Terroir 1996 banner
IVES 9 IVES Conference Series 9 Étude de la composante climatique du terroir viticole en Val de Loire : relation avec les facteurs physiques du milieu

Étude de la composante climatique du terroir viticole en Val de Loire : relation avec les facteurs physiques du milieu

Abstract

Les recherches conduites par l’U.R.V.V. du centre I.N.R.A. d’Angers ont pour but d’élaborer une méthodologie de caractérisation intégrée des facteurs naturels des terroirs viticoles, représentative des conditions de fonctionnement de la vigne et des différences sensorielles des vins. Dans ce cadre, le concept d’Unité Terroir de Base (U.T.B.) a été développé. L’U.T.B. représente une surface viticole d’extension géographique variable, définie comme l’association en un lieu donné d’une composante géologique, pédologique et paysagère, Morlat (1989), Riou et al. (1995).

La géopédologie oriente la morphologie et les conditions nutritionnelles du système racinaire, (Morlat et Jacquet, 1993), et influence profondément le fonctionnement de la vigne, (Morlat, 1989). Parallèlement, on ne peut ignorer l’effet du climat sur la qualité du raisin dans une étude globale des terroirs viticoles (Branas, 1946 ; Nigond, 1957 ; Huglin, 1978 ; Riou et al., 1994). L’environnement paysager d’un terroir peut engendrer des variations locales du climat régional (mésoclimat), suffisantes pour modifier la réponse de la vigne. Cette hypothèse a été testée avec succès par Nigond (1971) et Lebon (1993) pour des reliefs accentués ou semi-montagneux soumis à des climats tranchés (semi-continental pour Lebon, méditerranéen pour Nigond).

La plupart des éléments constitutifs d’un terroir, potentiellement modificateurs du climat, ont été étudiés isolément et le plus souvent en zones accidentée. Les effets des brise-vent ont été largement analysés et décrits par Guyot (1963) et Guyot et al. (1976). le rôle de la nature de la surface du sol sur les températures a été abordé (Branas, 1946 ; Verbrugghe, 1991). Godard (1949), Guyot et al (1976), Varlet Grancher (1975) se sont intéressés aux effets climatiques des versants, des pentes et de l’altitude. Tous ces auteurs sont d’accord sur le fait que les mésoclimats se forment principalement par ciel clair et temps calme.

La transposition de leurs résultats, indispensable pour comprendre les phénomènes climatiques locaux, est insuffisante pour prédire un mésoclimat, car celui qui se forme en un endroit résulte de l’action conjointe (convergente ou opposée) de ces multiples variables. Il est donc important d’inclure à la même échelle, et en lui donnant une dimension spatiale, la composante climatique du terroir viticole, au même titre que la composante édaphique (sol, roche géologique).

Ce travail devrait aider à hiérarchiser les facteurs locaux du climat, en vue de déceler les variables utilisables pour une cartographie climatique applicable aux zones tempérées de faible altitudes dont le relief est peu accidenté. Ce dernier objectif est fondamental pour la caractérisation intégrée des terroirs et comme outil de gestion agroviticole des vignobles.

DOI:

Publication date: March 25, 2022

Type: Poster

Issue: Terroir 1996

Authors

A. JACQUET (1), (2), R. MORLAT (1)

(1) I.N.R.A.. U.R.V.V., Angers, France
(2) Adresse actuelle : INRA – L.A.P.B.V., Université de Caen, esplanade de la paix, 14032 Caen cedex. France

Tags

IVES Conference Series | Terroir 1996

Citation

Related articles…

Climate modeling at local scale in the Waipara winegrowing region in the climate change context

In viticulture, a warming climate can have a very significant impact on grapevine development and therefore on the quality and characteristics of wines across different spatial scales, ranging from global to local. In order to adapt wine-growing to climate change, global climate models can be used to define future scenarios, but only at the scale of major wine regions. Despite the huge progress made over the last ten years in terms of the spatial resolution of climate models (now downscaled to a few square kilometres), they are not yet sufficiently precise to account for the local climate variability associated with such parameters as local topography, in spite of these parameters being decisive for vine and wine characteristics. This study describes a method to downscale future climate scenarios to vineyard scale. Networks of data loggers have been used to collect air temperature at canopy level in the Waipara winegrowing region (New Zealand) over five growing seasons. These measurements allow the creation of fine-scale geostatistical models and maps of temperature (at 100 m resolution) for the growing season. In order to model climate change at pilot site scale, these geostatistical models have been combined with regional climate change predictions for the periods 2031-2050 and 2081-2100 based on the RCP8.5 climate change scenario. The integration of local climate variability with regionalized climate change simulations allows assessment of the impacts of climate change at the vineyard scale. The improved knowledge gained using this methodology results from the increased horizontal resolution that better addresses the concerns of winegrowers. The results provide the local winegrowers with information necessary to understand current processes, as well as historical and future viticulture trends at the scale of their site, thereby facilitating decisions about future response strategies.

