Terroir 1996 banner
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 Étude de la composante climatique du terroir viticole en Val de Loire : relation avec les facteurs physiques du milieu

Étude de la composante climatique du terroir viticole en Val de Loire : relation avec les facteurs physiques du milieu

Abstract

Les recherches conduites par l’U.R.V.V. du centre I.N.R.A. d’Angers ont pour but d’élaborer une méthodologie de caractérisation intégrée des facteurs naturels des terroirs viticoles, représentative des conditions de fonctionnement de la vigne et des différences sensorielles des vins. Dans ce cadre, le concept d’Unité Terroir de Base (U.T.B.) a été développé. L’U.T.B. représente une surface viticole d’extension géographique variable, définie comme l’association en un lieu donné d’une composante géologique, pédologique et paysagère, Morlat (1989), Riou et al. (1995).

La géopédologie oriente la morphologie et les conditions nutritionnelles du système racinaire, (Morlat et Jacquet, 1993), et influence profondément le fonctionnement de la vigne, (Morlat, 1989). Parallèlement, on ne peut ignorer l’effet du climat sur la qualité du raisin dans une étude globale des terroirs viticoles (Branas, 1946 ; Nigond, 1957 ; Huglin, 1978 ; Riou et al., 1994). L’environnement paysager d’un terroir peut engendrer des variations locales du climat régional (mésoclimat), suffisantes pour modifier la réponse de la vigne. Cette hypothèse a été testée avec succès par Nigond (1971) et Lebon (1993) pour des reliefs accentués ou semi-montagneux soumis à des climats tranchés (semi-continental pour Lebon, méditerranéen pour Nigond).

La plupart des éléments constitutifs d’un terroir, potentiellement modificateurs du climat, ont été étudiés isolément et le plus souvent en zones accidentée. Les effets des brise-vent ont été largement analysés et décrits par Guyot (1963) et Guyot et al. (1976). le rôle de la nature de la surface du sol sur les températures a été abordé (Branas, 1946 ; Verbrugghe, 1991). Godard (1949), Guyot et al (1976), Varlet Grancher (1975) se sont intéressés aux effets climatiques des versants, des pentes et de l’altitude. Tous ces auteurs sont d’accord sur le fait que les mésoclimats se forment principalement par ciel clair et temps calme.

La transposition de leurs résultats, indispensable pour comprendre les phénomènes climatiques locaux, est insuffisante pour prédire un mésoclimat, car celui qui se forme en un endroit résulte de l’action conjointe (convergente ou opposée) de ces multiples variables. Il est donc important d’inclure à la même échelle, et en lui donnant une dimension spatiale, la composante climatique du terroir viticole, au même titre que la composante édaphique (sol, roche géologique).

Ce travail devrait aider à hiérarchiser les facteurs locaux du climat, en vue de déceler les variables utilisables pour une cartographie climatique applicable aux zones tempérées de faible altitudes dont le relief est peu accidenté. Ce dernier objectif est fondamental pour la caractérisation intégrée des terroirs et comme outil de gestion agroviticole des vignobles.

DOI:

Publication date: March 25, 2022

Type: Poster

Issue: Terroir 1996

Authors

A. JACQUET (1), (2), R. MORLAT (1)

(1) I.N.R.A.. U.R.V.V., Angers, France
(2) Adresse actuelle : INRA – L.A.P.B.V., Université de Caen, esplanade de la paix, 14032 Caen cedex. France

Tags

IVES Conference Series | Terroir 1996

Citation

Related articles…

Climate ethnography and wine environmental futures

Globalisation and climate change have radically transformed world wine production upsetting the established order of wine ecologies. Ecological risks and the future of traditional agricultural systems are widely debated in anthropology, but very little is understood of the particular challenges posed by climate change to viticulture which is seen by many as the canary in the coalmine of global agriculture. Moreover, wine as a globalised embedded commodity provides a particularly telling example for the study of climate change having already attracted early scientific attention. Studies of climate change in viticulture have focused primarily on the production of systematic models of adaptation and vulnerability, while the human and cultural factors, which are key to adaptation and sustainable futures, are largely missing. Climate experts have been unanimous in recognising the urgent need for a better understanding of the complex dynamics that shape how climate change is experienced and responded to by human systems. Yet this call has not yet been addressed. Climate ethnography, coined by the anthropologist Susan Crate (2011), aims to bridge this growing disjuncture between climate science and everyday life through the exploration of the social meaning of climate change. It seeks to investigate the confrontation of its social salience in different locations and under different environmental guises (Goodman 2018: 340). By understanding how wine producers make sense of the world (and the environment) and act in it, it proposes to focus on the co-production of interdisciplinary knowledge by identifying and foreshadowing problems (Goodman 2018: 342; Goodman & Marshall 2018). It seeks to offer an original, transformative and contrasted perspective to climate change scenarios by investigating human agency -individual or collective- in all its social, political and cultural diversity. An anthropological approach founded on detailed ethnographies of wine production is ideally placed to address economic, social and cultural disruptions caused by the emergence of these new environmental challenges. Indeed, the community of experts in environmental change have recently called for research that will encompass the human dimension and for more broad-based, integrated through interdisciplinarity, useful knowledge (Castree & al 2014). My paper seeks to engage with climate ethnography and discuss what it brings to the study of wine environmental futures while exploring the limitations of the anthropological environmental approach.

