Terroir 1996 banner
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 Étude de la composante climatique du terroir viticole en Val de Loire : relation avec les facteurs physiques du milieu

Étude de la composante climatique du terroir viticole en Val de Loire : relation avec les facteurs physiques du milieu

Abstract

Les recherches conduites par l’U.R.V.V. du centre I.N.R.A. d’Angers ont pour but d’élaborer une méthodologie de caractérisation intégrée des facteurs naturels des terroirs viticoles, représentative des conditions de fonctionnement de la vigne et des différences sensorielles des vins. Dans ce cadre, le concept d’Unité Terroir de Base (U.T.B.) a été développé. L’U.T.B. représente une surface viticole d’extension géographique variable, définie comme l’association en un lieu donné d’une composante géologique, pédologique et paysagère, Morlat (1989), Riou et al. (1995).

La géopédologie oriente la morphologie et les conditions nutritionnelles du système racinaire, (Morlat et Jacquet, 1993), et influence profondément le fonctionnement de la vigne, (Morlat, 1989). Parallèlement, on ne peut ignorer l’effet du climat sur la qualité du raisin dans une étude globale des terroirs viticoles (Branas, 1946 ; Nigond, 1957 ; Huglin, 1978 ; Riou et al., 1994). L’environnement paysager d’un terroir peut engendrer des variations locales du climat régional (mésoclimat), suffisantes pour modifier la réponse de la vigne. Cette hypothèse a été testée avec succès par Nigond (1971) et Lebon (1993) pour des reliefs accentués ou semi-montagneux soumis à des climats tranchés (semi-continental pour Lebon, méditerranéen pour Nigond).

La plupart des éléments constitutifs d’un terroir, potentiellement modificateurs du climat, ont été étudiés isolément et le plus souvent en zones accidentée. Les effets des brise-vent ont été largement analysés et décrits par Guyot (1963) et Guyot et al. (1976). le rôle de la nature de la surface du sol sur les températures a été abordé (Branas, 1946 ; Verbrugghe, 1991). Godard (1949), Guyot et al (1976), Varlet Grancher (1975) se sont intéressés aux effets climatiques des versants, des pentes et de l’altitude. Tous ces auteurs sont d’accord sur le fait que les mésoclimats se forment principalement par ciel clair et temps calme.

La transposition de leurs résultats, indispensable pour comprendre les phénomènes climatiques locaux, est insuffisante pour prédire un mésoclimat, car celui qui se forme en un endroit résulte de l’action conjointe (convergente ou opposée) de ces multiples variables. Il est donc important d’inclure à la même échelle, et en lui donnant une dimension spatiale, la composante climatique du terroir viticole, au même titre que la composante édaphique (sol, roche géologique).

Ce travail devrait aider à hiérarchiser les facteurs locaux du climat, en vue de déceler les variables utilisables pour une cartographie climatique applicable aux zones tempérées de faible altitudes dont le relief est peu accidenté. Ce dernier objectif est fondamental pour la caractérisation intégrée des terroirs et comme outil de gestion agroviticole des vignobles.

DOI:

Publication date: March 25, 2022

Type: Poster

Issue: Terroir 1996

Authors

A. JACQUET (1), (2), R. MORLAT (1)

(1) I.N.R.A.. U.R.V.V., Angers, France
(2) Adresse actuelle : INRA – L.A.P.B.V., Université de Caen, esplanade de la paix, 14032 Caen cedex. France

Tags

IVES Conference Series | Terroir 1996

Citation

Related articles…

Is wine terroir a valid concept under a changing climate?

The OIV[i] defines terroir as a concept referring to an area in which collective knowledge of the interactions between the physical and biological environment (soil, topography, climate, landscape characteristics and biodiversity features) and vitivinicultural practices develops, providing distinctive wine characteristics. Those are perceptible in the taste of wine, which drives consumer preference and, therefore, wine’s value in the marketplace. Geographical indications (GI) are recognized regulatory constructs formalizing and protecting the nexus between wine taste and the terroir generating it. Despite considering updates, GIs do not consider the nexus as a dynamic one and do not anticipate change, namely of climate. Being climate a fundamental feature of terroir, it strongly impacts wine characteristics, such as taste. According to IPCC[ii], many widespread, rapid and unprecedented changes of climate occurred, some being irreversible over hundreds to thousands of years. Climatic shifts and atmospheric-driven extreme events have been widely reported worldwide. Recent climatic trends are projected to strengthen in upcoming decades, whereas extremes are expected to increase in frequency and intensity, forcing wines away from GI definitions. Geographical shifts of viticultural suitability are projected, often moving into regions and countries different from current ones. Some authors propose adaptation in viticulture, winemaking and product innovation. We show evidence of climate changing wine characteristics in the Douro valley, home of 270-year-old Port GI. We discuss herein resist or adapt stances for when climate changes the nexus between terroir and wine characteristics. Using the MED-GOLD[iii] dashboard, a tool allowing for easy visual navigation of past and future climates, we demonstrate how policymakers can identify future moments, throughout the 21st century under different emission scenarios, when GI specifications will likely need updates (e.g., boundaries, varieties) to reduce climate-change impacts.