Under-vine management effects on grapevine production, soil properties and plant communities in South Australia

Under-vine (UV) management has traditionally consisted of synthetic herbicide use to limit competition between weeds and grapevines. With growing global interest towards non-synthetic chemical use, this study aimed to capture the effects of alternative UV management at two commercial Shiraz vineyards in South Australia, where the sole management variables were UV management since 2016. In adjacent treatment blocks, cultivation (CU) was compared to spontaneous vegetation (SV) in McLaren Vale (MV), and herbicide was compared to SV in Eden Valley (EV). Soil water infiltration rates were slower and grapevine stem water potential was lower in CU compared to SV in MV, with the latter having a plant community dominated by soursob (Oxalis pes-caprae) during winter; while in EV, there was little separation between the treatments. Yields were affected at both sites, with SV being higher in MV and HE being higher in EV. In MV, the only effect on grape must was a lower 13C:12C isotope ratio in CU, indicating greater grapevine water stress. In the grape must at EV, SV had higher total soluble solids, total phenolics, anthocyanins, and yeast available nitrogen; and lower pH and titratable acidity. Pruning weights were not affected by the treatments in MV, while they were higher in HE at EV. Assessments revealed that the differing soil types at the two sites were likely the main determinants of the opposing production outcomes associated with UV management. In the silty loam soil of MV, the higher yields in SV were likely due to more plant-available water, as a potential result of the continuous soil bio-pores formed by winter UV vegetation. Conversely, in the loamy sand soils of EV with a lower cation exchange capacity, the lower yields and pruning weights in SV suggest the UV vegetation competed significantly with the grapevines for available water and nutrients.

Short-term relationships between climate and grapevine trunk diseases in southern French vineyards

[lwp_divi_breadcrumbs home_text="IVES" use_before_icon="on" before_icon="||divi||400" module_id="publication-ariane" _builder_version="4.19.4" _module_preset="default" module_text_align="center" module_font_size="16px" text_orientation="center"...

Adapting the vineyard to climate change in warm climate regions with cultural practices

Since the 1980s global regime shift, grape growers have been steadily adapting to a changing climate. These adaptations have preserved the region-climate-cultivar rapports that have established the global trade of wine with lucrative economic benefits since the middle of 17th century. The advent of using fractions of crop and actual evapotranspiration replacement in vineyards with the use of supplemental irrigation has furthered the adaptation of wine grape cultivation. The shift in trellis systems, as well as pruning methods from positioned shoot systems to sprawling canopies, as well as adapting the bearing surface from head-trained, cane-pruned to cordon-trained, spur-pruned systems have also aided in the adaptation of grapevine to warmer temperatures. In warm climates, the use of shade cloth or over-head shade films not only have aided in arresting the damage of heat waves, but also identified opportunities to reduce the evapotranspiration from vineyards, reducing environmental footprint of vineyard. Our increase in knowledge on how best to understand the response of grapevine to climate change was aided with the identification of solar radiation exposure biomarker that is now used for phenotyping cultivars in their adaptability to harsh environments. Using fruit-based metrics such as sugar-flavonoid relationships were shown to be better indicators of losses in berry integrity associated with a warming climate, rather than solely focusing on region-climate-cultivar rapports. The resilience of wine grape was further enhanced by exploitation of rootstock × scion combinations that can resist untoward droughts and warm temperatures by making more resilient grapevine combinations. Our understanding of soil-plant-atmosphere continuum in the vineyard has increased within the last 50 years in such a manner that growers are able to use no-till systems with the aid of arbuscular mycorrhiza fungi inoculation with permanent cover cropping making the vineyard more resilient to droughts and heat waves. In premium wine grape regions viticulture has successfully adapted to a rapidly changing climate thus far, but berry based metrics are raising a concern that we may be approaching a tipping point.

Updating the Winkler index: An analysis of Cabernet sauvignon in Napa Valley’s varied and changing climate

This study aims to create an updated, agile viticultural climate index (similar to the Winkler Index) by performing in-depth analyses of current and historical data from industry partners in several major winegrowing regions. The Winkler Index was developed in the early twentieth century based on analysis of various grape-growing regions in California. The index uses heat accumulation (i.e. Growing Degree Days) throughout the growing season to determine which grape varieties are best suited to each region. As viticultural regions are increasingly subject to the complexity and uncertainty of a changing climate, a more rigorous, agile model is needed to aid grape growers in determining which cultivars to plant where. For the first phase of this study, 21 industry partners throughout Napa Valley shared historical phenology, harvest, viticultural practice, and weather data related to their Cabernet sauvignon vineyard blocks. To complement this data, berry samples were collected throughout the 2021 growing season from 50 vineyard blocks located throughout 16 American Viticultural Areas that were then analyzed for basic berry chemistry and phenolics. These blocks have been mapped using a Geographic Information System (GIS), enabling analysis of altitude, vineyard row orientation, slope, and remotely sensed climate data. Sampling sites were also chosen based on their proximity to a weather station. By analyzing historical data from industry partners and data specifically collected for this study, it is possible to identify key parameters for further analysis. Initial results indicate extreme variability at a high spatial resolution not currently accounted for in modern viticultural climate indices and suggest that viticultural practices play a major role. Using the structure of data collection and analyses developed for the first phase, this project will soon be expanded to other wine regions globally, while continuing data collection in Napa Valley.