Short-term relationships between climate and grapevine trunk diseases in southern French vineyards

[lwp_divi_breadcrumbs home_text="IVES" use_before_icon="on" before_icon="||divi||400" module_id="publication-ariane" _builder_version="4.19.4" _module_preset="default" module_text_align="center" module_font_size="16px" text_orientation="center"...

Impact of climate variability and change on grape yield in Italy

Viticulture is entangled with weather and climate. Therefore, areas currently suitable for grape production can be challenged by climate change. Winegrowers in Italy already experiences the effect of climate change, especially in the form of warmer growing season, more frequent drought periods, and increased frequency of weather extremes.
The aim of this study is to investigate the impact of climate variability and change on grape yield in Italy to provide winegrowers the information needed to make their business more sustainable and resilient to climate change. We computed a specific range of bioclimatic indices, selected by the International Organisation of Vine and Wine (OIV), and correlated them to grape yield data. We have worked in collaboration with some wine consortiums in northern and central Italy, which provided grape yield data for our analysis.
Using climate variables from the E-OBS dataset we investigate how the bioclimatic indices changed in the past, and the impact of this change on grape productivity in the study areas. The climate impact on productivity is also investigated by using high-resolution convection-permitting models (CPMs – 2.2 horizontal resolution), with the purpose of estimating productivity in future emission scenarios. The CPMs are likely the best available option for this kind of impact studies since they allow a better representation of small-scale processes and features, explicitly resolve deep convection, and show an improved representation of extremes. In our study, we also compare CPMs with regional climate models (RCMs – 12 km horizontal resolution) to assess the added value of high-resolution models for impact studies. Further development of our study will lead to assessing the future suitability for vine cultivation and could lead to the construction of a statistical model for future projection of grape yield.

The use of rootstock as a lever in the face of climate change and dieback of vineyard

As viticulture faces challenges such as climate change or vineyard dieback, the choice of the variety and rootstock becomes more and more crucial. To study rootstock levers in the Bordeaux region, a parcel of Cabernet Sauvignon (CS) was planted with four rootstocks in 2014. Twenty repetitions of each of the following four rootstocks were set up: 101-14 MGt, Nemadex AB, 420A MGt and Gravesac. The number of bunches, yields and pruning weights of the vine shoots were measured individually on 240 vines from 2017 to 2021. Since 2020, nitrogen status assessed by assimilable nitrogen level, hydric status assessed by δ13C and berry maturity were measured on 80 samples taken from 20 repetitions of the four rootstocks. A lower yield was measured for CS grafted onto Nemadex AB due to the lower number of bunches and the lower weight of berries. The differences between the other three rootstocks are small, but CS grafted onto 420A MGt was the most productive. The CS grafted onto Nemadex AB had the lowest pruning weight while 101-14 MGt had the highest. In 2020, δ13C showed a more moderate water stress with 101-14 MGt and 420A MGt than with Nemadex AB. Surprisingly, the Gravesac was under more stress than the 101-14 MGt. The nitrogen status in the berries was better for Nemadex AB but this was perhaps due to the significantly lower weight of the berries.Rootstock 101-14 MGt attained the highest accumulation of sugars in the berries while 420A MGt allows to preserve higher acidity. The parcel is still young which may explain some of the results. These measures must therefore be continued over the next several years to fully assess the effects of these rootstocks on the development of the vines and the quality of the production under new climatic conditions.

Understanding graft union formation by using metabolomic and transcriptomic approaches during the first days after grafting in grapevine

Since the arrival of Phyloxera (Daktulosphaira vitifolia) in Europe at the end of the 19th century, grafting has become essential to cultivate Vitis vinifera. Today, grafting provides not only resistance to this aphid, but it used to adapt the cultivars according to the type of soil, environment, or grape production requirements by using a panel of rootstocks. As part of vineyard decline, it is often mentioned the importance of producing quality grafted grapevine to improve vineyard longevity, but, to our knowledge, no study has been able to demonstrate that grafting has a role in this context. However, some scion/rootstock combinations are considered as incompatible due to poor graft union formation and subsequently high plant mortality soon after grafting. In a context of climate change where the creation of new cultivars and rootstocks is at the centre of research, the ability of new cultivars to be grafted is therefore essential. The early identification of graft incompatibility could allow the selection of non-viable plants before planting and would have a beneficial impact on research and development in the nursery sector. For this reason, our studies have focused on the identification of metabolic and transcriptomic markers of poor grafting success during the first days/week after grafting; we have identified some correlations between some specialized metabolites, especially stilbenes, and grafting success, as well as an accumulation of some amino acids in the incompatible combination. The study of the metabolome and the transcriptome allowed us to understand and characterise the processes involved during graft union formation.