Terroir 1996 banner
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 Étude de la composante climatique du terroir viticole en Val de Loire : relation avec les facteurs physiques du milieu

Étude de la composante climatique du terroir viticole en Val de Loire : relation avec les facteurs physiques du milieu

Abstract

Les recherches conduites par l’U.R.V.V. du centre I.N.R.A. d’Angers ont pour but d’élaborer une méthodologie de caractérisation intégrée des facteurs naturels des terroirs viticoles, représentative des conditions de fonctionnement de la vigne et des différences sensorielles des vins. Dans ce cadre, le concept d’Unité Terroir de Base (U.T.B.) a été développé. L’U.T.B. représente une surface viticole d’extension géographique variable, définie comme l’association en un lieu donné d’une composante géologique, pédologique et paysagère, Morlat (1989), Riou et al. (1995).

La géopédologie oriente la morphologie et les conditions nutritionnelles du système racinaire, (Morlat et Jacquet, 1993), et influence profondément le fonctionnement de la vigne, (Morlat, 1989). Parallèlement, on ne peut ignorer l’effet du climat sur la qualité du raisin dans une étude globale des terroirs viticoles (Branas, 1946 ; Nigond, 1957 ; Huglin, 1978 ; Riou et al., 1994). L’environnement paysager d’un terroir peut engendrer des variations locales du climat régional (mésoclimat), suffisantes pour modifier la réponse de la vigne. Cette hypothèse a été testée avec succès par Nigond (1971) et Lebon (1993) pour des reliefs accentués ou semi-montagneux soumis à des climats tranchés (semi-continental pour Lebon, méditerranéen pour Nigond).

La plupart des éléments constitutifs d’un terroir, potentiellement modificateurs du climat, ont été étudiés isolément et le plus souvent en zones accidentée. Les effets des brise-vent ont été largement analysés et décrits par Guyot (1963) et Guyot et al. (1976). le rôle de la nature de la surface du sol sur les températures a été abordé (Branas, 1946 ; Verbrugghe, 1991). Godard (1949), Guyot et al (1976), Varlet Grancher (1975) se sont intéressés aux effets climatiques des versants, des pentes et de l’altitude. Tous ces auteurs sont d’accord sur le fait que les mésoclimats se forment principalement par ciel clair et temps calme.

La transposition de leurs résultats, indispensable pour comprendre les phénomènes climatiques locaux, est insuffisante pour prédire un mésoclimat, car celui qui se forme en un endroit résulte de l’action conjointe (convergente ou opposée) de ces multiples variables. Il est donc important d’inclure à la même échelle, et en lui donnant une dimension spatiale, la composante climatique du terroir viticole, au même titre que la composante édaphique (sol, roche géologique).

Ce travail devrait aider à hiérarchiser les facteurs locaux du climat, en vue de déceler les variables utilisables pour une cartographie climatique applicable aux zones tempérées de faible altitudes dont le relief est peu accidenté. Ce dernier objectif est fondamental pour la caractérisation intégrée des terroirs et comme outil de gestion agroviticole des vignobles.

DOI:

Publication date: March 25, 2022

Type: Poster

Issue: Terroir 1996

Authors

A. JACQUET (1), (2), R. MORLAT (1)

(1) I.N.R.A.. U.R.V.V., Angers, France
(2) Adresse actuelle : INRA – L.A.P.B.V., Université de Caen, esplanade de la paix, 14032 Caen cedex. France

Tags

IVES Conference Series | Terroir 1996

Citation

Related articles…

Towards a regional mapping of vine water status based on crowdsourcing observations

Monitoring vine water status is a major challenge for vineyard management because it influences both yield and harvest quality. It is also a challenge at the territorial scale for identifying periods of high water restriction or zones regularly impacted by water stress. This information is of major importance for defining collective strategies, anticipating harvest logistic or applying for irrigation authorisation. At this spatial scale, existing tools and methods for monitoring vine water status are few and often require strong assumptions (e.g. water balance model). This paper proposes to consider a collaborative collection of observations by winegrowers and wine industry stakeholders (crowdsourcing) as an interesting alternative. Indeed, it allows the collection of a large number of field observations while pooling the collection effort. However, the feasibility of such a project and its interest in monitoring vine water status at regional scale has never been tested.

The objective of this article is to explore the possibility of making a regional map of vine water status based on crowdsourcing observations. It is based on the study of the free mobile application ApeX-Vigne, which allows the collection of observations about vine shoot growth. This information is easy to collect and can be considered, under certain conditions, as a proxy for vine water status. This article presents the first results obtained from the nearly 18,000 observations collected by winegrowers and wine industry stakeholders during 2019, 2020 and 2021 seasons. It presents the vine shoot growth maps obtained at regional scale and their evolution over the three vintages studied. It also proposes an analysis of the factors that favoured the number of observations collected and those that favoured their quality. These results open up new perspectives for monitoring vine water status at a regional scale but above they provide references for other crowdsourcing projects in viticulture.

