Terroir 1996 banner
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 Étude de la composante climatique du terroir viticole en Val de Loire : relation avec les facteurs physiques du milieu

Étude de la composante climatique du terroir viticole en Val de Loire : relation avec les facteurs physiques du milieu

Abstract

Les recherches conduites par l’U.R.V.V. du centre I.N.R.A. d’Angers ont pour but d’élaborer une méthodologie de caractérisation intégrée des facteurs naturels des terroirs viticoles, représentative des conditions de fonctionnement de la vigne et des différences sensorielles des vins. Dans ce cadre, le concept d’Unité Terroir de Base (U.T.B.) a été développé. L’U.T.B. représente une surface viticole d’extension géographique variable, définie comme l’association en un lieu donné d’une composante géologique, pédologique et paysagère, Morlat (1989), Riou et al. (1995).

La géopédologie oriente la morphologie et les conditions nutritionnelles du système racinaire, (Morlat et Jacquet, 1993), et influence profondément le fonctionnement de la vigne, (Morlat, 1989). Parallèlement, on ne peut ignorer l’effet du climat sur la qualité du raisin dans une étude globale des terroirs viticoles (Branas, 1946 ; Nigond, 1957 ; Huglin, 1978 ; Riou et al., 1994). L’environnement paysager d’un terroir peut engendrer des variations locales du climat régional (mésoclimat), suffisantes pour modifier la réponse de la vigne. Cette hypothèse a été testée avec succès par Nigond (1971) et Lebon (1993) pour des reliefs accentués ou semi-montagneux soumis à des climats tranchés (semi-continental pour Lebon, méditerranéen pour Nigond).

La plupart des éléments constitutifs d’un terroir, potentiellement modificateurs du climat, ont été étudiés isolément et le plus souvent en zones accidentée. Les effets des brise-vent ont été largement analysés et décrits par Guyot (1963) et Guyot et al. (1976). le rôle de la nature de la surface du sol sur les températures a été abordé (Branas, 1946 ; Verbrugghe, 1991). Godard (1949), Guyot et al (1976), Varlet Grancher (1975) se sont intéressés aux effets climatiques des versants, des pentes et de l’altitude. Tous ces auteurs sont d’accord sur le fait que les mésoclimats se forment principalement par ciel clair et temps calme.

La transposition de leurs résultats, indispensable pour comprendre les phénomènes climatiques locaux, est insuffisante pour prédire un mésoclimat, car celui qui se forme en un endroit résulte de l’action conjointe (convergente ou opposée) de ces multiples variables. Il est donc important d’inclure à la même échelle, et en lui donnant une dimension spatiale, la composante climatique du terroir viticole, au même titre que la composante édaphique (sol, roche géologique).

Ce travail devrait aider à hiérarchiser les facteurs locaux du climat, en vue de déceler les variables utilisables pour une cartographie climatique applicable aux zones tempérées de faible altitudes dont le relief est peu accidenté. Ce dernier objectif est fondamental pour la caractérisation intégrée des terroirs et comme outil de gestion agroviticole des vignobles.

DOI:

Publication date: March 25, 2022

Type: Poster

Issue: Terroir 1996

Authors

A. JACQUET (1), (2), R. MORLAT (1)

(1) I.N.R.A.. U.R.V.V., Angers, France
(2) Adresse actuelle : INRA – L.A.P.B.V., Université de Caen, esplanade de la paix, 14032 Caen cedex. France

Tags

IVES Conference Series | Terroir 1996

Citation

Related articles…

Comparison of imputation methods in long and varied phenological series. Application to the Conegliano dataset, including observations from 1964 over 400 grape varieties

A large varietal collection including over 1700 varieties was maintained in Conegliano, ITA, since the 1950s. Phenological data on a subset of 400 grape varieties including wine grapes, table grapes, and raisins were acquired at bud break, flowering, veraison, and ripening since 1964. Despite the efforts in maintaining and acquiring data over such an extensive collection, the data set has varying degrees of missing cases depending on the variety and the year. This is ubiquitous in phenology datasets with significant size and length. In this work, we evaluated four state-of-the-art methods to estimate missing values in this phenological series: k-Nearest Neighbour (kNN), Multivariate Imputation by Chained Equations (mice), MissForest, and Bidirectional Recurrent Imputation for Time Series (BRITS). For each phenological stage, we evaluated the performance of the methods in two ways. 1) On the full dataset, we randomly hold-out 10% of the true values for use as a test set and repeated the process 1000 times (Monte Carlo cross-validation). 2) On a reduced and almost complete subset of varieties, we varied the percentage of missing values from 10% to 70% by random deletion. In all cases, we evaluated the performance on the original values using normalized root mean squared error. For the full dataset we also obtained performance statistics by variety and by year. MissForest provided average errors of 17% (3 days) at budbreak, 14% (4 days) at flowering, 14.5% (7 days) at veraison, and 17% (3 days) at maturity. We completed the imputations of the Conegliano dataset, one of the world’s most extensive and varied phenological time series and a steppingstone for future climate change studies in grapes. The dataset is now ready for further analysis, and a rigorous evaluation of imputation errors is included.

