cherche en effet à éviter les problèmes d’interprétation des résultats à cause de données manquantes.
– des enquêtes réalisées auprès des viticulteurs qui permettent d’avoir de manière rapide une information spatiale sur l’ensemble du vignoble mais dont l’exploitation est parfois difficile du fait d’un manque de référentiel commun.
Les étapes de notre travail (Doledec, 1995) ont été :
– définir l’objet d’étude, “le terroir”, et informatiser les données disponibles. Le terroir est défini comme un ensemble de facteurs du milieu naturel en interaction (sol, sous-sol, relief). Compte tenu de l’hétérogénéité des parcelles (la superficie moyenne d’une parcelle cadastrale est de 12 ares), il est impossible de prendre en compte l’impact de l’homme, notamment par ses techniques culturales pour l’ensemble du vignoble champenois.
– estimer la qualité du jeu de données. Les données issues de la carte des sols font plus spécialement l’objet d’une étude de la justesse des notations utilisées par les techniciens. La comparaison entre la typologie de solums effectuées par le pédologue et celle issue d’une classification statistique permet d’affiner la carte des sols.
– déterminer les composantes principales des terroirs. Le choix de ces composantes repose sur la disponibilité de données informatisables et sur la connaissance d’avis d’experts mettant en évidence la relation entre des paramètres du milieu naturel et le comportement de la vigne.
– croiser les modalités des composantes principales des terroirs, pour aboutir à une carte des terroirs à 1/25000ème. Cette carte a été comparée à un zonage de la précocité de la vigne réalisé par des viticulteurs sur une commune.
– choisir, d’après la carte des terroirs obtenue, des sites potentiels pour l’implantation d’observatoires de la vigne.

DOI:

Publication date: March 25, 2022

Type: Poster

Issue: Terroir 1996

Authors

ANNE FRANCE DOLEDEC (1), M.C. GIRARD (2), D. MONCOMBLE (1), L. PANIGAI (1), M.C. VIRION (1)

(1) Comité Interprofessionnel du Vin de Champagne, 5, rue Henri Martin, 51204 Epemay
(2) Institut National Agronomique, 78850 Thivervai Grignon

Tags

IVES Conference Series | Terroir 1996

Citation

Related articles…

Metabolomic discrimination of grapevine water status for Chardonnay and Pinot noir

Water status impact in viticulture has been widely explored, as it strongly affects grapevine physiology and grape chemical composition. It is considered as a key component of vitivinicultural terroir. Most of the studies concerning grapevine water status have focused on either physiological traits, or berry compounds, or traits involved in wine quality. Here, the response of grapevine to water availability during the ripening period is assessed through non-targeted metabolomics analysis of grape berries by ultra-high resolution mass spectrometry. The grapevine water status has been assessed during 2 consecutive years (2019 & 2020), through carbon isotope discrimination on juices from berries collected at maturity (21.5 brix approx.) for 2 Vitis vinifera cv. Pinot noir (PN) and Chardonnay (CH). A total of 220 grape juices were collected from 5 countries worldwide (Italy; Argentina; France; Germany; Portugal). Measured δ13C (‰) varied from -28.73 to -22.6 for PN, and from -28.79 to -21.67 for CH. These results also clearly revealed higher water stress for the 2020 vintage. The same grape juices have been analysed by Fourier Transform Ion Cyclotron Resonance Mass Spectrometry (FT-ICR-MS) and Liquid Chromatography coupled to Mass Spectrometry (LC-qTOF-MS), leading to the detection of up to 4500 CHONS containing elemental compositions, and thus likely tens of thousands of individual compounds, which include fatty acids, organic acids, peptides, phenolics, also with high levels of glycosylation. Multivariate statistical analysis revealed that up to 160 elemental compositions, covering the whole range of detected masses (100 –1000 m/z), were significantly correlated to the observed gradients of water status. Examples of chemical markers, which are representative of these complex fingerprints, include various derivatives of the known abscisic acid (ABA), such as phaesic acid or abscisic acid glucose ester, which are significantly correlated with higher water stress, regardless of the variety. Cultivar-specific behaviours could also be identified from these fingerprints. Our results provide an unprecedented representation of the metabolic diversity, which is involved in the water status regulation at the grape level, and which could contribute to a better knowledge of the grapevine mitigation strategy in a climate change context.

Modeling island and coastal vineyards potential in the context of climate change

Climate change impacts regional and local climates, which in turn affects the world’s wine regions. In the short term, these modifications rises issues about maintaining quality and style of wine, and in a longer term about the suitability of grape varieties and the sustainability of traditional wine regions. Thus, adaptation to climate change represents a major challenge for viticulture. In this context, island and coastal vineyards could become coveted areas due to their specific climatic conditions. In regions subject to warming, the proximity of the sea can moderate extremes temperatures, which could be an advantage for wine. However, coastal and island areas are particular prized spaces and subject to multiple pressures that make the establishment or extension of viticulture complex.
In this perspective, it seems relevant to assess the potentialities of coastal and island areas for viticulture. This contribution will present a spatial optimization model that tends to characterize most suitable agroclimatic patterns in historical or emerging vineyards according to different scenarios. Thanks to an in-depth bibliography a global inventory of coastal and insular vineyards on a worldwide scale has been realized. Relevant criteria have been identified to describe the specificities of these vineyards. They are used as input data in the optimization process, which will optimize some objectives and spatial aspects. According to a predefined scenario, the objectives are set in three main categories associated with climatic characteristics, vineyards characteristics and management strategies. At the end of this optimization process, a series of maps presents the different spatial configurations that maximize the scenario objectives.