Impact of yeast derivatives to increase the phenolic maturity and aroma intensity of wine

Using viticultural and enological techniques to increase aromatics in white wine is a prized yet challenging technique for commercial wine producers. Equally difficult are challenges encountered in hastening phenolic maturity and thereby increasing color intensity in red wines. The ability to alter organoleptic and visual properties of wines plays a decisive role in vintages in which grapes are not able to reach full maturity, which is seen increasingly more often as a result of climate change. A new, yeast-based product on the viticultural market may give the opportunity to increase sensory properties of finished wines. Manufacturer packaging claims these yeast derivatives intensify wine aromas of white grape varieties, as well as improve phenolic ripeness of red varieties, but the effects of this application have been little researched until now. The current study applied the yeast derivative, according to the manufacture’s instructions, to the leaves of both neutral and aromatic white wine varieties, as well as on structured red wine varieties. Chemical parameters and volatile aromatics were analyzed in grape musts and finished wines, and all wines were subjected to sensory analysis by a tasting panel. Collective results of all analyses showed that the application of the yeast derivative in the vineyard showed no effect across all varieties examined, and did not intensify white wine aromatics, nor improve phenolic ripeness and color intensity in red wine.

Traditional agroforestry vineyards, sources of inspiration for the agroecological transition of viticulture

A unique “terroir” can be found in southern Bolivia, which combines the specific features of climate, topography and altitude of high valleys, with the management of grapevines staked on trees. It is one of the rare remnants of agroforestry viticulture. A survey was carried out among 29 grapegrowers in three valleys, to characterize the structure and management of these vineyards, and identify the services they expect from trees. Farms were small (2.2 ha on average) and 85% of vineyards were less than 1 ha. Viticulture was associated with vegetable, fruit and fodder production, sometimes in the same fields. Molle trees were found in all plots, together with one or two other native tree species. Traditional grapevine varieties such as Negra Criolla, Moscatel de Alejandría and Vicchoqueña were grown with a large range of densities from 1550 to 9500 vines ha-1. From 18 to 30% of them were staked on trees, with 1.2 to 4.9 vines per tree. The management of these vineyards (irrigation, fertilization and grapevine protection) was described, the most particular technical operation being the coordinated pruning of trees and grapevines. Three types of management could be identified in the three valleys. Grapegrowers had a clear idea of the ecosystem services they expected from trees in their vineyards. The main one was protection against climate hazards (hail, frost, flood). Then they expected benefits in terms of pest and disease control, improvement of soil fertility and resulting yield. At last, some producers claimed that tree-staking was quicker and cheaper than conventional trellising. It can be hypothesized then that agroforestry is a promising technique for the agroecological transition of viticulture. Its contribution to the “terroir” of the high valleys of southern Bolivia and its link with the specificities of the wines and spirits produced there remain to be explored.

Impact of changes in pruning practices on vine growth and yield

A gradual decline in vineyards has been observed over the past twenty years worldwide. This might be explained by the climate change, practices change or the increase of dieback diseases. To increase the longevity of vines, we studied the impact of different pruning strategies in four adult and four young vineyards located in France and Spain. In France, vineyards were planted with Cabernet franc on 3309C while Spanish trials were planted with Tempranillo grafted on 110R. Vegetative expression, yield, quality of berries and wood vessels conductivity were measured. The distribution of vegetative expression, yield and berry composition between primary and secondary vegetation were quantified. Finally, tomography was used to evaluate the implication of the treatments on sap flows.
First results show that i) the respectful pruning leads to an increase of 30 to 50% more secondary shoots than the aggressive pruning in France and between 15 and 20% in Spain, ii) there is no major effect on the yield over the first two years following the implementation of the new pruning practices, although the proportion of clusters from suckers is higher on the respectful pruning method. On young vines, the development of the trunk according to a respectful pruning leads to a loss of harvest 2 years after planting. This is due to the removal, on the future trunk, of the green suckers which carrying bunches. This operation carried out in spring rather than during winter pruning, would promote a better leaf / fruit balance when the plant comes into production, and could lead to better hydraulic conduction in the vessels of the trunk. Maintaining these trials for several years will provide more robust data to assess the impact of these practices on the vines over the long term.

Influence of agronomic practices in soil water content in mid-mountain vineyards

In the context of LIFE project MIDMACC (LIFE18 CCA/ES/001099), several pilots have been installed in vineyards in mid mountain areas of Catalonia (NE Spain) to test well stablished agronomic practices to increase the adaptation of Mediterranean mid mountain to climate change. Soil water content (SWC) at three different depths (15, 30 and 45cm) was measured in continuum from August 2020. One pilot (WC) included a well-established green cover (GC), a new GC (NC) and a conventional soil management (CM, tilling+herbicides). NC presented an intermediate state between WC and CM, responding similarly to CM in autumn but quickly reaching similar SWC to WC, then following the same evolution till next spring, with CM presenting lower values along autumn and winter. Then vegetation activation decreased SWC in all plots, (much slower in CM, lacking GC). Sensibility to spring rains is again intermediate for NC, which joins SWC evolution of CM by the end of spring till next autumn. It is expected that NC will resemble WC more and more as its GC develops. In the pilot combining vine training (VSP vs Gobelet) and hillside management (slope vs terrace), no clear pattern could be related with these conditions. However, both terraces seem to be more sensitive to spring rains. A third pilot included new vineyards (7 and 1 year old). In the new vineyard (N), higher canopy development, a spontaneous green cover and row straw resulted in a slower SWC dynamic, not so sensitive to rains but conserving more soil water in spring and most of summer, even with presumably a higher water extraction by vines. In the newest vineyard (VN) the deepest sensor is still sensitive to rain events all over the year and SWC is always highest at this depth, revealing small water capture by vines.