Deconstructing the soil component of terroir: from controversy to consensus

Wine terroir describes the collectively recognized relation between a geographical area and the distinctive organoleptic characteristics of the wines produced in it. The overriding objective in terroir studies is therefore to provide scientific proof relating the properties of terroir components to wine quality and typicity. In scientific circles, the role of climate (macro-, meso- and micro-) on grape and wine characteristics is well documented and accepted as the most critical. Moreover, there has been increasing interest in recent years about new elements with possible importance in shaping wine terroir like berry/leaf/soil microbiology or even aromatic plants in proximity to the vineyard conferring flavors to the grapes. However, the actual effect of these factors is also dependent on complex interactions with plant material (variety/clone, rootstock, vine age) and with human factors.
The contribution of soil, although a fundamental component of terroir and extremely popular among wine enthusiasts, remains a much-debated issue among researchers. The role of geology is probably the one mostly associated by consumers with the notion of terroir with different parent rocks considered to give birth to different wine styles. However, the relationship between wine properties and the underlying parent material raises a lot of controversy especially regarding the actual existence of rock-derived flavors in the wine (e.g. minerality). As far as the actual soil properties are concerned, the effect of soil physical properties is generally regarded as the most significant (e.g sandy soils being associated with lighter wines while those on clay with colored and tannic ones) mostly through control of water availability which ultimately modifies berry ripening conditions either directly by triggering biosynthetic pathways, or indirectly by altering vigor and yield components. The role of soil chemistry seems to be weakly associated to wine sensory characteristic, although N, K, S and Ca, but also soil pH, are often considered important in the overall soil effect.
Recently, in the light of evidence provided by precision agriculture studies reporting a high variability of vineyard soils, the spatial scale should also be taken into consideration in the evaluation of the soil effects on wines. While it is accepted that soil effects become more significant than climate on a local level, it is not clear whether these micro-variations of vineyard soils are determining in the terroir effect. Moreover, as terroir is not a set of only natural factors, the magnitude of the contribution of human-related factors (irrigation, fertilization, soil management) to the soil effect still remains ambiguous. Lastly, a major shortcoming of the majority of works about soil effects on wine characteristics is the absence of connection with actual vine physiological processes since all soil effects on grape and wine chemistry and sensorial properties are ultimately mediated through vine responses.
This article attempts to breakdown the main soil attributes involved in the terroir effect to suggest an improved understanding about soil’s true contribution to wine sensory characteristics. It is proposed that soil parameters per se are not as significant determining factors in the terroir effect but rather their mutual interactions as well as with other natural and human factors included in the terroir concept. Consequently, similarly to bioclimatic indices, composite soil indices (i.e. soil depth, water holding capacity, fertility, temperature etc), incorporating multiple soil parameters, might provide a more accurate and quantifiable means to assess the relative weight of the soil component in the terroir effect.

Terroir analysis and its complexity

Terroir is not only a geographical site, but it is a more complex concept able to express the “collective knowledge of the interactions” between the environment and the vines mediated through human action and “providing distinctive characteristics” to the final product (OIV 2010). It is often treated and accepted as a “black box”, in which the relationships between wine and its origin have not been clearly explained. Nevertheless, it is well known that terroir expression is strongly dependent on the physical environment, and in particular on the interaction between soil-plant and atmosphere system, which influences the grapevine responses, grapes composition and wine quality. The Terroir studying and mapping are based on viticultural zoning procedures, obtained with different levels of know-how, at different spatial and temporal scales, empiricism and complexity in the description of involved bio-physical processes, and integrating or not the multidisciplinary nature of the terroir. The scientific understanding of the mechanisms ruling both the vineyard variability and the quality of grapes is one of the most important scientific focuses of terroir research. In fact, this know-how is crucial for supporting the analysis of climate change impacts on terroir resilience, identifying new promised lands for viticulture, and driving vineyard management toward a target oenological goal. In this contribution, an overview of the last findings in terroir studies and approaches will be shown with special attention to the terroir resilience analysis to climate change, facing the use and abuse of terroir concept and new technology able to support it and identifying the terroir zones.

Bioclimatic shifts and land use options for Viticulture in Portugal

Land use, plays a relevant role in the climatic system. It endows means for agriculture practices thus contributing to the food supply. Since climate and land are closely intertwined through multiple interface processes, climate change may lead to significant impacts in land use. In this study, 1-km observational gridded datasets are used to assess changes in the Köppen–Geiger and Worldwide Bioclimatic (WBCS)

Modeling the suitability of Pinot Noir in Oregon’s Willamette Valley in a changing climate

Air temperature is the key driver of grapevine phenology and a significant environmental factor impacting yield and quality for a winegrape growing region. In this study the optimal downscaled CMIP5 ensemble for computing thegrowing season average temperature (GST) viticulture climate classification index was determined to spatially compute on a decadal basis predictions of the GST climate index and the grapevine sugar ripeness (GSR) model for Pinot Noir throughout the Willamette Valley (WV) American Viticultural Area (AVA). Forecasts for average temperature and a 220 g/L target sugar concentration level were computed using daily Localized Constructed Analogs (LOCA) downscaled CMIP5 historic and Representative Concentration Pathways (RCP) future climate projections of minimum and maximum daily temperature. We explore spatiotemporal trends of the GST climate classification index and Pinot Noir specific applications of the GSR phenology model for the WV AVA. Spatiotemporal computations of the GST climate index and Pinot Noir specific applications of the GSR model enable the opportunity to explore relationships between their computed values with one intent being to provide updated GST ranges that better align with current temperature-based modeling understanding of Pinot Noir grapevine phenology and the viticultural application of LOCA CMIP5 climate projections for the WV AVA. The Pinot Noir specific applications of the GSR model or the GST index with updated bounds indicate that the percent of the WV AVA area suitable for Pinot Noir production is currently at or near its peak value in the upper 80s to lower 90s of this century.