Geospatial trends of bioclimatic indexes in the topographically complex region of Barolo DOCG

Barolo DOCG is an economically important wine producing region in Northwest Italy. It is a small region of approximately 70 km2 gross area. The topography is very complex with steep sloped hills ranging in elevation from below 200 m to 550 m. Barolo DOCG wine is made exclusively from the Nebbiolo grape. Bioclimatic indexes are often used in viticulture to gain a better understanding of broader climate trends which can be compared temporally and geographically. These indexes are also used for identifying potential phenological timing, growing region suitability, and potential risks associated with expected climatic changes. Understanding how topography influences bioclimatic indexes can help with understanding of mesoscale climate behaviour leading to improved decision making and risk management strategies. The average monthly maximum and minimum temperatures, the Cool Night Index, the Huglin Index, and the monthly diurnal range (from July to October) were calculated using data from 45 weather stations within a 40 km radius of the Barolo DOCG growing area between the years 1996 and 2019. Linear and multiple regression models were developed using independent variables (elevation, aspect, slope) extracted from a digital elevation model to identify significant relationships. Bioclimatic indexes were then kriged with external drift using independent variables that showed significant relationships with the bioclimatic index using a 100 m resolution grid. The maximum monthly temperatures and the Huglin Index showed consistent significant negative relationships with elevation in all years. The minimum monthly temperatures showed no relationship with elevation but in some months a small but significant relationship was observed with aspect. Due to the lack of a relationship between minimum monthly temperatures and elevation compared to the significant relationship between maximum monthly temperatures and elevation, monthly diurnal range had a negative relationship with elevation.

Climate change projections to support the transition to climate-smart viticulture

The Earth’s system is undergoing major changes through a wide range of spatial and temporal scales as a response to growing anthropogenic radiative forcing, which is pushing the whole system far beyond its natural variability. Sources of greenhouse gases largely exceed their sinks, thus leading to a strengthened greenhouse effect. More energy is thereby being supplied to the system, with inevitable shifts in climatic patterns and weather regimes. Over the last decades, these modifications have been manifested in the full statistical distributions of the atmospheric variables, with dramatic changes in the frequency and intensity of extremes. Natural hazards, such as severe droughts, floods, forest fires, or heatwaves, are being triggered by extreme atmospheric events worldwide, thus threatening human activities. Viticultculture is not only exposed to changing climates but is also highly vulnerable, as grapevine phenology and physiological development are strongly controlled by atmospheric conditions. Therefore, the assessment of climate change projections for a given region is critical for climate change adaptation and risk reduction in viticulture. By adopting timely and suitable measures, the future sustainability and resiliency of the sector can be fostered. Climate-grapevine chain modelling is an essential tool for better planning and management. However, the accuracy of the resulting projections is limited by many uncertainties that must be duly taken into account when transferring knowledge to stakeholders and decision-makers. Climate-smart viticulture will comprise ensembles of locally tuned strategies, envisioning both adaptation and mitigation, assisted by emerging technologies and decision-support systems.

Soil, vine, climate change – what is observed – what is expected

To evaluate the current and future impact of climate change on Viticulture requires an integrated view on a complex interacting system within the soil-plant-atmospheric continuum under continuous change. Aside of the globally observed increase in temperature in basically all viticulture regions for at least four decades, we observe several clear trends at the regional level in the ratio of precipitation to potential evapotranspiration. Additionally the recently published 6th assessment report of the IPCC (The physical science basis) shows case-dependent further expected shifts in climate patterns which will have substantial impacts on the way we will conduct viticulture in the decades to come.
Looking beyond climate developments, we observe rising temperatures in the upper soil layers which will have an impact on the distribution of microbial populations, the decay rate of organic matter or the storage capacity for carbon, thus affecting the emission of greenhouse gases (GHGs) and the viscosity of water in the soil-plant pathway, altering the transport of water. If the upper soil layers dry out faster due to less rainfall and/or increased evapotranspiration driven by higher temperatures, the spectral reflection properties of bare soil change and the transport of latent heat into the fruiting zone is increased putting a higher temperature load on the fruit. Interactions between micro-organisms in the rhizosphere and the grapevine root system are poorly understood but respond to environmental factors (such as increased soil temperatures) and the plant material (rootstock for instance), respectively the cultivation system (for example bio-organic versus conventional). This adds to an extremely complex system to manage in terms of increased resilience, adaptation to and even mitigation of climate change. Nevertheless, taken as a whole, effects on the individual expressions of wines with a given origin, seem highly likely to become more apparent.