Analysis of Cabernet Sauvignon and Aglianico winegrape (V. vinifera L.) responses to different pedo-climatic environments in southern Italy

Water deficit is one of the most important effects of climate change able to affect agricultural sectors. In general, it determines a reduction in biomass production, and for some plants, as in the case of grapevine, it can endorse fruit quality. The monitoring and management of plant water stress in the vineyard

Protected Designation of Origin (D.P.O.) Valdepeñas: classification and map of soils

The objective of the work described here is the elaboration of a map of the different types of vineyard soils that to guide the famers in the choice of the most productive vine rootstocks and varieties. 90 vineyard soils profiles were analysed in the entire territory of the Origen Denominations of Valdepeñas. The sampling was carried out in 2018 (June to October) by making a sampling grid, followed by photointerpretation and control in the field. The studied soils can be grouped into 9 different soil types (according to FAO 2006 classification): Leptosols, Regosols, Fluvisols, Gleysols, Cambisols, Calcisols, Luvisols and Anthrosols. A map showing the soil distribution with different type of soils has been made with the ArcGIS program. Regarding to the choice of rootstock, Calcisoles are soils with a high active limestone content, so the rootstocks used in these soils must be resistant to this parameter; Luvisols are deep soils with high clay content, so they will support vigorous rootstocks. Because the cartographic units are composed of two or more subgroups, with are associated in variable proportions, 9 different soil associations have been established; Unit 1: Leptosols, Cambisols and Luvisols (80%, 15% and 5% respectively); Unit 2: Cambisols with Regosols and Luvisols (40%, 30% and 30% respectively); Unit 3: Cambisols and Gleysols with Regosols (40%, 40% and 20% respectively); Unit 4: Regosols with Cambisols, Leptosols and Calcisols (40%, 30%, 15% and 15% respectively); Unit 5: Cambisols, Leptosols, Calcisols and Regosols (25% each of them); Unit 6: Luvisols with Cambisol and Calcisols (80%, 10% and 10% respectively); Unit 7: Luvisols and Calcisols with Cambisols (40%, 40% and 20% respectively); Unit 8: Calcisols with, Cambisols and Luvisols (80%, 10% and 10% respectively); Unit 9: Anthrosols. These study allow to elaborate the first map of vineyard soils of this Protected Designation of Origin in Castilla-La Mancha.

The concept of terroir: what place for microbiota?

Microbes play key roles on crop nutrient availability via biogeochemical cycles, rhizosphere interactions with roots as well as on plant growth and health. Recent advances in technologies, such as High Throughput Sequencing Techniques, allowed to gain deeper insight on the structure of bacterial and fungal communities associated with soil, rhizosphere and plant phyllosphere. Over the past 10 years, numerous scientific studies have been carried out on the microbial component of the vineyard. Whether the soil or grape compartments have been taken into account, many studies agree on the evidence of regional delineations of microbial communities, that may contribute to regional wine characteristics and typicity. Some authors proposed the term “microbial terroir” including “yeast terroir” for grapes to describe the connection between microbial biogeography and regional wine characteristics. Many factors are involved in terroir including climate, soil, cultivar and human practices as well as their interactions. Studies considering “microbial terroir” greatly contributed to improve our knowledge on factors that shape the vineyard microbial structure and diversity. However, the potential impact of “microbial terroir” on wine composition has yet not received strong scientific evidence and many questions remain to be addressed, related to the functional characterization of the microbial community and its impact on plant physiology and grape composition, the origins and interannual stability of vineyard microbiota, as well as their impact on wine sensorial attributes. The presentation will give an overview on the role of microbiota as a terroir component and will highlight future perspectives and challenges on this key subject for the wine industry.

Adaptation to soil and climate through the choice of plant material

Choosing the rootstock, the scion variety and the training system best suited to the local soil and climate are the key elements for an economically sustainable production of wine. The choice of the rootstock/scion variety best adapted to the characteristics of the soil is essential but, by changing climatic conditions, ongoing climate change disrupts the fine-tuned local equilibrium. Higher temperatures induce shifts in developmental stages, with on the one hand increasing fears of spring frost damages and, on the other hand, ripening during the warmest periods in summer. Expected higher water demand and longer and more frequent drought events are also major concerns. The genetic control of the phenotypes, by genomic information but also by the epigenetic control of gene expression, offers a lot of opportunities for adapting the plant material to the future. For complex traits, genomic selection is also a promising method for predicting phenotypes. However, ecophysiological modelling is necessary to better anticipate the phenotypes in unexplored climatic conditions Genetic approaches applied on parameters of ecophysiological models rather than raw observed data are more than ever the basis for finding, or building, the ideal varieties of the future.